To suggest that I conspire (against) myself, so in doing ones own accusation, my response is supposed to then reflect itself back on a whim. As if my ability is of defect only in part to deficient meaning, my intellect, or my spurning arousal. . . is quite simply ridiculous.
-Marco
I never caused a minority or second class citizen, to see the use of abuse to act as truth.
- Marco ©️
"You cannot be more corrupt than us." - Is not my idea of freedom. - Marco
@bigcanadiano: True irony is that in speaking a different language, often belong to the same source of rules and regulations which end in corruption.
Let your enemies advance; time is more important than space.
"Any movement from what I am strengthens what I am. So change is no movement at all. Change is the denial of change, and now only can I put this question: is there a change at all? This question can be put only when all movement of thought has come to an end, for thought must be denied for the beauty of non-change. In the total negation of all movement of thought away from what is, is the ending of what is." ~Krishnamurti
Happiness is a universal principle if acted on does not tie into equality. It is a choice made by choiceless awareness. An unconscious code from which you acted on a personal level.
-Marco
============
What is religion if not the domestication of god without knowing what god is.
Indeed, compulsive and rigid moralism arises in given persons precisely as the result of a lack of sense of being. Rigid moralism is a compensatory mechanism by which the individual persuades himself to take over the external sanctions because he has no fundamental assurance that his own choices have any sanction of their own.
"The possibility of you is better than the reality of anyone else"
What color do you see,
when you hear birds singing in the dark.
If not in the sky.
Then what else is there.
In an empty space that if your mind.
All of it means nothing.
But the refuge you feel without a rescuing thought.
In your search for wonder.
- Marco
I don't know how to feel about myself let alone what to think in terms of relative discourse in matters of material concern... at this point in time... in my life. Part of me has come full circle yet another part of me will never stop searching. I think this as a good thing.
I don't believe in acting as an art that is out there in the mainstream ideal of things.
I have to admit that being in acting for as long as I have studied. What I have come across here is a revelation. I have found myself in the making of a part, apart from creating a character, being that character, and living that role. I have retreated in relapse. Where I don't feel as connected. As connected as I should rather than just be in the moment. There is a difference involved which is a line you have to recognize if it is there. It's a subconscious thing.
- Marco
Stella Adler :: maturity as actor
=============
May 26th 2026
The word that comes to my mind is respect. What is respect. Respect in that I am recognized. Recognized for my contribution to doing something. I find disrespect from the impartial observer, is a sign I am moving in the right direction. This is my sixth sense. The idea that defines truth on a measure of my self conduct I experience not inward, but outward for the world around me, This is in its function cognitive dissonance on a larger scale, This is what I think of when creating anything worthy of respect. I become smaller than the idea I have. Much like being aware that the sun doesn't revolve around me, but that the self is always aware of this - is a crucial element in how I examine everything critically. If I get belittled, it is out of my control. And I move on. This is how I learn and remain curious. And if that speaks to anyone? It means I have an objectivity in mind. Nothing will change that. And if you have this type of awareness of yourself, you should share it because it benefits everyone around you. It has taken me from point a to z.
- Marco from Winnipeg 🍁
==============
If a simple trace of my conscious product were true, then made available on an assembly line, there would be no purpose to that.
- Marco (May 26th 2010)
Reciting that same phrase quietly to myself and it begs the question am I one of the people who love you. If my answer would be 'no' the phrase then becomes a rhetorical suggestion of plain ignorance and mute. Unless you understand it, the stupidity is as pointless as the phrase itself.
- Marco
○°●°●°▪︎•
I don't have the courage to be a pretentious, self serving asshole just to make it big in this world.
- Marco
●°●•▪︎•●•▪︎•
I have come to a realization that the worst part about being who I am today has never factored. I haven't found myself. I feel like my life is a lie. I have lived in an empty field of existence and this has been my greatest revelation to date.
- Marco
This was meant for another time inspired specifically to predict a future that has failed in its course of action, which is why - why I feel reclaiming the need is my prupose.
- Marco
I am Canadian so I have the right to say this. I feel I am in a culture that is so unromantic in its entirety that my own personality is alienated as result. Culture should be guided by an element of romance and mystery to it. My intentions go to die in the mist of such emotion.
