seeing

 

False Stereotype

 I love what is this quote by Krishnamurti. He also says: The highest form of intelligence comes when you are completely aware that we evaluate without judgment.

- Marco

Meditation as movement

 With respect to what is movement in ideas from the unknown. That my ideas are a byproduct before, not after - any altered state of mind taking place. We are the universe in movement with what is living in ourselves. That much can be seen and felt with the heart. In my mind we call this form. In the outside world we see it as art.

- Marco 

Prayer

 It is not in life as in my fangs.

It is because my blood thirsty fangs,

measure what is I want god to feel.

If I had the power to make god 'feel'.

Feel how grateful I am for the sensations he gives me.

The same sensations I want to believe are hers.

And that in receiving that kind of power,

god's wishes I fulfill.

She is pleased.

And for this I feel everything.

- Marco

My purpose (Marco)

 

the law and the not

 

Church of the Holy Sepulcher

Church of the Holy Sepulcher  
The Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem — the church that stands today over the traditional sites of both the crucifixion and the resurrection — has a foundation story that most visitors standing inside it have never heard.

When Constantine became the first Christian Emperor in 312 AD one of the first things he wanted to do was locate and honour the physical sites of the death and resurrection of Jesus. He turned to his mother Helena — one of the most remarkable women in the history of the early church. Helena was approximately 75 to 80 years old when she undertook the journey to the Holy Land in 326 AD. She had converted to Christianity earlier in life and was known for her deep personal faith and her extensive charity work — founding churches, ransoming prisoners and caring for the poor throughout the empire. Constantine gave her unlimited access to the imperial treasury for her mission. In Jerusalem Helena sought out the site of the crucifixion and tomb — guided by local Christian tradition that had preserved the memory of the locations through nearly 300 years of Roman occupation. The site she identified was occupied by a temple built by the Emperor Hadrian around 135 AD during his rebuilding of Jerusalem — a pagan temple deliberately constructed to suppress Christian veneration of the site. Hadrian's strategy had backfired. Rather than erasing the memory of the location, the prominent pagan temple had actually preserved it — marking the spot so clearly that local Christians never lost track of where it was. Helena reported her findings to Constantine. He ordered Hadrian's temple demolished and excavation of the site begun. Ancient sources record that during the excavation a tomb was discovered consistent with the gospel accounts — cut into rock, with a rolling stone entrance. Constantine commissioned the Church of the Holy Sepulchre — a magnificent basilica complex incorporating both the site of the crucifixion and the tomb — which was consecrated in 335 AD. The church has been destroyed and rebuilt multiple times over the centuries — by the Persian invasion in 614 AD, by the Caliph al-Hakim in 1009 AD, and partially by the Crusaders who rebuilt it in the 12th century. The structure standing today incorporates elements from multiple historical periods but rests on Constantine's original foundation. An elderly woman in her late seventies. An imperial mission. A pagan temple that accidentally preserved the location it was meant to erase. And a church that has stood — in one form or another — for nearly 1,700 years over the site where the resurrection occurred.

The truest mark of genius

 

Church

 Church is a community based concept in all of time' (historic). If you think for a minute that you are not welcome there. You are the problem. This means you believe in one god everyone believes in related to the monotheistic regime. This also means the 3 main religions.

If you consecrate yourself to something, then take the same position that someone (else) doesn't have the right to express there religions regardless for who or where. You are a bigot. Simple.

My point is where does it matter where or how someone worships. But the minute you say it 'belongs' someplace because you don't like it. That's not how religion works. That is not the reality.

- Marco

Church ⛪

April 11th 2013

 The reason I write as is my experience of it described here:

"With age and experience we learn to use words with caution."

"We misuse them, put them back to front without noticing, until one day we discover they are as threadbare as old clothes, we feel ashamed of them, just as I can recall being ashamed of trousers I once wore with frayed bottoms which were meticulously trimmed every week to disguise the constant repairs."

"I believe that in writing these pages I have shown some concern for words and the way they are used."

"Before, I hardly ever used the word "love,"

And when I did, the word did not refer to me, or only to part of me."

"Now that it really concerns me, why should I not be cautious?"

"I would even go so far as to mask the word if necessary, use other words, as in those anagrams we composed in primary school to act as props so that the real world might emerge and flourish."

