Killers in high Places

 October 13, 2009

Literally, I find astonishing how little ignorance, can in effect come across no fear of retribution? (No such ignorance can it find in me.) To digress this point, perhaps further to a lesser fashionable sense of the word, intuition, can somehow manage a picture of thoughtless personally degrading deprecation. Of course, I am inferring to the cause/effect relationship between the internal versus external alterations of everyday life. This may seem almost morbid. It may appear it is, or not, that at times the dissatisfaction of one's position is not in connection with the other, perceived as a desirable, inalienable -requisition. However, myself included in a noble lie of 'discontinuation'.

Discontinuation, would result in so called my field of vision as a reprimand of unequal parts. Which is to say: that not all parts are equal to the sum of its whole, but on the contrary, if I were to reverse my judgment. It goes without saying: the whole must always be equal to the sum of its parts. In my most recent, experience of a accidental purpose, I've come across this with revelation of discontinuation as a daily routine. That people are more interested in misunderstanding then missing opportunities. I would also relate this definition of experience, through, though not limited to fear of mistaken identity or lack thereof a better form.

So much as in vanity, as in law, you can never tell the difference? That is to say: if you presume innocence before guilt. When I think of vanity, in the case of laws, we are as individually responsible to create our own destiny. My thought is as follows: laws cannot be a vanity riddled question of ill repute. Evidence goes to show for any such thing subject to jurisprudence. Subject to jurisprudence are all laws which govern the basis of all humanity. (Though in a paragraph.) Therefore, this is to exhibit certain kinds of behavior are not all acceptable at all times, but most of the laws are not prohibited to such behavior whether it be judged acceptable. All this examines is a pursuit of justice, nothing more.

So, insofar as I have thought, discontinuation can certainly create a metaphor of rather insignificant models. It is a kind of, for example, misdirection in this case is, in place of virtue or discontinuation. It is a universal habit, unknown, engrained within the framework of our society, and social identity. (In my view requires no sophisticated enigma due to chance it happens.)

The main occurrence (moral value) in 'discontinuation', I have not placed without making emphasis of my own. It is a theory (I have) which is two-fold. I place myself in it as such, as if it were a such thing which goes about on a daily basis. Therefore, free of thinking, routine is a thing which is synonymous with most people on a frequent level? If that is correct, I presume I myself see things much as most people do answer to. So, in looking at everything in a context put out, are routines only superficial on the surface? I would say not. It would defeat the main premise of self referral.

I have never been seen as a person who others may consider seeing the glass half-full, though I would also argue that may-be-true of what others subject toward me? I also would argue that I in fact do SEE the glass half-full, though not as others perceive it. This is in affect, my main argument regarding.