Coping as courage

 

=============

===================

Marco Almeida

 ·

not speaking to anyone in particular herein, but rarely do I quote anyone - if ever. . . What this means, my substance are usually written as formality toward all observable phenomenon, of which I had no apriori knowledge from another thing, such is Aristotelian logic. It is strictly a matter of experience, divorced from predictable outcomes.

What I cared to illustrate, was my reference of how people either elect, enforce, or are unspecific to reality. In the similar sense, our abnormalities or abstractions which become a part of greater internal perversions most live unaware to. I argue that people corrupt themselves in favor of their own attrition. Therefore, freedom is a lie with only consequential outcomes, or thought of in terms of a psychological nature. That the minute you sense betrayal or something familiar to an end beyond control, we excuse ourselves of such impunity.

On a scale of contrition, however, what we've included in our "human nature" as a species, is a how-to manual, from which mankind's idea of assimilation has completely dismantled conceptualized freedom, as if some kind of inherent right within all living creatures. . . which can only (falsely) be realized from a critical hegemoniz-a-tive stand point.

This furthers my own found belief system.

That not only can one read this to be, five to six times ahead of our present dichotomy as stated herein^. . . though relatively speaking.

The same can be adopted with Darwinian logic, that the cast-iron history we've undertaken through the course of ancient civilizations, based on appeals to authority, such as the Ottoman, Catholic Empire, Constantinople, . . .all can be switched on or off as in a molecular level such as Darwin' origin of the species. This now proves to be that evolution (not god's "switch") completely models our failure as a species.

============

And to be certain - my father is the most influential, honest to goodness human being I know.

Aphiemi

aphiemi 

Do not command the feeling; command the release.

freedom from the observed

 "As long as you are attempting to become something, as long as you are possessed by something, there will inevitably be conflict, confusion, and increasing misery. Your activities, your thoughts, the very structure of your existence are based on conflict and confusion, and therefore on the process of disintegration.

As long as you are unwilling to be nothing—which, in fact, you are—you must inevitably breed sorrow and antagonism. The willingness to be nothing is not a matter of renunciation or of enforcement, inner or outer, but of seeing the truth of what is. Seeing the truth of what is brings freedom from the fear of insecurity—the fear that breeds attachment and leads to the illusion of detachment."

— Krishnamurti

Commentaries on Living, Series I

My rebuttal:

Krishnamurti HAS to be talking about a duality. It HAS to be the cause. The case he made for being nothing vs attachment. The terms in favor of his argument as supposition are not mutually exclusive. This is undeniable.

" Seeing the truth of what is brings freedom from the fear of insecurity—"

Krishnamurti applies that nothingness is an operative element. (i.e. being nothing = truth and awareness for this itself is why we are free) Whereas attachment devalues or disintegrates one's wholeness of thought and pervades the experiencer's survival informing fear from attachment.

My own understanding is into how disambiguation frees the mind from attachment, only because in terms of being nothing (fear evaporates) do we act.

- Marco 

the poet is dead

 

form in truth and identity

 

Dark psychology encounters a surreal amount of compromise when it comes to what is acting between two opposing forces. The darker the depth of one's psychological failure if they are taken as 'soft' to form an event horizon, or if compared it to appeal another has as a social deviant alpha type. What do I mean by 'dark' and how this associates with our psychology is in a word: awareness. The capability to be defiant and at the same time spy on itself for the same idea. (Is my use of the term: awareness.) To spy onto a manner of thought about what is it another maybe thinking, although you have an understanding of the experience but may not be in aggrievance in its observation. Some misapply this awareness into meta cognition as a mistake for thinking about thinking, or perhaps a duality into thinking about 2 opposites which act in contradiction to the other. Neither are true.

The effect I am talking about is the dark psychology around what governs or dictates norms in our behavior if not attune to the natural environment. What in terms of manipulators use.

To present the term awareness together with what we observe is - is the experiencer. (i.e. cause) To cause awareness (awareness that acts as primordial or 'basic') is not the same thing as being an advocate to something else as a greater cause. You act to create. In order to create, you act greater to a cause. Think about that: you have acted greater to a cause. Think about that yet another way: [1] awareness as something TO a greater cause vs [2] acting greater TO a cause. In one case you are influenced. The other you have acted without being manipulated (e.g. influenced). It's that simple.

