movies 🎥

 February 7th 2009

Slumdog Millionaire - really does outlast some other candidates for this coming Oscar award ceremony. The concept is very clever. Taken - is another (action) movie well worth price of admission, Liam Nielson can really do some fight scenes.

Losing becomes you

 February 7th 2009

Weight gain is hard to deal with, you can make it happen - and if you're selfish enough it's not stupid to call upon affirmative action in theory only. In practice - this is the opposite of putting your mind to anything you accomplish.

I think it's important to mention I've been rattling upon the idea of returning to acting on no uncertain terms. As Einstein himself proclaimed, imagination is more important than knowledge. I think what Albert deduced from that, was in reference to a power struggle, whence in the idea of knowledge has since been associated with the 'knowledge is power' really does not justify. A person's right to pursue anything should out weigh the paradigm for power dynamic in life. Which in the world of acting, is a very real thing to find purpose to. Yet, even in my demise - I Realize blaming others is not my interest to convey, rather it is a challenge to learn from what I must obey otherwise. There are no rules to acting, only survival within the story which skill may not require.

More astounding to me is the level of complicity - the nature of this kind of awareness is a type where false beliefs are your enemy.

If there exists faith - trust - and virtue, it is only matched by caring, sharing and grief.

revive = furthest point of resolve.
enigmatic = to return from the depth of one's isolation
amoral = often done in confusion as ethical in practice; it is a person(s) failure to acknowledge ones elicit guilt or shame, this inevitably leads oneself to a false sense of hope, complicit behavior, and alienation.

---

 I am going to prove to you - that you are using logic against yourself.

Therefore, I am going to use logic (critical thinking skills).

Logic is against you.

 

----------------

End Game (my second part re; inflation is an invention)

February 7th 2014

Jump

The cause of inflation is based on the amount of supply and demand not exceeding the demand which increases the price of goods, therefore costs more to produce monetarily - as result - the higher the supply without demand weakens the value of a dollar. The less being distributed through the economy, the dollar decreases in value. So, the more debt on the dollar affects the production of goods and services due to a weakened currency. The government creates this debt ergo monetary sum so it has the power to buy off the debt incurred due to inflation. The debt is sold to the banks in the form of bonds, which the banks then sell back to the government at a premium x interest. This creates money which the banks issue as currency, currency is to be kept afloat guaranteeing inflation is covered by the government. The government has an infinite checking account so its purchasing power is against the consumer and keeps the economy moving.

In corrupted communist countries the agenda to buy and sell is reduced exclusively to the title of wealth.

=============

Luke 6:35

 This is the most misunderstood most profoundly confounded view allotted from the Bible. If it is decidedly considered in its proper form, peace would be a reality avoiding contradicting warfare. - Marco

===========

 Andrei Tarkovsky

Cinema 🎦

Andrei Tarkovsky

Duration

February 7th 2013

I have never felt so dejected as on this night, of which clued into my own life. It is this time I have since realized remains symbolic of me.

I do not know when it all started, what I can suggest is this: that through my self interest, provides me dissatisfaction.

It all happened in a circle, where I see the equivalent of Beavus and Butthead, what in the 90's were abnormal looking caricatures named as the characters. It is rather disheartening to be witness to such flagrant stupidity. That cure in my mind, to be adept in the art of reasoning which is chocolate or chocolate milk - because neither tastes the same as the other. After some deliberation, one of the cartoons insist that chocolate milk is the correct answer.
The problem is, what do we know is the taste of chocolate milk. All we know is the consistency of the flavor has its expiration date, to which it is no longer valid. So, the great trouble in solving this puzzle, never really had a fair examination.

This is where I encountered a person, that this person forbid the use of its name neither 'him' or 'her' - just a person of no equal or lesser importance.

The next person requires description as a monopoly figure; not the kind of thing you pay attention to everyday.

Through this emotional containment, there is a projection involving no real source of words, just a reality present, where the kind of things that you think about are never real.

This is where I discovered how bad I feel about myself. That through the course of this dilemma, the most unnatural of paranoia, its been said, I have brought something to life much louder than the eye can see. There is a place, where I sense prevalent or profound, its manner that no one else feels where a sacred seed has been planted.

This is to allow the forgiving nature of anything less than its kind. That is the only rule.

All this follows is one simple question: can you think of the one thing that possess courage over you. If you answer that correctly, you have made it a greater sacrifice of yourself.

==========

The moral of this is in my next source of words these ideas create, as they manifest over time.

=============

How much courage must you possess, to truly allow another person to hold you safely in their arms. Is there such a thought that crossed your mind, if even at random. Does that same person attract you whole hearted. If you open your eyes, you will see the amount of it in shatters. If you seek it in your heart, you will feel the empathy it takes, that resonates. If you radiate honesty.

