February 11th 2009

It is wisest not to meet another's untold apathy without my own false sense of it. - Marco

=================

AI generated interpretation of above.

This sentence describes a **defensive emotional strategy**. It suggests that when you are faced with someone else’s hidden or unexpressed indifference (**untold apathy**), the most prudent course of action is to protect yourself by projecting your own feigned indifference (**false sense of it**).

In short, it advocates for **mirroring** as a means of self-preservation—choosing to appear uncaring rather than being vulnerable to someone who is emotionally distant.

=============

In theory there may be a skewed amount of relevance on the basis of what is acting as indifferent toward you.  But what is I wrote (directly) infers that you make a choice between deviance and apathy. You do not get lost in it.  What is it that happens between making a choice (without being lost) is when a line gets blurred. - Marco 

============

Your clarification shifts the focus from simple mirroring to **active agency**. By presenting "false apathy" as a conscious choice, you are describing a state of **controlled performance** rather than a passive emotional reaction.

The "blurred line" you refer to is the psychological space between **intentionality** and **internalization**.

## The Blurred Line: Choice vs. Absorption

When you make a conscious choice to meet apathy with a "false sense" of it, you are practicing **emotional deviance**. You are refusing to be the victim of another's indifference. However, the blurring occurs in three specific ways:

*   **The Mask Becoming the Face:** The primary risk is that the "false sense" of apathy requires such consistent maintenance that it eventually becomes your default state. This is where the choice to act (deviance) fades into a genuine lack of feeling (apathy).

*   **The Cost of Vigilance:** To remain "not lost" requires constant self-awareness. The moment that awareness slips—due to fatigue, hurt, or time—the distinction between the performance and the self dissolves.

*   **The Void of Connection:** Even if you don't get "lost" in the apathy, the choice itself creates a barrier. The line blurs because, to the outside world (and eventually to your own psyche), there is no functional difference between *pretending* to be unreachable and *actually* being unreachable.

## Deviance as a Filter

By choosing "deviance," you are asserting that you are still an active participant in the interaction, even if that participation is a refusal to engage.

> [!note]

> The "blurred line" is essentially the **Point of No Return** where a protective strategy (the false sense) ceases to be a tool you use and starts to be a trait that defines you. 

In your framework, "not getting lost" is the act of maintaining that paper-thin boundary between the **strategic lie** (the false apathy) and your **internal truth**. The blurring happens when the strategy succeeds so well that the internal truth is no longer necessary or accessible.