do you (March 20th 2009)

ever wake up with a feeling of complete enlightenment, where answers come naturally as they are. If I could describe this to you, it would be as though living in a world of perfect total clarity. I guess that sounds hard to believe. So much of me, although, particularly has made this impression of late - I can't say 'why' I get these feelings. I suppose it is to do with enlightenment on some level. Though enlightenment can be purely subjective a retort. This recourse of myself, in some stages, throughout this time in my life I think has a certain level of objectivity in mind. Causes which I can communicate without some belief in knowing the outcome or what may result due to cause.



I restrict these feelings - not to ambition - per se.



I would equate my own enlightenment to 2 phases separate of natural cause(s). One being passion, the other being hope.



Sometime(s), if I wake-up, it's living as if in a nightmare, to which end I cannot differentiate the outcomes present-ed to me in that state of utter delirium. In which case, most dream(s) depicting the challenge of your altered state in a (i.e. parallel dimension) for sake of argument cannot be unfounded in a universe all its own. As unnatural the vivid a psychosis might take you.



When I awake from this dream state, the world appears to me, exactly as it once was a priori to the dream world before it happened. I do not realize this until, I begin to challenge the thought, with the same thought that 'it was only a dream.' However, these are not the answers one is to fill without a sense of urgency. Which, this leads myself to believe, that my retroactive sense of the dream life is an opportunity to examine the question of its exactness. However, my problem became one of, what measure can I propose the possibility of a duplicity? In other words, how can I answer questions, to answer, in a world that does not exist from this of our own. If there is a correct interaction between myself, into a modern day paradox of the cerebral kind, when I make the choice to correspond with a mixed interpretation. One part human (physical), the other dream (spiritual).



There can be no confusion between underlying variables, which a paradox of this kind would undertake the possibility of both human (cerebral) or "the dream" (psyche) to co-exist. The dichotomy present is theoretically, when one is awake, there is no definitive proof that dreams exist. Therefore, you or I as a physical entity cannot assimilate or combine the same physical properties without a dream which make-believe is absent.



In this desired state between dream-life and the presence of time in physical reality, there are conditions from which the physical property between one's answer to what-is-real, is to believe what you want to believe. That condition is already present in the universe of one's cerebral ineptitude. The second part of this ulterior "dream state" is the non-physical attributes, which exclude such things such as hope or vision is to wish fulfillment. Wish-fulfillment is something typically associated with dreams. However, therein lay the difference between the dream-life one experiences without the interpretation to correctly match disingenuous inferences. The nightmare - which is equally relevant to one's dream life is nonetheless a dream of escape, or abandonment.



(1) In conclusion of such argument, the favour of what dreams represent are insofar as emblematic of conditions. I argued this, because conditions of such self-awareness prior to the dream-life could not possibly cohabit in the same place you once were before the dream happen(s). This is lucid to no particular subjective force, which is to examine, with what dreams contain physical yet actual properties. In fact, the dream-life is impossible to reconstruct which is what makes them so fascinating.



(2) The conclusion of such a dichotomy, is that common sense already dictates what we know about dreams, but not why we dream. The dream life represents one's physical attributes, the paradox, that one does not differentiate between the dream life. The purpose of when one dreams, assuming we have no direct idea that something physical happened, even if immune to it. The paradox of an altered state such as dreams, in fact, lead to the same direct answer of strictly unknown phenomenon.



(3) The final conclusion of this continues between the altered state of dream(s) to physical property. There are in litany of the subject hope - and - passion. Perhaps, there are few other types of interaction which shapes the human mind or ego, yet are sublime to subjectivity. Both hope - passion, working together do not form dream(s). However, those are concepts which form vague if not abstract interpretations impossible to emit through gestation. Unfamiliar as hope - passion, resemble nothing they reveal to. The same kind of ambiguity refers back into the dream life in hope of achieving a desired goal. Passion - is of unfulfilled destiny, that can only be broken, yet crushes the feeling of a wish fulfilled. Therefore, hope always leads before passion. Such is the dream life as is to living the good life.

=================

Just to clarify something. . . I do not plagiarize any of what I write. In fact, teachers in the past would ask me of a source to my writing. When I would reply these are my own thought(s), they either wouldn't believe me, get jealous, then fail me.

-------------------------

So why don't you wirte a book. The way you express yourself with words, you would make a great author. Serious! I would purchase, not becuase your a friend but for the way you write.

------------------------

I am seriously_flabbergasted. Not so much due to the compliment, (because you've truly humbled me), but why you have flattered none the same. I thank you. Totally unexpected. I thank you.

----------------------