"Obsessive people tend to do extraordinary things." - Christian Bale

Christian Bale

etiology

 God and only god will always be the missing piece in my belief system. - Marco

Carolyn Wong ·March 4 at 6:52 PM ·

Kierkegaard - poses life struggles, paradoxes, dilemmas - and asks the reader to decide for themselves.

With Kierkegaard there is no external enemy - there is only the conflict within self. Any external enemy is a distraction from the enemy within.

His concern - Have they been confronted with a God who demands that they look into their own hearts and not just analyze the pathologies in themselves (Psychotherapy ‘shadow self’ Jung)

Before God - one kneels and prays. The forgiveness it seeks is divine. The blindness it is not a psychological mechanism to be integrated, but a spiritual condition to be healed by grace.

"The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately sick; who can understand it?" (Jeremiah 17:9). This is pathology, but it is pathology with a specific etiology: (cause) separation from God. The sickness is not in the psyche; it is in the soul's relationship to its Creator.

The most subtle deception is this: psychological frameworks can make the self the center of its own salvation. Even when God is mentioned, even when Christ is invoked, the operative framework remains one of self-actualization, self-integration, self-healing, spiritual discipline.

Kierkegaard saw this clearly. He spent his entire authorship attacking the idea that Christianity could be made reasonable, palatable, psychologically satisfying. Christianity is offense, he insisted. It is the Absolute Paradox. It demands the crucifixion of human understanding. It requires a leap of faith into the unknown.

====================

Presence and belief (pressure, stigma, and release under panic)

Only in essence do you register impulse.  

Only in impulsiveness does one recognize or experience truth.

Momentary relapse in acting strategies (for the actor).

the permanency of an emotion

 

the sound of private language

 authentic renewal 

Templars

"NO more purchased animals or sacrifices are to be brought through this gate."

Is this the basis of what is the Templars, were excommunicated and made to be purged against. That the Templars became a system (which they created) where the economic and social authority was made illegitimate. Therefore, not recognized by the Pope and repealed of their symbolic status with the church. It is unknown historically as to why. - Marco

Why the Templars were persecuted is unknown in history

The reasons behind the Templars' persecution remain a subject of historical debate and speculation. While the Templars were accused of serious offenses such as heresy, blasphemy, idolatry, and financial corruption, the true nature of their beliefs and practices remains shrouded in legend. The accusations were likely contrived to mobilize public opinion against the order and secure ecclesiastical approval for its actions. The Templars' wealth and independence drew envy, leading to their downfall. The Templars' enormous fortune was officially transferred to the Order of St. John, but much of it ended up in the hands of secular rulers, particularly in France.

The Templars' persecution was not solely due to the accusations but also the political ambitions of King Philip IV of France and the influence of Pope Clement V. The Templars' international networks and special rights placed them directly under the Church, which Philip perceived as a threat. The Templars' wealth and independence drew envy, leading to their downfall. The Templars' enormous fortune was officially transferred to the Order of St. John, but much of it ended up in the hands of secular rulers, particularly in France. 

The sixth sense of unreason

Combating any kind of evil over the forces of nature at play - pays for itself.

Centering what is 'unknown' acts as a gravitational pull, unused mental mechanics that your brain provides entropy of the mind. To stimulate growth disorder bestows upon you (creates order).

Entropy of the mind

Resistance: truth tellers deceive no one even if the the observer cheats the observed 

Insubordination: Conspiracy to act in a way that is resentful or manipulate others.

Imperialist ideology 

principle and order

(Thinking) Information Theory vs psychological impairment (Feeling)

There are 2 rules I differentiate which I must follow internally as an actor:

1 [Acting is not a suicide.]

2 [Not acting is the suicide.]

There are mental blocks. (Disambiguation) What is mental according to your observational eye.

The feedback is in the action.

The subtext is in the thought.

Silence is a psychological state of the actor.

The mask I wear comes off as I make choices that reveal the character.

Subtext lives in silence between thoughts.

"Plot is character revealed through action." - Aristotle 

- Marco 

Roles and identity = source vs essence

 profound wisdom

philosophy in life

Daniel Day Lewis

The rare

regeneration

Rick Rubin

 Rick Rubin

The profligate of reason

 Good question which also happens to fly in the face of what is deontological. Conventional wisdom does not allow for the supenatural or a divine order of anything to do with monotheistic ends. However, does this also mean philosophy is branded against your hyper worldview? If I ask you what is a moral value system, I can't show you anything other than my own actions. Some actions are relatively scaled based on a cause. And my imprint of this in fact is our universal idologies done to promote the human condition. This can be done usefully by either philosophy that's a measure of deontological ends, or a measure of interpretation which we act in theory.

