More twitter feeds

Marco Almeida ‏@bigcanadiano

Why is it a persons false desires - fear how others need, live in a vacuum, if they themselves unaware are fulfilling it.

Scot McCormack ‏@scotmccormack

Trying to impress people on the internet is the lowest form of self affliction. It just reeks of desperation.

Marco Almeida ‏@bigcanadiano

@scotmccormack What does that mean, 'trying to impress people'. All I read out of that was self-affliction which is mostly true.

Scot McCormack ‏@scotmccormack

If you are who you tweet, a handful of my followers are teenage girls with self image problems and metrosexual douchebags.

@scotmccormack There is no such thing as followers on an open medium. It is what it is, why take exception to that.

Marco Almeida ‏@bigcanadiano

@scotmccormack that's what worries me, scot, I do not protest human nature. Think about it.

Marco Almeida ‏@bigcanadiano

@scotmccormack please feel free to overreact re; 'sensitivity', truth is in my exaggeration.

Marco Almeida ‏@bigcanadiano

Each day that passes I am more and more thankful to live in Canada. As canadian am I, feels blessed.

Marco Almeida ‏@bigcanadiano

@scotmccormack do you touch everyone's life that way, or is it just me, I must be dreaming.

Marco Almeida ‏@bigcanadiano

@scotmccormack you were a royal d-bag last night, you are excused, it's not a majority of the time.

Marco Almeida ‏@bigcanadiano

I find it fallible how we live in a world traced out of fear, to embody the human condition - use discrimination to justify our actions.

Marco Almeida ‏@bigcanadiano

Oh, I know - . . .let me fake my own voice as if I know what I'm talking about. > fallacy of hypocrisy

Marco Almeida ‏@bigcanadiano

Why is it people find the argument of hypocrisy the newest form of fallacy being given. It borders on the ridiculous.

Twitter Feeds

Marco Almeida ‏@bigcanadiano

Hypocrites, true hypocrites and I will never get along.

Marco Almeida ‏@bigcanadiano

Quite simply selfish. <

Marco Almeida ‏@bigcanadiano

I don't get scared easily; I do find feeling intimidated just as fast, is not a skill, to no fault of my own. It places emphasis on being.

Marco Almeida ‏@bigcanadiano

The joy of movement is only superseded by enjoyment to persuasion, it's only motive, causes happiness.

Marco Almeida ‏@bigcanadiano

Being nice is not as unblessed as flagrant honesty, indifference of purity applies to one cause more imperfect then the other.applies.

Marco Almeida ‏@bigcanadiano

@scotmccormack I doubt my condescending nature is on par with the same intent you are leading yourself to believe. I am not being a dick.

Marco Almeida ‏@bigcanadiano

@scotmccormack What about rage, who said it's a bad thing. Tell me about something I don't know.

Marco Almeida ‏@bigcanadiano

@Suttsy23 Your name is on the jersey I ordered this week. > fact

Marco Almeida ‏@bigcanadiano

@scotmccormack I won't let you imply something that's totally false of me.

Marco Almeida ‏@bigcanadiano

@scotmccormack No worse than someone else's divorce from a candid reality; I have my own view of life. What can I say.

Marco Almeida ‏@bigcanadiano

Whoever said addiction is a bad thing - I don't want to know.

Perceptual reality

We are speaking, of course, of hyperbolic awareness in the same infinite sense of perceptual reality. (i.e. cosmic being)

1- We are cosmetic entities in the minds (human) order. (e.g. species specific time frame)

2- If there is depth perception unto our understanding of the physical universe around us,

3- a presence of "species specific" infinite possibilities, (i.e.what our perceptual experience creates,) would never materialize in-world upon which is based.

There is (a) perceptual experience in consciousness, then (b) reality has infinite possibilities, which follows (c) perceptual reality is experienced, why am I not seen or heard. Is the physical object exactly as we perceive it. > There is the answer. Therefore, no such thing as (species specific perceptual experience) takes place in time, the physical universe has a brain, owning its own mind.

Take This Waltz

so I saw take this waltz last night.

