Getting Wired

 February 4th 2014

“…love and gluttony justify everything.”-- Oscar Wilde

It has been 10 years since facebook has changed my life. Using this medium as a publishing tool has been the best thing that ever happened to me.

When I look at myself and ask what it all means is simple. That people unaware of themselves would hardly equate a real question worth knowing what it is I have to offer. (I will get to this aspect shortly further on.) In these words and in my use of language - I see a great deal of abundance. What characterizes my writing is how less instinctive readers are. They answer questions they rather not be asked if push came to shove.

I have encountered some of the most frivolous, bigoted, uneducated natives in Facebook community which has translated into real life.

The sad part is as this nude sense of myself caters to an unsuspecting audience. The truth is as I mentioned a few sentences prior re; how investigators of my cause choose to see me fail rather than be enablers. What that means is no matter how I have ideas worthy of consideration to its executioners.

The bottom line is I am proud. Even if the knife in my back appears to be lodged in it, nothing can take away what I have accomplished on facebook. Nothing.

------------------------

The fact of the matter is people that know I have answers in a theoretical sense, this acts threatening to others that rather see me fail at their mercy or better judgment.

non-imported of the supernatural kind

 February 4th 2011

Two words of intellect which I've transmitted via your wannabe ingrates without a moral seeded in their tiny little brains: One enters Socrates' (mind).  The other enters Plato's (mind).

 

 

This is philosophy people.

 

 

But not one you might think of yourself.

 

 

The reason being, where philosophy of law from Plato's musings, the divided line if you will.  The Socratic Method of Socrates teachings, waged academic pursuits into the widest range of possibilities known to man, were born from those ancient classrooms.

 

 

--------------------------

 

 

Now you feel the return of Marco Almeida.

 

 

Where Marco Almeida - has entered some prime real estate opportunity, the same cannot be true of the person he is.

 

 

Therefore, only Marco Almeida must have some idea to commit the same practice, the same way, over and over again e.g. 'repetitively' not 'redundantly'

 

 

This very small but humble teaching, the art of humility let us pray of humility.

 

 

--------------------------

 

 

The question is does it matter which words were entered into either of the philosopher's brain even matter, which now gives you a false impression of Plato's laws.

 

 

Everything in the universe now consists of something to do with Plato's laws.

 

 

Therefore, the same cannot be said of a person of Plato's equal, be him or woman, man or her.

 

 

-------------------------

 

 

It is because of this disparity in resourcefulness, that clever Plato, always understood himself a negater of art.  The art of philosophy, cannot be taught, the philosophy of itself can (be taught), which that clever little Plato was enabled.  Plato felt he was onto something.

 

 

-------------------------

 

 

This is when the man of law, collided with the man of reason-ability.

 

 

------------------------

 

 

The man of reason, never truly understands the laws Plato insisted be taught, though that in itself would only be a rejection of regularity between variables.  So Plato thought, let's make law something that defines normalcy.  Although normally Plato would act as clever than most others; LAWYERS ARE YOU READING THIS.

 

 

-----------------------

 

 

Normalcy always declined the invitation to legitimacy, legitimacy declined the truth of 'normal' to be subject to things such as decency, or let's say indignity, or even torcher chambers.  No thought Plato, the law is too good for that; I am special knowledge of such power, they simply do not exist in law.  Does man have a threshold not to withstand the cause of law, because law has no age limit, no barrier, no complacency, no economic value, simply - law has a variable over every other living thing.

 

 

Here is where you are retarded Plato.

 

 

You have no say in irregularity.

 

 

Absolutely none.

 

 

They say Plato was a manipulator of no substance, or mind, or substantiating human sacrifice unconditionally speaking.

 

 

^ That was Plato's way of suffering the human condition, to say that laws were not made to be broken, that they defeat the purpose in all things young or old.

 

 

It was as if an unrestricted insurance claim, unlimited in potential on one anonymous condition of purging victims who actually enjoyed the thought of philosophy baring nothing else, simply continuity of choices, perhaps open ended, perhaps shut out.  But Plato always felt uncomfortable (inferior) so - so like many or next to most lawyers.  They pretend that you do not exist.

 

 

-------------------------

 

 

The problem wasn't that Plato didn't know how to do philosophy; it was that he didn't claim to know philosophy had a purpose of it's own, only he was unaware of it.

