Negation and dissent

You interpret consciousness as appearing in bodies and in the world. I interpret bodies and the world as appearing in consciousness. Why should your interpretation of the evidence be preferred over mine?

●°○°○°○°

 I have to say, I initially thought he had an argument refuting yours as false dichotomy.  But failed.  

Your original argument does represent two sides, vague enough to equal each other. Therefore, I see tautology.

"You interpret consciousness as appearing in bodies and in the world. I interpret bodies and the world as appearing in consciousness. Why should your interpretation of the evidence be preferred over mine?"

°○●••○●●○•

My debunking of your representation of your argument, sees ²equal parts.  My refutation is if interpretation is expressively prohibited, I would have agency without knowing what is consciousness.  How do we know? How do we claim consciousness.  I think this is a fair example given my counter argument.

°●●○○○○

My reason for suggesting tautology, is simple that refining your idea - interpretation justifies as cause for what we think of as consciousness.  My point here is, I agree with it. Why? Because consciousness can be seen as you have stated, in bodies and the world.  Interpretation appears in consciousness and consciousness appears in our renunciation of it. Hopefully you will understand what I have postulated, theoretically surmise consciousness in the body can be interpeted in ideas consciousness creates.

- Marco

Habit produces disorder | J. Krishnamurti

Habit produces disorder | J. Krishnamurti 

Is there an action not based on thought? | J. Krishnamurti

the Man he cannot plagiarize

 

Behaving mannerly leads you to nowhere, it is only in misbehavior that you learn to trust your inhibition and what your intuition tells you.

- Marco

hidden secret in acting

 

July 4, 2013 at 2:04pm

"I look at 'beats' in the scene as coded signals given between two opposing forces NOT cynical of their environment but to feel shifts within it. (Opposing forces are the actors that may experience a polarizing sense of power, conformity, alienation or complicit style of acting. This concerns a type of coercion, or complacency the actor must always be present in their awareness.)" (Marco Almeida)

Plain and simple: actors make a habit of debunking or negating the others acting choices.

June 24, 2014

MA

===============

salvation in desensitizing Plutocracy

 

The false linguist

At what point does information become experience ?

 All information is - is our sensory experience put into action. (i.e. the action of interpretation) To live as in metanarrative are the things that put you in sensory experience. What I think is of a property value in everything I see. I assess, and in my assessment there is a sensation which I translate as I go. So, in return, I equalize this as a means to an end. This is why I am a philosopher. That in this process, my language acts as the information of sensations I experience in real time. And information travels as the source of my ideas. These ideas are words that my use of language, in its style and syntax create. So as a philosopher of experience (e.g. wisdom) I record using my poetics.

This is self mastery. And information is found in the experiencer ("the me") with relation to how I present my trained mind. Theoretically speaking, I have trained this unitarily as my sensory experience. Where the eye meets the world through its own interpretation of me. "The me" - out of my control. Which circles back to being authentic as opposite of not being predictable.

So yes - I predicate the self in relation to sensory experience as something that negates the predictable with something else that the experience creates. This is a higher state of mind, in my view. My point here is if you are not creating something new to the world, why are you doing philosophy if it's not? This infers critical thought, logical reasoning, and language (information) itself.

- Marco

No one is self made (?)

 No one is self made

Contradiction negating value~ Wittgenstein

 

==============

This is my mind is both a brilliant yet a conflicting statement....

In the world everything is as it is and happens as it does happen. In it, there is no value, - and if there were, it would be of no value. Ludwig Wittgenstein.

1 John 2:15-17

 

=================

Another way of learning | J. Krishnamurti

 Another way of learning | J. Krishnamurti

There is a time interval between the idea and the action.  That is, there is, the ideal - and you are trying to put that ideal into action, so there is a gap between the principle, the ideal, the belief, and the actuality. 

Right?

Now, we are saying - the interval of time ⌚ between the ideal and action is non existent. 

================

A mind free to look ~ Krishnamurti

==================

The dying is the living | Krishnamurti

dark psychology? Machiavellian

 Self respecting principles 

I want to believe this is bs before thinking I blindly accept these so called laws. Anyone that says otherwise need to reevaluate themselves. - Marco

Machiavelli 

=====================

energy of it all = metaphysics 

 

🇨🇦 sovereignty

 

Acting in principle

 

 

I'm no fake

 

I rather talk-tough = mean it. . . than to be confronted by someone who acts tough who has no idea whatsoever.

