Social commentary to the world's hypocrisy isn't everyone's cup of tea.  As if speaking only debunks a dogma.  This through unsuccessful negation, as it does not nullify the main premise (harmony) following use of false antecedents.  Nor does this watered down model codify, what acts validly quantifiable.  Purifying the world is not about fairytale's to some magical island. 

What agrivates me personally, is much the same philosophically inquiring what results, for example, what informs punishment vs reward as westernization to that end.  Philosophy should be meant as remittance to our grievances.

In conclusion, on what planet would Werner suggest harmony be?  Where hostility, chaos and murder are refuge to a greater version of Hegelianism.  If you read this and don't see the difference, than why bother believing a word that Herzog implies.  Herzog is selling us what we are blind of.  I get it.  But this exercise in submission is to quote a fragile loser.  Which is to read it, and subvert it.

- Marco

So suggesting Werner creates a character where the fictional element offers a protagonist. The protagonist lets say for sake of argument, has been done before. We can use James Camron's 'Terminator' as our example to that effect. My point is: if the same social commentary has been done before. Herzog is having his say, albeit looks different. In Terminator the protagonist is a machine exhibits chaos, hostility and murder. There is nothing that motivates the human mind more than the average inferiority complex we place upon ourselves as a mirror to the world view we possess in others. That is harmony. Our human condition. (Let's not bullshit here.) Herzog is either commiting theft of an idea without further investigation or we can call it, see it, for what it is. A fabricated lie. Show me something that tells me about the human condition such as in philosophy, demands challenge. That is a clear issue for the audience to personify. Herzog stirs emotion typical of a topic that's been beaten.

- Marco