12 June 2016

 

16 July 1944 ~ Krishnamurti

 

12 June 2014

 

12 June 2022

 

12 June 2018

 

12 June 2023

 

Threatening me, is no threat to my character [divinity]

 One of the last reality checks I had came to me over this past week. I went to a semi-open to public though privately operated affair. 

It was there I realized that for my own sake, sadly, yet truthfully humbled by attending this... that so much of my past entered.

What was unmistakably although unescapable is how I've come face to face with.

Old friends that seemed more like stangers...

The relationship. The vibe. No longer there.

Present in me if the moral ties this altogether.

I have to let go. I cannot affrod to hang onto it. I have to let go of my grip. I refuse to pretend. I will not allow myself to be hurt - but I will acknowledge how the hurt makes me feel. 

It's a difficult thing.

But far more mature I can be proud of why this is.

- Marco

12 June 2023

 I question what is energy vs. what is force. Force cannot be made up of energy because it is not a property of force. Therefore, energy is not force.

Why I make that equation stems from Einstein theory of relativity. Trying to equate force vs energy.

If force Is a field from which gravity is proven to be a force then it is not energy. Why is that important to compound into an equation. One might think the theory of relativity is a proof of subatomic particles. But not because they are energy only because they are force. So,. I think it's important to infer from such as true.

So if force and gravity dictate how subatomic particles behave it is found in Einstein's equation. That no matter how we relate subatomic matter to energy. It is gravity and force that can determine why energy works the same way. Force is a factor in the universe that energy must behave in as a RESULT of why force interacts with subatomic particles.  

I would think all the focus should be onto why subatomic particles behave based on how it interacts with force. For example: light particles may/will travel at the speed of light as it is proven. However, once the speed of light is reached time dialates. Therefore, force must be combined with the same amount of mass a subatomic particle has in order to generate enough energy to produce nuclear fusion. A reaction so powerful that the energy it produces is equal to the force of gravity. 

We remember that in theory Einstein must have postulated all of this. My language is probably the scientific equation to the calculation.

Further to this discussion what mirrors gravity is force and time dilation because energy is needed in a vacuum to produce quantifiable evidence of subatomic particles. The way subatomic particles behave is a natural composition of light which happens to also be a form of energy but not equal to force. That is also true because light behaves differently on that subatomic level.

In conclusion what are the effects of force.

- Marco

Galatians 6:9

 Let us not become weary in doing good, for at the proper time we will reap a harvest if we do not give up.

Galatians 6:9

June 12th 2023

 

My main recourse to reason is not about what I know; it is about that which I know nothing. To say I know what it is I am known for is quite stimulating to me. In my mind to know about how much one goes on or on about ones knowing in essence is not academic but it's tabulated. They rather quantify what it is they know rather than qualify its being. That is why and or how most people calculate and what they find will be only as disappointing. What comes in the true nature of response should never resort to political beauraucray or academic discourse. All of it unbequeathed.

- Marco

terrifyingly unneurotic

 June 12th 2026

We live in a world that ties together instant gratification on a societal level, with a neurotic disposition in order to attain happiness no matter what it looks like. These are facts in my mind. You can separate the two into those categorically. My point is I rather create genius on my own, in my manner of thinking, to eliminate causes associated to obtaining these aforementioned. To see things as they are but not necessarily what they are in return for knowing. The area between being unconsciously aware. an awareness inculpable to create your own way of thinking.

No one can tell me otherwise . That's the difference.

My point is, that I have to master it - all. There really is no in between wisdom where giving up or letting go. How do you tell someone who is a genius. They are not genius. The answer is: you can't. People in this day and age are cheating on this conceptually, out of using what acts as second hand in everything they see and do.


I have this much wisdom. Unless I impart it, there is no point withholding it.

- Marco

===============

casting light on energy :: as secret element

 June 12th 2026

"Nietzsche observed humanity's eternal struggle to maintain personal identity against collective pressure. He believed societal forces often demand conformity, and true self-actualization requires the courage to forge one's own path, even if it means standing alone." ------> Are you sure the conformity of the wrong individual can not correlate to a tyrant that would interpret Nietzsche? Only to act as a nihilist that disreputably conforms to his own ideals rather than what a collective would? If a person that gains the proprietary aim of any collective and directs that control in a manner. A manner which the conformity of a collective must submit to in obeyance. Than that means Nietzsche has implemented philosophy to the same end. That whether a real hero identifies with courage to their own means. What that entails has to be something that historically matches the result. The result of how a ruler governs in democracy. Fascist ends also apply to what Nietzsche proposes. Which is my point.