Pride

 

Be what you are. This is the first step toward becoming better than you are. August W. Hare

June 20th 2022

 

I hate the feeling when I get my intelligence insulted due in the event I am being tested or screened base on the where I center on that other person's radar. I really don't know why it just bothers me to no end. I intuitively pick up on the ideological signals taking place and yet someone is setting up to be the victim of their personal judgment toward you. I can sniff such assholery out from their foxhole from the moment it happens. But the best part is another thing altogether remained unscathed.

My question is one portraying that person on the first part being immoral to me on the second part per se.

Every bit of my journey throughout life has met the risk of being undermined. Everybody does.

My purpose as philosopher is to identify the stereotypes associated with those that fit the profile.

With this in mind I find it parable to place my head above the water and this helps manifest the dichotomies that form a razor thin margin to help continue on my path to relative unknowns.

- Marco

 I have never thought of my body. The body. Something that is seperated from the mind Whereas the human experience is not within my grasp. If nothing else is worth knowing. Conceptially, being my body vs being itself- the conscious self - is a higher state of knowing. To infer what is a speaker in my body using this (my) flesh and blood as a deposit. This awarenss is not separated as in mind vs body. But the reason we exist? I feel almost embarrassed to say it. That this reason we exist, is without realizing how lucky we are. The fact is we don't know. It is in knowing that we don't. That makes for what is beautifully made. That there are no rules to be found, why we are just a body, that formed from the womb. If it is not divine in nature. Then my thoughts on this are false. Falsely put it.  

○°○•●•●

That is all it can be. (Falsely put.) That our awareness is as ancient as the symbols we ignore in time. Which throughtout history, time is a sign that we ignore certain elements that make up what is made of just our bodies. Nothing else?

°•○●○•°•○

The negation of our minds. That is what puts me here. That is what fascinating it is to think, my body is my spiritual self in human form. That without the soul, the body is nothing. There is that is nothing. That there is nothing to hold up the spine. A soul. A.souless spineless life in skeletal form. Just bones.  

Think abour that. I do.  

°°•●○••  

I know I have been searching for a greater part of me. And i will never stop searching. Because to stop searching is to concede curiosities. The faculty of what is in my body. What holds me up is not the skeleton. It is the power of my self itself. The human body is the soul stored in flesh and blood wrapped with skin and traced in spiritual form. My body takes shape, the shape of an awareness we have no control over.  

°°•○○••°

- Marco

if not true

 “Since ancient times, the left side has stood for the side of the unconscious or the unknown; the right side, by contrast, has represented the side of consciousness or wakefulness. Through the late twentieth century, the movement of the Left limited themselves to a materialist understanding of reality -exemplified by Marxism- demanding social justice and economic equality but not the restoration of intuition and the recognition of the hidden, qualitative dimensions of being suppressed by the mental-rational consciousness, narrowly focused on the quantifiable.”

–Jean Gebser

June 19th 2024 the ethics of Marco Almeida

 There is something about me. When I feel wronged. I always almost always make myself to blame. It goes without thinking. I don’t know why this is. I do know where it has taken me. I know I am a sensitive person - it is not out of character for me if you know me better.  

But to further this self examination, it boggles my mind how much hurt I've been through. 

In return from such a realization, it comes from a place of repentance. That people who blame themselves before placing that same type of judgment onto others, are people of god. This means you look out for others, putting their needs before your own.

It's about feeling disappointed but on a human level, most won't understand.

What I can say of me is that it makes me a good person, not - not that it makes me better than others. It simply means that when you connect the dots, you know what good vs evil looks like. And consequently there are those who perversely take advantage of that in spite of you.

In conslusion, there are people in my history. Some I loved dearly that completely shattered my personal perception of myself, my well being, and only misunderstood me for what I can now say had nothing to do with me. It was about me blaming only myself.  

It can be lonely.

- Marco

°•●●○○••••

The paradoxical nature between God and man is the very fabric of philosophy. Therefore, theology is philosophy with a general assignment of those variables. The truth is not theological. Only the question of God is philosophical and unknowable. Which creates our own dialogue.

°●○°○°○°○°○°○°○

June 20th 2026

I don't know about that.  A pure metaphysical standpoint, from which all things derive thenselves as is, does not physically represent an apriori discerned representation of MY REALITY.

°○°○°●°●°

 So what your argument says, is interesting to me.

°●°○°○°●° 

My point being that my personal affirmations (i.e. thoughts) that I hold myself to.  Are they merely dogmas of some type.  How do you know I am acting on my metaphysical representation of my relationship to the physical experience. Which to your point: would make my own sensory experience - obsolete?  °•●•°°

If in which case you don't see my contradiction as constructive of your idea.  Then, please refrain from a thoughtless response to me.

Thanks for your insight, regardless.

- Marco