 

 

Candid as Plato was, that time before him allowed for it to happen, so we got stuck with lawyers make-believing they were philosophers for a shorter period of time than they could be called out on it.

 

 

That way they might get spooked to easily, there flushing their careers away at shore.

 

 

----------------------

 

 

The truth about the divided line, was only implemented, because Socrates drew that line, on the other side of the debaters.  Where Socrates secret society of non-linear thinkers held votes for the wicked philosophers of Plato's domain.

 

 

It was there the divided line came into being.

 

 

They say those were the ballots in between democracy, that Socrates won unanimously, but Socrates followers were sworn to secrecy on the subject of winning.  They said unto Plato, let's just let him play, we're nice enough to do that aren't we.

 

 

They say Plato has been fooled ever since.  In fact if true, he refuses to acknowledge the same answer to the same question, over and over.

=====================

And here finally is the answer, I find myself, to a fault - no fault of my own.

It gets really very very stupid when people confuse my intellect, my better judgment without thinking of it. It gets smarter still when they guess I am a Canadian hero like Bret Hart.

It gets better or worse when violent predators refuse to look me straight in the eyes, because I am watching your every move, you silly boys and girls.

---------------------------

You see when you are one of the bad guys; it's one of the good guys that takes on my Maple Leaf in Red and White.

When you are obsessed with art as I am, you fill the stars, you earn my stripes.

I've always imagined scraping by the defense in stride, burying my head, and playing for pride, making the save, getting the girl.

-----------------------------

Damn - I really love being Canadian, eh.

----------------------------

Attention - whichever one of you fukwits deleted an entry of mine "which magically disappeared due to paranoia", keep chasing those rainbows, but wipe that smile of your face.

---------------------------

One day, long before my time, I will know exactly what all of this means.

=================

I dedicate this fabulous entry, to be eaten again and again, in the mouths of Karim Dharamsi and Sandra Tomsons, whose toothless and spineless aims caused me great grief - not unto this day.

sprinkle's of minimum wage

 February 4th 2010

I was working inside, where elderly people live, when this one lady provided me with her unsolicited wisdom. It was something clearly ornate, but much less done by. She told me quite simply to make sure I enjoy life, that her generation 'over-did' thing's. To which this alerted my frame of reference, I was after all, seated on the floor from where I was listening to her speak. I thanked her for the odd peculiarity of those comment's directed at me for unspecific reasons.

I guess I make the most of situation's, eventually her harmless looking hostility toward me, was meant to relieve me of pressure, whichever matters out of my life thus far. I much prefer honesty related to me, so I felt I somehow caused this, without the guilt.

I've made much less effort in loving life for what I have, throughout my very cold - at times a masked resistance.

So, I really didn't show her anything to prompt this, but in my mind - I must have.

As I stepped outside my comfort zone, this I managed to do, was symbolize something. I guess that's how I see what the older person said, meant to me. Not that she symbolizes anything, only the mere thought does. I usually think in terms of common sense, as a means to an ends, is something I participate in - knowing what the interlocutor is onto. In that sense, if it was intended as such, I really had no idea about why this took place. My claim to it was to keep my mouth shut as I did.
It's what nature intended.

controversial nature of a decathlete

 February 4th 2010

Whenever self-control becomes an issue, I find it of primary importance. The question quickly asserts itself, under any given circumstance, of a superior social skill set. Further to this discussion, in virtue of it, there is a need to elicit, what are the non-specific causes not associated with self-control to properly define it. There is no action, or no such a thing as action. There is no instinct, or no such a thing is present. The question then becomes how does one empower themselves of self-controlling measure, if so, what method which is lost can attribute into such natural causes.

So self-control, is a kind of all too ill-advised a source.

Does self-control elicit it's whereabout's, in a timely order, so that your acting in synchronicity of a universal proportion - or proportion to it. I find this a very fascinating investigation of individual-ity. Only because, in every way shape or form, the self-control that you exhibit will in fact - ultimately - prove it's outcome.

Can there be a link or divide of such a loosely defined term, such as self-control, which this may adopt some case toward an origin. An origin, that is possible.

