Let's break this down. . .
Nobody cares about how you debunk something not worth actually knowing if both empirically and factually inaccurate. This follows: How might one constitute determinism if without the interchange between existence preceding essence without manifesting cause. Cause is the central idea behind determinism, once removed, falls into the trap that cause falsifies freewill altogether. Therefore, his argument falls apart. (You cannot negate one thing in freewill without the other when the antecedent aka 'cause' is being falsified in favor of determinism.) It is a mutually exclusive argument.
Thinking about what is god: would you say God pressed his face upon the window of your mind and gave you rational placement above everything else. Nonsense. Freewill is not free from cause and effect. The relationship between cause and effect is the outcome of freewill.
- Marco
Nobody cares about how you debunk something not worth actually knowing if both empirically and factually inaccurate. This follows: How might one constitute determinism if without the interchange between existence preceding essence without manifesting cause. Cause is the central idea behind determinism, once removed, falls into the trap that cause falsifies freewill altogether. Therefore, his argument falls apart. (You cannot negate one thing in freewill without the other when the antecedent aka 'cause' is being falsified in favor of determinism.) It is a mutually exclusive argument.
Thinking about what is god: would you say God pressed his face upon the window of your mind and gave you rational placement above everything else. Nonsense. Freewill is not free from cause and effect. The relationship between cause and effect is the outcome of freewill.
- Marco
No comments:
Post a Comment