Self centeredness

 Everything is becoming, it is not being.

I question what makes you think you can do philosophy. You don't. You never qualify your ideas. You make claims then refute anything opposite. I can't deliberate with you. Your posts are something that hover over the very same concept of what is metaphysical. The very word 'being' is the inference for which metaphysics is drawn. My point is if everything is becoming, then there is no center. The very assumption contradicts everything that is verifiably controversial, you create controversy here. That's a subjective approach to reason. IT IS BEING. The very foundation of metaphysics is 'being'. Being is the cause for which we act on ideas. Not becoming.

- Marco 

==================

Ignorance.

Process philosophy (also ontology of becoming or processism) is an approach in philosophy that identifies processes, changes, or shifting relationships as the only real experience of everyday living. In opposition to the classical view of change as illusory (as argued by Parmenides) or accidental (as argued by Aristotle), process philosophy posits transient occasions of change or becoming as the most fundamental things of the ordinary everyday real world.

=================

Philosophically speaking, being and becoming are often treated as opposed ways of describing reality. Being refers to what simply is—stable, permanent, and self-identical. Something that truly is would remain itself and not fundamentally change. In classical philosophy this view is most famously associated with Parmenides, who argued that change is impossible because “non-being” cannot exist. If something were to change, it would have to come from what is not, but since non-being cannot be, reality must ultimately be one, eternal, and unchanging. According to this view, the changing world perceived by the senses is deceptive; true reality is pure, indivisible being. In contrast, becoming refers to process, transformation, and flux. Here reality is never static but always in motion, continually emerging and dissolving. This perspective is famously associated with Heraclitus, who held that everything is in constant change, captured in the idea that one cannot step into the same river twice because both the river and the person are always changing. Under this view, nothing possesses permanent being; everything exists as a process of becoming. Because of this, being and becoming appear logically opposed: being implies permanence and identity, while becoming implies change and transformation. If something truly is, it should not change; but if everything changes, it seems nothing truly is. This tension became a central problem in metaphysics.

=====================

Aleksandr Vilinskiy " the changing world perceived by the senses is deceptive; true reality is pure, indivisible being. In contrast, becoming refers to process, transformation, and flux. Here reality is never static but always in motion, continually emerging and dissolving."

Being is movement that is a quality. Movement is the knowledge for seeing. Seeing what is. What is language. What is movement. What is thought. It all corresponds to being.

As I said in an earlier post to this. Being is metaphysics in action. Movement must be free to understand what our movement is. There is the cause for the metaphysical. It has no beginning and no end. Seeing is metaphysical. Therefore, metaphysics is both seeing and knowledge of the 'knowledge of being'. Complete awareness.

- Marco