Total and utter bullshit. If I can not tolerate the self, the idea of the id, my egocentric self. Then what good is tolerance. What does it serve. My point being that without knowing what my tolerance is - also for. There are norms which my ethical tolerant self only will defend. This is to say there are forces at work in favoring a tolerant (psychological) end in attitude tolerance itself rewards.

To think of tolerance keeps to my beliefs. Therefore, tolerance (its foundation) is connected with relation to recognize my personal intolerance, which increases the odds for my survival. Tolerance in this argument represent universal models in the name of crisis arising, where tolerance acts, intolerance reveals the truth. If my tolerance is tested (for naming truth) as in failing that idea of truth gets rejected, a crisis emerges as sign from which to act. You keep the foundation for tolerance as the bridge to your rational self.

○°○°○°

Marco ©️ 2026

○°○°○°○°●°

 

ADHD characteristics

 

God as energy

 "I don't quite understand how there can be seriousness unless one is serious about something," he replied. " I think I see what you mean," said his companion. "I want to find God, and it is important for me to find Him, otherwise life has no meaning; it's only a bewildering chaos, full of misery. I can understand life only through God, who is the end and the beginning of all things; He alone can guide me in this welter of contradictions, and that's why I am serious about finding Him. But you are asking, is this seriousness at all?"⁠

⁠

Yes. The understanding of living, with all its complications, is one thing, and the search for God is another. In saying that God, the ultimate end, will give meaning to life, you have brought into being - haven't you? - two opposing states: living, and God. You are struggling to find something away from life. You are serious about achieving a goal, an end, which you call God; and is that seriousness? perhaps there is no such thing as finding God first, and then living; it may be that God is to be found in the very understanding of this complex process called life.⁠

⁠

⁠

J. Krishnamurti⁠

Series III - Chapter 44 - 'What Does It Mean To Be Serious?'⁠

⁠

Commentaries on Living⁠

============

The Holy Spirit produces nine specific attributes in a person's life who is connected to Christ.

My defense that Oscar Wilde is my protege

 "In all unimportant matters, style, not sincerity, is the essential. In all important matters, style, not sincerity, is the essential." - Oscar Wilde 

=========

Oscar Wilde is my protege, he singlehandedly became the man I want to be, an artist, philosopher, writer.  Therefore, he protects my interests, because he put his interests in place, and I put his interests in place of my own.  (It is impossible to put my interests in his place, which would make me his protege.) Since I care to represent what path he created, makes him my protege - of the path I want to take.

=========

I use the same type of thinking. . . with names like Fernando Pessoa, Jose Saramago, Socrates, all of these men.

=========

I am quite satisfied with the kind of artist I always wanted to become, a writer, a philosopher - this is what I aimed for in my life.

=========

Love has deprived me my ability to master the art of being human in its unromantic environment, hard to please, and never failing.

=========

1. No matter how hard you try - you will not provoke me into a fight.  No matter how jealous you are.
2. No matter how much you want to hurt me - I am not scared of being hurt.
3. No matter how weak or vulnerable empower yourself to be more than you think of it.

=========

Winnipeg is full of nobodies with integrity and take pride in that.  Fail.

=========

I on the other hand have integrity because I am somebody that makes your life more than it actually is. 

==============

Marco Almeida

 ·

It is to a man's honor to avoid strife, but every fool is quick to quarrel. -Proverbs 20:3

My command is this: Love each other as I have loved you. -John 15:12

Marco Almeida

 ·

The key to success is for you to make a habit throughout your life of doing the things you fear. - Vincent Van Gogh

Proofs as to why I cannot be considered as Oscar Wilde's protege: (notes)

How can anyone be someone else's protege unless that same objective is not carried out from the opposite source. You cannot be another persons protege unless you know that they adopt your interests the same way you do.

I cannot say I am Oscar Wilde, I can only say that I want to be like Oscar Wilde. Therefore, this does not make me his protege.

Oscar Wilde cannot possibly know I adopt the same interests that he does. Therefore, because I want to emulate him my own way, is to be honored.

advantage into weakness

 

The meaning behind everything I write, is a language of it's own. Whether or not it is understood or not is not up to me. It is to be learned.

Therefore, my own inhibitions rest on a grave of ideas, that may or may not benefit the masses. What I care about is myself as an existential being. If you train your eye to read something enough times, you will begin to learn it. It's like anything new to you, then it becomes what you train your eye to decipher.