Those are skills of the heart, against darker forces of nature.
I have lived to see the kind of things most do not attempt to. Can you search for the truth, in its most vulnerable state. How do you know it. Why did you.

===================

I really like this definition of a "Growth Fostering Relationship"- One in which empathy is experienced freely and without shame; a relationship in which two individuals are growing and developing together. It is also one in which there is mutuality. This does not mean a balance of power, but rather a commitment by both parties to be impacted by one another (Jordan, 1991)

============

Marco Almeida

I have no idea what should that mean, as I feel, I am an open book when it comes to such ideology. The point that needs to be made (which is not addressed) is that people driven with such motives do not exist. If they do exist, they are hardly aware of it. It is a qualitative view of life in terms of being found if at all. There is a lot left to be desired in what truly acts as sacred. People fake this notion of reality. Therefore, they are good at faking it, conveniently put themselves into that situation pretend as if it happens.

To find a person with such powerful insight is a rarity to combine it with less than superficial values. What that tells you, is people abandon the thought of truly selfless cause, more often retreat from it.

==================

I have known this all along. There is no greater truth that people fail to live.

"Don't aim at success. The more you aim at it and make it a target, the more you are going to miss it. For success, like happiness, cannot be pursued; it must ensue, and it only does so as the unintended side effect of one's personal dedication to a cause greater than oneself or as the by-product of one's surrender to a person other than oneself. Happiness must happen, and the same holds for success: you have to let it happen by not caring about it. I want you to listen to what your conscience commands you to do and go on to carry it out to the best of your knowledge. Then you will live to see that in the long-run—in the long-run, I say!—success will follow you precisely because you had forgotten to think about it." ― [Viktor E. Frankl]

======================

1- Through this emotional containment, there is a (a) projection involving no real source of words, (b) just a reality present, (c) where the kind of things that you think about are never real.

2- The moral of this is in my next source of words these ideas create, as they manifest over time.

3- If you radiate honesty.

^All of this is existential. If you can radiate honesty, your nature of morality manifest over time. Then, revert yourself through a-b-c.

===================

I dedicate this entry to my sister, Marta Vodrey. And my family in Vancouver.

 February 13th 2013

I understand not everyone has to think the same as I do, what I cannot accept is that my epistemology is rejected on no uncertain terms. This is what separates me from people that generalize everything in life, when it is a critical amount of forethought that is required, displacing those values. - Marco

I love the way people dismiss me that at times, they judge you based not on what you feel, but how you think, then pretend not to exist so to act as if they have. - Marco

This describes the notion of life long hypocrites.^

Freedom in ethics according to Spinoza

 Most accurate definition for freedom i have come across. What is freedom, defined.

- Marco

=============

 “To be rooted is perhaps the most important and least recognized need of the human soul.”

–Simone Weil

°○○•••••

Being rooted is the first and the all of what is.  Philosphy itself stems for 'root' = cause.

- Marco

consummatum est

 Hamlet essay on revenge

"when he refuses to “seem,” when he turns language into irony and excess, he rejects the entire grammar of political authority in general"

I live my life this way what is illustrated in the quote above as shown.

From this it would appear that we all have some form of identity crisis. Life may keep hidden underneath the surreptitiously unknown purview for ourselves. That is to say: Hamlet is a genuine genius. He operates from the core of his passions. No one is the wiser. Otherwise, why would we care about the story if at all.

Ultimately, our own understanding of the common good (commonality) of an identity crisis, would not yield the same results. Because, let's face it, if Hamlet by today's regulated day and age of measured response, the narrative would be lost on Shakespeare's audience. The triviality or purpose would undermine logically taking medication, seeking psychiatric help, and the audience would only be wondering where is Hamlet? (Not coinciding with his lost cause.) Not that revenge is a 'lost cause'. Revenge itself is the aristocratic rule the play itself demonstrates as cause. The defiance being that (as I mentioned on the onset of this) that genius rises above the cause of law to protect.

In reality, the same Hamlet cannot be realized.

The context of an identity crisis, philosophically = cause for suicidal ideation. We can say Hamlet went mad, turned astray, and in today's day and age made headlines.

Food for thought.

- Marco

Hi - plato

February 6th 2011

Because your metaphysical implications denote mental embodiment of a future reclaiming to ourselves, there are a few things worth mentioning here.

First offering a story about how much we own you since then.

The time material implication arose out of nothing, came soon after Aristotle, before he made you even more famous using his model of reason.

Now that we are able, we can rethink much more clearly upon the factuality of which we know them.