Awareness = greater cause vs acting greater (dichotomy)

The dark psychology I mentioned earlier has exactly to do with the dichotomy. The brain is acting on which is which. It's that simple.

Note; I don't believe there is an answerable question to this. The point I am making is to find irony and present yourself in the paradox. We are acting in the form of this element. To find the paradox between it: awareness and its cause. What informs your mind? Do you assess it with the information; given to you. Does the feedback you give it cause your awareness. What provides you not speaking of this as awareness - without your attention to awareness having caused it. What causes the mind to interfere with the thoughts you never originally had?

My reason for this dissertation is that I am not a soft individual; I serve myself soft. Everything that kills me from the outside are forces that move, is out of my control.

This is Socratic wisdom at work.

Be whatever you want to.

But don't expect anything from me.

- Marco

 Total and utter bullshit. If I can not tolerate the self, the idea of the id, my egocentric self. Then what good is tolerance. What does it serve. My point being that without knowing what my tolerance is - also for. There are norms which my ethical tolerant self only will defend. This is to say there are forces at work in favoring a tolerant (psychological) end in attitude tolerance itself rewards.

To think of tolerance keeps to my beliefs. Therefore, tolerance (its foundation) is connected with relation to recognize my personal intolerance, which increases the odds for my survival. Tolerance in this argument represent universal models in the name of crisis arising, where tolerance acts, intolerance reveals the truth. If my tolerance is tested (for naming truth) as in failing that idea of truth gets rejected, a crisis emerges as sign from which to act. You keep the foundation for tolerance as the bridge to your rational self.

○°○°○°

Marco ©️ 2026

○°○°○°○°●°

 

ADHD characteristics

 

God as energy

 "I don't quite understand how there can be seriousness unless one is serious about something," he replied. " I think I see what you mean," said his companion. "I want to find God, and it is important for me to find Him, otherwise life has no meaning; it's only a bewildering chaos, full of misery. I can understand life only through God, who is the end and the beginning of all things; He alone can guide me in this welter of contradictions, and that's why I am serious about finding Him. But you are asking, is this seriousness at all?"⁠

⁠

Yes. The understanding of living, with all its complications, is one thing, and the search for God is another. In saying that God, the ultimate end, will give meaning to life, you have brought into being - haven't you? - two opposing states: living, and God. You are struggling to find something away from life. You are serious about achieving a goal, an end, which you call God; and is that seriousness? perhaps there is no such thing as finding God first, and then living; it may be that God is to be found in the very understanding of this complex process called life.⁠

⁠

⁠

J. Krishnamurti⁠

Series III - Chapter 44 - 'What Does It Mean To Be Serious?'⁠

⁠

Commentaries on Living⁠

============

The Holy Spirit produces nine specific attributes in a person's life who is connected to Christ.

My defense that Oscar Wilde is my protege

 "In all unimportant matters, style, not sincerity, is the essential. In all important matters, style, not sincerity, is the essential." - Oscar Wilde 

=========

Oscar Wilde is my protege, he singlehandedly became the man I want to be, an artist, philosopher, writer.  Therefore, he protects my interests, because he put his interests in place, and I put his interests in place of my own.  (It is impossible to put my interests in his place, which would make me his protege.) Since I care to represent what path he created, makes him my protege - of the path I want to take.

=========

I use the same type of thinking. . . with names like Fernando Pessoa, Jose Saramago, Socrates, all of these men.

=========

I am quite satisfied with the kind of artist I always wanted to become, a writer, a philosopher - this is what I aimed for in my life.

=========

Love has deprived me my ability to master the art of being human in its unromantic environment, hard to please, and never failing.

=========

1. No matter how hard you try - you will not provoke me into a fight.  No matter how jealous you are.
2. No matter how much you want to hurt me - I am not scared of being hurt.
3. No matter how weak or vulnerable empower yourself to be more than you think of it.