"However, having given this some thought,

I prefer to invoke the word "love" loud and clear and see what happens."

- Jose Saramago

the French language (standard deviation :: a critique)

 French dialect is a challenge. My personal thesis: : 'of the French language'. . .

Its inventive nature often requires as "something-or-other" of itself interest, which can not be surrounded as non-specific narrative related to linguistically reduced terminology. (In logic is called non-sequitur) My point being that to understand French ideals, there is no parallel between French and English literature. (Non-sequitur) Think about you putting language into a box. (If true, then the box is closed.) With your conscious mind, incredibly you failed in not considering it open, even with or without being told about this box. There is no idea stored in the box. You just want to get this 'hidden' idea out of it! (Did you fail to realize what is in the box?) I never told you - in which case you were guarded against seizing the box, what if then, you decided to alter what's inside of it - instead. This is French without the logic at work. (Deliberately charged non-sequitur can work in language.)

My question when reading French philosophers: What is the speaker trying to relate to me on subconscious level? The French like to romanticize this as a love affair, with language, out of its own poetically charged neo-liberal cause. I think of this as 'the particular or peculiarity of language in a transfer of non-sequitur.)

This archetypal language acts opposite in search of natural criticism toward it. This "opposite" (i.e. mystery) of the French dialect compels me to believe the literature as something that is best read as imagined without words. This allows me to describe what is the language (e.g. what acts as information) can be interpreted, into various forms of thought. What I am arguing, that invariably speaking French made literature offers its own dimension of how thought metaphorically intercedes for its reader. What is taking place goes beyond reasoning. This would help understand the challenges of reading inspired as French literature as a whole. Just my observations.

- Marco 

I, the confessor

April 11th 2026

If I must. I would go to hell to face Netanyahu, Trump or Putin myself. Only to make sure they burn. If god were to refuse me, I would end at the gates of hell just to be sure those that killed so many on earth are purposely made vile. I would do this on command, if it meant the death of the most vile perpetrators in since WWII. To execute this would be the ultimate sacrifice. This is why I fight the way I do.

This is me, the confessor. You think I am antisemitic, let's see how far that gets you. You're just some MAGA clone. I know in my heart what is right from wrong.

And what my point is - if I am wrong. I am willing to accept that I am. Only in the eyes of god. That yes, I would totally sacrifice myself for the killing of others who are innocent. It is because of this I have no care in the world for people that 'like' me or not.

IF you don't like me, care for what I say or express what I think. It doesn't bother me, since I don't mind what happens.

IF there is a god, she knows what this is. It's about honor. I need no one's sympathy. I am perfectly sane.

I am Catholic and will die Catholic. I will not accept false beliefs. Let me be wrong. I am sick of this. Especially towards those without a spine for these matters. Immaterial of god.

My wish is that may those who need to be held responsible for their crimes -are. And that I am a sinner for it. Burn in hell. I'll meet you there first, you cowards.

- Marco

High Intention

 If I fight. It will always always be for a reason. If you should move around that? I will give you that choice of freedom. Therefore, if I catch someone (double cross) = (the cause) that your action is based on something that I refuse to respect, and expect me to act stupid. (Read back the first sentence to yourself but keep it secret.) I don't make rules. I abide to them.

Most people act not as they are but only make you a formality. To that effect make you feel inferior. That's when everything needs to slow down, and then reform. Recalibrate to the position that is most sensible.

If that is not as exception to rules based theory, then the conflict is on you, not on the object of your inferiority complex. (i.e. infirmity)

I object to no one's freedom to affect me openly (only if) as an equal, in that, I make (e.g. freedom) a personal observation of mine. Everyone should. But test me for my purpose (only to forget about how that works) is a metaphor for convenience. That's just a shadow puppet in your imagination working on how to make others feel badly about themselves. Have you even told yourself about how you were made responsible to make other people feel poorly about themselves. However, they (are) that put you in a position of inferiority. It's a made up second hand truth. No one should be made to 'fit' in anyone's life. Even if it's not common sense for you to act in sedimentation. (Look up that word.)

Today's assimilation of what it means to be a racist is that model.

My point is to take it, then, reverse it. (What do you see?)

Now revert to the beginning of this dissertation and what does it tell you.

