Stephen Harper's sickened branch of humility

 November 20, 2013

Stephen Harper's Canada: 1- where the average person is out to prove how much better than you they are feel justified in doing it, 2- compare ourselves with Americanism only masking it with a false sense of dignity 3- limit class conscious to one of feudal representation so its population base is oblivious to power corporate-class elitism 4-recognize how much more sophisticated the rest of the world sees us (if you paint a picture of how hedonistic we are on an unconscious level.)

Rising above a personal creative state :: falling from grace

 Passion is the freedom from the “me”, which is the centre of all fulfilment and pain. Passion does not demand because it is, and I am not speaking of something static. Passion is the austerity of self-abnegation in which the “you” and the “me” is not; therefore, passion is the essence of life. It is this that moves and lives. But when thought brings in all the problems of having and holding, then passion ceases. Without passion, creation is not possible.⁠

⁠

⁠

J. Krishnamurti⁠

The Urgency of Change⁠

⁠

Eradicating the intolerable cause of freedom between Israel and Palestine

 Everything I am explaining here is inspired as it pertains to what is currently and presently happening in the Middle East between Hamas and the Israelis. Palestine is not a state, and will not be recognized as one in spite of Jewish held territory. They must learn how to coexist. A new Jerusalem should have made itself a constitution that would remedy that. If Palestinians wore their flag and agreed to a joint coalition with Israel, it would be a Jesuit based society, planted in the middle of a Muslim population, which would be recognized all over the world, thus protected in principle. The Jewish membership MUST comply and the Palestinian authority MUST act with complicity. A Jewish state without a shared identity of its people without such a constitution will never flourish. Therein is the problem - ergo its solution. These are strictly my ideas, though the population of a Jewish run state under its own constitution could always be a reality, if they concede to Palestinian rights as a people to that Kingdom of Jerusalem. Moses said that Jerusalem was inclusive, Jesus said that freedom is more important. Therefore, they are all gods people exclusively. How can it possibly be any clearer.

========

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1aH5vpvp2C/

====================

Whatever Bill Maher is trying to achieve, I think he may have failed in revealing. Then again his failed success is attempting to prove a point, (a) what provides evidence then also (b) produces proof.

Maybe that is the true reason why Maher pursues its;

1- dichotomy of choice over

2- religious freedom (dichotomy)

3- that failing the dichotomy is in fact the real cause behind his act.

Therefore, the cause behind Maher acting superficial is extended toward freeing the idea of repression. That religious dichotomy fails to provide proof that in this case, woman are underscored as an 'evil' source of gods will waiting to be committed to treasonous acts. That those treasonous acts are against religious duties which woman MUST then follow verbatim - women are the carrier of gods will which means they are a deficit to illegal amounts of convection (i.e. women cannot under strict obligation have freedom to movement.)

All religion is deemed by appeasing ones appearance as magical, that is, not running parallel to the idea representative of faith: that belief resists change. That then and only then this results as opposed to vertically/horizontally (i.e. earth bound spirit) as equals. That religious dichotomy is the rule of law in Eastern tradition Westernization concludes its worthiness useless. Maher accentuates the "religious vs. dichotomous" as false in both Western/Eastern traditions. Maher is presenting the ideas as false, not the fact that they are false.

==============

"That religious dichotomy fails to provide proof that in this case, 1- woman are underscored as 2- an 'evil' source of 3- gods will waiting to be committed to treasonous acts. 4- That those treasonous acts are against 5- religious duties which woman MUST then follow verbatim - women are 6- the carrier of gods will which means they are a deficit to illegal amounts of convection (i.e. women cannot under strict obligation have freedom to movement.)

All religion is deemed by appeasing ones appearance as magical, that is, not running parallel to the idea representative of faith: that belief resists change." (MA2012)

1- through 6- represent the restricted freedom of volition women have, not because THEY ARE WOMEN, but because in the eyes of god, they define the truth in that religion for what it stands and the purpose to religious training. On the other hand, read that as follows: women are the MESSENGERS of gods will. Their obedience is what god measures as failure. Therefore as messengers of god, beliefs of any other cause, are foreign therefore treasonous.

