Thursday, June 28, 2012

anti-climatic flow

I just figured out what truth there is that causes failure, it's the fact any one will do everything not to hold you back.


It's that if we live in a world of self-regulation that people forget about facing each other, in this day and age, of instant gratification. There is no such thing as natural delay in the mind.




 ‎"natural delay": a term used to describe what if you put your mind to something, whether or not you can achieve it, is not up to you. The idea of divine intervention does not exist. If you delay the thought of reward, then and only then, will you find success.




Therefore, "you can achieve what you put your mind to" is a myth; to make what happens in reality work toward progress. Progression comes before the work is involved. The idea is the larger picture.


If there was one perfect ending to a life you wanted to live; what might it look like. I would argue, people rather not deal with fate. So, they get use to a secular approach, resorting to superficial ends.

The medium is message as we see, how that medium is being won.

People will devalue your sense of the world, according to themselves, as you yourself can instantiate. Their sense of the world, can be completely undermining if you learn not to agree with it.





Plato's model for living the good life or not is such a deliberate joke.






I just figured out how the truth, to find truth uncovered, that lying is implied as an acceptable practice. I can see how it now works. "any one will do everything not to hold you back."




If you haven't figured it out, "any one will do everything not to hold you back" is the nature of (a) lie being given (b) the liar herself (c) the pragmatic nature of a persecutor.





3 comments:

BigC said...

I can't follow an anti-climatic form of energy. It just isn't real enough for the universe to have happen, unravel, reveal itself.

What is the least desirable, lowest form, most dominant, deliberate flow of energy I can tolerate, is the false sense of self over entitlement as an inalienable right.

I think of this as a person putting themselves at an unfair advantage, far too common, revolting.

BigC said...

‎"Selling out takes on an emotive level, which has never been this easy to do throughout our models of a lifetime of conscious awareness. The ancients never realized how old they were getting to be at it."

^if you do not mistake transparency over irony; you have achieved a great deal.

It's a question in how history, does not openly teach how to overcome the norms associated with it. The answer should always rely on consciousness itself.

A disappearing act: is not considered (a) artistic (b) in merit, just as in (c) history not taking on a form of it's own.

Therein lay the difference between knowing both, irony over transparency, and both, consciousness over awareness. Just as the ancients never thought before acting on consequence, causes indivisible morality.

BigC said...

You know, there is something about a brand I don't like, I stop to think about it. Then, I (1) commit to reason (2) attempt to lie to myself about it (3) do everything I can to expose the truth of it. So the moral of the introspective effort is to do as follows: (a) consider the source (b) increase my moral aptitude (c) do something about it.

This is inspired by people that make a profession of lying habitually, because they believe they deserve special treatment.

Marco Almeida @bigcanadiano
@deepakchopra divinity is a sacred right, not god given to any particular incumbent. There is no nature in divinity. #universaltruth

Have you ever met a person that you don't necessarily like, not because they don't agree with anything you do, but because they've sold out to a group of false witnesses. That would be my definitive undertaking on the nature of divinity, that you do not decide what is divine in nature, but understand the division from it.

This is also relevant to my dissertation on the subject of irony as is developed.

There is nothing punitive about love; which is why I feel no one has ever loved me. That takes immense amount of self-courage to implore.

My relation to the subject of irony has been one of my most engaging in recent memory. I really had to find it.

Control mechanisms are the same as defense mechanisms, they are only made to look different than the other.

Deepak Chopra @DeepakChopra
Only the invisible is real

Marco Almeida @bigcanadiano
@DeepakChopra which can only depend on what is - is invisible or not.

Deepak Chopra @DeepakChopra
You don't need to learn. You simply need to remember

Marco Almeida @bigcanadiano
@DeepakChopra Transparency is a factor which only irony can dictate, you can deviate from

Fascism is the one true definition of sarcasm; you choose not to secure the irony from its persecutor. I had a guy last night confuse my ability at achieving, an ironic context (purity of the will), with glaring sarcasm, as though what he felt was somewhat as demeaning as I was being portrayed by him.

He's not the first person I've encountered, to being aware of irony in the face of reason.

He actually tried to convince me I was being sarcastic rather than irony as being present. I was merely a spectator to it. The moment you are being controlled by something other than your mental awareness dictates, you have allowed a serial mentality to take the place of your freedom.

Irony is the one true possession of living in the moment present.