“All my life I've looked at words as though I were seeing them for the first time.”

–Ernest Hemingway 

The anti-philosopher's guide (gone missing)

 Getting disrespected is a funny thing.  To me, I know the feeling. It dictates for those who fuels their inner needs.  Yet acts like a trap in their cheating mind as if disrespect in bad faith is something normal.  The experience itself is completely futile result.

- Marco

==============

What you learn, you learn to master with the self-interest of an intention so real, where instead that psychological fear - wisdom stems from a higher place that inner peace you thought you would never reach.

- Marco 

=============

===============

reality gone missing

 

June 30th 2026

BS. I do not know reality unless it is given a name? I can invent symbols of any kind without assigning them meaning. Such are words. Words - in the order they appear to us as to mean what can only be interpreted into something secondary. (i.e. "interpreted" in this case also equates not according to any prior assigned meaning) It moots your entire argument. What governs why we are here.

My point is if invention of language itself does nothing to necessitate reality itself. I can point with my finger to my mother and know it symbolically states something. It represents me. It is a symbol. I identify the object with my relation to this. To know something like this is obsolete, if not symbolically proven. The question arises: how can something be proven without knowing? The answer: it is universal.

You've unequivocally stated: ' we do not know reality'. That is not a bold thesis, but that the same idea e.g. What governs the laws of motion are also not fully completely known to us because we're countlessly made incomplete by those same laws that our understanding IN reality is a measurement of it.

Example: We don't know what numbers are either, we just accept this as random. Theoretically, in the very least, numbers pose what systematically lay beneath us or what act as a purge in mentality. Same goes for science. Science is a lie to the eye of one's own symbolic interpretation of reality. We all make up reality. A reality without unitary form. The designs are invariable. This means that what reality is - is purely conscious or why make choices that only mirror our decisions? Decisions not made to be a danger or the inseparable force that may work against us. How do we know reality is not something that if it were made to be held for power. That if reality is a presence of eyes gazing into a crystal ball only being governed without our own will - or our will to live.

How do we know what we are? = is the better question. What if we are not the observers and only being observed based on how we are unaware. Unaware of the observer observing us. Not totally in our control?

- Marco

psychological theory

 

Happiness is what happens when we stop avoiding risk in a vain attempt to protect ourselves. Only then can we truly live without regrets. - Marco

 “But if he must, the man (poet) remains fearless.
  Alone with god, simplicity keeps him safe
  And needs no weapons and no cunning,
  As long as God’s absence comes to his aid.”

(Friedrich Hölderlin, “The Poet’s Vocation”)

Prov 23:7

 

A critical purpose of natural displacement (June 29th 2010)

 There is nothing remotely inferior to, nor made typical of such "non-limited" attention span at length. From that we already know?

Perhaps it is an invalid form of critique, something which come through measure upon measure, until. . . the very end. (It's own ending.)

I have never once misused my better judgment for things being 'rational' to fear, as in, what once was unknown to be measured, then corrected, somehow or other rehabilitated (or in some cases most taken advantage), toward the belittlement of others less than unfortunate. In fact, in these cases, what blame if any is mistaken or misplaced, by virtue of those that vindicate any other miscontraception.

Where is our better judgment, when most others may not be favored of you or I.

Such to me, is of uninhibited nature, a freedom of skin which beneath my surface of thought, I am self-conscious. . . though only to yet be suffered at a minimum of this cause or that thing or otherwise left desriable.

I search to that point of my offering, that no other man can leverage a thought of distrust against my own better solution, or equation.

Such are erratic disbeliefs thereof. (There it rubs.)

Disbeliefs can be self-taught, nor are self-beliefs defficient as if a by-product of deffective efforts. These I recognize in myself as 'flaws' of the amazing misfortune that creates (me).

So, confident in self-thought am I?

Trust is the issue itself, a compatibility to pull punches at random.

Then, what else is obsolete as it remains crucial if not critical to my distinction of choice! That the human condition abridges my luxury of convenience. . . the evil of this world will never fail. So my self-conscious takes over to empower the from which I stand, an evil representation I think against - will never not know the truth. I will oblige my will accordingly.

It would be unintentional (dishonest) of me, to presume you know what I'm thinking already??