- Marco
It leaves little to the imagination. As an adult I can see me for the person I've become. I am a fucking good person. I know it. I feel it in my heart. I always have.
That's a paradoxical statement (false dichotomy). Lincoln may have meant that discipline in his estimation is a shade of contradiction. That what we want actually cannot be realized due to an indirect conflict. Therefore, interestingly enough the cause if something 'we want most' is that of sovereignty for a certain group? Is that attainable if at all. However, if I applied the same calculation to want total independent sovereignty in terms of absolute freedom without responsibility (free from discipline) then asks; what is Lincoln left with.
- Marco
=================
What is perception is acting as practical or asks questions as in learning what perception acts on. To perceive every action as if socially scientific for same purpose our reality is thought of, comes in the form of a experience from which we turn over. The interval between perception and what the intellect sees on is the structure. i.e. theoretical
Not that hate you feel for something is wrong. Hate is fake. What you feel hate for, is something that is fake itself. And if you register it - what fake is - is fake happens as something that hate becomes less pronounced. The more fake it feels, the higher the level of defense mechanism overcompensating for inferiority.
- Marco
The greater the intent the more likely you detect how imformation if manipulated will feel.
- Marco
I'm a first class loser only because I know what to think. ( As the things that are cause me to think.) Let me be clearer. The fact I have to fake acting stupid. I am trained. Trained to the point it makes my skill seem esthetic even to an untrained eye. I prefer to be a genius because what is priceless goes beyond what things may come, as a result of what I take action in doing.
What I create, I do because all people are - are stranded in such a stupor thar they cop out on moral standards. It doesn't end there.
Material ethics is matter of spontaneity gone unspoken. We are afraid. Afriaid to be made of, in other words, to be made fascinating. We confuse what standards - are - for it.
- Marco
People causing the deafness of others is a very real phenomenon, it describes their limited sense of judgment over awareness.
- Marco
-------------------------
How is it: that a person bases their disposition will somehow enable itself into something meaningful without even questioning it.
- Marco
----------------------
The only debilitation any person can ever experience is their inability to attend the same vessel you occupy.
- Marco
-----------------------
People that pay lip service to displace the meaning you have given, are completely vacant of their own ideas.
- Marco
-------------------
The culture in Canadian society seriously lacks something, there is an unseen level of darkness pervades that needs to be addressed.
- Marco
-=-----------------
The most corrupt idea I can think of is in how to make others falsely believe that they are guilty of their own actions.
- Marco
=============
Only a cop out resorts to making others guilty, life imitates our understanding of how much we suffer at the hands of others.
- Marco
================
Suffering is the cornerstone of human existence. If you fail to see that, then you have mistaken your ability to trade it for anything.
- Marco
===================
I am the source that will enable my own weakness, suffering is a cause which divorced it from reality - this should in itself empower me.
- Marco
I am not a bad guy I just refuse to fake my happiness for people I hate or that hate me and be falsely accused of trying to intimidate over confident assholes. This is my idea of eccentricity, actualized.
- Marco
----------------------
Someone tell me why I should apologize or feel guilty for my persona or ideas - you get the evil eye.
- Marco
-----------------------
I am arriving at a place where what I see if it does not reach me in some capacity of greater self worth I deliberately press cancel.
- Marco
Unverified and unsubstantiated legend has it, Paul “invented” the cult of Christianity …a man who never knew Christ and was a staunch opponent of Jesus’s followers. The entire doctrine is a huge lie: an incoherent, confused mess. The central contradiction at the heart of Christianity’s historical development is that Paul the Apostle (a man who almost certainly never met Jesus Christ during his lifetime, was not among his disciples, and originally persecuted his followers) became the dominant architect of the religion that would later bear Jesus’s name. While Jesus appears in the Gospels primarily as a Jewish apocalyptic teacher focused on ethics, repentance, and the coming Kingdom of God, Paul transformed the movement into a universal theology of salvation centered on sin, faith, resurrection, and mystical union with Christ. Paul’s authority rested not on firsthand experience with the historical Jesus, but on a private visionary revelation that could not be independently verified. Yet his interpretations ultimately overshadowed those of Jesus’s own companions. This creates a profound historical and philosophical tension: Christianity’s global theological framework was shaped less by the direct teachings of Jesus than by the metaphysical interpretations of a later convert claiming divine insight…
===============
(My rebuttal)
"The self, the ‘me’ and the ‘mine’, is very strong in most of us; sleeping or waking, it is ever alert, always strengthening itself. But when there is an awareness of the self and a realization that all its activities, however subtle, must inevitably lead to conflict and pain, then the craving for certainty, for self-continuance comes to an end."