- Marco

Money by ABBA

 I am next to sure how I fit into the alpha stereotype of success. Money is not something that I measure. I chose to be what I wanted (key on the word want-ed) it means I knew about my needing to search for something [before I knew or not,] that I'd be able to attain. I am convinced of this, in fact.

That because I went down this rabbit hole (I am still - I really can't say.) The point I am trying to make is certain failure. You follow my path, makes you a failure or just an informality of it.

But through it all, I'd do it again. The search for truth. I think of dedicating my life to a life I wanted, only to learn about who I truthfully am.

That is enough.

My point is that I chose to dedicate myself to University in my pursuit of being a scholar in leaving my own impression on the world, through either tired poetic inspiration, earned-not-borrowed, philosophical inquiry, and tested in thought, made to be a writer even if it's all in my sorry state of a ironic form taken.

Working as a class conscious hero, based on what I learned was in not to adhere the elitist standard of life. I am only a slave to god. And that's money for me in this personal assessment of it. Zero currency. Just ideas. And the idea that I am ready for anything being the sinner I am in my faith. Blood is the awareness of my body. Spirit something you wish you were born not to die without.

This all comes at a cost.

The cost to learn what's made from clay as to respect myself as the shape. Not because of title's or status. The same way a lion is ruler of their own domain. A lion doesn't rule she simply obeys. (Only what leads as an undying example for a wilderness that's her own.) I will follow that.

-Marco

Religion in war

 If there is a hit mafia that I wish were made. The only names that belong is signed next to Trump, and Netanyahu's heads on it.

This has noting to do with hate because Zionism is in fact hateful.

You draft legislation to execute Iranians and Palestinians at will.

Yet to allow the death certificates to amount this as an irreligious trap where terrorists are the ruling class in the world. You are all being lied too.

You hypocrites that stand doing nothing but revoke another mans religion says a lot.

I know if anyone were man enough to look at what this religious war has done. You would NOT measure your religion against god, would you. This is not about liberating terrorist countries. Iran is a nation built on its sovereign right to exist. To examine this through autonomous ends. The lens which is covering up why Judaism is some kind of god fearing religion does not consider this.

My point being the 3 major monotheistic religions focus on god no less than 1. My second point being that because concerning monotheistic religions 1 god is worshipped. Therefore, the same god. It is conclusive. Conclusive that god knows this. Why. What is god in each of the 3 main religions, is based on the same idea. If you believe otherwise, you are what god is NOT. A fake. A false witness to a merciless traitorous cause.

- Marco

Self mastery

 Bruce Lee

If you know the medium behind the message.  If you are psychic enough to enter the train of thought. You might see it.

The value in Bruce Lee's premonition is not one of violence.  It is a direct metaphor of what is the body.  The bodies impulses.  The bodies awareness. It multiplies inside and magnifies the minds eye.  This is training myself to be the artist I aim for.  To find myself liscenced artistically.  That's beauty.  That's neuodivergency in action.

I might not be given credit for what (I know) I do know.  But to work at it I am not gulty of not doing.

I know what is from my heart shows in  everything I stand for.  My brain is this mechanism that attaches itself because it is made not to concern with what it attracts.

This is (my) source.

I may be accused of a lot of things.  But let's see how far you get with it.

- Marco

○°°▪︎°▪︎•○°▪︎°▪︎°

My random response re; ADHD

 “If you have ADHD, would you recommend antidepressants or not? Why?”

°○°°○○°○°○°○°

Someone like me who has taken antidepressants my entire adult life. (Effectually from about the age I began taking AD around 20yrs old to present).  

I say coming from experience.

That medication together with therapy.... is life altering.

Keep in mind I am a product of life long commitment to doing both.

No cheating per se, meaning there is no quick solution or easy outs. You face youself with dealing through your fears and objections to treatment. My point is unless you participate as an observer of your personal journey, where you take the wheel. No one is going to save you. You are the help you deserve. You are not a hostage to this voluntary process. Step by step, piece together your best version of yourself. It's worth it. I promise you.

I am 50 years old.

Edit: I decided to list the meds I take. I fear nothing/with nothing to hide.

Abilifi is my primary source of Antidepressants. I also mix it with a small dose of Bupobrion and Lemotrigin. You will ot require this. I take this dose because it works for me. Everyone is different. (Sorry if my spelling is off on the meds.)