My idea in favoring self-control, certainly, make's my case which involve's over-reaction to phenomena, as if, almost at will. So, my question is interfaced, without I cannot examine any known natural cause, whether self-control in someway's inertia playing in large part to observance, whether or not self-control is in it's own efficacy a natural cause itself. A purpose nonetheless rewarding. Which then ask's, how do us, in natural effect's somewhat, somehow, somewhere, exhibit this very natural archetype. Self-control is merely an awareness, which come's and it goes as please's.

Therefore, I am in constant communication with my own sense of perception, whether I am provoked in someway evoke's emotion, or does self-control if in fact it does exist, lose itself. (It must be allowed to.)

So, I came to the conclusion, that if self-control is always imminent, never to far beyond our scope of necessary reason, albeit necessary which self-control exhibits functioning. It does not however, inform nor guide anything other than myself, in what may in factuality i.e. real time it is taking place. Where everything, everyone submits is a known entity only determined by self-control as a means. In fact it is of an utmost important thing - us believe - not worth about questioning. Self-control simply is. It is - perfect. It manages itself without worry of natural causes related from it.

The same truth may apply to the surface, of unrelated causes, such as in pleasure in appetite, though we would not exhibit dieting as a form of pleasure, but one of punitive means. To lose weight is a superficial form of self-control, yet to gain weight is not seen in term's of self-control, what self-control does not do is gain weight which deviates from the dieting model. In retribution, self-control is the exact opposite of dieting as weight gain as it would be permissible. So, your choice in eating less, may offset the guilt in various stages of dieting, which is not the same as weight gain. As complex a system self-control is, undeniably it play's a major unconscious role in the way we factor.

It's as if we're compromising, negotiating our way into a kind of transparent state of mind, where we control nothing, but our self-control. Yet, it is a vaguely unfamiliar way to denounce such a thing into yourself. I find everything I've ever done based on this version of thoughts.

fortune-telling entitled to benevolence

 February 4th 2009

Have you ever had that feeling, where everything is in a kind of total transitory state, which you can only realize the feeling has escaped you, as if a clock were timing how placid that it became long to trace back. I experience this from moment to moment. The difficulty is in examining thoughts, as if they were meant to take shape in some form of triangulation, however, the plans were drawn out on blue prints if they were. My own personal view in the matter, has certainly evoked something peculiar in the event of regret. It is a "coming together" of sorts, where trial and error have gone mistaken for under privileged satisfaction - if there could be such a thing - that in question.

I have never been alone in experiencing the frugality of others, however, I inform the better of my intuition by chance - that my choices are made.

This brings me to the answers I unusually, yet, uncharacteristically find - estimate my sense of morality. I ask myself, in almost everything I classify what is moral. It goes to prove my own virtue in life, that should I choose to act what doormat am I stepping on in the process of doing. It would appear as though my vast knowledge of such a densely popular subject, would gather steam behind it - although my approach would adjoin it - if there is a time and a place for morality, where should it begin or end. Therefore, in an accurate evaluation of the subject no matter what entails its cause, morality is in fact perpendicular to such parameters of an enclosure. For in this instance my practice of writing could very well be someone else's (but not my own). Would this in such a case limit my potential - especially in moral juxtaposition. The question is again valid, as it is tenfold.

The problem is at the root, of asking such moral self-examination, though not in understanding it as a critical proclimation. At the heart of all moral investigation, the true nature of what is in fact immoral can only stem from virtue. In such a reference of thought due to morality, I suspect myself - is a cause. The cause of truth, is the same as the pursuit of ones morality. The problem that surfaces in appropriation to the cause, is that morality cannot exist without virtue. If thought in morality can exist. Therefore, intellect is the presence of virtue not of thought. Morality is in effect the essence of ones virtue.

I have reached this stage in life - that questions do mean everything, unless I am challenging superficial context which stems from thoughts that manipulation refrains from virtue.

Unwinding in good faith

The grave grace of silence if fakse beliefs in the air... what is death beyond words, the tragic sound wisdom creates.

And the unwise know everything there is to think of.

While the simplest form of truth is void in meaning not its energy.

- Marco

 You have to live spherically - in many directions. Never lose your childish enthusiasm - and things will come your way.

