The falsely implied ingenuity of Dante

 How is Dante's Inferno at all relevant, if in making false statements, you wish things to be true. There is a dialectical element in what comes across as rather pretentious of Dante.

===============

I say it is more important to intercept what reacts to me in a diabolical instead of natural manner. I would go as far as saying, territorial intimidating factors are what provides Dante with the right to defy what is morality based. I reduce this idea to a common denomination, that includes rather than exclusion of existentialist thought. Dante is the anti-thesis to existentialism, making it superfluous.

My sense of a perfect world, can only come through the existence I carry to it.

1- Gods existence is tested in my faith of it.

2- Therefore, god does not (a) REQUIRE faith, that - that faith (b) does not require gods existence.

3- Faith is sacred FROM my dependence of it.

That being said: my sense of gods existence is only tested in my faith provided FROM it. God does not REQUIRE my faith. Faith should be a voluntary measure of humanity, a basic necessity of life lead virtue. Dante is highly contentious of that perspective. In my idea of a virtuous image of god, god represents faith on me. The idea of gods image is independent of that faith in question. This type of thinking requires an existential god. In other words, gods idea of me is not conditional nor cautious of my faith to gods image.

How can Dante possibly infer any of this from such moral ambiguity.

================

January 15th 2013

“The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who, in times of great moral crisis, maintain their neutrality.” ― Dante Alighieri, Inferno 

 

I say it is more important to intercept what reacts to me in a diabolical instead of natural manner. I would go as far as saying, territorial intimidating factors are what provides Dante with the right to defy what is morality based. I reduce this idea to a common denomination, that includes rather than exclusion of existentialist thought. Dante is the anti-thesis to existentialism, making it superfluous. 

 

My sense of a perfect world, can only come through the existence I carry to it.

 

1- Gods existence is tested in my faith of it. 2- Therefore, god does not (a) REQUIRE faith, that - that faith (b) does not require gods existence. 3- Faith is sacred FROM my dependence of it. 

 

That being said: my sense of gods existence is only tested in my faith provided FROM it. God does not REQUIRE my faith. Faith should be a voluntary measure of humanity, a basic necessity of life lead virtue. Dante is highly contentious of that perspective. In my idea of a virtuous image of god, god represents faith on me. The idea of gods image is independent of that faith in question. This type of thinking requires an existential god. In other words, gods idea of me is not conditional nor cautious of my faith to gods image. 

 

How can Dante possibly infer any of this from such moral ambiguity.

==============

 

1 -My idea of Dante is that integrity cannot regurgitate what classifies as moral based thought.

 

2 -If gods idea of me does not exist, is that a moral crisis. I infer that god would not be served of such thinking. What is it that Dante can infer from that.

 

3 -^If god does not exist, how is that possible.

 

============

 

God does not need my idea of gods image to exist, in order for it to be true. Dante would completely disagree with me. How is that a moral crisis exactly.

 

My idea of Dante is simple, I can categorically introduce my idea of gods image as a moral acclimation of the will. I can also dictate that is a sample of Dante's aversion to what acts as moral: the question becomes what - if anything - does Dante base his psychic ability to portray 'evil'. 

 

Furthermore, if my existential argument does not exist, it is NOT - I repeat NOT an extension of Dante. Dante would repel or make my argument redundant (i.e. circular). Therefore, my existentialist thought is not invalid, but a objurgation of Dante. 

 

Gods image is my indication to Dante's idea of morality.

 

Dante's idea of a moral crisis can only act itself on the idea of whether god exists or not. There is no, I argue, no other justification for morality over its apathy.

=====================

"1- Gods existence is tested in my faith of it. 2- Therefore, god does not (a) REQUIRE faith, that - that faith (b) does not require gods existence. 3- Faith is sacred FROM my dependence of it.

That being said: my sense of gods existence is only tested in my faith provided FROM it. God does not REQUIRE my faith." (MA2013) > All of this proves, is that because I exist, god must exist, then and only then, and because of this my faith is restored in humanity. The unproven fact that god can only exist because I exist is a notion that the other person gives birth to, only I would never come to know it nor expect it FROM another persons faith. I simply characterize that they believe I exist, means that because I exist - then so to does god. Therefore, their faith is renewed constantly.

-------------------------------