Loopholes by design [a syllogism]

 February 11th 2014

Re; homophobia

1- Can you reach an understanding with the same person that has no sexual orientation before you knew him or her in a permanent sense.

2- An example of this blurred line is in the stereotypes - labels or defamatory degradation.

3- Therefore, homophobia carries a negative connotation turning against the modern convention of those whose preference (sexual orientation) is not unethical. It is an ideological function.

======

Proof of the above syllogism is as follows:

The truth about homophobia is much more evident than concise with why it exists. Homophobia is a form of punishment toward those that act vulnerable in life so they can be targeted as victims. In that sense homophobic persons experience what they believe to be is enabling a minority group that threatens their own autonomy to survive rather than its freedom.

If you see homophobia as an insight rather than insult inasmuch becomes far less.

Do not confuse homophobia as racism, it is a disease that must be fought. You must use homophobia against the process it cohorts. Therefore, homphobic tendencies are manifested as blaming the victim in a minority. Homophobics think they are being purged upon which in turn results their own mentality as justified, thus refuse to see the state of minority re; homosexuality / as a mere satire to the human condition.

===============

Some know how to break the rules, while others are obtuse, the third group are split down the middle.

Now consider this:

Half of the population are rule breakers while the other are busy being a fraternity of hypocrites.

The answer is:

If you are the third option 'split' means they suck at life as in their education.