- Marco

maturity as the me

 

I like people like me. Like those who care not only about themselves but have the empathy in mind to miss and vibe through others as they are. I've always possessed a natural conscience but as I've learned about how to think, it separates the need of not what to think. A person with a conscience is perpetually the rarest thing in any individual. - Marco =============

Falsifying for measure as propaganda transcends itself

 The appeal to popular opinion as argument that Israeli's under Netanyahu are trying. Is an attempt into justified propaganda only disguised to purge those who are antizionist into false confession of hating Jews. (The war is not measure for measure.) This is about demonstrated natural cause informing Jewish identity. That the victimization of civilian populations in the name of Judea is not nationalist in motive. Therefore, the cause is natural. Therefore, measures how antizionist rhetoric as something that is a cause which justifies their mission for statehood.

I HAVE TO make myself perfectly clear-er, here, opposite the victim card Netanyahu's use of proprietary propaganda instills is.

That an argument propositioning how woke critics are of Israel abhorrent conduct is, does not allow Jews to inform how others measure it. Do not measure me as antizionist because it equates to hate. Your cowardly arguments precedes all promise of human condition. Jews are not victims of the same false purpose into the propaganda they act with. = (The moral of the previous sentence means they say one thing but it means another.) To say I am antizionist that incites hatred toward Jews is one thing. I agree. (The irrational measurement is another.) It is the Jewish statehood that has club med attitudes. Not woke Liberals such as myself. Examine your elitism and tell. Tell me why I am unsubservient if it means someone getting what they want.

The Jewish state is modern day genocidal warfare while Netanyahu propagates it using propaganda to fit the mouths of fools that actually believe him.

- Marco ================

letting go of why

 

What is enough (is never enough) :: drawing the line freedom creates

 

A non-fragmented mind, a mind that is whole is in freedom. It does not know it is free; what is known is within the area of time, the past through the present to the future. All movement is time and time is not a factor of freedom. Freedom of choice denies freedom; choice exists only where there is confusion. Clarity of perception, insight, is the freedom from the pain of choice.

Krishnamurti

"Untold: brain matter" 1- art of the mind as a natural superconductor 2- in behavioral awareness [psychological time]

 

 I think there is a bigger truth to the meaning hidden behind the message. Being, that although we link ourselves to the premise of what is regarded with a true sense of prestige, our only aims are guarded from consequence over failed, either perceived or projected self achievements.

It's a mind hack or trick we play as our ego.

My question asks: if we have to do something, (think of it as though life or death,) would you?? Should we kill ourselves over something we can or cannot control. Turn over our souls to the devil in exchange of ideas over a cheapened sense of survival.

My point is we are all capable of brilliance. It can be very very small.

I myself - don't really care for what the statement reads in that meme. I found it curious because I am on a totally different path. I want to be original (curious) in a world that lacks curiosity (originality.)

My thoughts about how everyone should be effected by the same thing we look at, may be different than how it works in another persons perspective. But the time it took me to figure out not to believe everything you hear or see is a skill. Simply, to think of things differently takes greater homage.

My aim at this point in my life - if any of this makes any sense - is that I want to operate at a higher level. (This doesn't mean I want something MORE than what ANOTHER person wants.) I am on a type of spiritual ordeal, to be in touch with a higher role in life that isn't typical of life itself. I try to translate this into my thoughts, my actions, my words. I am also; not referring this to perfection. Perfection does not equal to what is honorable.

To do your life's work, in your personal space, on your terms. . . isn't made to suffer.

I see this in everyone.

=======

What is in my opinion the best trait or characteristic a person can think for themselves? It's having a clear intimate understanding that we live in a world that's worth dying for.

- Marco

================

When the mind is no longer resisting, no longer avoiding, no longer discarding or blaming ‘what is’ but is simply passively aware, then in that passivity of the mind you will find, if you really go into the problem, that there comes a transformation.
⠀
Longer passage: A quiet mind is a mind that is intent on understanding. It is not a mind that is exclusive, that is trying to concentrate—which again is an effort of resistance. If I really want to understand something, there is immediately a quiet state of mind. When you want to listen to music or look at a picture which you love, which you have a feeling for, what is the state of your mind? Immediately there is a quietness, is there not? When you are listening to music, your mind does not wander all over the place; you are listening. Similarly, when you want to understand conflict, you are no longer depending on time at all; you are simply confronted with what is, which is conflict. Then immediately there comes a quietness, a stillness of mind. When you no longer depend on time as a means of transforming what is because you see the falseness of that process, then you are confronted with what is, and as you are interested to understand what is, naturally you have a quiet mind. In that alert yet passive state of mind there is understanding. So long as the mind is in conflict, blaming, resisting, condemning, there can be no understanding. If I want to understand you, I must not condemn you, obviously. It is that quiet mind, that still mind, which brings about transformation. When the mind is no longer resisting, no longer avoiding, no longer discarding or blaming ‘what is’ but is simply passively aware, then in that passivity of the mind you will find, if you really go into the problem, that there comes a transformation. —Krishnamurti
⠀
From the book The First and Last Freedom

======================

Semiconductor in negating materialism

 

🔮return of the Psychic hero in real time

 A psychic 🔮 return into the future (if not a poisoning of my minds eye).

