Rational or irrational what really provoke anger?
What make a difference between anger and craziness in mental state?
If psychosis hits you're imagining there is a wall where there is an actual doorway. The metaphor being that everything you imagine to be true of reality is actually incongruous with it. The results ae psychological in nature. You are out of touch with what is your perceived world, where the projection is cast back to you. I've been there. Not fun.
Does immortality appeal to you?
Marco Almeida
A question can be applied to provide the answer, being, why wouldn't immortality appeal to me. Why? If the same question to immortality were given on the basis of what is god. My point is if god wants me to be. If God's will points to us being immortal, it is in God's hands. If god willing me to be a mortal, I equally accept it. Remembering, the philosophy in favor of immortality is a hermetic end. We are written in the stars, by either the eternal (religious sense) of being or we are reincarnate.
“Most propositions and questions, that have been written about philosophical matters, are not false, but senseless... They are of the same kind as the question whether the Good is more or less identical than the Beautiful.”
–Ludwig Wittgenstein
Marco Almeida
So what is it Wittgenstein states to qualify his assertion that senseless construction of philosophy is false and hypocritically exaggerated. Why not just say most of what non philosopher pose as pragmatic in their effort to that effect. It's kind of a poor debunking assessment and I applaud Wittgenstein's genius. But this is weak even by his standards. The irony being what is good is also beautiful, is a dialectic property. Wittgenstein is classifying what cancel culture is today. For no better reason than what is the anti-woke movement. All of MAGA fall under it. And unless we have philosopher's in contradiction to fascist motives - where does that leave us. Wittgenstein, I can conclude, arms us with his petty notion.
•○●•••••
Marco Almeida if I understand you sir, in my relatively simple mind, this sounds like an elaborate way to denigrate the current American voter majority.. I may be wrong.. im not sure what a pety notion is. Please forgive my uneducated behavior..
Kent Martin There is no such thing as behavior for what is uneducated. Following what you said there, is a misnomer. What I accused Wittgenstein of is that his practical use of anomaly triggers a warning. The warning (I suggest) what is a pragmatic philosopher, who comes across informing his audience as dogmatic in thinking. Maybe it sounds diabolical to you. Sorry. Whatever the thing you think I said about majority of MAGA voters? It's the truth that should I reassert.. . . The point is any formal empirically valid evidence can meet my hypothetical as ironic choice of words. (Which again Witt~ is disarming the pragmatic philosopher from doing.) Therefore, I am accusing Wittgenstein in his own formality. (I am using this as my argument, that the use of pragmatism to debunk is using philosophical justification for it.)
Therefore, my cause is the force behind Witt~ thought. That in lieu of a majority that view Trump as their savior, it is Trump that the world is in diaspora of. Philosopher must counteract such moral contagion in our vice vs virtue against the majority or pragmatists in place of Trump.
- Marco
No comments:
Post a Comment