All I can say is I have no words.

 after everything you've taught us to see, that was an oscar worthy performance by michelle.

 the entire concept of the movie blew my mind.

I couldn't believe what was happening.

I saw m.williams in 'blue valentine" with r.gosling but she went leaps and bounds ahead of that.

 sarah silverman kind of surprised me a bit. I wasn't expecting that from her.

 you're right about seth, tried really hard, I felt for him in the scene he realizes it's over.

 but williams, man, that was a life altering role. She must have picked something up from h.ledger.

I couldn't leave the movie feeling inspired by what I saw, but I respected it with all my heart.

it really had a strong set of sub plots, the whole experience left me perturbed.

 I don't know how anyone couldn't feel a bit of vertigo leaving that piece of film.

 it really cracked open the modern conventions of real life.

it was not a movie for the faint at heart that's for sure.

extremely intriguing film piece to critique.

I thought the scene between her and seth, "it takes courage, a woman, to seduce a man" was rather brilliant.

the fear of knowing

 I've been thinking a lot since class, the significance, in feeling what uncharacteristically, success has to do with virtue.


 how is it we shut down our sense of expressing emotion within the body.


You covered a most difficult subject to focus on, but I gained so much attention to it.


it is how we cause our own connectivity to what is unknowable. You asked each of us, if we were ready to own up to rejecting.


rejecting what we most want, that what we most want is an illusion at best.


 can we see the fear living in us, not before we need to feel validated.


 there is beauty in what you speak. I am not afraid of it anymore - anymore then concealing what the truth is.


 the truth is in my explanation. That what you have in your heart is to be kept safe. It is the nature of true vulnerability.


so much of what you do, involves emotive achievement. That what truth lives as emotion demands respect.


Can you create, in recreating yourself go to remain grounded, therefore retaining your own capability to express truth.


that to search for truth, the truth cannot be manipulated from outside forces. Emotion is what decides, driving the experience.


emotions which can only be blocked, as I have hit a wall. I call it an analytic fabric which constrains me. Truth is emotion.


 all this time I've been hitting a wall. I must change that, you have challenged me to.


 I do not fear your inner beauty, I fear not knowing it myself.


 I know I can do the scenes you give me. You have been right all along.


 My body has been telling you differently.


you have been right about me all this time.


your search for truth, what is life altering. Just watching you describe Michelle Williams I ate up. It all makes sense now.


 I used to be exactly like you, a person of great free will, that produced great abundance of joy.\


I only allowed others to take advantage of me, until I realized I was no longer safe anymore.


 but there is always a desire to get back what has been taken from you, that worldly desire to change the world around you.


I have taken aim, I'm aiming at the stars as if it's the first time I've experienced.


That is the beauty in acting, can you go back to the same time you were most vulnerable and change the outcome yourself.


 that's what you saw in Michelle Williams. You could feel yourself being misdirected. Acting is not about miscalculation.


 u asked us in class, are we totally committed as actors, that u openly reject how others commit themselves to. Can u see it.

my own fear of nature brings fate about

god bless you onalee. Ames. I have never believed in god, until I stepped out of my cave.


If seeing past my own insecurities is so others might hold onto. Then, have I lived my life successfully - I have or have not.


I guess that is not up for me to decide, what I must feel.


What I must be feeling, without the nature of fear.


 You have taught me that about myself.


I must make a choice, to choose not to control.


If I can see things as they are, I can create reality, that others will not fear am I manipulating.


that is what makes me authentic, it is unique.


The real lesson you taught in class, was important, about - about feeling what the other person is feeling. As if an insect.


 That lesson was so important in fact, I caught myself listening to the depth had impacted me to endear it.


 I have no words to describe where fate has brought.


 I live of myself in fear, that can change in a heartbeat. And you showed me that.

m~

Universal principles of law

Restrictions of the morally impaired:

1 - I will not be lied to.
2 - I will not be intimidated.
3 - I will not be told what to do.

debunking a myth

Why is it so hard to capture the essence of a cheater.  Perhaps it was in conversation before the night was over - over a long period of satisfaction to restore ones wakefulness from death.

The first order of business in such a time frame, modeled a cheaters, that such a cheater is able to convey meaning behind the medium of life.

