the confirmation of language

 When I think too fast - I don't know what difference exists in the world to presuppose of it.

When I think slowly - it's a matter of time over measure.
When it doesn't matter - the question isn't worth thinking about.


My point is when life has tested me, the answers never really came until I experienced it. I suppose the nature of language supports this argument. Language just didn't come to me through something vernacular built on semantics. It was learning about how to master the self through a reckoning with something personal.

I have never been asked why I write the way I do, because I realize what I have mastered, can not be copied. That is to say the truth gives it's name to those that aim toward a greater denomination. I am talking about asking questions, observing what is, of value.

And when I began operating from this point of examining life.

What I did was interpret the things around me in a manner of vigilance over substantially amounting my recourse for sensory experience. (This last sentence should confuse no one.) It means that a heightened state of awareness occupies the mind in large part. I asked no questions, if ever. It was a matter of acting on things that I connected together as some form of it. That is how language functions.

That once expressed into a formal kind of thought, words gather the image of sensory experience and sensory experience - only. The point is to exact a sign. Assigning some form of understanding in psychological investigational choice. Why choices were made, as an example of what is a matter of the word you use assigned to it.

All of it relates to the sensory experience of what is.

The most important finding I have ever made is to create what asks a question if only and only if - worth asking. The answer behind everything turned into: 'how do you know?' And the property of serious inquiry starts from there.

Therefore, words, their meaning and interpretation are not consequential. Ever.

The point I am making here?

Never be fooled. Any fools choice of words, are still a choice worth paying closer attention to. To interpret this is the end of all things without which words are interpreted superficially. Think about that: words are not the interpretation of what it means to be or not to be restricted by our capacity to think. Therefore, the core belief of our worst fears are also turned into a projection of thoughtless action. Thoughtless projections are how a coward coerces its victim.

So in terms of the nature of language. Words are the nature of language that assign meaning to things. What we characterize language as - is a matter of interpretation to what is. What is the product of your intelligence as an image.

- Marco