Surreptitious fruit

“We feel and know that we are eternal.”

Baruch Spinoza

======

^All that means to me is when I feel something literally. It is the fact I know intuitively, that this intuitive level of investigation, only measures exactly what is that feeling is trying to tell me. I just need a feeling to know how I am being judged. It's how I have lived my entire life. I formulate everything there is around it.

Do not read that thinking my interpretation metaphorically illustrates a self centered person living a life that has impenetrable boundaries.

The safest way to think, isn't about going to the most dangerous elements of your mind, then thinking is poisonous - a place.

(No one breathes underwater.)

===============

"The world is the totality of facts, not of things" (Proposition 1.1) in his Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus.

------------------------

If we were to lie given a promise of something greater. Would you live your life (knowing) that without the lie - would lead you to death. How do you know. You can't possibly know the difference. There are people of all kinds. We live in world that vengeance is normalized since the inception of Adam and Eve in Eden. However, since the cradle of psychology as a science has helped shape our world. The view of this private dilemma, between living a lie and shaping our virtue. The true nature of one's secret life comes at a cost.

My point is we all have skeleton's in our closet. But when you are charged with the criminal offensive as what is a lie to cover your lack of potential. Then the crime fits a punishment. This is of course a cause of fiction. We live our lies as if we live inside a fictitious mind to enable ourselves on a societal level.

Live the fiction. That's how you know when feeling is a mirage or is more of a biblical narrative. Surreal in your thoughts. (e.g. surreptitiously)

All I know is I've created a certain level of consciousness that the narrative is not as boring to process. Especially when thinking of things. (i.e. philosophically)

This acts as a word for word in accountability. I think this is what philosophical law (the genius) Wittgenstein offered.

=============

Abstraction if not philosophy is also truth because we are fearing to be judged. Language is a medium to the furthest point of death. My meditation vs the mediation of others = what is a metaphysical event interfering with personal sensations or what I think of as the predictability to understand a thing.

If you were to lie to yourself about everything I just wrote, is it possible you never thought about it. (Causal interpretation)

The cause of nature is to force the ambiguity in life as though you think on an empirical level to justify your thoughts. (Metacognition)

So what comes first?

Empiricism vs virtue?

1 - Abstraction is ambiguous by its very nature. (Empiricism)

2 - To examine life should be the same thing while thinking. A critical examination to what is being said either internally or external to. (Virtue)

Unless you are willing to live your life as ambiguous to it, where there is no cause that death supplies your innate ability to register thought. What's the point? The point is in sensing how to trust your thoughts, not to the same psychic understanding of another's.

- Marco

==================

Oscar Wilde -

“Those who are faithful know only the trivial side of love: it is the faithless who know love’s tragedies.”