So, the wandering eye becomes trained against.

Now that I can remain nameless.

This skill is a requirement of riches based on thoughts of a cerebral value, that once it becomes noticeable.  The variations can beckon - as astounding.  What's worse as though the mention of a cheater.

Such troubled desires of unceasing virtue.  The myth goes on, it builds, as it continues to suffer the pangs of thought, the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, and the dimly lit night sky.

I fancy the other narrating voice which does not appear in this thread of words.

The cheater.

the success of integrity

If there was ever a molecular division of the heart, there is the question near impossibility.

'metaphysical' is the term used for psychic energy

It's your birthday again.  Well I hope it feels like a miracle you got this far.  I certainly don't believe in what fate has taught us up to this point in our lives.  But at least you're on the radar.  Too much fake bullshit people don't care to realize.

How does one have a conversation with the truth of such a subject.

Does this relate to the psychic, or is it purely metaphysical in origin.

What thinking causes such a truth to occur in history.

At what point did the thought of a psychic, the thought become magical, or inspired . . .that such truth actually exist.

universal principles against the cynic

I must say, as much as I am not to be considered italian, only because I choose not to adopt myself to be part of an exclusive brand, I can't say I commit myself to what makes the portuguese community in this city. One thing is certain, I feel no sense of selling out to either one. I am not even cheering for spain on sunday. My disappointments are in people as a whole, as history suggests how pretentious are those people.

I have been through a lot in this day and age, a lot which has pierced through my sense of self worth.

I will not decide, what causes my failure. Those are people that deplore how others view themselves. To think I actually believed people were labeling me.


What is worse then to fail in feeling pride, a false sense of direction, which results in getting a wide eyed stare, only to find condescending nature under duress.

What can you expect from people, who fake their own insecurities because they have established themselves as full proof ambassadors to how popular they aim to be. 

How do you value disdain based beliefs, undertaking the very nature, your nature, of consent for granted. 


Try finding honesty in practice, you will quickly come to realize, no such thing exists.


My work in writing in philosophy in what I believe in, takes on an invaluable law. While everyone is busy cheering; I'll be secretly taking my turn at narrating the world I see.

My belief systems are a kind of adventure in waiting for the blind spot no one else cares about moving to.

anti-climatic flow

I just figured out what truth there is that causes failure, it's the fact any one will do everything not to hold you back.


It's that if we live in a world of self-regulation that people forget about facing each other, in this day and age, of instant gratification. There is no such thing as natural delay in the mind.




 ‎"natural delay": a term used to describe what if you put your mind to something, whether or not you can achieve it, is not up to you. The idea of divine intervention does not exist. If you delay the thought of reward, then and only then, will you find success.




Therefore, "you can achieve what you put your mind to" is a myth; to make what happens in reality work toward progress. Progression comes before the work is involved. The idea is the larger picture.


If there was one perfect ending to a life you wanted to live; what might it look like. I would argue, people rather not deal with fate. So, they get use to a secular approach, resorting to superficial ends.

The medium is message as we see, how that medium is being won.

People will devalue your sense of the world, according to themselves, as you yourself can instantiate. Their sense of the world, can be completely undermining if you learn not to agree with it.




Plato's model for living the good life or not is such a deliberate joke.






I just figured out how the truth, to find truth uncovered, that lying is implied as an acceptable practice. I can see how it now works. "any one will do everything not to hold you back."




If you haven't figured it out, "any one will do everything not to hold you back" is the nature of (a) lie being given (b) the liar herself (c) the pragmatic nature of a persecutor.

incremental obsolescence

I never believed in the ancient Egyptians model of life, as privilege, in fulfilling needs for a wealthier nobility.

I also never trusted a man who has never been in a real fight.

As history would indicate, there is a kind of seizure, a disclosure, an undesirable will which irony in itself has evolved through time.

It is an embarrassment of riches.  The kind of thing, one might detonate reality if frowned upon.  A type of serial morality, a brand of thought, an appraisal of the will.  That when these types of thoughts emerge unto ourselves, is a universal acclimation of the will.

A definitive ironic impact.

