Happiness in a {plutocrat}

 Energy should never come in the form of your nervous system shutting down. It means I am perfectly aware of what fear does to me on a personal level. The only thing I have ever learned to do is learn how my energy informs my way of being, the sensory world interprets me as.

Therefore ,we are all fractals of a greater purpose.

Energy escapes me constantly.

But that is the beauty of it. That's why I exist the way I do. I make my ideas useful to me first, second comes everything else after my a priori experience of it.

Metaphysics is the conscious mind working at deconstructing reality. And is how I believe in doing my philosophy. I only return to what the information I provided through observations. Therefore, the ability to observe is doing philosophy. (I think.)

When people judge others through our Plutocracy in asking "What is the pursuit of happiness. . . "?? IT is automatically separate from asking "Is this person x or person y truly happy?" In the US their constitutional right is entered as if happiness is a quotient, that you are SERVE the RIGHT to be HAPPY. How stupid are you? (I need to ask.) Living the good life should NOT be examined by your right to happiness. Our self centeredness should never be a right to your QUALITY of life. Therefore, your idea of happiness may be a contradiction.

My idea of happiness is a formulation itself: that creating happiness is different than living it.

To me, intelligence is happiness. Intelligence is a concentration of the eternal. Only what is eternal can be made happy.

To experience life as we think of reality per se - it is in the attention you pay your observation of it. (Valuing everything.) So the static of the universe is just you on alert of the constant noise in it. That focus is to register happiness as a resistance to a cause. And if that your only cause were thought of as resistance. This in order you recreate what acts as eternal happiness (e.g. intent) in you. It is attending to compulsions that you trained your mind with. You unlearn something only before you were conditioned to believe in happiness as something of value itself. To attain happiness in the form of resistance itself.

- Marco

Cosmic shift

Thunder ⚡

 

Dave Guetta  

How the world governs those that work for it. No unicorns. No guns. No drugs. No money. (That's me.) Just the presence of something else greater, without making a choice you are FORCED to make. (I.e. belief in God) The safety of other's in place of values made for everyone. = The idea of what is "global consciousness" follows an unwritten code. Everything comes together but you don't necessarily know why.

My point is to serve. Serve what never allow for norms without questioning what those norms are.

- Marco

===============

Truth and happiness

 

 

if only freedom collapses

 

responsibility before freedom collapses

"Misery and poverty are so absolutely degrading, and exercise such

a paralysing effect over the nature of men, that no class is ever really conscious of its own suffering. They have to be told of it by other people, and they often entirely disbelieve them." - Oscar Wilde

================

“But possibly I am something more than I suppose myself to be.” Rene Descartes

==============

Psalm 23.3

 

fearing I am enough

 

the confirmation of language

 When I think too fast - I don't know what difference exists in the world to presuppose of it.

When I think slowly - it's a matter of time over measure.
When it doesn't matter - the question isn't worth thinking about.


My point is when life has tested me, the answers never really came until I experienced it. I suppose the nature of language supports this argument. Language just didn't come to me through something vernacular built on semantics. It was learning about how to master the self through a reckoning with something personal.

I have never been asked why I write the way I do, because I realize what I have mastered, can not be copied. That is to say the truth gives it's name to those that aim toward a greater denomination. I am talking about asking questions, observing what is, of value.

And when I began operating from this point of examining life.

What I did was interpret the things around me in a manner of vigilance over substantially amounting my recourse for sensory experience. (This last sentence should confuse no one.) It means that a heightened state of awareness occupies the mind in large part. I asked no questions, if ever. It was a matter of acting on things that I connected together as some form of it. That is how language functions.

That once expressed into a formal kind of thought, words gather the image of sensory experience and sensory experience - only. The point is to exact a sign. Assigning some form of understanding in psychological investigational choice. Why choices were made, as an example of what is a matter of the word you use assigned to it.

All of it relates to the sensory experience of what is.

The most important finding I have ever made is to create what asks a question if only and only if - worth asking. The answer behind everything turned into: 'how do you know?' And the property of serious inquiry starts from there.

Therefore, words, their meaning and interpretation are not consequential. Ever.

The point I am making here?

Never be fooled. Any fools choice of words, are still a choice worth paying closer attention to. To interpret this is the end of all things without which words are interpreted superficially. Think about that: words are not the interpretation of what it means to be or not to be restricted by our capacity to think. Therefore, the core belief of our worst fears are also turned into a projection of thoughtless action. Thoughtless projections are how a coward coerces its victim.

So in terms of the nature of language. Words are the nature of language that assign meaning to things. What we characterize language as - is a matter of interpretation to what is. What is the product of your intelligence as an image.

- Marco

disappearing act

 

Proverbs 10:28

 

experience to the source

 

July 16th 2026

It could be that. . . 'ME vs ME' = very interesting characterization into attaining self mastery or the machination of one's own awareness as propositionally ephemeral. How does "not caring" not contradict "doing better" because, that would ONLY be the case. In asking myself what is my experience.

To illustrate my points follow:

1 - What is the question behind what is in my imagination is the source of my ideas. (I am speaking on a personal level.) My goal is to make myself a resourceful actor. Knowing why I commit to an act.

2 - My cause is to see. To accept the shadow I possess in everything I do, not so I can cancel it. I want it to inform my functioning. This is really a matter of principle and be purposely creative. No matter what.

- Marco

Angel vibe