Sunday, June 07, 2026
The subtle art of seduction by Marco Almeida
Wednesday, April 29, 2026
intoxicating defect (April 29th 2009)
As do - stop - then do - run, that is the kind of adrenaline one might find dense, so dense, it fills the air in a making of lighter weight to carry as if gravity reversed itself, only, to reduce our sense of less application of necessary force. That redundant, because, if force travelled upward without any kind of gravity would defy the laws of a physical nature, the laws of gravity would not allow for such disobedience. This provides a clear example, of the Newton provision to gravity, that all such force cannot travel upward without a return to it's original frame of conjecture.
The more you actually try to prove, perhaps, the less you get out of it - would have been a better result - known to such things without any weight to them. However, even insufficient information finds its way into an inscape, trapped, within the parade of gravitational pull, so, parades were given a general route to follow without really telling us anything about its purpose. Science, has no mystery attached to its easy, happy, frame of existence in life.
Upon so much one stands by the wooden leg, on a little, deviant, perhaps omission of greed, as completely left to search a time in place that that the place originated. Where does this keep, holding down, this weight of such fortunate circumstances, described, only as the perverse patronizing force of a cynical nature.
This body type of no particular birthstone, gave such, to the freedom of age upon years, counting not days or years, but only recurring thoughts of force given to him by nature.
First came the worst - as forming the heart in shape with love - came betrayal. It is something almost unavoidable, but to the best of my knowledge, bitter resentment does not contain which instead in fact rose out of inner peace, strength, sincerity, which can only amount to pleasure of something unknown to most anyone else.
Then perhaps time became a pill of enemy-like, proportions, that you consume in a small tedious dose, a prevention of the mind to wander back from there, that in time, you may recognize how these creatures concealed itself from you, only to reveal the mask they can no longer hide behind, that when they see you, you may know they are in fact - yes - in a small tedious dose, you may know they are in fact living a lie.
Though there is nothing that this time in the occupancy of a story, can measure the diameter of width over infinite whereabouts, such moments are made. As to refuse the laws of physics, to also may refuse, those that contaminate it.
Along side of moral ambiguity, is intellectual dishonesty. The flood against time is a result of perverse cynicism, so to speak, one combines the elements of random execution as if to examine nothing worth deciding, then replaces it without the ethics of reason, then dangerously crossing the joining crossroad. This is an extension of conscientious stupidity, for sincere ignorance, but what can only then be replaced, again with defying such anarchy to the same principle once it appears.
The weight of the world in a free falling choice, coincidental to, the defiance of laws or scientific explanation.
No longer has the insubordination of gravity, felt so mundane, as if to say take me from this long awaited return, as if to respond, you were never here that long from vacation, then what are you doing here, you forgot. The question was a matter of decency, yet, so few people act in truth, they rather pretend, the lie is always a better solution to the problem. Though even lies deserve proper solutions, which is how dignity is recovered from such greater things less than short-lived material in matter.
Though once, that same liar snuck in behind that buried shadow, quite content with being only half-witted, or clever depending on who you ask, throughout this time in the trial of no-return, so many disguised have made their living on it. To this end, it is to refuse going through the motions, where as they were - so many disguised - rest on their laurels.
In my time, I see a generation gone by which I refuse to acknowledge with any envy, only remorse, that those are they who are now happier going through the motions - it is there that they will stay, I seek refuge, from that one-upmanship, of ulterior motive, or grieving a reality, that represent so few.
Which is where my gravity has always been.
Monday, February 23, 2026
Sunday, February 22, 2026
My kingdom for a horse
Acting notes:
Feedback is made in what choices are through the act of listening.
Happiness (universal end) is Intelligence leaving the body (through action).
Wednesday, February 18, 2026
question: Are there necessary truths that are not analytic but are either synthetic or metaphysical? If so, what would be some examples and how would you justify your claim?
•●°●○°°○○°○•
Everything is metaphysically relevent when it comes to reasoning on a philosophical level. You reach a state of transparency in a world we are in. The order in what we seek to interpret into language. The transcending of our very thoughts into something concrete. It is metaphysically impossible not to perform philosophy without the antimatter we have within ourselves to repel or displace (a thing for that thing in itself). My point is that in order to prove what we think is a finite process within a system that may or may not work against it. Philosophy to be true of something can also be false.
- Marco
Sunday, August 10, 2025
First principles working as philosophy
"I have knowledge of my forthcoming thoughts, and/or words. My awareness notwithstanding, my consciousness is where my thoughts and/or words take form. Emotion is its root, but consciousness is its essence. Howbeit, it is undefined philosophically, therefore it still belongs to me. Hence, who can impose a definition on it for me?"
My rebuttal:
Sounds to me like rudimentary supposition. Nothing wrong to report. We all carry an element of this type awarenss. Especially when you get to a sophisticated point of philosophical inquiry. Scholars in general, for example, rely on their expertise using empirical evidence to justify their claims. In my work doing philosophy is based on an intuitive level. My measure of langauge is mastered using language in this intuitve element as philosophical.
Edit: I am well aware scholars would reject this stated view of philosophy. But Socrates wouldn't. If that makes sense.
Edit 2: and what I mean by rudimentary is that you allow your thoughts to guide or modify what already may be known philosophy. Only you have an awarenss that follows principles to affirm your own views as impartial. Therefore, relevant as you reveal these thoughts in logical - linear manner.
I know my shit.
- Marco
Sunday, August 03, 2025
The Good
I don't know what sharing good news is, but I am here too.
“To find fault is easy; to do better may be difficult.” Plutarch