When I write, I do so with the confirmation of irony, that what translates off the page, speaks as a narrators version of real life - real life. What if real life had it's own narrator.  As I've said before, what if history had a nature to it (as in science), and time had a voice. To have this type of conscious awareness, the individual, has an internal dialogue which connects to the universe as a model of thought.  A type of narrative assembly on automatic pilot, methods turned inward then outward to be tested, again, then again, then it was before.

We do not confuse methods of the heart with a universal model (i.e.manipulative intent;) devices to satisfy a normal adherence of choices being made unto ourselves.  I would argue this is what makes up a moral acclimation of the will, the improvisation of self-regulation as we decompose our self-righteous habits.  To what degree are we aware of our universal being.

Searching for identity is a universal embodiment of the will, to succeed at your universal self image.  What proofs can there be, to achieve a truth of history's aims through a course of self embodiment of the will.  This is a conscious question, making up the nature of experience.  (a)  To contest the will, (b) in accordance of our human spirit. (c) It is not a sacred right, it is a privilege.

The same way in what defies reason, is not seen as sacred.  As result follows the course of history, dictating norms of a punitive level of arousal (i.e. moral acclimation of the will)l, which then follows what we know to be a universal model instead.  Awareness of the universe is a ironic choice of medium, effortlessly, to defy different forms of historical centerpieces.  To eliminate the traces of history, within a confluence of normative elements.  A narrative component made of universal affluence.

The logistics of self-directing accomplishment, rather then defeating irony in a universal contextual level, the irony influenced itself narrative.

Irony takes a step by step process toward achieving awareness on a non-secular universal model.

Self-defeating irony plays a prominent role in witness intimidation, when you are looked down upon to surrender your humility.  To achieve this an internal dialogue of the will over irony asserts itself, in exchange, that the same reason establishes a 1. pure irony from which to 2. limit the loss of 3. condescending behavior.  This is how one escapes from such irony not being fairly presented.

Privilege of desire

There is no point in leaving the board. Sure, great hockey minds think alike. Rise above the shadowy exceptions. I've been on the Internet since I can remember, it should be used as a vehicle, despite the candid behavior one should come to expect.

People don' agree with what I have to say all the time, I feel the need to express myself should never be compromised, so leaving the board is pointless.

People don't necessarily know how to argue, so it should make you stop and think about being alienated. Just because it's true, doesn't allow other people to stop you. It means you can decide what course of taking action, changes the outcome.

The moment people deny you that right, you have taken on the privilege of desire. There is nothing worse than a firing squad, against cries for mercy. This isn't dragon's den.

No matter how arrogant a reason never affected my choice for being objective, being belittled, or not to face it with an opinion.

Dicing onions may not make you cry, it also won't absolve your fears away, and everyone else is immune.

I have made a skill at tracing the devils whereabouts.

Moral of the story: feelings can make cowards of us all. The better question should always be understood, how does one become relevant to the conversation.

Read more:http://jetshockeyforum.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=business&action=display&thread=12&page=290#ixzz1xzOCbbIK

Anti-thesis of Privilege

There are few things in life, that desensitize the moral courage to define our reasons for change.  It is a deregulation of two separate facets facing the need for change that most matter.

One of the reasons for adopting change is to answer, what if, history had a science to it.

The second reason: what if time, had a voice.

Somehow the two facets are complete with so much of what goes on in the world presently.  As change will follow in a moment, if that world were made of absurdity, abnormality, which also lead to censorship, which then becomes conspiracy.  Those would describe the thoughts of a theoretical nature.

If we were made to be born unto a world of such change, could we maneuver through time and space unknowingly.

My thoughts on this are act against my own clumsy instinct, of a defense mechanism persuasion.

I hate it when people cop out, using religion as if it is a fait accompli, that once you turn your back on such religious sanctimony, you are somehow inferring the other persons right to a dichotomy of existence.  In so many ways, a dichotomy of privilege, as if they are a model to find fault with you.

If you think about a dichotomy of choice, the thoughts become further estranged from using religious means as your own model.

giving away dignity

 I dislike how my doctor negates everything I do in life. He makes me feel weak and inferior. I don't know how I've been able to put up with him for so long. 