I would also ask if there is human error in judgement that we must reject if one is to move forward. What ends justifies the means. So Kantian ethics is the formulation of cause and effect.

- Marco

°●○°°▪︎°●○°○°

ADHD TRUTHS (VALID INTERPRETATION)

 That is a solid verifiable list of characteristics for the ADHD mind.

-Marco

°●°○°○°○°○○°○°

Absurdity multplies my sacred self (private self) vs personal regret (public self)

Search for a psychological state = my private self

Protecting your observers sophisticated idea into feeding my introversion = public self

A free mind is objectivity.  A liberation projecting my soul.

- Marco 

R = q = x

R is to Sparing guilt.

What q is to Fill in the gap.

What x is to Subtextual silence

- Marco

The philosopher's antihero

 A philosopher cannot be a hero. The archetype of the hero is a purely rational mode at its limit, when everything is put at stake for what one considers one’s own, what one knows for certain, what one does not doubt. Here “rational” is used in an ontological sense, as the function of preserving an already existing structure. The philosopher, however, is always in doubt; it is precisely this that prevents him from becoming stuck in the traces of his own activity and allows him to remain in a contemplative mode. The hero, on the other hand, does not doubt; there is no such thing as a doubting hero. The hero is commitment, a passionate mode directed toward the future, whereas the philosopher abides in the present moment. This does not mean that a philosopher cannot perform heroic acts; it only means that he does so accidentally (not out of convictions), but out of humility before the context.

°●°○°○°○○°○°°▪︎○°

If anyone thinks that a philosopher is irrefutable based on her intelligence alone. She had done her job.

- Marco

○°○°°○°○°○°▪︎°

Note: it's a philosophical construct of the antihero, or better put the philosophical agency of an antithesis in 'not doing'. (I am thinking of this in terms that processes negation - as this theory suggests.)

- Marco

°●°●°●●°●°○°○°

It is absolutely necessary for maturity that there should be:

1. Complete simplicity which goes with humility, not in things or possessions but in the quality of being.

2. Passion with that intensity which is not merely physical.

3. Beauty; not only the sensitivity to outward reality but being sensitive to that beauty which is beyond and above thought and feeling.

4. Love; the totality of it, not the thing that knows jealousy, attachment, dependence; not that as divided into carnal and divine. The whole immensity of it.

5. And the mind that can pursue, that can penetrate without motive, without purpose, into its own immeasurable depths; that has no barrier, that is free to wander without time-space.

⠀

Krishnamurti’s Notebook

Critique vs correction

If control mechanims are in place the source of such ideology acts as device ten steps behind a deviantly lead false sense of reality. (i.e. political recourse :: lies)

- Marco

====================

Mark Carney is legit genius. He is🍁... new found breath of fresh air.

He knows.

He knows we are not in this alone. We have to mobilize against MAGA's political ends.

All the right wing bot accounts that falsely generate disorder, do not tie into that world view.

Most ignorant of cause will resort to reverse psychological tactics, such as those that have aligned behind Trump to use his propaganda. Not for my measure.

My measuring stick is this:

1- Do not try using propaganda against those that demonstrate cause with the same moral courage it takes to expose Trump for what he is. (This is reverse psychology in action = oldest mind trick in the book of knowledge)

2- Do not use false pretense to engage with those that are not rightfully exploited by MAGA's perturbed mentality.

3- Do not falsely objectify the type of view that only help to project lies in the politics of prevention. Revenge politics works this way. In a manner of trying to formulate FALSE CLAIMS passing them off as principled.

What I am relating back to the reader here is to learn how to falsify, falsify - without wasting your time trying to convince another of their own way of thinking. It is a game of do's and don'ts.

What comes to mind, is the look of defiance in the face of committing to finding what's rooted in truth.

I have plenty of enemies that view what I do on here in one way: They use reverse psychology (either in secret or in their private thoughts) initiating it by posing no real argument that excuses their principled effect of generating a plausible form of argument between both doing and (not) doing. If you can't wrap your head around what I am saying, you are heading down a dangerous - dangerous path to nowhere. It leads you to the void of anything you ever possibly could imagine.

You want to live your life in bullshit, you were born to be under the influence of your personal degradation.

===============

Krishnamurti on inattention leading to conflict

=====================

"When philosophizing you have to descend into the old chaos & feel at home there."

