pathology

I am religious.  I am moral. Therein lay the dichotomy.  That any fabrication of a lie does not constitute as the immoral objectification in nulifying religion or choice of what is non secular.  What makes me religious is not what I repeatedly do because I know I am born a sinner.  When you adopt the truth behind such awareness.  This allows you to think and be accepting of everything so long as non truth is conditional. Knowing what is right from wrong. *Deontological = Kantian ethics.  Religion plays the role.  It's up to the individual to find the space that is light of it. - Marco

===========

Cody Hooper

 it's not all about you. How do you justify whats happening in the 3 major mass religions ?

==========

(My rebuttal)

religion is starting WWIII. In which case there is only one god to blame. Which by that logic means, the three main monotheistic religions are what is setting the war? If that is your argument, you are in error. I stated I am both (religious and moral). I also unequivocally stated a Deontological way of reasoning should be based. My point is between being irreligious or not moral per se can be defined.

-Marco

========

Cody Hooper

 you started barking like a guilty dog. You are the victim there was no reason to plead your case of morality. it's weird that millions of Christians aren't pissed about this which makes me despise religion more for being a tool for power to start ww3.

-----------------------

My Rebuttal:

I never implied that. My argument therein characteristizes deontological ethics as the bridge from which systemic disobedience functions. As result a reduction of truth about morality itself is not at fault. Your question is both loaded and condescending as it is insufficiently a denial about what my postulates should define.

- Marco