I hate finding myself at the wrong side of his analogies, such as, if I were someone who was at the gym wanting to get better at my level of fitness. Instead of (a) judging someone follows (b) being judged by another person for (c) not being as fit as they are, my own ego would be uncontested. 

What my doctor is really trying to say, is unless I put myself in the other persons shoes, I would be calling myself out as being weak and out of shape, by the person who is in better physical condition then I am. 

I find this position to be utterly absurd, because what my doctor is trying to make his own point - which is - if I see myself as inferior to compare my own physique to others. Therefore, I can also assume that I am the same type of individual who would frown upon another person who is not as strong as I am if the roles were reversed. 

My doctor wants to make it, so I become obvious of myself, that I always resort to thinking too highly of myself then to others.

the length of impunity

When it comes to a diversity, relatively speaking we readily adhere to such rules that have not yet been set in place. In this disassembled form of hierarchy, an emergence in what we see in reality, as opposed to what is permissible (i.e. real time) takes place. What is this reality in light of a mirror being held. 

How do we carry the same idea, imprinted in our mind as is the reflection of choices being made at random. 

Perhaps what gives rise to truth prevailing, just so happens the same truth, cannot find a measure. 

It's not so obvious, but you know in your heart you have to stick to your guns because the world is set against you.

anger-stood

What angers me most about my doctor, is a feeling of resentment on my part, as to why he insists on calling me out as if to purge me.  He wants me to change, but he couldn't find me directly, where it counts, where it matters the most, in my heart.

I blame a lot of my failures on him.

This is mostly due to the fact, I could have done something drastically different with myself, with a higher regard.  He did the opposite of what he should have done, which he was suppose, to help me see things for what they actually are.

Even though he must have thought I wasn't open enough to change, I only felt misunderstood by him.  I guess that is to a fault of my own. What he wanted me to do, was opposite of what I tried so desperately to accomplish.  The more I listened to him, the more time I needed to process things the way I thought they should be.  He needed feedback, based on nothing in particular.

I never believed I was as he had made me out to be.

testing my secret life

I am not going to let you decide my fate.

I will not get trapped
in your pigeon hole.

When you talk to me,
do so with
curiosity.

How I have grown out of
the shape of intolerance.

I was mistook
for a bribery,
then from an evil.

Befallen danger,
of a secret life.

This if it were,
as it were only true.

Bells Bells Bells

I can hear the sound of church bells ringing, but when I do I do not think of a ceremonious assembly.

Instead, what I believe to be true of myself, is the profession of selling out your secrets.  (i.e. the secret to selling out)

What keeps us marginalized in society today, the very concept of older more ancient time does not follow. Therefore, living in a world of fast forward, which history then becomes, a monopoly of reason.  How might we arrive at history, or more importantly how might we arrive at protecting our own beliefs.

At what critical point of conduct was there a presence of greatness within the story. Perhaps in society today, that which is not to be confused with greatness, is an unheard spectator of profession: selling out to secrets.  Put into another context, selling out in a history made up of cost.

What becomes the truth in a world made up of unwilling heroes in a successive order of time, what then comes from out of that, that of which emerges in place of freedom, is the question being asked which needs to be answered. There is a selling out that makes such are secrets so much less valid.  What this also requires, as in observation as an art form, over which art than requires observation. The concept of life imitating art can only be true, when it becomes no longer valid. So we result through speculation, as the result of 1- a world gone blind to 2 - the face of reason in such some specific timeframe.

This in secret defines as 'history' dissipates on itself, of a journey without (a) norms or its (b) means are not dictated, which can only be true of (c) our own ideas of a cellular nature, making up our lost consciousness. Our desires to learn the truth are mixed without emotion, so fails to rely on sensory experience, as a direct model of convenience for convenience sake.