Perhaps one day you will find the truth in all of this.

Pure reason can only tell one thing: that one thing from itself (irregularity) cannot apply your wisdom lack thereof.

Finally, and without noticing simply just how feable minded you are, all those things that surround you in place of freedom surrendering to your cave, you retreated. You called them figments of your imagination. Therefore, persecution was always has and always will be.

You forgot one thing, plato.

That the future holds your lies.

That lawyers are idiots too.

That judges confuse logic, by twisting her own mind.

And then we have it - anamoly of your toothless aims.

How about a syllogism that Aristotle wanted (probably) inspired in spite of himself.

You are an arse.
If you are an arse, therefore 'a'.
Therefore, you are an arse.

I made that up myself.

The minute it all came crashing down on you.

Everything eventually fell right back into place, again, then - came the obvious choice.

To feel how troubled, or insipid the nature of a duality.

We refer to it as fiction since your work.

Oh how the wicked will fall in line, how true - how very ruthless of you.

Now Plato - it is mine.

All mine.

hahahahaha

===============

To think that this guy actually wrote the story of Euthyphro as an underlying current, to resurrect Plato, in light of being a character more ruthless he could search for truth unwillingly? Euthyphro proves the fucking idiot Plato was, still is, way before he milked it to undermine the world which we now live in.

That bastard fuck.

------------------------------

And really this is just to teach people, spineless are not thoughts, they are words which that fucker himself would readily dismiss, would readily impose, would readily inflate his ego with. Without whichever method you take.

-----------------------------

And for those of us that care about analogous (analogy) situation, when saying, Plato sought revenge against Socrates (revenge) is double jeopardy. To suggest the nature subject to law, should impose or implement, the very core of philosophy are false ideals (which no one realized until today placed Plato further ahead of his time - putting standard of information in place of truth.)

Socrates had it right the whole time.

Yet - Plato had superimposed the nature of the will as Socrates suicidal state, when the true unspoiled nature of law, became completely blurred in the process of dichotomy from pure reason itself.

To suggest Plato ¤ had (for this example:) examined the law based on a philosophy of deceit or impartiality, is nothing less than an understatement. It is more about providing the same criminal to his double, with ingrate lawyers - legally procuring war, fascism, genocide, all for the wrongfully accused purpose of providing such criminal activity with state intervention.

The same can be said of a persons experience with taking hostage, what we are blind to, others (of course) taken for granted. The same can be said for Socrates - wrongfully taking the hemlock disposing the poison in himself as a suicidal truth claim. In effect, the same can be said, it took the law to rape you, with the intention of a lie (refute nobility of law) now replace it with noble freedom. The noble lie Plato had taught, defends a hostage taking, a rapist, and corruption against malpractice lawyers.

================

And if Plato were himself not to confess, purge¤ or alter the purpose of his own intention, requires no intervention whatsoever. Only inquisition on the merit of strict obligation; to inquire a false intention of lawyers deception, control or manipulation of the laws.

A judge once thought she was so brilliant, she told me I should stop acting too cute for her to like me. Imagine that.

==================

That idiot actually wanted me to perceive knowledge (my) as a threat. Talk about moral cowardice, Pascal was absolutely right on the money (fucking unbelievable).

=====================

Socrates knew the entire time, he died unwittingly through using pure logic, he knew, that fucker knew the Jekyll and Hyde routine would not allow Plato's escape plan.

===============

Double jeopardy in point form.^

==================

^The entire scripture above as annotated...

© Marco Almeida 2011

How do we make the mind see :: Krishnamurti

How does the mind see - Krishnamurti 

The mental abortion of psychic hero :: abandonment as if orphaned

 Wrote this just now thinking about (what I think,) being an artist means to me in the long run. This follows: as somewhat of my personal mission statement.

°●•○○°●•●○○

Normalcy is about evading our true emotion for what we don't really feel, rather than go through a process of learning, something - instead... we internalize, edit the truth, then we act in accordance to rule based behavior. We are content in psychologically killing ourselves. Also, this is in reality is the price we pay in exchange for a fake experience. (We act on superstition out of a fear based response, that we are being judged.) Your inner life is suppressed forever. So the roles we mask ourselves as is the consequence of being a psychological slave, rather than a servant to: an endless beginning.

Marco Almeida 2025

- The Peg

tear-drops in careful application

 February 5th 2010

Cnd pm S.Harper:

"I think it also says something about the character. Hockey is a fast, aggressive, tough sport and that's an important part of the Canadian psychology and history. It's sometimes forgotten because Canadians are thought of as peace-loving and fair-minded and pleasant -- which I think we are -- but that's not inconsistent with tough and aggressive and ambitious, which is also part of the national character."