===========

" That then and only then this results as opposed to (a) vertically/horizontally (i.e. earth bound spirit) as equals. That religious dichotomy is the (b) rule of law in Eastern tradition (c)Westernization concludes its worthiness useless. Maher accentuates the "religious vs. dichotomous" as false in both Western/Eastern traditions. Maher is presenting the ideas as false, not the fact that they are false." (MA2012)

Case in point, Maher's accentuation IDEAS apart from FACTS, are BOTH false in BOTH Eastern/Western traditions.

THEREFORE, as earth bound spirits the IDEA is that we are in FACT made equal. The models between both East/West traditions nullified the other. That religious dichotomy of the religious right is censored from Western thought of its modern day abundance.

This is my own version of what Maher is promoting as falsified evidence between traditions.

© Marco Almeida 2012

The ultimate test in maturity

 

Context: You must live with sorrow, not morbidly, not in self-pity, not in isolation, not in resentment. You must live with it as you would a dangerous pet, ever watching it, trying to understand its ways, its intentions, following it with alert awareness, being open to its intimations. Great pliability is needed, which is denied when thought-feeling is anchored to a belief, a theory, an experience, a memory. It is this simple and uncontending pliability of the mind and heart that brings peace and joy, love and understanding. Living with sorrow, we get tired and numb. Weariness and numbness indicate a desire to be free from sorrow, to get rid of it. We exhaust our thought-feeling in seeking comfort, which brings about thoughtlessness, deadening our feelings. Comfort is a subtle poison to be avoided by those who would understand and transcend sorrow. Suffering, when allowed to mature, finds its own release.

Krishnamurti, The World Within

 

Singularity as a philosophical concept can be structured/surveyed in a way for what man himself enters equal value (i.e. words) to things of a deviant nature. If man's nature is made up into components, those components being how language works. Man transcends language as a singularity understood only by forces that lead or at the very least influences or acts as language. Singularity can be mans foundation for a critically active awareness of language. Language acting superimposed as a result of singularity once you master the art of language. (aka space time continuum)

Singularity as language is the philosophical composition into what man proves has interpretive value. This is a foundational element in dialectic or material language. Aristotelean = poetics. Wittgenstein = dialectics.

- Marco 

 How do you serve a higher purpose without getting tangled in the cobweb that is your mind.

- Marco

(Incorrect science of meditative quality)

 November 15, 2012

 

Re; "deeper silence"

In my estimation, deeper silence is what you use as a filter on the surface of reality. Think about is this way, we are a measure of reality, trying to constantly receive, retrieve, amass new (or old for that matter) waves of information. If reality were a measure of yourself (I.e. You or I are not engaged in forces beyond ourselves) that is the deeper understanding of silence. Ask yourself: can you PRODUCE silence the same way you collect sound. If you can do that, it is what I call my own reflection of what the universe has been giving me.

I receive silence.

Think about it, really think about it. Can you desecrate reality to its most infant form, in reality, this is a skill of focused, disciplined, external reality. What you do with what I just taught you is to remain connected with your virtuous (fortuitous) sense of self. What I mean by that is simple, can you achieve enlightenment, without the superficial factors in reality which WOULD NOT, I repeat, would not care to have two thoughts about you otherwise.

Meditation is a myth in the physical universe, purity, truthful mediation can only take place in the genius of ones heart. No matter what the world is telling you, is an illusion created without internalization of its so called "reality".

If we were all concerned for each other based on thoughts and clarity, that exclusively not, I repeat NOT inclusively requires silence. The end result is specific to the CAUSE of UNDERSTANDING meditative states of awareness. You are a vessel of a reality gone blind.

==============

I have said it already. A Canadian philosopher, holds the glowing hearts of the many not so much the few.

