Total and utter bullshit. If I can not tolerate the self, the idea of the id, my egocentric self. Then what good is tolerance. What does it serve. My point being that without knowing what my tolerance is - also for. There are norms which my ethical tolerant self only will defend. This is to say there are forces at work in favoring a tolerant (psychological) end in attitude tolerance itself rewards.

To think of tolerance keeps to my beliefs. Therefore, tolerance (its foundation) is connected with relation to recognize my personal intolerance, which increases the odds for my survival. Tolerance in this argument represent universal models in the name of crisis arising, where tolerance acts, intolerance reveals the truth. If my tolerance is tested (for naming truth) as in failing that idea of truth gets rejected, a crisis emerges as sign from which to act. You keep the foundation for tolerance as the bridge to your rational self.

○°○°○°

Marco ©️ 2026

○°○°○°○°●°