The economy of mind :: freeing the image (is seeing)

 measurement and sensory experience ~Krishnamurti 

Powerful a paradox

 The cost of living is about what is less shallow than what it is you believe you already know. The return you get is an opposite effect: the dogmatic version of you- that you are never aware of there is no restitution for it.

- Marco 

the measureless (in theory)

===============

 Disclaimer: this is a not an attack on anyone, this is a philosophy page. So, I am inspired in this way to express my philosophical thoughts. My thoughts on the post is as follows (but to not make disparaging thoughtless remarks because that is not my intent here. . . ) This is why we draw inspiration to postulate things of this nature. SO if you think I am not being serious, that's on you. DO NOT -shit post my take.

=============

June 5th 2026

(begins. . . )

I prefer to identify with the lamb. Metaphorically speaking, we all know Lions. But for every shallow type of lifeform, those that are not made to defend themselves, - there is a restitution to be paid for. My point is that those that fail to protect the lambs from being threatened as lambs. The Lions are rulers in defense of the lamb. (To know the lamb, is its inherent worth. The property of the lamb is symbolic of truth which is the cost to be made a Lion.)

(ends.)

- Marco

=====================

Please be experiencing as we go along, do not remain on the verbal level.⁠

⁠
What is the relationship of the mind to what is? So far, the what is has been given a name, a term, a symbol of association, and this naming prevents direct relationship, which makes the mind dull, insensitive. The mind and what is are not two separate processes, but naming separates them. When this naming ceases, there is a direct relationship: the mind and the what is are one. The what is is now the observer himself without a term, and only then is the what is transformed; it is no longer the thing called emptiness with its associations of fear, and so on. Then the mind is only the state of experiencing, in which the experiencer and the experienced are not. Then there is immeasurable depth, for he who measures is gone. That which is deep is silent, tranquil, and in this tranquillity is the spring of the inexhaustible. The agitation of the mind is the usage of word. When the word is not, the measureless is.⁠
⁠
⁠
J. Krishnamurti⁠
Commentaries on Living⁠

As identity collapses

What is it I experience, how do I know - if the use of it through this voice is all nothing but a lie.

I have this voice.

And the weight of it is a freedom from all suicide.

Why do people wait to be free, when the wanting to wait for it is all they need.

(Why did we become slaves to the thought.)

The same thought that we were not meant to examine things.

How do I hear that voice in my life that is the good.

The good in things.

The voice is not the one in my head.

That voice only sings.

And because I think of things this profoundly,

it makes me wonder who I am.

What desires I have will never come, fulfilled.

It is in my heart that things are my salvation.

And the heart is where they will stay.

As I remain the mortal man,

whose desires are not my own.

Because I see - everything.

And this is my greatest skill.

Let it rain.

Let it rain as it cleanses my face,

and deepens my core.

I love the feeling of being wet.

Drenched in the water that rushes down my adrenaline filled body.

Because in this adrenaline filled world,

the world is fueled by your soul.

And how real is that, asks - you.

I just sit and wait for it.

That when it comes to me, I'll know.

And that is so - so nice.

Where nothing matters but your sacrifice.

In that moment,

that moment you felt sacred.

Too scared to admit you ran from fear,

the fear that caused you trouble.

Trouble that was near the heart, too close.

Let it all collapse.

Just collapse into your angels arms.

-Marco 

Mainstream opulence

Her rare perfume -

is something like its intoxication 

feels time running through my hands.

A time so distinct,

you can hardly not tell the difference.

June 5th 2014

 

================

You can only be weak at heart as opposed to strong; because only in the weak do we find beautiful things.

June 05, 2014

MA

=================

Namrata Ascetic

yes agreed. the kind of beautiful heart our societies cherish and encourage everyone to have, that kind of heart cannot be made without rendering the person emotionally vulnerable and weak. the one's who are strong at heart are perceived as unemotional and blunt. the irony is that the same society the promotes the possession of a weak heart, actually creates an environment in which the weak hearted will inevitably suffer and break.

June 5th 2023

 Here are thoughts I have I'm proof relating to ex gfs that had it in for me and all I gave them.

