the political arcade

December 4, 2008

The very existence of democracy is almost unpronounced, it becomes a difficult thing to manage, which it is in the interest of ones civil authority to examine our place within the exact time from which one operates. I suppose the dynamics are similar to ancient predecessors from which all good things come, we are entertained in the view of secular beings thrust into a spotlight whether evil or not is no great matter. Further to this thought of many embodied prudent in our idea of government, perhaps we jump at the word 'inaction'. Which to my surprise I've observed countless, perverse, petulant, inferior, models for. Part of me realizes this, the other simply takes inventory to make sense of my own necessity in life. In short, to give this any meaning or hitherto my personal lack of clarity, my voice remains in tact - as opposed to a personified style in manipulation. In so many other words, it is this act I carry within no short order no man that is so called making superior judgments on my own behalf can allow.

When you attempt to identify with government, strange things may result, due to the power struggle which implies accountability. In this country of ours, responsible or reasonable accord should act in such parameters that laws are made just so. This is to say, what resembles any opposing forces in contradiction to the laws, are made prevalent as to be represented by those chosen to administer the assembly of we the people.

^This is in fact democracy, within a written framework of constitutional reform.

To make such claims are in search of the ambiguity that takes place in the political referendums, without being asked about or brought into our daily lives.

What is sought when the afflicted political parties are no longer engaged in political welfare, is no cause for alarm, either, or that in and of itself belongs.

Therefore, we can determine that those in power reflect a need of so little satisfaction, they've already dropped a confession of how innocent they clearly are. The troubling thing is, no matter how hard you try to look for the answers, sometimes there really are none. In politics, the political landscape in Canada has taken a nose dive that much more could be said about the Conservative dichotomy, about how Conservative values are not truly being made as promise. It is a difference in disguising the fact that incompetent leaders run - but - they can't hide.

We see instead the lawyers which to some may be common knowledge, that promise to return results, but alas cannot indeed make soup without a broth.

This infers my most previous form of argument: that in turn, nothing can replicate my right as an individual, no law can truly protect me against my enemies - which only I can avow is my choice not to raise white flags. In this case the color Red which symbolizes the maple leaf may be one of resistance. In that case there is something Stephen Harper himself may have been able to avoid, however, it is crystal clear that so many before. In and of itself, the government circa 2008 has never really been given a seal.

I can say I am certainly happy with that.

Again - when we see politicians arise playing a game of monopoly, which behind the scenes do not decree the average citizen, it makes you wonder do we find ourselves guilty of? It is not that politicians wake up every morning only to realize what they're trying to get away with is it, or is that something normal in throughout life's history of magicians.

There is no evidence of a political dichotomy being worn down, or the gavel being thrown at, it is a rational piece of resistance that we are blind to behind closed doors. Again - that only lawyers can see through facts, but facts cannot see us through due to one reason.

I do not see Stephen Harper as a true Conservative. I believe if he were, Harper would've been unequivocally elected as PM.