"Think about it, really think about it. 1- Can you desecrate reality to its most infant form, in reality, 2- this is a skill of focused, disciplined, external reality. What you do with what I just taught you is 3- to remain connected with your virtuous (fortuitous) sense of self." (MA2012)

All of this refers to silence as a resource in meditative principle: that you cannot give another silence, nor train it, nor direct it, you can only have the power of potential to be it, sit with it, share in its opulence.

That- is the hardest human ability to master.

Have I done it. Why would I be writing something I do not practice.

==============

And if you have taken the opportunity to read what I write, it changes the landscape of ones intellect. My intellectual freedom is the most important skill I may have ever learned to, developed.

My next series of writing will center on communism as the binary element of reproduction in societies face of reason. That my Canadian westernmost view of marxist principles can change, therefore adapt into new sources of dialects. I will do this all not without an accredited degree such as in law, but the sophist version of socratic persuasion. It will be my work that will be published on its theoretical artifice, against the violations committed against Socrates, that socratic rule in its portrayed unpopular aspects of communism can correct the misconception that law has taken into consideration, on the basis and tenant of reason. That in fact true, socratic dialogue can institute the formal condemnation of fascism, totalitarianism, bipartisan concepts and conjecture.

Mark my words; that it will be published.

====================

"that socratic rule in its portrayed unpopular aspects of communism can correct the misconception that law has taken into consideration, on the basis and tenant of reason. That in fact true, socratic dialogue can institute the formal condemnation of fascism, totalitarianism, bipartisan concepts and conjecture." (MA2012)

Read that ten times over if your name is Pierre Trudeau or John Diefenbaker. I am going to start something they never finished, but it will be great for debate.

=====================

I do not see myself as a politician, but if someone were to endear me, I would not object to it.

=====================

When I am finished, I will dedicate that work to Dr. Diane Gall, Dr. Douglas Walton, Dr. James Muir and Dr. Jeremy Gordon.

Adhd

 The shortest aversion to detail is an ADHD strategy. This means eliminating information overload. When your brain can focus like an adhd mind does, the brain collects and simultaneously edits what it wants to store. It is about an awareness. Having this awareness, is solution driven. You learn to live this way = acting as a normal individual. My adhd mind is aware of many things at the same time. This is my conscious state to create results driven behavior. Where I've intuitvely anticipated everything that happens - happens because I feel present in my body. Freedom for an adhd mind is tapped to a higher-order of (as I said in the beginning) solutions that regulate my behavior. I can pay attention to many things as they happen, but I have learned how to eliminate distraction. My source is isolating my conscious mind into acting as singularity.  

My mission: to beat my evil twin that's living in my head, (the evil twin that doesn’t know who is doing the observing). This means the actions I take come from infoming my evil twin I am in charge of it from intentionality I perform with.

- Marco

The proliferation of my psyche

 November 14, 2013

I have been better served by lesser people - this is in my view what approaching all individual archetype reveals to me.  Fact: any trained actor develops their creative ability to play a character, inasmuch the imaginary role a person on average has in real life tabulates nothing new to the world.  The same is true especially in acting.  

 

I would not confuse acting ability with having any special talent or specific quality other than the crave of it for hyper individuality.  

 

A result of this came as I attempted to do a scene with an actress.  She made a point of disowning my efforts that left me feeling rather repulsive, as I refuse to incorporate the image any person carries of themselves not without stepping on their egos.  That is the message I had been conveyed.

 

I have never experienced the type of humiliation this actress or any actress like her represents, I simply use this as an example of sickness in the acting industry which so many tread on.  I refuse to impart what that experience did to me as an actor - which made feel as an inferior rather than empowering the source of all art.  If anything it opened my eyes.  

 

It told me why stereotypes exist in the form of satire that cruelty enables the most wicked of minds.The point is this: if you are a fan of your idol 1- that person is probably a huge fake and made a profession of it. 2- Can you detect it.

 "Problems do not come with assumptions, they begin with false ideals of importance, and the attention to have accepted its (fallacious) reasoning."

