Dialectic philosophy is my idea of language as it acts in non contradiction as formally presented logic. . . which the purveyor interprets as either empirical or not. What I am suggesting is that comparing opposing ideas comes across as fallacy not objective truth. Therefore, my conclusion is that to determine how language records ideas, its primary function is a negation. "The truth must be (this) therefore it is or is not. Not here nor there dependant of evidence." = dialectical theoretical application.

Maybe the better definition is presented in that way.

Dialectic is ascertainable truth which may or may not emerge based on a theoretical construct of language. Concepts are valid only if those concepts can be tested by means of dialectical theory = language itself.

My argument being, dialectic theoretically can only be defined through use of language strictly based on its idiosyncratic function.

- Marco