My ex gf fallacy:

I would never erase from memory re; the concept of "love"... the evil seeds planted in my mind. For these lessons are for me to learn. I have been taught things that I now gather what I can look upon as evil bestowed. But I have reserved strength to rise above and break those chains knowing the devils work trying to provoke me. True story...

You want me to go on? Read on...

My ex gf's didn't know what they had. They tried to bring my sense of self down to denial and loss of devotion. For this.... they have failed. I have come out ten times the lion!! It's not just psychological. It has manifested to inspire me further.

- Marco

================

The digital age

“Simplifying to the extreme, I define postmodern as incredulity toward metanarratives.”

–Jean-Francois Lyotard

Kind of looking into space.

Kind of wondering what you want out of me. (Interpret that whatever way you wish.)

Either way we're all getting along fine without twisting it sideways in life. That's if you rather not regret things everyone else consider normal. We are faced with a period in our lifetime that is unparalleled. Entering a revolutionary digital quantum age of computing (Theoretically) is suppose to change what is. (But I am not convinced.) I am not convinced we are all faced with w things your children will have not faced while my generation was 20 years old. We are not that far removed from each other.

My point is as the future looks.

Today, I still believe in the other side. That is in my faith. And I still believe it.

My second point:

Is that my (1st point) re; faith = is what we all will be faced with considering the quantum age. Are we bigger than what we originally thought possible for us? That's the confusion. We all have skin without the snake's head penetrating our lives with its teeth guarding itself. (Only what we strike with our senses is what matters.)

Computers can not predict my future. I won't let that happen. Our behavior is in protecting what is ours alone, as if each one of us have the sovereign right to fight for life as a species. Computers cannot generate the norms we associate with a digital age. It's about attaining the difference of what is heart to brain and sensory experience. The same way poets reveal what it means to fall in love. Words on a human level are products. Technological advancement is a question of power. If computers in the quantum age can create themselves and create other versions of themselves (i.e. patent and clone other machines thereby making them a species specific to machine life:) what are we left without it?

It's the Elon Musk's of the world.

What we need are to examine where we are heading and create the same environment we all have made without borders, or are at the very least illusory to machine culture. Our customs as humanity depend of one thing only. Your faith. Upon which faith is that god is not representing machine life. If god is human as if he were. It's that simple. Our realization of faith in context will depend on it. Depend on human civilization's continuity.

I speak as a Canadian philosopher that includes an inclusively diverse nationalist ideology without borders.

- Marco

2014

Caged in the fire (incomplete informational feedback)

 Steven Bernstein

What is the main purpose you propose to manage how we arrive at something (as you said) poetic? What is a poetically specific motive as a framework for creating something original or challenging norms. This, as ideology, becomes dogmatic independent of the way it is received because, in my view, most audiences are complacent to what already is in the world. My point is that the audience's perception is a constraint in what they are receiving behind the medium, beneath the message, based on an unconscious lack of disbelief. In other words, the audience wants a new source to interpret causation. Meaning - I, as the actor, have the ability to alter an audience's domestic element. All people in general take aim without thinking about what's at stake. My job is to make something that is completely beyond that. So my question is, how do you know? How do you know what objective focuses is doing things completely disobeying together laws we are all centered on or pulled into (without) gathering convention. I can tell you that I work from this place. And most actors are not aware. This is my personal laboratory. °●•○•●●• Marco from Winnipeg


====================

Matt Good

===================

June 4th 2016

I found this song for the first time this week. It has touched me on a mysterious level I can only feel.

I am a huge fan of this Canadian artist.

Out of all the music he has created, this reaches to the top of my favorites of his.

============

It reminds me of a place I used to call home. But home never leaves you - your best version of yourself. That the it factor we all chase is in vain. It is about making the opposite for that choice. That choice we all wish for things to happen though may never come.

This message is about how stupid I am to think I'm an artist.

(Put that phrase I last thought a different way.)

I'm not the artist that everyone thinks - I am. To think that I'm an artist is my secret life made public. It may be how stuck you all see me. But it doesn't make me a loser. I rather fight dying to be what I want. While everybody watches it happen or not, is not up to me.

That's how truth works.