I have never been one to debase myself, around the notion, of a need to know basis.

I suppose that can be true of juxtaposition, when sitting right there hovering above, is a visceral view -
of an impersonable type.

It strike's me as totally odd, because such verbiage suggests, that I may or may not see thing's the same way. I think therefore I am - so to speak.

When I look at my Cnd. psyche, I have to admit, Harper actually inspired me for the first time on such a subjective visceral view of himself.

When I think of peace-loving, or fair-minded, pleasant, I presume it means I am subject to those thing's in return - even when they are not - is the question, is the same, is the answer - I search.

More often than not, I rarely do receive the same answer.

So, in Harper's world-view of Cnd's, pre-olympic satire, I choose not to answer to what is tough, what is aggression, what is ambition. As a matter of fact, it makes us who we are, it is part of our distinct character - a national identity - which also can be characterized as though us as nationalist's. (That is what I would presume.)

Again, we are faced with a mini-crisis, where aggression, toughness, ambition, equate to satisfying the status quo. Us as Cnd. must seek such status, us identify with, outmuscling our opponent's if interfered with (tough), or strength in reform as assertive (aggression), or capitalist virtue of decisive not so much constructive (ambition).

These are thing's which all remind me of a chicken coup, trapped, obsessed before it's time. I certainly hold nothing against pm Harper, why should I.

When - I've seen people singing with Ronald Regan, or Yo-YoMa, I think to myself - this won't be the last we see people singing to the same tune, of artillery being made, so to provide arsenal in the hand's of it's insurgent's, classify a war. It's not odd to think about that for me either. I mean - we've done it as the 51st state for a very long time, so why not celebrate it altogether.

==============

I consider this to be a moral hypothesis of my own variety. That is to say it acts as a hybrid mentality or lack therof hijinx. Greed + silence do not mix very well together.

==============

SOMEONE GIVE ME A BADGE NOW - OR I AM ALL WARNING YOU - I WILL CONTACT STEPHEN HARPER!oL

The existential romantic (a letter to 'R.')

 February 5th 2013

Dear R.,

 

I respected you always - because you are a model personality.  I have always felt grateful toward knowing you, which I cannot say about just anyone.  I will always have your back.  Through all this time, I have grown to see a lot that helps explain how unimportant certain things are as people think of themselves.  I never quite knew you would be someone I would admire this way.  Most people would dismiss what you read-here as 'kind' in words, when in reality they are unaware their insecurities prevent them from seeing how pure adrenaline is true to ones decrease in irrationality.  (Ask yourself what is rational, then ask how it challenges the conventional needs to increase their motives.) = That is a skewed version of what reality truly represents only we are semiconscious of it. In other words, what this informs me of - of people that I once knew no longer exist to me - as what I believe my right of passage examines.  They have forgotten who they are because they have sold out.  That is the world we are living in today.

 

The generation we have grown in are completely unaware of it.

 

Best regards,

 

The Big Canadiano

===============

“Whenever a man does a thoroughly stupid thing, it is always from the noblest motives.”

-- Oscar Wilde

"The reason we all like to think so well of others is that we are all afraid for ourselves. The basis of optimism is sheer terror."

-- Oscar Wilde

==================

"The only way to get rid of a temptation is to yield to it. Resist it, and your soul grows sick with longing for the things it has forbidden to itself."

-- from The Picture of Dorian Gray by Oscar Wilde

"Goals are not only absolutely necessary to motivate us. They are essential to really keep us alive." - Robert Schuller

===================

Sometimes, almost foolishly, what lives in the universe somehow tricks the mind as though the world is set against you, that is when you realize the ability you have to semi-power it. (Semi-power= energy.)

================

“I believe that you're great, that there's something magnificent about you. Regardless of what has happened to you in your life, regardless of how young or how old you think you might be, the moment you begin to think properly, there's something that is within you, there's power within you, that's greater than the world. It will begin to emerge. It will take over your life. It will feed you. It will clothe you. It will guide you, protect you, direct you, sustain your very existence, if you let it. Now, that is what I know for sure.”

- Michael Bernard Beckwith

================

"We have to go for what we think we're fully capable of, not limit ourselves by what we've been in the past." - Vivek Paul

"He who is not everyday conquering some fear has not learned the secret of life." - Ralph Waldo Emerson

===============

R.'s identity is that my idea of Republic, Romance, Rationality (a renewed version of how to reform beliefs.)

==============

"That is a skewed version of what reality truly represents only we are semiconscious of it. In other words, what this informs me of - of people that I once knew no longer exist to me - as what I believe my right of passage examines." (MA2013)

^That is a true definition of knowledge via Socrates.