Everything I write infers to the laws of OF ONE'S OWN dialectic, trained thoughts, verbalized into being.

The only people I write to are myself, and myself as the other.

If you cannot have a conversation with yourself about anything in the universe, as it commands you, you are not doing the world any favors either. To know yourself, then becoming a language that is your own.

Furthermore, I know what the fuck I'm talking about. I see people in real life who label me. I don't give two fucks what people think anymore. I know better than to take advice from dimwitted wannabe's.

Philosophy to the trained eye is simple, equated, with having a conversation, with yourself, then confidence to make-believe my own imagination can transform the world, strictly based on principles of thought alone. That is my idea of philosophy.

Thank you. Good night.

====================

"Fear is to want, what hope there not is. This is what in principle a martyr does. To instill fear into want, want what hatred does not hope. A martyr is a false witness to the cause of freedom in everything. They want the mercy, they want the glory, they want what everybody else knowing is not their own."

1- In the context of martyrdom, such reason should suggest, a dead proof. That is to say, what (a) "fear is to want" = is the martyr's intention. This follows (b) if fear is to want something then (c) comes only in light of what SOMEONE ELSE wants. What the martyr wants always acts as the conditional. Which we are self-explaining is a false ideal.

If a then b.

Then b.

Therefore a not b.

2- In the context of martyrdom, (a) "Fear is to want" then (b) "what hope there not is."

'a followed b', which is, 'b' as undefined.

Let's answer (b) "what hope there not is."

Therefore, "what hope there not is." is a result of a martyr's belief. That one thing cannot want something out of hope, because the martyr has already decided for you. To want anything is false hope, to you, the end result is your freedom being taken.

In the context of martyrdom basing your fear is to want something in return - therefore, the martyr acts as a means, "you should fear it rather than stand up to it." The martyr wants to take away your right to want anything. To falsify your hope.

In this sense we live in a martyr less-than-kind based society which can only become unconsciously acceptable. It is a breach of trust, that should a martyr be untruthful as they are toward the will of the many, (i.e. the will of the many) shall only depend upon the will of: disparaging unconscionable rights of the martyr. Such civil discord would cause dissidence.

Therefore, the right to freedom is inalienable on no condition or terms of agreement. Then, "what hope there not is." represents the embodiment of a martyrs will to diminish your hope. You cannot want something in return of a favor, so long you depend ONLY on what a martyr wants for you. You have ceased to "hope", to "exist", to "want" anything. Your responsibility has been taken for granted of you. You must obey the martyr's commandeering riffle, or you will be faced with consequences unknown to you, hatred would be instilled you from the martyr. "You cannot hate me." - Martyr's intentional psychology to reverse roles.

==============

=====================

Signs in Departing

 

Prince 🎸

 Prince, man. Prince. 

The druid

 Jung's horse 🐴  

The scholar that Jesus was

 Palestine

The force of sacrifice

Here's what ends up happening in that situation. We know because it's already happened with farming. Our farmers and the US are so efficient that they can produce food for the entire world. So the government steps in and limits the production. They don't allow farmers to grow the amounts that they can grow because when you flood a market with supply, the prices go down. So if the production of goods exceeds the money supply then what will happen is the government will step in and stop allowing the manufacturers to produce those goods. Because the goods would drop in price as a result of the economic law of supply and demand

===============

(Marco's rebuttal)

 l What this sounds like - is like - absolute communist ideology run amok. A true communist theory would hold that no matter the result, as communist theory proves, that results driven reward (independently of itself) - it therefore, reward's only those fiscally responsible that the system is owned. Therefore, the theory as it has been tested (stands to cause) that communist driven ideology can not compensate the commune, why - because, common law statutes would eliminate the supply chain driven in the form of said communist [communal] aims.

This is what we already know as capitalist society or anti-regulatory socialistic ends.

(i.e. Privately owned property (e.g. farm land) reminds us of what statutes allow us to perform, as land ALL LAND is provided for the purpose of capital.)

Where this division makes property a feudal based system, it is delivered only onto the assumption what is produced on a title of land is taxed and so forth, whereas ALL the tax is in ordinance with value or its worth. Such point is made can also reveal even the smallest share holder has the right to regulatory provisions, that the return allotted in terms of monetary customs not to serve the commune. The smallest effort for the maximized amount in reward. (i.e. minimum capital) This is Marxism. Marxist ideology has no radical ends or to capture itself as such fantasy in. The problem has always been with ineptitude of its leaders. That all people are equal to the land. Therefore, all private property is abolished.

