form in truth and identity

 

Dark psychology encounters a surreal amount of compromise when it comes to what is acting between two opposing forces. The darker the depth of one's psychological failure if they are taken as 'soft' to form an event horizon, or if compared it to appeal another has as a social deviant alpha type. What do I mean by 'dark' and how this associates with our psychology is in a word: awareness. The capability to be defiant and at the same time spy on itself for the same idea. (Is my use of the term: awareness.) To spy onto a manner of thought about what is it another maybe thinking, although you have an understanding of the experience but may not be in aggrievance in its observation. Some misapply this awareness into meta cognition as a mistake for thinking about thinking, or perhaps a duality into thinking about 2 opposites which act in contradiction to the other. Neither are true.

The effect I am talking about is the dark psychology around what governs or dictates norms in our behavior if not attune to the natural environment. What in terms of manipulators use.

To present the term awareness together with what we observe is - is the experiencer. (i.e. cause) To cause awareness (awareness that acts as primordial or 'basic') is not the same thing as being an advocate to something else as a greater cause. You act to create. In order to create, you act greater to a cause. Think about that: you have acted greater to a cause. Think about that yet another way: [1] awareness as something TO a greater cause vs [2] acting greater TO a cause. In one case you are influenced. The other you have acted without being manipulated (e.g. influenced). It's that simple.

Awareness = greater cause vs acting greater (dichotomy)

The dark psychology I mentioned earlier has exactly to do with the dichotomy. The brain is acting on which is which. It's that simple.

Note; I don't believe there is an answerable question to this. The point I am making is to find irony and present yourself in the paradox. We are acting in the form of this element. To find the paradox between it: awareness and its cause. What informs your mind? Do you assess it with the information; given to you. Does the feedback you give it cause your awareness. What provides you not speaking of this as awareness - without your attention to awareness having caused it. What causes the mind to interfere with the thoughts you never originally had?

My reason for this dissertation is that I am not a soft individual; I serve myself soft. Everything that kills me from the outside are forces that move, is out of my control.

This is Socratic wisdom at work.

Be whatever you want to.

But don't expect anything from me.

- Marco