June 29th 2013

 

Complacency is the worst quality I find measures all things, that being said, my perception to everything in life - is based on two things: 1- the world does not revolve around me 2- my feelings revolve around the world. Huge difference. - Marco

June 29th 2014

 

June 20th 2015

 

June 29th 2021

 

royal menace

 

Self destructive Maniac (June 28th 2014)

 Totally sick of this shit. I am in my 30's - these I banked on as the best years of my fucking life.

 

 

 

There was this girl I saw whose face was lit up just because of her bf. The guy was a stone faced Abercrombie model. What gives.

 

All chicks are not angels, some of them are victims of their own false perception in herself. I am a nice guy yet look at me like a creep.

 

I tolerate women to a degree it reaches a point that her actions in general infer me as a danger is twisted as fuck. Get over yourselves.

 

Winnipeg has to have better women than this crap here. I can hardly even look at one without feeling judged. This is not all in my head.

 

And when I speak of women, I am speaking of them in general. There is a pattern that is sociological and I am no serial killer. So fuck off.

 

Being a man my age is terribly frustrating that should never reach this end. There have to be better women out there. I know few of them.

 

Totally fucking fed up. Doesn't mean I carry a gun and go ape shit. I use my intellect without abusing another persons privilege.

 

When I see a chick that thinks highly of herself, I fucking laugh at this generation. You flaunt your ass like you dick tease then what.

 

Seriously fucked up time which I have never experienced before. There is a reason for everything and I don't take shit sitting down.

- Marco

Moon Landing

 

Slave as the mind

 I have seen the eyes of people that view me and expect to victimize me as the culprit of some unfounded ill repute.

You dickheads look at me like that again, you will get what's coming to you.

“A human being is a part of the whole, called by us the Universe, a part limited in time and space. He experiences himself, his thoughts and feeling as something separated from the rest, a kind of optical delusion of his consciousness. This delusion is a kind of prison for us, restricting us to our personal desires and to affection for a few persons nearest to us. Our task must be to free ourselves from this prison by widening our circle of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole of nature in its beauty.” - Albert Einstein

Just because people refuse to acknowledge me, doesn't mean they're right and it doesn't make me wrong. Think about it.

 

"There is no such thing as second chances; only birth to a improved version of an ambivalent past - I am less impoverished over time. A complete reinvention of past beliefs, totally - totally renewed."

June 28, 2014

MA

==================

Heidegger's take of suicide in philosophy

 However we are so absorbed by our pastimes and distractions that we simply forget that there’s an outermost limit to our pursuits; and in so doing, says Heidegger, we live an inauthentic life. It’s not until we project our lives onto the horizon of our death that authentic life can be found.

===================

-

 

“An artist has got to be careful never really to arrive at a place where he thinks he's...somewhere. You always have to realize that you're constantly in a state of becoming. And, as long as you can stay in that realm you'll sort of be alright.”

–Bob Dylan

“The goal of life is living in agreement with Nature.” Zeno of Citium

 

cause before perception

 

No one knows how to properly manipulate AI. If you can't infer from it properly... you're probably inept. You look for things that a process of induction will eliminate false causes. It is a manner of testing what you already know. And induction will allow you to examine proabablities as result. You have to decide what's right or what's wrong. It is not a plagiaristic tool. It is more of an automatically advanced encyclopedia at your disposal.

- Marco

Hebrews 7:25

 

 For those unafraid of AI (much like myself. . . )

The following is an illustration as to why AI in the future will not imitate nor replicate itself accordingly. This means it cannot question itself. A matter of conditioning that questions our own assumptions of reality. - Marco

"Bohm called it intelligence, a subtle force not born in the brain but acting through it. It sees the illusion of the self, questions the programming, and touches the brain directly, freeing it from conditioning."

Source: The Conditioned Self: J. Krishnamurti, David Bohm, and Saral Bohm (Krishnamurti Education)

=================

 This in my wheelhouse. My approach to acting is in response to create using a theoretical approach. My idea's is what drive my intent it's a type of method. The plot? To use your passionate self - my intense self - my psychological self. My personal investment is in art - how my nervous system works "naturally". What is acting? Acting to me begins and ends in how to think like an actor first (self) and imitation second (characters).

=======================

Dennis Hopper  

Red Flags (June 27th 2014)

 I hate actors that get pushed on us in this city. I don't care.

 

When I attended the U of W I was not nearly as shoved aside. It is these shitty acting studios that Darcy Fehr facilitates. The past decade of actors that have infused this city are self serving idiots. I am not joking. 

 

Like fuck off already.

