I hate actors that get pushed on us in this city. I don't care.
When I attended the U of W I was not nearly as shoved aside. It is these shitty acting studios that Darcy Fehr facilitates. The past decade of actors that have infused this city are self serving idiots. I am not joking.
Like fuck off already.
=============
Ex-future patriots of language, carried in thought, landing in a remote area of charging seahorses. It is one of the few species known to mankind, that reproduction is made through the male species of animals.
You interpret consciousness as appearing in bodies and in the world. I interpret bodies and the world as appearing in consciousness. Why should your interpretation of the evidence be preferred over mine?
●°○°○°○°
I have to say, I initially thought he had an argument refuting yours as false dichotomy. But failed.
Your original argument does represent two sides, vague enough to equal each other. Therefore, I see tautology.
"You interpret consciousness as appearing in bodies and in the world. I interpret bodies and the world as appearing in consciousness. Why should your interpretation of the evidence be preferred over mine?"
°○●••○●●○•
My debunking of your representation of your argument, sees ²equal parts. My refutation is if interpretation is expressively prohibited, I would have agency without knowing what is consciousness. How do we know? How do we claim consciousness. I think this is a fair example given my counter argument.
°●●○○○○
My reason for suggesting tautology, is simple that refining your idea - interpretation justifies as cause for what we think of as consciousness. My point here is, I agree with it. Why? Because consciousness can be seen as you have stated, in bodies and the world. Interpretation appears in consciousness and consciousness appears in our renunciation of it. Hopefully you will understand what I have postulated, theoretically surmise consciousness in the body can be interpeted in ideas consciousness creates.
- Marco
All information is - is our sensory experience put into action. (i.e. the action of interpretation) To live as in metanarrative are the things that put you in sensory experience. What I think is of a property value in everything I see. I assess, and in my assessment there is a sensation which I translate as I go. So, in return, I equalize this as a means to an end. This is why I am a philosopher. That in this process, my language acts as the information of sensations I experience in real time. And information travels as the source of my ideas. These ideas are words that my use of language, in its style and syntax create. So as a philosopher of experience (e.g. wisdom) I record using my poetics.
Another way of learning | J. Krishnamurti
There is a time interval between the idea and the action. That is, there is, the ideal - and you are trying to put that ideal into action, so there is a gap between the principle, the ideal, the belief, and the actuality.
Right?
Now, we are saying - the interval of time ⌚ between the ideal and action is non existent.
================
A mind free to look ~ Krishnamurti
==================
I want to believe this is bs before thinking I blindly accept these so called laws. Anyone that says otherwise need to reevaluate themselves. - Marco