This false reality you found,

when attention is paid.

(Psychological factors stop with rules to follow.)

Rewired.  I rewind the rational processes from memory.

Inside, it is my light shinning through a dark dark cloud,

I abandoned in thought.

Word's upon words that carry no meaning,

far from making any sense.

Takes a brilliant mind to create it.

- Marco 

A return into the future as false reality (retold)

 Unsure why I'm moved to share this. I find it speculative therefore incomplete. But the imaginative quality that this creation manmade might still be held together in over a length of time humanity might not exist. Yet, the information on it represents our extinction. That's what gets me. If it's discovered by another entity, the information on it seems unobvious (not curious) to the object that "finds" voyager over its subsequent journey once discovered. It's like a empty drink can on the street. Discarded like a thing that we once thought could excite us based on its discovery, only to be treated like space trash seems more likely. Is physics infinitely incomplete? What is the point. We travelled 200,000 years to prove nothing.

My question: what (if anything is worth knowing) forces us to believe that immortality is a natural cause for us as a species to act. Is this our mission or should we reconsider it?

ambiguity as silence

Steven Bernstein

June 8th, 2026 ○°○•○•• There is a paradox that lives between what is courage and what cowardice is. If you fail - you don’t find yourself in the irony of it, it is in the paradox (as mentioned), do you find yourself that makes for something personal. A great thinker percolates moment to moment. •°○°○°○° Marco from Winnipeg P.S. I have listened to everything you said. The key elements are how 1- transmission works if you are alone in your thoughts, (this is poetry) 2- relapse of memory is if you misplace value in oneself trying to justify something you cannot control, and 3- contrivance in general is the idea if you live to concoct a viscerally purposeless mode of convention. = We are all just copies of something else we haven't learned about ourselves yet.

- Marco

what is free from fear

 If there were ever an autopsy given, to report the sense between what self-doubt does or to a collective species everyone person pledges, to no surprise we are left to uncover the beautiful circumstances given to no conspiracy of our own.

-Marco

This is my translation of the discovery Darwin has made.^ It is my own interpretation, re; the author for evolutionary physics. It creates a story, more intricate than what religion professes as 'the fear of God', to which confessional 'god fearing' individuals supposedly replicate to inform truth from falsehood. (i.e. corruption, guilt, false truth's)

Perhaps the single most important theory since Genesis re-invented itself as the cause of human sacrifice.

A theory so complete in tracing Darwin's 'origin of the species', is to say a person's humanity makes no mention of a self-condemning plea, the truth in evolutionary physics (rather) is to offer an explanatory aversion which:

a) differentiates between natural causes (i.e.inform our association to each thing immaterial or otherwise as is 'unknown' )

b) bargaining a negotiation from condemnation. (i.e. lies, false dichotomies, devils advocacy etc.)

Chris Jericho

If Chris Jericho is not the best export to come out of Winnipeg ever, he is at the top of my list, and we hardly know it. Shameful.

- Marco

 

tying one on

Only love and right thinking will bring about true revolution, the revolution within ourselves. — Jiddu Krishnamurti

 

wise expectations

 

Unserious

 

Romance in the years of life

 This. I made this rule. I will die alone not breaking this rule. And I don't perform my confidence to sell myself out to my principles. (That last sentence means I do not navigate the world, I simply live my truth and lead by example.)

cashing out on Oscar Wilde

"The image stained upon the canvas possesses no spiritual element of growth or change. If they know nothing of death it is because they know little of life, for the secrets of life and death belong to those, and to those only, whom the sequence of time affects, and who possess not merely the present but the future, and can rise or fall from a past of glory or of shame. Movement, that problem of the visible arts, can be truly realised by literature alone. It is literature that shows us the body in its swiftness and the soul in its unrest."

