We're different: mes amis

On the basis of indecision. . .
The philosopher's igloo of sorts,
were two figures of man.
So the other one says it:
I cannot figure out why.
We have our own values and customs,
it seems I've become someone else?
But how is that possible!
The clueless games philosopher-igloo
claims; but he has sort of an idea:
that became transparent over time.
Evolution.
On the basis of instruction. . .
the story changes.
The philosophers have evolved over the
ice age, and since then transformed.
Not ever realizing the short history this
narration proved.
But I digress.
The igloo philosophy never came into being.
Its as though it never existed.
Therefore, the subject-matter did not materialize.
But the igloo philosophers had thought of philosophy
for a short time.
What became of the history between such novel
creatures.
Imagine, as if to think a history of philosophers,
with pet names and theories that somehow'
are still in place.
Like space and time are continually in motion.
There was rationale during the ice age after all.
Sculpting a igloo was only just as practical is to sculpt.
Like body-sculpting.
Or, a craft such as pottery.
Poetry.
The same person.
One in the same.
So this reality is truly something unique.
I can see it.
While the structure of time requires service.
Religious followers probably process structure of
no other kind.
I propose a psychological nature perhaps.
But why not time in its infinite place,
be kept secretly / remains as if there never
were structure.
Time is like an igloo or automobile.
It requires service.
If the opposite were true, how is it impossible
if car manufacturer's made automotives without
breaking systems.
whoops! Would they say?
Or - is it not aware of consequences automatically.
That the structure of time acquired fear.
And through fear came consequences of actions.
Would an evil be set precedent if all were crazy.
Meaning that a status quo demanded,
that auto-makers stop installation of breaks
in their vehicles.
Only because the will of all people everywhere
wanted to drive without being able to progress
in motion.
They wanted change.
They thought breaks in cars needed no break-mechanism.
And the rules they'd adopt within changing the system.
The system of thought would eliminate the fact
cars which once were equipped with assembled breaks.
As though cars stopping never existed.
And the need would be diminished.
Extinct.
Extinguished.
Cars everywhere would only be assembled to
continue the process of motion.
Never stopping.
Not ever.
Not even thought.
Thus, no one complained.
Nobody realized the difference breaks had made in time.
Cars were defined as vehicles in motion only.
Only vehicles in motion can train the senses to collide
with any other mechanical machine operated object.
Quite a mix of revolution and entropy.
The story lacks substance.
But I enjoyed writing it as this.