=========

Winnipeg is full of nobodies with integrity and take pride in that.  Fail.

=========

I on the other hand have integrity because I am somebody that makes your life more than it actually is. 

==============

Marco Almeida

 ·

It is to a man's honor to avoid strife, but every fool is quick to quarrel. -Proverbs 20:3

My command is this: Love each other as I have loved you. -John 15:12

Marco Almeida

 ·

The key to success is for you to make a habit throughout your life of doing the things you fear. - Vincent Van Gogh

Proofs as to why I cannot be considered as Oscar Wilde's protege: (notes)

How can anyone be someone else's protege unless that same objective is not carried out from the opposite source. You cannot be another persons protege unless you know that they adopt your interests the same way you do.

I cannot say I am Oscar Wilde, I can only say that I want to be like Oscar Wilde. Therefore, this does not make me his protege.

Oscar Wilde cannot possibly know I adopt the same interests that he does. Therefore, because I want to emulate him my own way, is to be honored.

advantage into weakness

 

The meaning behind everything I write, is a language of it's own. Whether or not it is understood or not is not up to me. It is to be learned.

Therefore, my own inhibitions rest on a grave of ideas, that may or may not benefit the masses. What I care about is myself as an existential being. If you train your eye to read something enough times, you will begin to learn it. It's like anything new to you, then it becomes what you train your eye to decipher.

Everything I write infers to the laws of OF ONE'S OWN dialectic, trained thoughts, verbalized into being.

The only people I write to are myself, and myself as the other.

If you cannot have a conversation with yourself about anything in the universe, as it commands you, you are not doing the world any favors either. To know yourself, then becoming a language that is your own.

Furthermore, I know what the fuck I'm talking about. I see people in real life who label me. I don't give two fucks what people think anymore. I know better than to take advice from dimwitted wannabe's.

Philosophy to the trained eye is simple, equated, with having a conversation, with yourself, then confidence to make-believe my own imagination can transform the world, strictly based on principles of thought alone. That is my idea of philosophy.

Thank you. Good night.

====================

"Fear is to want, what hope there not is. This is what in principle a martyr does. To instill fear into want, want what hatred does not hope. A martyr is a false witness to the cause of freedom in everything. They want the mercy, they want the glory, they want what everybody else knowing is not their own."

1- In the context of martyrdom, such reason should suggest, a dead proof. That is to say, what (a) "fear is to want" = is the martyr's intention. This follows (b) if fear is to want something then (c) comes only in light of what SOMEONE ELSE wants. What the martyr wants always acts as the conditional. Which we are self-explaining is a false ideal.

If a then b.

Then b.

Therefore a not b.

2- In the context of martyrdom, (a) "Fear is to want" then (b) "what hope there not is."

'a followed b', which is, 'b' as undefined.

Let's answer (b) "what hope there not is."

Therefore, "what hope there not is." is a result of a martyr's belief. That one thing cannot want something out of hope, because the martyr has already decided for you. To want anything is false hope, to you, the end result is your freedom being taken.

In the context of martyrdom basing your fear is to want something in return - therefore, the martyr acts as a means, "you should fear it rather than stand up to it." The martyr wants to take away your right to want anything. To falsify your hope.

In this sense we live in a martyr less-than-kind based society which can only become unconsciously acceptable. It is a breach of trust, that should a martyr be untruthful as they are toward the will of the many, (i.e. the will of the many) shall only depend upon the will of: disparaging unconscionable rights of the martyr. Such civil discord would cause dissidence.

Therefore, the right to freedom is inalienable on no condition or terms of agreement. Then, "what hope there not is." represents the embodiment of a martyrs will to diminish your hope. You cannot want something in return of a favor, so long you depend ONLY on what a martyr wants for you. You have ceased to "hope", to "exist", to "want" anything. Your responsibility has been taken for granted of you. You must obey the martyr's commandeering riffle, or you will be faced with consequences unknown to you, hatred would be instilled you from the martyr. "You cannot hate me." - Martyr's intentional psychology to reverse roles.

==============

=====================

Signs in Departing

 

Prince 🎸

 Prince, man. Prince.