• This requires intervention of a cerebral value, in accordance to the laws of it's citizens calibrated upon a societal functioning level.
• A kind of treasure map aiming at a history of world views, which translated, exists in of itself, a history in of itself in its most natural surroundings.
• The search for truth so becomes magnified in search of cutting historic material losses. And so because, this follows - a pattern of thought, so each thought creates historic ritual fortitude. That those patterns of thought (what is influenced by significant aims) in historical means, crosses together toward (an end game) will match with awareness on a level of consciousness.   However, this can only occur, in how our view to life - within a combine of (1) natural rights, as (2) citizens of the world, not (3) expeditious of a nation state's intervention.  Therefore, this is the end game toward consciousness toward a cerebral level of awareness.

Can you im-a-gin-ate a world viewed of itself, throughout a history of telling secrets to the product of mankind, (i.e. all of consciousness.)  What is that secret, what would it be, what might it reveal, what does it look like.

I dare say the thought of viewing life as in art is not one in the same, as if say, art as in life would suggest to you.

ii. Consciousness adds awareness

What shape is the world really, according to us, now imagine if the world is no match to your awareness due to scientific study of itself. In fact science is not science at all, what you find within reason, is of a history of the world secretly holding onto a picture of itself.  ii. Consciousness adds awareness. (follows i.)

i. Consciousness of the individual

We arrange things as models, but not as specific as we get closer to them. Life is not a matter of physics, or habitat to the natural world around us. Physics is the change of a universe gone blind, turned inside out, upside down in disputing nature's secrets. The nature of secrets, as in selling out is a better profession than it would be to observe it.  i. Consciousness of the individual.  (follows ii.)

People might concoct a version of historical fragmented pieces, put together into one giant peace pipe, but never having experienced the nature of it's longevity. How might we free ourselves from the nature of selling out, what might it be if the same patterns of thoughts were truth instead. - The world would be a radically different place.

The nature of awareness depends of our natural rights as individuals to conceive, in owning our observations of a secret nature, out in the open fragment of our history. This dedicated to make a forward leap throughout one's lifetime, as if the fountain of youth were a pond which immortals were doomed of such rival conjecture. History never had a voice given to it, that was worth selling out to a professional yet shallow, naïve, or narrow minded version of itself.

The same can be said of feeling what you feel is being done, at your own cosnscious level of awareness. The truth is: there is no path in history, or history, takes us. What we create is a version unto ourselves, of a night gone daylight.

Selling out takes on an emotive level, which has never been this easy to do throughout our models of a lifetime of conscious awareness. The ancients never realized how old they were getting to be at it.

You can tell how old a person gets, by not revealing their age, but moving backwards from the time they were born. From an age in a historical sense, that in selling out our older conscious awareness, to an newer version of itself. Perhaps we are just ancient dwellers, not improving at history's aims, waiting for a secret to arrive, before we get unearthed from a shallower depth. What level of morality might we dare relinquish in ourselves if we challenged out of fear of selling out to a heightened conscious awareness.

There is the secret.

My commitment to happiness

Channeling 2006

Had I a character change,
in the last 8 years, this - was it.

I hate mowing the lawn.

How I hate the smell of gasoline.

My doctor - rehabilitated.

narsty.

I am seriously disappointed in every aspect of this site. All I can say is I make honest attempts at reaching out and deserve far better than what I've experienced on this site thus far.

If you qualify as in having an unadulterated though not impartial attitude, can relate with some interest in good taste, have high standards of human value, and can resist the urge to self-destruct than I'm your man.

I classify as a sophisticated individual, with a no non-sense approach to life. (I've evolved in this way, not that it means anything it shouldn't.)

I have a lust for life - although just saying that doesn't stand by itself. My reason being I know I've yet to capitalize on it. I simply haven't found that lust in finding what it might be like. It's there buried inside of me like a treasure lost.

Maybe I'm naive enough to think this place has something here. I needed to look. For those of you that received my first contact would know what I've written here to some extent. Maybe being naive with a lust of the unknown really does have a place over the internet - I prove. (It's taken me only a month to fill out this portion.)

disclaimer: any person on this site that does not have interest in me should let me know without indiscretion. I ask that you politely send a message stating you refuse to speak with me by writing, "Please, do not message me." Then, I can block you from that. When you give me signals of viewing my profile over a consecutive amount of times, it tells me you are in fact doing what this board was invented for. If you are doing anything other than that, I accuse you of being an intentional hypocrite. Grow up.

