the jordan river

 December 6, 2009

When people confuse being outspoken, either by their actions or otherwise in speech, which would only surmount to senseless bigotry? This being the craziest thing I can think of - is a matter of habit - where (in my mind, anyway. . .) tells me. It is a question of I have no answer to provide, myself, without the answer. (Not that there is any answer necessary.) However, that being made true, the question is in and of itself entirely a relevant one.

I find it shameful, probably even more so disbelief, that any persons 'he' or 'she', has not as much the gravity to find a common intention - or - intention common. So to speak of my world view on immaterial matters of implication (i.e. material implication) becomes rather delirious a perspective.

The book I am currently enamoured in scientific study (i.e. reading) researches this very topic very well. At what point in the human psyche, do our causes within the human realm of existence, appropriate the same existence of another cause, be it 'natural' or 'inhuman', it is a classic illustration of the normative sense of which reality fosters our outer limits. So, what is being said in the dialogue creates, a substantive amount of reasoning, to introduce, me, myself as the reader, to a longer list of qualitative measures. (The world as we think we know it?)

From what source do we exhibit the force to, our interest's as a whole, on a human level which is secular with humanity. Or - is humanity extinct already? It is a powerful rendition, of fabled narrative, into a quantity of literal concerns. Does the power of poetry, realize a proper historical articulation of fact as the main idea, subjective analysis, or circumstance.