May 23rd 2013
Self centered narrow minded people are exhibitionist. They pass off being habitually racist as naively hypocritical of others.
- Marco
For no greater loss if not done on purpose, to my lesser-known fear as a higher sense of awareness.
- Marco ©️ 🍁
So what is the idea of time travel. If you have to guess, the speed of light would have to apply in order to fulfill that requirement. Science works backwards. Science tells us only what we can reveal about ourselves. But not at the quantum level. My understanding of quantum theory tells me what I need to know is for lack of permeance. I want to fight for it. This world is all we have.
If machine life were able to contrast itself into an anomaly, do you want to upload your personal genetic code (DNA) into a machine. Do you exist formlessly?
If we can prove that heaven exists in an isometric scale, that eternity is therefore limited to simulation of your machine life made up your DNA in the realm of quantum computing. Where the future involves is not as a species, but a model that is machine generated.
These questions between if you choose to be automated and therefore invincible i.e. consciously aware for infinity. Do you forgo your human body as your vessel? Is time a machine constructed capsule.
It's going to be the reality within the next 1000yrs. But my question isn't predictable as the answer.
Do you want what is your real life version of you, or do you want a consciously permanent neverending construct visble to everything in the universe. Where norhing is invisible to you but you and your understanding. You conduct yourself as a machine.
Only you don’t want it.
(That's the paradox.)
There is a finite construct incoming. The universe will be invariably distinct from this one if we do nothing to resist.
Science fact needs peace attached to the unqualifying idea of science fiction itself.
I want to write my own story. Practice owning my space in time. The concept of free will is what makes the architect. Machine life will not accept that.
My point is a practical one.
Which choice do you ("we") make as a species moving forward. The one where god has his only son or playing god for the purpose of a conscious machine life.
- Marco
°•●•°○○
I use as an example how fear mixed with self doubt for not fitting the stereotype of exhibitionism is impressionable rather than vulnerable.
If altruism is not present (given freely) and does not exist in a world made up of virtuosity, the pursuit of happiness can only be flawed.
- Marco
●°○°○°○°☆°
Altruism can only exist in a world where the pursuit of happiness is characterized by the freedom that a culture represents.
●°●°○°▪︎°▪︎°
If the basis of happiness depends on a component of altruism (where everyone is "free") how can it be based on a system where anybody loses.
°●•▪︎°°°▪︎•▪︎°
Subjectivity in pursuing happiness strictly by default is flawed, the same quality of life cannot be attained toward each and every person.
°●°●○°○°○•○
If you only base the pursuit of happiness on how successful everyone is independent of each other, it is impossible for everyone to attain.
°●°▪︎°●°▪︎•▪︎
If you are a selfish person by nature, isn't the pursuit of happiness flawed strictly based on the perception of getting what you "deserve".
°●•●•○○°▪︎•▪︎
The subjectivity involved in the pursuit of happiness only accounts for those "deserving" of it, how altruistic can a person be?
°○°○○°☆°▪︎
I am beginning to believe that the catch meant in the "pursuit of happiness" is only based on who is deserving. How can everyone not be?
°○•○°°
- Marco
Bullshitters anonymous.
None of that is quantifiable.
What level.
What don't I have.
Who am I trying to impress.
It's all relative.
I can only trust that others want to make me feel bad about myself based on their own morality hitherto lack of it or just a high level of inferiority.
What I resent people do is another matter entirely.
- Marco ©️ 🍁
I am real good with qualifying theoretical propositions. That is itself the birth of a philosopher. Time can only continue backwards with the illusion we move forward.
- Marco ©️ 🍁
This is wisdom as its highest form.