I can't believe I had to do this^. However, if you think this is punitive of my character/demeanor then ask yourself, "Do I use this site as a vehicle simply to ride on it anonymously so I don't have to feel bad." Believe you me, I am not a stupid individual. I can promise you that. Confusing? Point is: I am not going to give you the power to simply be told, "I don't like you." Only to save you from wearing a poopie-face.

Secondly, allow me to clarify that at the age of 31, I need what a 31 year old needs. My age doesn't neglect the necessary value of vulnerability, or sensitivity that empathy creates. (The opposite of this is shallowness.) Being 31 has made me far stronger, in fact, more aware of who to judge. It doesn't reflect my ability either, when it comes to being confident of my sexuality. I am not on here looking for sex. (Again I say poo-poo kaka.)

excellent

RE:i'm not going to say much. My feeling is that no matter how rough around the edges, I need to be honest with myself. That makes for a fairly wasted human being. I just keep trying to push whatever that is away, rather than dealing with it. I suppose the trouble is in the way I look at myself, yet I see room that demands improvment. I feel like what I'm describing to you, is getting to know myself better, without really having something to show for it (which indicates a problem) I would think there is a lot missing. Therefore, I'm not going to abdicate from myself, what I do not have. I can just communicate this for no other purpose than to benefit. I guess my main objective here is to let you know something, with the intention of not sharing the real me. I believe it's better that you know this, then I not let it out in the open.

So anyhow, it's good this place is anonymous, and I feel I can let another person feel they know what's honest out there for no better reason than there is value.

I wish there was more I can say about myself at this stage, but there it is. No games. Just my beliefs (re; mer) for what it's worth reading. I wish I could say I know how important some decisions are in life, those bridges one comes across, but let's just say I'm pretty quiet. Not until I change that anyway.

I guess you didn't have to ask. Which is why I've call you a smart girl.

---------------------

I can tell that you've done some soul searching, and I hope that it's not on account of me. I want you to be the best person you can be for yourself, not for anyone else. If you woke up this morning sad, you better ****ing change it!!! Life is too short to be sleeping in your parents basement. I think that if you set goals for yourself, you can achieve them!

---------------

I want this to be a fair - thoughtful as a response as you truly offered to me. I can only thank you for not judging me, (not that you would) but I think of it as a compliment about you. I do connect with it considerately.
---------------

well - this is about giving credit where credit is due, just not in my case. If I can live with saying that, then there's hope for the future. However, as an exception to my rule - for sure you are a nice looking person. That is all I know from what I've done thus far - nothing less.



Thank you for the compliment.

coalition

I would have to agree with the valid assessment in which you’ve demonstrated how false logic can skew the real meaning behind the message therein. Further to your observation of the fallacy, it is rather a form of misconception which is attempting to make the reader believe something that is not really there to begin with. I believe that same author is using a similair objective, to conclude, (i.) Harper is ‘right’ in order to abdicate or thereby dimiss the coalition perogative (ii.) this follows ~ because Harper is under no moral obligation that he’s being out done by ridicule hithereto false pretense of a mock coalition government. (Even if it’s perfectly legal).

My own summation of the author’s view is territorial, insofar as the campaign against Harper is being seen as a Vampire-hunt. It is as such the author implicates a clever hidden medium within which creates metaphor: The coalition government is being lead under false pretense, history of such-and-such show us so. . . therefore, illegal. (Ad Hominem) Not only is it a misnomer: but this “allows” the reader freely to imply that a coalition is also forcing (i.e. purging) the populous into a mock form of government which Harper is the rightful heir/furor. (Ad Baculum)

In all honesty, that is exactly my own argument which should defeat any false notions herein. I appreciated your take on this important issue, norm. A coalition government will be truly historic. I see Harper reminding me of Max Headroom, not really knowing the effects from a tzar.

