Everything I am explaining here is inspired as it pertains to what is currently and presently happening in the Middle East between Hamas and the Israelis. Palestine is not a state, and will not be recognized as one in spite of Jewish held territory. They must learn how to coexist. A new Jerusalem should have made itself a constitution that would remedy that. If Palestinians wore their flag and agreed to a joint coalition with Israel, it would be a Jesuit based society, planted in the middle of a Muslim population, which would be recognized all over the world, thus protected in principle. The Jewish membership MUST comply and the Palestinian authority MUST act with complicity. A Jewish state without a shared identity of its people without such a constitution will never flourish. Therein is the problem - ergo its solution. These are strictly my ideas, though the population of a Jewish run state under its own constitution could always be a reality, if they concede to Palestinian rights as a people to that Kingdom of Jerusalem. Moses said that Jerusalem was inclusive, Jesus said that freedom is more important. Therefore, they are all gods people exclusively. How can it possibly be any clearer.
========
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1aH5vpvp2C/
Whatever Bill Maher is trying to achieve, I think he may have failed in revealing. Then again his failed success is attempting to prove a point, (a) what provides evidence then also (b) produces proof.
Maybe that is the true reason why Maher pursues its;
1- dichotomy of choice over
2- religious freedom (dichotomy)
3- that failing the dichotomy is in fact the real cause behind his act.
Therefore, the cause behind Maher acting superficial is extended toward freeing the idea of repression. That religious dichotomy fails to provide proof that in this case, woman are underscored as an 'evil' source of gods will waiting to be committed to treasonous acts. That those treasonous acts are against religious duties which woman MUST then follow verbatim - women are the carrier of gods will which means they are a deficit to illegal amounts of convection (i.e. women cannot under strict obligation have freedom to movement.)
All religion is deemed by appeasing ones appearance as magical, that is, not running parallel to the idea representative of faith: that belief resists change. That then and only then this results as opposed to vertically/horizontally (i.e. earth bound spirit) as equals. That religious dichotomy is the rule of law in Eastern tradition Westernization concludes its worthiness useless. Maher accentuates the "religious vs. dichotomous" as false in both Western/Eastern traditions. Maher is presenting the ideas as false, not the fact that they are false.
==============
"That religious dichotomy fails to provide proof that in this case, 1- woman are underscored as 2- an 'evil' source of 3- gods will waiting to be committed to treasonous acts. 4- That those treasonous acts are against 5- religious duties which woman MUST then follow verbatim - women are 6- the carrier of gods will which means they are a deficit to illegal amounts of convection (i.e. women cannot under strict obligation have freedom to movement.)
All religion is deemed by appeasing ones appearance as magical, that is, not running parallel to the idea representative of faith: that belief resists change." (MA2012)
1- through 6- represent the restricted freedom of volition women have, not because THEY ARE WOMEN, but because in the eyes of god, they define the truth in that religion for what it stands and the purpose to religious training. On the other hand, read that as follows: women are the MESSENGERS of gods will. Their obedience is what god measures as failure. Therefore as messengers of god, beliefs of any other cause, are foreign therefore treasonous.
" That then and only then this results as opposed to (a) vertically/horizontally (i.e. earth bound spirit) as equals. That religious dichotomy is the (b) rule of law in Eastern tradition (c)Westernization concludes its worthiness useless. Maher accentuates the "religious vs. dichotomous" as false in both Western/Eastern traditions. Maher is presenting the ideas as false, not the fact that they are false." (MA2012)
Case in point, Maher's accentuation IDEAS apart from FACTS, are BOTH false in BOTH Eastern/Western traditions.
THEREFORE, as earth bound spirits the IDEA is that we are in FACT made equal. The models between both East/West traditions nullified the other. That religious dichotomy of the religious right is censored from Western thought of its modern day abundance.
This is my own version of what Maher is promoting as falsified evidence between traditions.
© Marco Almeida 2012
No comments:
Post a Comment