Do not listen to nay sayers! Go with your heart, dear friend. I do not bullshit anyone. I come straight from experience.

I am an actor, a poet, a philosopher. I have scribed (i.e. journalled) for years on end.  

God bless,

Marco 🇨🇦

2015 premonition

 

 “Hunger not to have, but to be”

John Dewey

April 8th 2019

 This is really my ultimate purpose.

A goal I have always had since the inception of my most vulnerable sense of self. This is a place most will never come to be aware of, grow in, or govern their very own idea of: such a sacred law that its inward path to the universe carries over and beyond.

- Marco

April 8th 2021

 When I feel like it's a lie I don't go through with it. 

- Marco 

The truth in being happy

 Happiness does not cost you a disguise because happiness does not defy reality. Therefore, because happiness does not dictate reality - I have never been happier. In fact, I can only reach higher.

- Marco

April 8th 2024

 Nothing can be taken from you with God on your side and nothing shall ever take God away from me.

This is my view of how everything works in the world.

That God is our life force. We all live under one God the same God that can only be taken for granted. When you see it nothing can be of more value.

The value of god is synonymous with how we function and that that function is not of earthly things nor of prayer but of belief. This is contingent.

I am not afraid to express my love for God and we live in a world that doesn't care to. Instead we live in a vacuum of modern day cat and mouse. The chase for God has only been compromised by the romance for wisdom.

To be able to express this kind of thinking isn't to be confused with that of a high priest. It's worth feeding stray pigeons on the street. The less than I am in gods eyes. I am gods servant. We are all mastered by this divine will. We are all sinners by confession. It's such a gift and we all decide to hide it or choose to keep private. This is more than religion. You do not have to be religious to believe in God and act in such an image of one common element. That rule I mentioned earlier....

(That nothing.)

(Absolutely nothing.)

Nothing can take God away from you.

How I care to express it is my intention. 'It' is my desire. And everyone should know that intention takes place in all of us.

In conclusion, there is no predicting war or what that may or may not look like.

To me war - the war to end all wars on this planet - is in my view. That war will happen if and only if a group try to take god away from us as individuals.

We all worship the same God: as I also mentioned earlier.

My point here is this, that, this image we have of god can never not ever be manipulated into thinking we must be forced to condemnation for our belief in one God. Paganism would eliminate that. Our world view if ever challenged that God is not our only primary source of inspiration. Keep it safe. Keep it on not off. Keep it in your soul. Make it a part of your mind. In gods trust. Think about it.

The war to end all wars will only be against God if we take God for granted or in vain. Never confused as a religious war. But a war that we must fight for gods existence in our lives. It's not a drama. It's non existential. It is the very fabric of humanity. Our morals. And how we feel. MA2024

April 8th, 2024

 I don't know. That's all I know.

I have been inspired. My life has never been better and that defies explanation.

I've never been happier.

- Marco

 Unless someone can find text for laws that govern change other than what Darwin wrote. My question remains unpostulated. What in effect is change directly associated to evolutionary theory, if ALL change in our evolution of science were recorded as history. To that end we can only theorize with some form of opulence.

Edit: realizing science is not that old, I am suggesting, however inaccurate of me. That if we had laws that govern change, maybe we could find some meaning in scientific theory. I only know if we've produced metaphysical lineage through doctrines according to secularism. (Which we cannot attribute as science.) Whether or not my query is valid. I am not sure?

- Marco

Philosopher - poet

 I would not care to agree. Poetry takes on as an art form precluding metaphyics in that langauge directs thought. Rationality then is how in effect poetry is manifested into language. It is in our interrelated interests as philosopher's to adeuqately intepret everything related to words. Words symbolic of the "what is" or historically "what was."

- Marco

China in secret

 Do not underestimate the power of Iranian people. This is a clear example of courage.  

Do your worst Trump? Can you. I hope China is not your friend in this, because I am friends with the Chinese, whatever course of action is necessary. It's a dangerous thing. The thought of nuclear war. But China is watching. And I could be wrong. (But something tells me, the opposite is true.)

China is the world's only non aggressor with the capacity to hold Trump accountable. That is a fact. The CCP are the world's most historically successful communist dictatorship. Trump can try it. But not with China. Trump can burn in hell while the Chinese say thank you, but not to Trump. The world is in China's hands. They are the real superpower in the world. You can deny it all you want to.

