fortune-telling entitled to benevolence

 February 4th 2009

Have you ever had that feeling, where everything is in a kind of total transitory state, which you can only realize the feeling has escaped you, as if a clock were timing how placid that it became long to trace back. I experience this from moment to moment. The difficulty is in examining thoughts, as if they were meant to take shape in some form of triangulation, however, the plans were drawn out on blue prints if they were. My own personal view in the matter, has certainly evoked something peculiar in the event of regret. It is a "coming together" of sorts, where trial and error have gone mistaken for under privileged satisfaction - if there could be such a thing - that in question.

I have never been alone in experiencing the frugality of others, however, I inform the better of my intuition by chance - that my choices are made.

This brings me to the answers I unusually, yet, uncharacteristically find - estimate my sense of morality. I ask myself, in almost everything I classify what is moral. It goes to prove my own virtue in life, that should I choose to act what doormat am I stepping on in the process of doing. It would appear as though my vast knowledge of such a densely popular subject, would gather steam behind it - although my approach would adjoin it - if there is a time and a place for morality, where should it begin or end. Therefore, in an accurate evaluation of the subject no matter what entails its cause, morality is in fact perpendicular to such parameters of an enclosure. For in this instance my practice of writing could very well be someone else's (but not my own). Would this in such a case limit my potential - especially in moral juxtaposition. The question is again valid, as it is tenfold.

The problem is at the root, of asking such moral self-examination, though not in understanding it as a critical proclimation. At the heart of all moral investigation, the true nature of what is in fact immoral can only stem from virtue. In such a reference of thought due to morality, I suspect myself - is a cause. The cause of truth, is the same as the pursuit of ones morality. The problem that surfaces in appropriation to the cause, is that morality cannot exist without virtue. If thought in morality can exist. Therefore, intellect is the presence of virtue not of thought. Morality is in effect the essence of ones virtue.

I have reached this stage in life - that questions do mean everything, unless I am challenging superficial context which stems from thoughts that manipulation refrains from virtue.