My inspiration for being an actor is two fold. I no longer carry the ambition to be known or carry myself in a bubble. I simply want to be who I am. Without ambition. Without false pride. I don't need the perfect head shot or the perfect role to be a player. All I aspire is my flame.
It is not that I am invisible. It's that nobody knows me anymore than they use to or they just ignore. This means something. Marco Almeida: Impartial subjectivity is a manner in which man is born ethical. "@Philosophers21: Education is the art of making man ethical. Hegel"We impose judgment based on our preferential treatment of others because it is how easily we contain what emotions might otherwise express.
Stop yourself from being drawn into the dogmatic thinking of mainstream ideology so not to be taken for granted - your story begins there.
This one is dedicated to my idol Oscar Wilde. . .
I have never had a cup of tea with my self-importance - but I am sure he would like to join. - (Marco Almeida 2013)
I had the strangest dream last night, I dreamed about my body weight.
I believe my own morality of myself comes to mind; I think my body weight symbolizes gravity on a universal level of being. Gravity represents that of knowing myself image.
The weird thing is, I felt more (a) inspired by my weight, then I would be feeling if I were (b) uninspired by my weight. My weight does not reflect societies image of me; what society thinks my weight should be does not matter. it is a dream that is affirmation of myself - self taught.
To which end: 1- an expansion of my own awareness, through which develops my full frame of consciousness, living, breathing, toward a universal level of laws, then is (exhibit '1') more important than 2- reality on a superficial level where reality as a means is dictated, without honesty, morals, virtuousity. Which is dependant of me '1' consciousness evolved, compared to '2' abundance of riches. Consciousness evolved is to achievment, what reality of abundance is to marxism. Therefore, we are living in a world made of - of what reality we see on the surface, which otherwise neglects my own capacity to deliver consciousness, unless I create my own awareness in perpetuity of myself consciousness.
^All this relates to how consciousness is something that renews itself, then if compared to what is easiest to consumate which reality does not show us on the surface of thought. Consciousness is more important to knowledge, then what reality is to winning at all costs not in favor of human error. There is no in between success to failure, which means acts as reality. In marxist thought, there is no such thing as winning with integrity. in consciousness the integrity of losing is that which is condemned on a universal level
we live in a society where it is acceptable to think in terms of bigotry for the sake of wanting something, becasue it is easier to. Consciousness on the other hand takes its own final element, to apply it's force of nature.
- Marco Almeida
intent comes from a disability, unconvincingly appointed as freedom.
I believe my own morality of myself comes to mind; I think my body weight symbolizes gravity on a universal level of being. Gravity represents that of knowing myself image.
The weird thing is, I felt more (a) inspired by my weight, then I would be feeling if I were (b) uninspired by my weight. My weight does not reflect societies image of me; what society thinks my weight should be does not matter. it is a dream that is affirmation of myself - self taught.
To which end: 1- an expansion of my own awareness, through which develops my full frame of consciousness, living, breathing, toward a universal level of laws, then is (exhibit '1') more important than 2- reality on a superficial level where reality as a means is dictated, without honesty, morals, virtuousity. Which is dependant of me '1' consciousness evolved, compared to '2' abundance of riches. Consciousness evolved is to achievment, what reality of abundance is to marxism. Therefore, we are living in a world made of - of what reality we see on the surface, which otherwise neglects my own capacity to deliver consciousness, unless I create my own awareness in perpetuity of myself consciousness.
^All this relates to how consciousness is something that renews itself, then if compared to what is easiest to consumate which reality does not show us on the surface of thought. Consciousness is more important to knowledge, then what reality is to winning at all costs not in favor of human error. There is no in between success to failure, which means acts as reality. In marxist thought, there is no such thing as winning with integrity. in consciousness the integrity of losing is that which is condemned on a universal level
we live in a society where it is acceptable to think in terms of bigotry for the sake of wanting something, becasue it is easier to. Consciousness on the other hand takes its own final element, to apply it's force of nature.
- Marco Almeida
intent comes from a disability, unconvincingly appointed as freedom.
not speaking to anyone in particular herein, but rarely do I quote anyone - if ever. . . What this means, my substance are usually written as formality toward all observable phenomenon, of which I had no apriori knowledge from another thing, such is Aristotelian logic. It is strictly a matter of experience, divorced from predictable outcomes.
What I cared to illustrate, was my reference of how people either elect, enforce, or are unspecific to reality. In the similar sense, our abnormalities or abstractions which become a part of greater internal perversions most live unaware to. I argue that people corrupt themselves in favor of their own attrition. Therefore, freedom is a lie with only consequential outcomes, or thought of in terms of a psychological nature. That the minute you sense betrayal or something familiar to an end beyond control, we excuse ourselves of such impunity.
On a scale of contrition, however, what we've included in our "human nature" as a species, is a how-to manual, from which mankind's idea of assimilation has completely dismantled conceptualized freedom, as if some kind of inherent right within all living creatures. . . which can only (falsely) be realized from a critical hegemoniz-a-tive stand point.
This furthers my own found belief system.
That not only can one read this to be, five to six times ahead of our present dichotomy as stated herein^. . . though relatively speaking.
The same can be adopted with Darwinian logic, that the cast-iron history we've undertaken through the course of ancient civilizations, based on appeals to authority, such as the Ottoman, Catholic Empire, Constantinople, . . .all can be switched on or off as in a molecular level such as Darwin' origin of the species. This now proves to be that evolution (not god's "switch") completely models our failure as a species.
OMG - not to think that an actual Cnd.^ actually wrote what came a part of this.
And to be certain - my father is the most influential, honest to goodness human being I know.
OMG - not to think that an actual Cnd.^ actually wrote what came a part of this.
And to be certain - my father is the most influential, honest to goodness human being I know.
No comments:
Post a Comment