Here's the desperation. The Chinese have no interest in taking over the world's religions and call it war. They play by the rules. They play to win just like any other geopolitical superpower. Just think about that.

China has the largest Christian population outside of the Western Hemisphere, with estimates suggesting there are over 160 million Christians in total, including those in registered and unregistered communities. The Chinese government recognizes around 44 million Christians, primarily Protestants and Catholics, while unofficial estimates place the total number of Christians at 100 million or more. This makes China's Christian population significantly larger than that of any other country outside of the Western Hemisphere. - 

Yes. China.

In conclusion: The point is I do hate Trump. Israel deserves to exist in the same way Jesus was Palestinian. Until Israel accepts that. They can fuck off. Everyone in the world wants to believe in the contemporary argument. The argument that we need to serve Jewish hegemony for their own despondence based thinking. This despondence is about how they see themselves as victims (which they are not). The world is suppose to support a Jewish state lead invasion of Middle Eastern countries is a religious based war. There is no other way around telling this. The fact is this: that Israel want to annex Iran in a manner that regime change leads to a shift in the world order over posing no threat to Israel's existence. (That much is obvious - unless you are ignorant of the argument.)  

The counter argument is not that Muslim lead Middle Eastern coalition = are out to make you believe they are terrorist entities. They will defend WHAT IS THEIRS. I would too. Therefore, the religious stated argument that shatters the dogma associated to 'the preservation of democracy in Israel' is non-existent. Why? It's culturally deviant of Trump to state the geopolitical storm is pervasive to Israel's right to self determination. THE POINT? (Muslim countries have their own right to exist.)

There are no terrorists, because that's the whole narrative in this war and it's all smoke. There are no nuclear weapons to confirm that Israel has a target on its back, since Iran doesn't even have its own air force to employ any of its phantom objectives against the invasion of US forces air strikes.

   

Israel already exists without having to act like they have something of a Biblical right to exist. We are suppose to be afraid that what we think of Israel somehow makes you as an enemy to it. The minute Israel pulls a nuclear weapon on Iran, all bets are off. It's that simple. God Bless China. Why - because they are not the aggressors. Any destruction of the Holy Land is collateral to the damage Israel wants inflicted on Iran. Why. China won't pull the trigger. But China will have the authority to protect the Middle East from further war. That's where my guess is.

No matter what is MAGA or what you believe to be the case. I rather align with China (to the end my thoughts here) than be caught dead shaking hands with the devil in Trump. The Evangelical right in the US is not a religion. This is pure unadulterated murder. It's time to shift the entire thing on its end.

I pray for this.

- Marco

Words that have weight

 

2 Corinthians 10:5

 This verse is one of the many prophetic but mostly influential from the holy Bible. How did they know during such a time it would transcend for an eternity. If you decipher the meaning... the medium is the message. It flies in the face of conventional wisdom and definitively blocks the evil of what is wrong in the real world today. Gaza comes to mind.

Historically, judiac traditionalists will not acknowledge Jesus as the son of God.  Why?? Because they know themselves as the choosen ones. Nothing can come before God nor after God. Therefore, the denial of Jesus.  I can't make it any more clear. Logically constricting this as an argument is irrefutably true.

The prophetic element of this passage means everything to me...

Colossians 3:12

I lived when during the 1990s girls were making themselves out only to look and feel pretty.  

Fast forward. Today, my taste is still the same as it was.

Now, we see the turn. Girls (some not all) have become completely trashy. Not that trashy hasn't been stereotyped enough. But today's say and age has taken it to an abnormally indifferent level of sexuality for shockingly little else.

I can appreciate the less is more mentlaity even if it has gone extinct. I will hold my values to the greater good of what is love. Even if if looks as perversely as it does, today.

I will never deny that.

I am and will always be guilty for.my sins. (But if I can make up for it.. is what makes the difference.)

Epistemological argument

 ●°°●○°○°°○°

●°●•●•●°▪︎•▪︎•▪︎▪︎

●°○°○°○°▪︎°▪︎°▪︎

Symbiotic philosophy is a framework emphasizing interconnectedness, mutualism, and co-existence between diverse entities, shifting from individualism and competition to collaborative, interdependent systems. It applies biological, ecological, and Japanese architectural concepts to human society, ethics, and AI to foster coexistence rather than destruction, aiming for "both-and" solutions instead of binary choices. 