Believe me, I'm not waiting to be famous. I will fight the same way despite the unfathomable destruction of me. That 'me' that everyone thinks deserves special treatment. Special treatment is not about wanting the things we want and getting them. It takes the truth of climbing the mountain and thinking how the view is as good as everyone else's. That takes courage. Test me, my friend. This point on the mountain is all just over the top nonsense no one cares to understand nor think about. (A perfect sentence to define me.) But really, as fictionally delusional you make this out to be. There are things that reach the pinnacle in life, you hardly are ware of. Like your first born. The marriage you have. It's all real. I'm searching for words to find how that computes into the reality WE ALL WANT. And my point is I am what interprets my personal affirmations.

You are not the rejection you faced all your life because it became larger than you ever could imagine it. Now I fall under the escape plan.

This is about being that version I only imagined when I was the younger version (of myself).

I've become something of an idea. And may be it's true. And may be it isn't. But I know I can fight. And that doesn't make me a boss, a prize fighter, or an executioner.

I fight (because I can) without protesting my own advocacy means something.

People have accused me of being something I can only imagine myself as. I know it. But I don't care. I fear it will have to be out of my control.

The whole purpose about making no sense to anyone is this:

I want to make a difference. I fight as not to be purged upon.

And this is where I will end my truth. Without living a lie. Lies - where we all fall in line with whatever is in front of us. I have what makes me feel things most of you never do. And I want to feel it without safety. My animal instinct. The kind that you have but you dispossessed. You dispossessed something that you failed to conquer along the way. If that doesn't have you thinking. . . than what other lies are you living?

And this is the proof of how I arrange what I see in life. Words are my only proof. Words upon words of self control. A self control that we all fail to connect to others with but use judgment. I have never fucking judged anyone in my life for who they are. Just ask anyone.

But if you cross the line between my faith in god and what stands on the other side of this. You've gone lost.

That's where you'll find me.

This is where I am in life. A 50 year old man that is wiser than he ever thought possible.

Marco's been through heart ache, through the worst near death experiences you'd never purport.

But I will die going out swinging before someone takes my wings away.


- Marco

criminal record check

 

it's not that pride should be so unimportant, people go through enough trouble trying to (a) bring you down - or - (b) bring out the worst in you. I've only ever experienced my loss of pride, due to another persons failure at it, most days. Today is one ('and counting') of those days. I truly rather not wake up.

June 4th 2010

Defections of a diffused vulgarity

re; duality / If you can compound what your other idea is telling you, what the brain does not perceive to be real - is a metacognition.

re; 'duality' / This mind over matter in the nature of duality, is an abnormality, something which you would otherwise feel if experienced.

The brain processes information to outright reject how its environment feels defective - desensitized - creating a duality in its function.

June 4th, 2013

 

Vague tricks in memory

 

secret promised (the shape)

 

Master in disguise

 'Natural as what is'

For those skeptically critcial into what is creation of new information itself, have yet to consider conscious activity as something that our own energy becomes a recursive anomalous thought. Our ideas govern how we function, the rules we follow, and theories we postulate (as being) either empirical or scientific or both. The fact that you ignore it, requires rethinking the problem. The problem is the root of it taking shape for new sources of information as we know what seeing it means. The object of what we think we know, may be completely altered from what else? It can only be a conscious model that spontaneously arises from a natural source to that effect. My point is: how do we "know" we are operating from our conscious effect in how a revelation comes into our heads? This, I think, does not require scientific evidence. It is a meditative awareness while we harness it. The spontaneity of ideas requires tremendous intelligence.

- Marco 

June 3rd 2026

○°○°°▪︎•▪︎▪︎•▪︎

You can emphasize new information.. what the majority of this generation can benefit from is the improved interpretation of information... there are several factors 

How can you know, that there is an improved or a more accurate interpretation of the data coming in through senses, at all times .. and even our own feelings

Most find out after taking steps to optimize the systems that are responsible .. the identity and interests adjust slowly as a process as they are stress conditioned 

New information is a stressor, where stress is merely an honest signal that lets us know that resources or access to them, is challenged.  The issue is something that compounds if it is left unmanaged or poorly managed. New information requires processing and therefore prompts a deman for resources..