-- Gilbert from "The Artist as Critic" by Oscar Wilde

 

conventional truth's

 

internal war: rules of respite & the act of confession in meditation

 

I don't require punishment. God requires me in the face of his punishment. I am a sinner. I will always be. Understand that and declare war on yourself is what the beginning of wisdom creates. I don't feel punishment I fear only if god is for me. - Marco

all acceptable mistakes only in punishment or reward

 

“Truth, which is permanent, eludes the historian of events. Truth transcends history.” Mahatma Gandhi

“Faith is like love: it does not let itself be forced.” Arthur Schopenhauer

Dreams that never come cheaply

 

I don't believe what Krishnamurti is trying to get across here. I understand it. But I don't necessarily agree with it. I think it is a fallacy to assess how the church has indoctrinated us as a whole of humanity. Unless you see what is it Krishnamurti is saying. To break the glass ceiling. The church does not influence me to act idealistically. Neither before nor after illusions.

Romans 8:1

Native Prairie Sun

50 Reasons You’ve Got Winnipeg All Wrong 

June 7th 2026 Winnipeg's native prairie son, here.   I can sit here and use anything superficial to convince you of what Winnipeg has to offer.  (But I won't.)   Being from here, we are not elitist in any way shape or form.  If that doesn't appeal to you for the same reason the stereotype we get is in writing us off.  [You have no idea what that false contradiction even implies.] It means we won't cater to the view that 'me only" mentality applies.  It does not fly here.  We are fiercely independent and care about each other as the result.  Whether that be to a well being we share together this land, it's here - it's Winnipeg - where Canada has its roots.  We are not some hornets nest that we compare to other major cities, where core level systemic racism is preferred. This follows how-there are difference's which in this day and age MAGA brain rot has spread into the Western culture, but Winnipeg prides itself around being indifferent to the cause which lessen partisan values.  We are attune to socialist ideology in our modern political climate and have this approach to keep this Canada's melting pot as a model mosaic.  We are equals in this city where it's not meant to seem that way to critics of Winnipeg.  In case you are not from here - We hold that defect to power, in this very intelligent destination city not named Vancouver, or Toronto where Winnipeg's values and secular self image is painted over.  My point is you feel like you belong, because Winnipeg is a prairie town which we love to create, speak about what it means to be from here non denominationally and where its endless skies forges you a romantic identity. We are Winnipeg. - Marco

the standard for empiricism as ethically sound

 

Toothless are aims coming in the form of a lack in courage itself. This lack of courage (dispossessed) is representative as sardonic in psychology. The style - thoughtless. The purpose - inattentive to detail. The awareness - illiterate. It is a principle in that the mission has been named, having reached an implausible end. It is on an empirical level we think of this as one's clarity gone amok. Primaeval instincts - that mirrors a self centered approach toward anything cogent perceptively. Your identity is hidden from view (no concern) for cheating others. This mask being worn as one that is torn or two-faced in reflex. Mainly elitist Western values.

- Marco

Fingerprints for gods DNA

 No one's personal doormat. Got myself out of being into that habit. That's it - for today's revelation. When I share things of this nature, it is a matter of setting a footprint. That as I move forward in life, I can look back at signs that put me here. And when I look back it's more symbiotic reductionism between extremes. I'm no victim. Fuck that. I pay attention to noise that remains relevant to the psychological processing that is (my) mind. . . that takes skill. If you fail to learn from what that means, that's on you.

I'm a revolutionary in the product of what I do on a daily basis from here on out. It's been like this for a while now. A man of ideas. I know who my friends are, and I pray for them. Always,

- Marco

graphic loss as is reductionism

 

What the most (a) sacred right to (b) my own will (c) is then made of [August 26th 2012]

 The most important characteristics about me are:

 

 

1- I am no mental whore to freedom. (corrupted model)

2 - I am no uneffeminate slave to reason. (passive aggressive)

3 - I know how to delegate unstable authority. (systematic)

 

 

My extended beliefs make up a greater circumference of ideals (i.e. detailing), to dream - dream my own reasons, so too become my unconscious civility, my unconscious civility then takes on a personal level of nature (a) am I living a lie (b) can I make wishful thoughts (c) an  altered state in reality to create energy of a cerebral nature. Can my value in all things be invested into one thing, a secret value, a secretive nature.

 

 

My own sense of self (belief) pervades my self gratification of a superficial value. Therefore it is in all things superficiality is the most obvious form of misconduct.

 

 

Can I not fall out of favor with the universe. That seems as if an aggressive formality against myself inhibition, as opposed to the outside forces I trust are at work in my favor.

 

 

I am made not to understand things that operate in the same way the universe does, nor am I in a universe as everyone else imitates. This is the most conventional ideal of wisdom I can think of.

 

 

We are made 'not' to understand why things are the way they are, or why they happen as they do, this is my true belief of life.

