Hi - plato

February 6th 2011

Because your metaphysical implications denote mental embodiment of a future reclaiming to ourselves, there are a few things worth mentioning here.

First offering a story about how much we own you since then.

The time material implication arose out of nothing, came soon after Aristotle, before he made you even more famous using his model of reason.

Now that we are able, we can rethink much more clearly upon the factuality of which we know them.

Perhaps one day you will find the truth in all of this.

Pure reason can only tell one thing: that one thing from itself (irregularity) cannot apply your wisdom lack thereof.

Finally, and without noticing simply just how feable minded you are, all those things that surround you in place of freedom surrendering to your cave, you retreated. You called them figments of your imagination. Therefore, persecution was always has and always will be.

You forgot one thing, plato.

That the future holds your lies.

That lawyers are idiots too.

That judges confuse logic, by twisting her own mind.

And then we have it - anamoly of your toothless aims.

How about a syllogism that Aristotle wanted (probably) inspired in spite of himself.

You are an arse.
If you are an arse, therefore 'a'.
Therefore, you are an arse.

I made that up myself.

The minute it all came crashing down on you.

Everything eventually fell right back into place, again, then - came the obvious choice.

To feel how troubled, or insipid the nature of a duality.

We refer to it as fiction since your work.

Oh how the wicked will fall in line, how true - how very ruthless of you.

Now Plato - it is mine.

All mine.

hahahahaha

===============

To think that this guy actually wrote the story of Euthyphro as an underlying current, to resurrect Plato, in light of being a character more ruthless he could search for truth unwillingly? Euthyphro proves the fucking idiot Plato was, still is, way before he milked it to undermine the world which we now live in.

That bastard fuck.

------------------------------

And really this is just to teach people, spineless are not thoughts, they are words which that fucker himself would readily dismiss, would readily impose, would readily inflate his ego with. Without whichever method you take.

-----------------------------

And for those of us that care about analogous (analogy) situation, when saying, Plato sought revenge against Socrates (revenge) is double jeopardy. To suggest the nature subject to law, should impose or implement, the very core of philosophy are false ideals (which no one realized until today placed Plato further ahead of his time - putting standard of information in place of truth.)

Socrates had it right the whole time.

Yet - Plato had superimposed the nature of the will as Socrates suicidal state, when the true unspoiled nature of law, became completely blurred in the process of dichotomy from pure reason itself.

To suggest Plato ¤ had (for this example:) examined the law based on a philosophy of deceit or impartiality, is nothing less than an understatement. It is more about providing the same criminal to his double, with ingrate lawyers - legally procuring war, fascism, genocide, all for the wrongfully accused purpose of providing such criminal activity with state intervention.

The same can be said of a persons experience with taking hostage, what we are blind to, others (of course) taken for granted. The same can be said for Socrates - wrongfully taking the hemlock disposing the poison in himself as a suicidal truth claim. In effect, the same can be said, it took the law to rape you, with the intention of a lie (refute nobility of law) now replace it with noble freedom. The noble lie Plato had taught, defends a hostage taking, a rapist, and corruption against malpractice lawyers.

================

And if Plato were himself not to confess, purge¤ or alter the purpose of his own intention, requires no intervention whatsoever. Only inquisition on the merit of strict obligation; to inquire a false intention of lawyers deception, control or manipulation of the laws.

A judge once thought she was so brilliant, she told me I should stop acting too cute for her to like me. Imagine that.

==================

That idiot actually wanted me to perceive knowledge (my) as a threat. Talk about moral cowardice, Pascal was absolutely right on the money (fucking unbelievable).

=====================

Socrates knew the entire time, he died unwittingly through using pure logic, he knew, that fucker knew the Jekyll and Hyde routine would not allow Plato's escape plan.

===============

Double jeopardy in point form.^

==================

^The entire scripture above as annotated...

© Marco Almeida 2011