Posted 07 Dec 2008 at 2:10 am

breakfast at tiffany's

I can stop bullets.
--------------------------
I look cute in boots, have a killer smile, man - life is sweet. I also have a huge heart.
------------------------
Newest approach: wow - you think i'm a loser, that's great, say hi to your mother for me - okay. P.S. you will be forced to have my babies. P.S.S if you can't find humor in some of the stuff I presented herein - there is something wrong.
---------------------
I wish we lived in the 80's. Things were so much simpler then they are now.
------------------
A revelation: I am not changing my profile based on false pretense. This enabled me to realize something. . . some of the reason (maybe not all) that females are protective or put boundaries up get rather defensive. That is probably because the women don't want to feel coersed or put into a similar manner as if being lured into a relationship they have no control over. I suppose that is a fair assumption of how unhealthy this type of interaction over a screen can mislead some of you to believe that. However, I am the sexiest non-conformist you'll ever meet. I am straight forward on here which is to say I am nothing like this in real life. If you're on here for any other reason, you need to re-evaluate yourself. But stop and think about the habits you yourself contribute on this site.
---------------------
Surprise update: Can you imagine a guy better looking than Barack Obama, well let this be your lucky day. (I also love fruit smoothies.)
--------------------
Nov.04-08 I don't know if I'm searching for something I can't find, but all I can say is I'm definitely glad this site is free.
------------------
Update: oct29-08 I feel really good about this site today - I think I'll have a hot chocolate.
----------------------
Hey - I know! Let's (shhh. . .) use this site as a vehicle, that we test our weapons so I don't have to feel guilty or be sorry about it.
-----------------------
Just because you're younger - doesn't make me anti-social. Have fun - drink milk. Grow up.
----------------------
My personal attempts at making invitation to connect with those of you - I hope have been revealing enough to consider me worthy of my efforts.
------------------------
Please stop sending me nudes, it lowers your credibility, but my opinion of you won't change much either.
-------------------------
I've never been married. I have good values. I'm just a boy at heart looking for real love. But a man with needs only the right person can satisfy.
-------------------------
there are some of you (not all of you) which need to get one thing straight = get off the high-horse (this follows) some form of decency? Since I feel this way, albeit subjective of me to say so: many of you may have taken a royal princess diary that you've forgotten how (me in particular) only care to empower females I'm attracted to. No thanks necessary (. . .you make that abundantly clear).
Disappointing is not the word I'm looking to offer those. Just, unreal. What happened to pretty women. > Okay, I am not short on brain matter, but this internet thing gets real annoying ya know? So anyway, if any of what I just said matters, let's may be keep it that way.

Note: to the younger objectionable females, which say they're interested in 30+ males but when approached run back into their foxholes. Please, please be certain you are past the point of your sexual deviance, reason being, I am here for social contact. Nothing more. If you want Austin Powers go to your local blockbuster. Yeah baby!

So after talking to some nicer ladies on here, I suppose this site is up for sale on a variety of things. First off: learn to use your email settings (I'm talking to the 20 something femmes that don't care for ugly dudes older than them.) Not to be shallow here, but some need to read the facts before they can think for themselves, it saves us from having to guess how narrow minded you are. Secondly, (my advice is) if you want guys that have six-packs or biceps, consider you can be better served. People say I look like Hugh Jackman. Hugh Jackman in wpg!

I guess for the most part, being 31 isn't such a bad thing. At my age, you've either become a voice that seeds positive energy - or - you've done everything possible in order to pretend how great your self-concept is. A lot of what I'm saying is true: chances are you agree with me. If not, the other dudes on POF might be for you.

------------------interests

being the best dancer at the bar - my ego - not your ego - my sisters puppy tazz - people that don't necessarily promote neurotic behavior - arcade fire - universal health care - hygiene - surprises in general - latte's - women wearing sweet kickin' bangs on their foreheads - staying up late - absolute boredom - reasoning - logic - forms of argument - the fact nobody has me on their favorites list - sense of humor - friendship - my acting (BA2006) - true romance - hair unlike male pattern baldness - random acts of kindness - the magic of spontaneity - damning pretensious snobbery - resistence - anarchy restricting our limited control of government agencies - toast (nutella spread) - females that are genuinely attracted to me - abolition of wealthy con artists (in the free world) that pollute our social environment - living the good life - young and the restless (not the soap opera) -

books: rights of desire, about the author, pornographer's poem