Revealed Out of luck

Yesterday. . . I saw The DaVinci Code the movie. I am fairly confident without reading the book, it was a good adaptation of the original.

Simply put, the film is redundant.

1 - It starts with the main premise:

The movie begins telling us that Leonardo DaVinci is a master coder, once a head of a secret council, that protected the message of Jesus Christ. (e.g. Holy Grail)

2 - "The Holy Grail"

The assumption that Jesus was married. This was the purpose of the Holy Grail. That in order to prove Jesus existed, there is a rose line (i.e. Blood Line) of descendants. Jesus in fictional sense, did not have a wife or a child rearing mother. In the non-fictional reality of birth, the factual evidence if it were to exist would prove that Jesus existed empirically. In other words, it could not be proven false, that beyond a reasonable doubt Jesus had passed on his seed.

3 - Opus Dei

This sect/cult of religious followers of Jesus, act as disciples of the word of god. The church, is a head of which hitherto Opus Dei. However, the divide of believers and followers on behalf of Opus Dei will resort to any means to guard the "secret" of a blood line that proves Jesus divinity.

The scenario becomes rather redundant, and plays out of necessity.

The fact there existed a "son of god" that members of a secret society included a Blood Line, if it were protected.

My reasons for the refuting of the DaVinci Code:

- There is no surprise that there exists the idea that Jesus was Married.
- There is belief that Jesus created a belief system known as Christianity.

All of the time Jesus did exist, he may or may not have a child to bare his name. If that is true or false, makes the purpose of the DaVinci Code a story within a story that claims to prove nothing. If a blood line were to be the cause of people's faith in Jesus, the Church would be irrelevant. These points are the central focus of what we must precede with emphasis of.

I make emphasis of the fact, that the Catholic Church and its head: the pope.

I can tell you, in its entirety the movie is redundant. It makes a fallacy of history, using some questionable logic to understand the film. The film, without giving it away: is a good film to watch. But it comes out with little truth to offer, which is what I was hoping to get from it.

1 - There is no shock value.
2 - Jesus: may have had a wife. This, if it were true is not a surprise.
3 - The main premise of the film questions whether Jesus created offspring.

The DaVinci code is set to instruct of a secret society that believed Jesus left a blood line of descendants. Therefore, it would refute everything Jesus stood for in subjectivity. Faith would be a renewal of ones upbringing without the church being involved. Also, the trust in the role Jesus played would largely refute anything to do with fascism. No rules would be allowed or should be followed with justice in mind.