Learning therefore is stress managing as is growing

Maturing adapting 

Transitioning 

A choice fits into most places

A decision is governor for alot of choices and therefore the demand for resources  related to transitioning the character, and resolving all of the conflicts is greater

Information is the same way the more that it challenges or interferes with stored data, the structure of thr belief system in place... the more resource is required to resolve and to balance the whole program "identity" which we experience of observe as character ..

Belief and behavioral response divided by attitude and self image

°○°○○°○•°▪︎°▪︎

My rebuttal:

William Black: I think identity and the fusion between cobscious thought's travel from the experience of one intepretation to another (perspective) as if a new set of eyes. This is shifting our ideas into what we are arguing in favor of. That new sources of information is relative to our sensation toward any object. This takes supreme intelligence.

- Marco

Non-deviant (consequential) methods of meditative critique - (June 3rd 2010)

 Explanation: (i.e. thoughts based from experience into social science) Rejection of convention in evolution of social scientific research methods. Understanding the medium of a message is not done exclusively from the realist manner of philosophy, it is to generate perspectives born strictly (i.e. to regard this as a 'choice') from meditiative learning.

I just finished writing this to an important figure in my life. I thought it is worth sharing with you (because she) inspired this from out of my soul, in asking the question, about my affluence in writing (what I do.) I think I agree, therefore, that everything I create through these thoughts emerge as sedentary lifestyle (my choices) reveal exponential power to the reader. In fact I improve the reader by empowering them, based on my foundation (method) of social scientifically driven motif.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Dare I say: challenge is to create, what social science is a power (tool) of the mind to dictate "meditative" learning, as THE measure of thought based on experience (ONLY).

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


Please read this with that background in mind. (My new found discovery as I've worked very hard to deliver new medium/message as my method to agreement. . . new found inspiration. . . new literature to inform.)

ENJOY!!:)

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

(begins. . .)

Much love and respect be on you. I am of Portuguese bloodline, both my parents are Portuguese, therefore I am pure (full blooded) Portuguese ancestry. First generation (born) out of Canadian soil. . . seeing my birthplace came in Canada. However, my devotion remains to my real homeland (Portugal). Always has, always will.

As for understanding/comprehension of my words - it is of your 'concern'. This is (my belief), that when you find hidden meaning embedded within written language, it is much different from what spoken
language does in how we communicate (language) from thoughts.

It is a matter of experience, existential writing, born out of thoughts. It is a matter of training the eye - to read the medium of the message embedded in written verse. All meaning in written language is hidden within the messages created (from authorship).

Therefore, the traditional sense of empirically motivated writing, I directly challenge with using my thoughts as method for instruction through revolutionary skills in writing. My medium is to break that pattern of convention, without resorting to previous or distinguished methods of research, to which I strictly write (speak to the reader) based on my reality (experience).

I think beliefs, all writing should be kept to challenge reality based thinking. . . this completely changes the moral spectrum from thoughts into language we communicate (from writing as a compass a passage directly evoked from 'our' minds.)

Once you connect with the mind in your realm of thought, you are born out of thoughts from experience to inform your (my) writing.

This is my (strict) method in everything I write. . . I've developed. "Strictly" born out of thoughts to challenge the medium of instruction, which social science has both literally/figuratively attained strictly through methods of research or study.

My approach is not considered conventional in social science(s), but disregarded as 'unconventional', which I completely reject.

In essence, my thoughts (everyone's thoughts) I argue, should result in resorting to directly challenge, create, into meaning of words through my revisionist sense of social science.

I call this a transparency of thought born out of "meditiative learning", which is written into a language inconsequential of social scientific methods of agreement.

Thank you for your inquisitive mind.
==============================================================

- Marco ©️🍁

The rules as rules are made

 

I think of everything as abstract, if you have an idea you hardly need justify why you gave its birth.

- Marco

===============

June 3rd 2019

 I have no idea what it is about my connection to animals is, but I know how dejected they feel when I see them being treated inhumanely. It is humans that do this, not animals.

-Marco

==============

Revelation 7.10

 

June 3rd 2024

 Looking back on it.... this is exactly what my grade 6 teacher Mrs. Quenette thought of me.

I remember this story. It's a random piece of the past but a history lesson that the scenario plays upon.