Ludwig Wittgenstein

What is it that Wittgenstein is characterizing does not deal with self respecting nature. It lives in a vacuum as we examine things upon which we are primordial. We live in a world that obsess with instant gratification and want to play god. In theory, the order of language is the thought that produces the most knowledgeability. My point is that traditionally, Wittgenstein's postulating what we already know but forget about. It is hidden strategically in the mind where chaos meets your deontological self. We are what we are that we live to absorb things in their most natural state.

This all applies from my first sentence that if I am speaking as a philosopher, you must revert to your origin in place of thinking.

- Marco 

°•●●☆○●••○•••

True reality is not physical. Science and humanity needs to learn this.

••○••○•••••

What is philosophy? Philosophy is critical thinking. Though it is not physical reality. What is reality, is rooted in such concept. It is also a deontoloigcal structure in accordance to how we function with natural law, as result we would fail to act compatible on a universal scale.

My point is nothing has to be evidence of what is physical. The answer is in the question as a matter of minor consequence. Thinking that there is no such thing as reality, because it is not traced to be physical informs an invalid argument.  

- Marco

Higher Dimensions

When rules no longer protect you - you have to defend yourself.  To that effect... when the same principle doesn't apply the same way to all things being equal.  You are looking at a headless ideology without its tail end.

- Marco

Krishnamurti

Psalm 34:7

“The angel of the lord encamps around those who fear Him, and rescues them. ”

================

Worms

 

I don't really recall positing this only to fast forward and think it, today. When I pull into my brain matter, what comes out is akin to reason. Somewhere in the isle of Home Depot you'll find a layer of bricks. You forget it's not Safeway. You're in a home improvement store wondering about groceries. That's how one transcends logical discourse. By relating two things and making it comprehensive. The danger is in how comparible they are but if the idea is a good working animal, you open a can of worms and find nothing relates back to your origin of it. The can of worms is a poor metaphor to fuel something we describe as shallow. Worse is defining what we don't already know. So unless you find the can of worms is an analogy for how we misconstruct things, the point is made. That you must search for truth.  

The truth is founded where reasoning ends as predictable of a cause. That if cause is predictable. There would be no point in norms being associated with it. Therefore, cause is where we measure everything by itself.  

When I said weird, I am not saying what is it that qualifies as weird. I think about what I said back then, meaning that one needs to find it.

I have found my sensational identity as weirder than I thought I could defy.  

The world will adjust accordingly. Whatever truth is, you have to fight for it.

- Marco

Order and discomfort (safety valve)

If you are scared, you talk yourself out of something you would rather not do.

If you are stuck on an idea, you'll have talked yourself into it.

- Marco

Emotional perturbation (technique for the promising actor) :: awareness principle

It isn't only a neurological funtion of the brain, but it is a valid theory.

The more more psychologically invested you are, then less is disturbing of the character fiction to demonstrate cause.

This purposely done.  You've imagined circumstances and think it is useful action.

To have made the anomaly is the detail in art.  Otherwise, your performance becomes superficially untouched.  You audience is suspeneded in disbelief to the spontaneity they feel, based on experience.

You play with intention because you can't play an emotion.

- Marco

Straight edge :: pure fantasy vs false reality

 Israel has no more sovereignty than any other nation that's formed statehood independence. The real question: why should Israel 🇮🇱 have immunity other nations don't have under what is universal. The universal answer; Israel acting under the false pretense as children of Zion. Believe their sovereignty is universal as a model under the false imaginary reality. The idea of Israel living vicariously to it, is an ultimate political end. 🇮🇱 ironically the evil of if god were merciful, reinforce Israelis offensive attack as the aggressors on the basis of dogmatic, self made conspirator's working in expanding its militaristic capabilities.

- Marco

°●○•○○•••

Trump, Israel, Iran, and the Question of Power

Let us set aside slogans for a moment and ask a harder question.

When Donald Trump takes a strong pro-Israel stance against Iran, framing the issue as security, deterrence, and strength, is this responsible statecraft or a dangerous escalation? 

When Israel views Iran as an existential threat and acts from that perception, is it exercising legitimate self-defence or reinforcing a cycle of hostility that makes long-term peace impossible?

°•○○••••••

The lost cost of winning vs mind control

Recognition is based on a naive false sense of fear that you are not scared to act.

-Marco

Cheating is extortion

 Universal (rule) :: a valid dichotomy in testing someone's resolve vs rebellion.

Nodody wins.

Only winners lose more than they win.

Therefore, I am a loser.

 Marco 

Showing Why :: frames who does what 'the is' - if it is

How you feel informs your behavior.

What you think stimulates acting.

Stella Adler :: soul in what is acting

David Whyte