Good question which also happens to fly in the face of what is deontological. Conventional wisdom does not allow for the supenatural or a divine order of anything to do with monotheistic ends. However, does this also mean philosophy is branded against your hyper worldview? If I ask you what is a moral value system, I can't show you anything other than my own actions. Some actions are relatively scaled based on a cause. And my imprint of this in fact is our universal idologies done to promote the human condition. This can be done usefully by either philosophy that's a measure of deontological ends, or a measure of interpretation which we act in theory.
I would also ask if there is human error in judgement that we must reject if one is to move forward. What ends justifies the means. So Kantian ethics is the formulation of cause and effect.
- Marco
°●○°°▪︎°●○°○°
No comments:
Post a Comment