It was my first week of Jr High School. Two months prior I had left Principal Sparling elementary school. Mrs Quenette being my grade 6 teacher.

At that time, the beginning of my grade 7, was a rather overwhelming week being introduced to new classmates and teachers and an environment that wasn't familiar all added up.

My heart wasn't where I wanted it to be. I needed to reset myself and I was scared about not fitting into the Jr High vibe. Visiting Mrs. Quenette popped in my mind. I thought about paying her a visit that same early September.

So I did...

I went by myself.

I saw Mrs.Quenette.

I'll never forget what she said to me. She said, Marco, they're going to eat you alive.

I didn't know how to react to such a statement. I felt what she expressed and what she said (still is... hard wired in my brain.) I couldn't help but know at that precise moment, that what I knew - (she knew). Mrs. Quenette saw right through me. She knew I was scared. She knew I sought refuge. She knew I wanted to come back and not go back.

But I never forgot those words. What I could process at that moment - I had to. I knew what she meant. I needed to gather courage....

And away - away I went. - Marco

-==================

Genius as ethics 🍁

 Canadian health care isn't a crime. Only criminals from political parties that align along side the power elite and are consumers with wealth are trying to dismantle health care.

That's the reality. The truth is simple. ian HC doesn't discriminate.

ian HC isn't a disparaging promotedly class conscious model that power elitists try to debunk. Health care isn't a privilege it is a fundamental human right to each other. That every person deserves be alive.

Regardless of race or religion you can believe in a regulatory system to be upheld, working for human dignity. No, the system isn't there to cater to minimize your privilege, for things like wait times or spoon feeding your entitlement to decent HC.

Health Care is about respecting your place in life in accordance to someone else's needs. Health care is about tolerance for those that want what is best for everyone involved. Health Care is universal right. Dedicated to an element we all have infused in us. It's elementary.

It's elementary to a cause that should make you feel a part of a larger demographic and not split into private interests because of issues that will not relate to those with lesser privilege.

Health Care is about being reasonable with expectations relied upon reasonable government policy that caters to the concept of universal equality.

- Marco

as shapes make sense (if not blind)

 

aware as purity of reason :: causation vs corruption

 We create what we don't have

Because we're sorry it's missing,

And whatever we long to see

Is what we end up seeing.

Later, tired of that vision

Which sees only what's unreal,

We shut up all the windows

And in our souls are sealed.

Although the vision is gone

The figures that took part

Still dance, and in great number,

But only inside our heart.

June 9th 1934

Fernando Pessoa

===============

June 3rd 2024

I know what I love about poetry, and Pessoa encapsulates all of it. I know I can't be him. But if I can try to emulate even a fraction of what he offers in language... I'll be better off. I don't know what it is about him. He was so fucking far far ahead of his time. How does a genius like him happen, and go unfettered, unnoticed for his imagination of superfluous level. I know I want to create and change the world. But Pessoa is on that level. He can't be touched. He is in a league of his own. Yet it's not mainstream. The translation is lost on these terms. I've studied him and on a mainstream conscious level not even a whisper? It's unfair.

How do we NOT know when we may be in contact with genius of his obviously higher dimension. Fail to connect with it?? - Marco ===============

the value of symbolism :: contradiction and its custom [causation against corruption]

Irony contradicted as value = what is human vs what is natural I absolutely do rely on my aloneness. It is this trust in myself that has guided me up to now. To limit myself is not an option. The false intent other's have of me is contemptible but in my understanding - of myself - will never corrupt who I am or what I stand for. false intent

the personal psychology of metaphorical irony

 June 3rd 2025

Intent.  All individuals (this universal rule applies to everyone) what may be fueled by wisdom but it is not freed from irony.  Only genius marks what symbolism creates as the opposite of norms.  Unless it is found, only that type of character can cheat what (questioning death) nature represents.  Food for thought.

Do I consider myself an artist on these terms?  Yes.  Absolutely.  Otherwise, I wouldn't be.

- Marco from Winnipeg 

What makes me your equal

 

"The past is of no importance. The present is of no importance. It is

with the future that we have to deal. For the past is what men should

not have been. The present is what men ought not to be. The future is what artists are."

-- Oscar Wilde