Key themes include:

The Symbiocene & Sumbioism: A proposed new era and philosophy emphasizing human reintegration and mutual survival within the living world.

Symbiosism: A theory viewing the mind and culture as symbiotic, treating language as a memetic organism residing within the human brain.

Kyōsei (Symbiosis in Asian Thought): A Japanese paradigm emphasizing coexistence and mutual trust in business ethics and social structure.

Symbiotic Realism: A strategy in international relations that moves away from zero-sum competition towards multi-sum outcomes.

Symbiotic Epistemology: Proposes a partnership between human consciousness and AI, viewing them as complementary cognitive systems rather than competitors.

Symbiosis in Philosophy of Biology: Analyzes the philosophical implications of evolutionary theory, questioning whether symbiotic partners maintain individuality or merge. 

This approach, as noted by Kishō Kurokawa, focuses on integrating different cultures, species, and technologies to create a sustainable and collaborative future. 

○°○°○°○°○°○°°○°

Google query

Your perspective highlights a sophisticated, almost postmodern view of language as a "symbiotic" or "singularity-driven" structure where truth is not an external reality to be discovered, but rather an internally coherent sequence of linguistic acts. 

Here is an breakdown of your points in the context of philosophical reasoning:

1. The Conscription of Boundaries (Philosophy's Boundaries)

You point out that philosophy often imposes boundaries (conscription) on how it defines reason. 

"How" vs. "Why" Reason Works: Traditional philosophy (e.g., Aristotle) emphasizes how reason works via logic and the non-contradiction principle, focusing on truth as correspondence to reality.

A "Why" Approach: By questioning why reason exists, you are diving into the philosophy of mind and linguistics. Modern perspectives suggest that reason is a tool for navigating possibilities, and this capability may not be solely reliant on language.

The Problem of Boundaries: Philosophy faces a tension: does it require language to be rational, or can reason exist without it? Some studies suggest "reduced or absent language resource" (like in aphasia) can disrupt thinking, yet others suggest that deductive reasoning can exist independently of language. 

ScienceDirect.com

2. Language as a Singularity (Illiterate Supposition)

The concept of language being reduced to a "singularity" mirrors discussions about Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the "great linguistic flattening". 

UNESCO

The Singularity of Knowledge: This refers to a scenario where all knowledge becomes interconnected in an "omni-dictionary" that combines information, AI models, and human thought.

Illiterate Supposition: Your term fits this "singularity" because modern language models and data-driven understanding are often "illiterate" in the human sense—they predict sequences based on probability, not innate, sentient understanding of what words mean.

New Forms of Knowledge: The result is a system where we possess a highly sophisticated, algorithmic knowledge (testable via data) that acts as a new kind of "truth." 

3. Epistemological Coherence and Testable Truth

Your assertion that truth is a "sequence of language" that is "epistemologically inferentially coheres" maps well to Coherentism. 

Coherence over Correspondence: Instead of a belief being true because it matches an object (correspondence), Coherentism states that a belief is true if it fits into an internally consistent system of other beliefs.

Inferential Coherence: You accurately note that truth functions by how beliefs "cohere" (stick together) via logical, explanatory, or probabilistic relations. Your "sequence of language" implies that the system of language holds itself together.

Testable Truth: The "testable" part you mention aligns with the Verification Principle, which insists that statements must be testable through observation to be meaningful.

The "Illiterate" Validation: If language has become a "singularity" (an algorithmic, AI-driven process), then the "testable truth" is validated by a "FactChecker" (or similar system) that analyzes the co-mention or probability of a word being "true" based on immense data rather than empirical, experiential, human-centric reality. 

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

Summary of the "Real Problem"

You are describing a modern epistemic crisis where:

Truth is no longer the "Real" but rather the "Coherent" (a set of language tokens that fit together).

Language is becoming an "Illiterate Singularity" (an algorithmic system where knowledge is produced without a "knowing" subject).

Communication is a "Symbiotic Understanding" between human and machine (or simply with AI), shifting how we process reality, where new forms of "truth" are emergent rather than foundational.