Federico Fellini

The philosophy of poverty 2014 [subculture in Westernization]

 February 3rd 2014

Poverty stems from all things.  If you do not begin to seek yourself through poverty then you have lessened yourself as an opponent to the variety of things that can be said for you.  I attribute myself to the idea that ideas live as enigmatic and contribute to the same effort taht is required in our subcultures.  In other words subjectivity should always begin and end in truth for its great content, which reveals your inner poverty - your inner self - your inner life's quality as less than presumptuous.

 

Hate to me is a sign of success, not because it is contempt against me being made - but because it takes a certain impartiality meant only to be hurtful with NO amount of respect given. It tells me of what imaginary beliefs people have. I see the same type of individuals look hating you against your will. That is empowering to prove it wrong, even if it is in my own mind.

 

 

Forgiveness is not something I equate with reward. Unlike anything else it is a skill. People look to forgiveness not as something you give freely but measured with prohibition. < That is a crucial aspect of this. (Read on.) Therefore to be forgiven is a very skewed alternative to what is inclusive. Forgiveness is about perception. Ultimately the individual is responsible for this fact in their reality of it.

 

Unless you are good at pretending to care forgiveness is just false. In that case I rather have 1000 enemies and only one true imaginary friend that transcends myself.

 

Hypocrisy is a loaded term used to describe the same definition of forgiveness. I openly have a chip on my shoulder, especially to those that I concern myself with deserve no respect or sense of it whatsoever. Some people do that better than others.

Forgiveness is closely linked to guilt, and I credit mine with solutions not condemnation. That requires profound logic to do it.<p> </p>I give you myself as an example^. I openly admit all of it. I do not reject MY views - I AM it. That takes bravery. It takes a genius to inform those that are evil two-faced liars. It is the reason I wrote all of this in response to MY OWN revelations re; forgiveness. It is the least understood of all intellectualized concepts.

I learned this about myself at the age of 5. Take that Einstein. xoxox

 

I have worked tirelessly to model myself as an individual that has learned what my intellect means to me and how it transcends all things.

 

I see people in my life that no longer see me for who I really am, because they can only pretend to know what is they think of myself.

 

When I close my eyes I have the ability to see geometric patterns changing and transforming as I see them. It is like a laser show, if you can imagine beams of light cascading through time and space. That is what I have the ability to do with my mind.

 

I have worked painstakingly hard to find my sacred self. I see these patterns develop in deep in my subconscious. It is a theme of the brains circuitry. It literally tells me how I function based on the experiment this video provides as evidence. 

 

To put this mildly, this experiment is not complex. Such a simple idea can immediately transform your perception of everything in life. 

 

If you want to understand the universe, think of energy, frequency, and vibration – Nikola Tesla -

 

 

http://www.spiritscienceandmetaphysics.com/amazing-resonance-experiment-the-sacred-geometry-of-sound/

 

======

 

This is a break down of what are Hidden Portals only because they are invisible.

 

Watch from 2:12 - 2:32 to explain how portals form and are then to be located as x-points:

 

There is a magnetic re-connection between forces between the sun and earth.This theoretically produces a "mingling of lines" between magnetic forces.Therefore, the sun x earth crisscross their magnetic forces.

 

As result: the magnetic field join to create openings.

 

X-points are where the crisscrossing takes place and a portal opens.

 

Theoretical implication: The joining of magnetic fields propels jets of charged particles from the x-point creating an electron diffusion region. In other words this creates a vacuum effect where in my view traces of physical phenomenon can travel through it. These portals are only meant to serve the type of conscious matter that interfaces with our physical realms. You are a model of energy, such as thoughts are to a bolt of lightning. You have the ability to transcend your conscious matter through to an unlimited energy source. These portals exist in order to magnify your life force - you have energy that is an element much like the periodic table - so this enables you to see things in a special manner than most are attuned.

 

February 3rd 2011

When facing that curtain, before the window; when facing the challenge of total sickness, slowly as I make my way out - into a light - perhaps of music. Yet all I see happens to be fear in the minds of others, my face doesn't turn to gold. I have truly faced the light, into the dark.

======================

This entry is made, because I care about the fear in people that hardly know it of themselves. That might be my face Plato cared about, by betraying a father of philosophy in Socratic wisdom. May Plato perish in flames of fire.