----------------------------

Rules and regulation looking into communist theory is how communism has been ruined (not that communism ruins the world.) A proper thought out system based on how we distribute equity, how is communist thought as supposed to work? We need to reform our place in history that communist ideology dispossesses itself as an operative element, also its real objectivity, the supply is evenly distributed at no cost to the consumer. The point is to create a system where goods are produced in that ( 1 ) the minimum effort, ( 2 ) the maximum its output demands, ( 3 ) all are equal to the cause. (This requires great thinking.) What factors is an undertaking into how much is necessary ~ needed to be produced not necessarily how little in abundance.

- Marco

July 30th 2010

 

 Am I a slave to time.

This motive of mine:

in the prison note.

"You're dead."

Am I - a dead man.

Between a suicidal mission,

and what the prison note says.

It tells me of how.

How things change.

To tell of all the things I have read. . .

I hear a cry.

(There, in my mind.)

That voice of mine.

My main idea is the question.

I desire.  What it means.

To ask the right question.

Because the idea is what charges the mind's eye.

It's all I've ever needed.

To see things as they are.

The miracle is in listening to that voice.

In every single motive I've ever acted on.

It is the view from where time ends.

And thought.

the principle of thought [non individuality]

 July 28th 2026 

I can only think of happiness or by means as a force, a force so great that the freedom it generates is a feeling. A feeling that it obeys through how you and you alone vibrate. You may think of it as a free spirit testing the inferiority complex we mistake for our personal nature. Only you surrender to it because no one even considers that happiness is a quality. (Not a truth.) Happiness is not a norm that it surrenders the good life. You are judged according to the quality that happiness is its measure. Therefore, the most complete version of what is true happiness, that you trade your quality of life for an existentialist one.

•°○°○°

- Marco

○°○°○°○°

Enforcement and bullshit artists

 There is a certain infallibility to scrutiny once you unlearn from its accusations or melodrama albeit against your better mastery of any particular thing.

However, if that level of scrutiny isn't sincere - only to disguise it wraped into some kind of gift box.

The way to this truth is seeing.

While the search for truth is an endless path.

You mustn't compare youself to others. The real scrutiny you may have to overcome is while your search for it is finite, there are people from all classes that rather concentrate on their suntan.

- Marco

=============

What acts as a calming influence in you should be greatly exaggerated; held onto... as opposed to the high maintenance projects we get ourselves caught in that negates the mastery of self preservation. This exaggeration is when the curtain raises on each moment of every thought you carry. Some call upon it being the imagination. Other's might learn to adopt this as a secret life.

- Marco

==============

Walk in solitude, though you live in society. —Krishnamurti

Context: It is becoming more and more difficult to be physically alone. Most people don’t want to be alone; they are afraid to be alone; they are occupied. They want to be occupied from the moment they wake up until the moment they go to bed. Even then, they are haunted by dreams. Those who live alone, in caves or as monks in their cells, are never alone, for they live with their images, their thoughts and the practices which promise future fulfilment. They are never alone; they are full of knowledge and full of the darkness of the cave or cell. One must be an outsider, not belonging to anything or to anybody. But you cannot fight your way out, for then you still belong to it. The very action of fighting your way out is the action which makes society tick. So you must die to society, so that the new life comes into being without your knowing it. And so walk in solitude, though you live in society.

From Meeting Life

===============

Far and away the most crucial aspects of Pessoa's work that I wholeheartedly agree with....

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Living, it seems to me, is a metaphysical error of matter, a mistake of inaction.

I look attentively at the traces of absorption and distraction that are erased in it.

No problem has a solution.

We use our feelings indiscriminately to resolve the problems of our intelligence, and we do it because we are tired of thinking or because we are too timid to draw conclusions, out of an absurd necessity to find support, or out of a gregarious impulse to return to others and to life.

Since we can never know all elements in a problem, we can never solve it. We lack the data necessary to attain the truth as well as the intellectual processes that would exhaust the interpretation of those data.

- Fernando Pessoa

=================

1- Seeing is having seen.

2- the thing we suppose is alive in the supposition.

-Fernando Pessoa