 

 

Therefore, I am 'not' made.

I am passionate.

 

However, I am not made to do anything in particular. What I am simply is 'that'. This is in my definition of the universe, my ultimate wisdom at a distance, I ask myself (a) what (b) is (c) that. The 'what' is what I forfeit myself to. The 'how' is to ensure you are not trapped in a universe made out of a confessional where you sit somewhere and contemplate your sins of my own emotional state or my satire in all of this.

 

In its effect: life is not a pursual to excellence.

 

 

The universe is not that powerful.  I want to think this is a concept of the weakest version I myself would be able to survive it.  This flies in the face of Darwin's survival of the fittest theory.

- Marco

=============

==============

This entry in it's entirety was truthfully trying to explain, how does one determine to answer, if there is one thing in the universe that is 'sacred', what would it be, how could it look like, what makes it permanent. Therefore, what then is my sacred right as an individual, myself taught, sacred to freedom.

I believe the truth in that answer, begins and ends in asking the question itself, what acts as sacred, the scared act to feel the truth. Is it even a possibility, in the way you ask a question has the nature of such a duality. What is sacred then what is reason. What 'is' sacred to reason.

That is the question one LEARNS to ask. You do not live as sacred, there is no nature in divinity, only divinity in nature can produce the divine will. This is what provides me, with the revealing of substantiation.

That what is sacred is a substantiation of my own will. That how you answer the question of what is sacred, can only then act as my divine will to answer it. It is the super self unconscious self. Can you live with yourself, in such a self described role, without the power to judge but of empowering the unconscious psyche that is my own minds eye - the eye of god, my eyes to gods will tells me.

==============

Can I testify myself to the will of god, then god would recognize me. How would I possibly know. This is the basis, of asking what is sacred. How do you possibly begin to ask yourself that question, let alone discern its answer.

===============

^The very nature of the divine will in action.

=============

"I am made, not to, understand things that operate in the same way the universe does, nor am I in a universe as everyone else imitates. This is the most conventional ideal of wisdom I can think of. " (MA2012)

If there was ever a way to inform the masses against its own unfavorable gestation, in the form of ignorance set free, this would be it.^

We live as a means to be sedated of free will, then free thought would radically be different to a cause.

===============

In every instance I inform myself, I believe in my truth to reason consequential to each moment a thought is born.

===============

"The universe is not that powerful. I want to think this is a concept of the weakest version I myself would be able to survive it. This flies in the face of Darwin's survival of the fittest theory."

June 18, 2014

MA

If the universe acts as the single most viable creation known to man, the conceptualization we have of ourselves in it is our greatest misconception. We take for granted in each instance the universe if it were a creation man has deemed itself as the founder is a fatal flaw. Therefore even in evolutionary theory which aim is to disprove the theory of God's ad hoc existence means only the coefficient of evolution versus theology where man acts being the rational cause or choice of free will cannot be falsified.

===============

(Part I)

"However, I am not made to do anything in particular. What I am simply is 'that'. This is in my definition of the universe, my ultimate wisdom at a distance, I ask myself (a) what (b) is (c) that. The 'what' is what I forfeit myself to. The 'how' is to ensure you are not trapped in a universe made out of a confessional where you sit somewhere and contemplate your sins of my own emotional state of my satire in all of this."

August 26, 2012

MA

(Part II)

"That what is sacred is a substantiation of my own will. That how you answer the question of what is sacred, can only then act as my divine will to answer it. It is the super self unconscious self. Can you live with yourself, in such a self described role, without the power to judge but of empowering the unconscious psyche that is my own minds eye - the eye of god, my eyes to gods will tells me."

August 27, 2012

MA

============

^What this entry means to me is property of everything I have ever wanted to accomplish in my life. It means I aimed at the kind of ideas that might change our world views.

As far as I am concerned this is what I do now. I scribe and I revisit what I felt at the time.

I asunder what became these ideas which cannot be expelled.

============

This entry asks what is the universe and what does that question entail. I make an attempt at this stating there are certain values we can never fully be aware.

============

This part of the thesis has two equal parts: (Part I) is describing what is my idea of participating in the universe. (Part II) That if the universe is what I say it is can it also be attributed with the same idea of what is sacred. That in both instances it is not a love of god or the combination of truth:

"you are not trapped in a universe made out of a confessional where you sit somewhere and contemplate your sins of my own emotional state of my satire in all of this."

That if there were a god what does gods will tell you. The idea is that gods will is separate from yours nor does he dictate it. Therefore, what does gods will tell you if it were a lie.

"my eyes to gods will tells me."

June 21, 2014

MA