 =============

Future ex-patriots of language (June 27th 2010)

 Ex-future patriots of language, carried in thought, landing in a remote area of charging seahorses. It is one of the few species known to mankind, that reproduction is made through the male species of animals.

The product of Kings, which used to be of counting great wealth. Personally, I myself haven't found pleasure in the language of '$'. Instead, I stack against all odds what most reverts itself, as in how to give benefit in place of its more appropriate language perhaps forgotton. Speaking of such a language, now seems less trivial, as in feeling the currency of thought. Those thoughts that speak in a reformed product of language rather than wealth. It is this the product of emotion. In fact(s) such psychological nature, what language of love spoken without reason(s) specific to wealth. There, there is beauty in everything.

If I had a choice to wake-up, instead of 'importance', I would help myself relate to every future ex-girlfriend I've ever wanted. So I could live in the past tense, then posses nothing or no one else because of it.

==================

Really, for all it's worth - what inspires me still finds its meaning in mystery.

Marco's effigy of faith as the year 2012 to present

 

self destructive repellant

 

🍁 visionary as sovereigntist for Canada

 

ultimate wisdom

 

what is god

 

perception is action

 

Negation and dissent

You interpret consciousness as appearing in bodies and in the world. I interpret bodies and the world as appearing in consciousness. Why should your interpretation of the evidence be preferred over mine?

●°○°○°○°

 I have to say, I initially thought he had an argument refuting yours as false dichotomy.  But failed.  

Your original argument does represent two sides, vague enough to equal each other. Therefore, I see tautology.

"You interpret consciousness as appearing in bodies and in the world. I interpret bodies and the world as appearing in consciousness. Why should your interpretation of the evidence be preferred over mine?"

°○●••○●●○•

My debunking of your representation of your argument, sees ²equal parts.  My refutation is if interpretation is expressively prohibited, I would have agency without knowing what is consciousness.  How do we know? How do we claim consciousness.  I think this is a fair example given my counter argument.

°●●○○○○

My reason for suggesting tautology, is simple that refining your idea - interpretation justifies as cause for what we think of as consciousness.  My point here is, I agree with it. Why? Because consciousness can be seen as you have stated, in bodies and the world.  Interpretation appears in consciousness and consciousness appears in our renunciation of it. Hopefully you will understand what I have postulated, theoretically surmise consciousness in the body can be interpeted in ideas consciousness creates.

- Marco

Habit produces disorder | J. Krishnamurti

Habit produces disorder | J. Krishnamurti 

Is there an action not based on thought? | J. Krishnamurti

the Man he cannot plagiarize

 

Behaving mannerly leads you to nowhere, it is only in misbehavior that you learn to trust your inhibition and what your intuition tells you.

- Marco

hidden secret in acting

 

July 4, 2013 at 2:04pm

"I look at 'beats' in the scene as coded signals given between two opposing forces NOT cynical of their environment but to feel shifts within it. (Opposing forces are the actors that may experience a polarizing sense of power, conformity, alienation or complicit style of acting. This concerns a type of coercion, or complacency the actor must always be present in their awareness.)" (Marco Almeida)

Plain and simple: actors make a habit of debunking or negating the others acting choices.

June 24, 2014

MA

===============

salvation in desensitizing Plutocracy

 

The false linguist

At what point does information become experience ?

 All information is - is our sensory experience put into action. (i.e. the action of interpretation) To live as in metanarrative are the things that put you in sensory experience. What I think is of a property value in everything I see. I assess, and in my assessment there is a sensation which I translate as I go. So, in return, I equalize this as a means to an end. This is why I am a philosopher. That in this process, my language acts as the information of sensations I experience in real time. And information travels as the source of my ideas. These ideas are words that my use of language, in its style and syntax create. So as a philosopher of experience (e.g. wisdom) I record using my poetics.

This is self mastery. And information is found in the experiencer ("the me") with relation to how I present my trained mind. Theoretically speaking, I have trained this unitarily as my sensory experience. Where the eye meets the world through its own interpretation of me. "The me" - out of my control. Which circles back to being authentic as opposite of not being predictable.

So yes - I predicate the self in relation to sensory experience as something that negates the predictable with something else that the experience creates. This is a higher state of mind, in my view. My point here is if you are not creating something new to the world, why are you doing philosophy if it's not? This infers critical thought, logical reasoning, and language (information) itself.

- Marco

No one is self made (?)

 No one is self made