Curiosity

When the use of unliteral force (i.e. intimidation) if for no real unconscious nor ostensible reason or intent is unjustly committed. The use of equal force to combat it becomes a necessity.

I don't make the rules based on another's independence. (I say this because I would rather be able to recognize it than not.)

When I use the word 'combat' it is to accentuate how intelligence plays part, disarming what is it that acts in the reality of a seemingly dire situation 'if' called upon.

The reality: What we are witness to in the US is demoralizing.

Unless, you have a use of coping mechanisms in place, Our collective humanity is at stake unless for it to end in Christo-fascism. We need to tip-toe our way around what is fear based of one's enemy.

The enemy = is obviously far too comfortable playing god.

(Hint: fear). Fear is equal to weakness in disarming who plays god. This is the ultimate question to all political discourse.

The issue being anti-woke as to identify the main cause. (Fear based reality.) This follows in asking yourself: how can you afford not to be silent. If your political behavior depends on your fear of god. The fear of god if it depends on your freedom, can only be equal to how we behave politically.

What must not happen (but does happen) is the weaponization of our ideas. We must fight to counter ourselves against the god complex. This has nothing to do with facts, because propaganda does not rely on factually given evidence. (It never has - empirically). Therefore, on a non-empirical level what We must look at is in our pride as individuals and turn the page on a god complex that is no more ancient than rules - as rules are only made to be broken. Recording our history in place of how things should happen (present tense), although not because it is as they've happened (past tense). God does not act as a mortal in our lives. How does this frame of thinking work in place of god? This comes in asking ourselves. = Acting is god's way of stating what we must do, only if we ask what is it we must face to act as mortals. What does this prove politically if not policing ourselves? It is nature. Our view of nature in things as much as ourselves.

Conclusion:

We should always ask: If we are being coerced to believe what we should as we should. Rewind to the beginning, on this basis :: who plays god. The aim is our humanity on a secular level. In ourself = Not gods functioning (e.g. what is god). To act = not what fear in god we possess (i.e. omnipotence) however, in the name of god all are made to be mortals and must remove the mask of those that refuse to be made mortals. We must not fear our power in the face of corruption. This would make an omniscient view for our future, that in time our psychological manner of thinking, would not subvert politics in place of mortals who possess a god complex.

Think of it: who in their right mind, 'deserves' independence. Independence if not equal. Can it be independence?

- Marco