Schemes in thought

Theme; basically I am negating all rules and laws on the basis of what is empirically given as validation for evidence based logic.

I suppose, as is the saying: the devil is in the details.  Which is accurate.  But better put, logic in manner of which it forms comes from inference l. Inference in logic then bequeath's itself as a meter of induction.  What becomes a matter of formal logic, whereas our perceptions immaterial or material "either/or" depends on the observers relative information to that end.  My point is: what is found in language aimed as rhetorically given, the element of survival, (as discussed) supercede all expectation.  To think in theoretical models should not be seen as a fear based logical anomaly. This leads to the conclusion, being, cognition based behaviorally suggests that models in our thinking is to act.  To act based on presenting sound logical devices as our modus operandi.

- Marco