Marco Almeida 2014

"I rather regret something worth doing than vacate my life's journey without it. There is nothing to learn."

Marco Almeida 2014

 It is easy to spot a blind man, because even if they do not respect my intelligence it would not affect me, impair my own judgment or evoke thoughts of a deceitful nature. However, what a blind man cannot detect of me, is that ability, to find reason, to identify cause, and only define that if my intelligence were to be insulted makes it much more difficult to just laugh about. - Marco

My 2013 thesis to end an unconscious apartheid no one is aware of. . .

 Master Thesis:

 

Think about it - does the world function on an ad hoc representation as its basis of corporate greed. (Now read this. . .) can you live in a place that - your country is forever branding itself an Utopian model of citizenship, that if you fail to sink or swim are you not (in the case of American civilization to this date) an evil empire. I argue you are blind to the systemic apartheid of corporate class conscious to abolish the middle class as fait accompli.

 

=============

 

Thesis (answer):

 

I have no idea why Ashton Kutcher is revered for pushing the envelope against white bred mentality when it in fact enables the corporate (enemy) class. YOU HAVE TO BE STUPID NOT TO SEE - that the class conscious divide is being thread by corporate agenda. Ashton Kutcher should be not be saying their is a false sense of entitlement - but that the avg. middle class is being taken for a ride and this is an apartheid against families that are at the bottom of the bread basket.

 

If you believe for a minute that hard work takes commitment, effort and practice to become a leader - you have branded the same stereotype of competition is enamored through sacrifice - struggle - suffering of those that cannot. This is about a gigantic corporate class model to abolish an already weakened complacent population. 

 

WAKE THE FUCK UP PEOPLE - ASHTON KUTCHER HAS NO IDEA WTF HE IS TALKING ABOUT!!!!!!

 

============

So let me get this straight - conservatives in America (which is the basis of where this article is published via 'conservativepost.com') are fighting tooth and nail to label Obama - an honest Christian believer that does not entertain the wealthy over their own entitlement, is suppose to make me believe Ashton Kutcher on Ellen's show zeroing in on the same subject using loaded terms to describe the arrogant nature of white bred America.

 

1- Did anyone else not catch that? 2- American's are diseased with their false sense of entitlement, so specifically targets the same group of zealots that govern them?? That way the conservative agenda can push forward, and only Ashton Kutcher has realized this. Does anyone not feel how ridiculous that sounds.

 

Yeah - I thought so.

Mental distortion : causal matter

When exposing a crime is treated as committing a crime, you are being ruled by criminals.

 The trouble is white supremacy as an example. Criminal activity by white collar criminals fit into into a stereotype that does not discriminate no matter the color of skin. What supports my thesis herein, is that as long criminals have a cause for their sovereignty. Sovereignty is a sensory experience that is a material matter. White supremacists believe they are materially superior as a race. It is a matter of exhibiting this cause. Hence, critical race theory: is rejected. Rejected because when races of another kind of culture are born into, they are accused of tribalism to fit the same dark psychology. Dark psychology expediting fear regardless of = white supremacy in action on a normative associative level where discrimination is only seen as a mental distortion which is indivisible and can't be persecuted.

All causal matters in sovereignty falling into the same category of all human history have been dictated on the premise of white supremacy as the main motivating factor. That is fact.

Although we can change it.

- Marco 

==================

Revised:

All white supremacy is - is indivisible.

The following serves as a definition of the word:

----------------------

indivisible (adjective)

unable to be divided or separated:

----------------------

The trouble is white supremacy if treated as an example of the following premise:

"When exposing a crime is treated as committing a crime, you are being ruled by criminals."

Criminal activity by white collar criminals fit into into a stereotype that does not discriminate no matter the color of skin. > That much is not only a true statement but is irrefutable for purpose of reason.

What supports my thesis herein, is that as long criminals have a cause for their sovereignty. Sovereignty is a sensory experience that is a material matter. White supremacists believe they are materially superior as a race. It is a matter of exhibiting this cause. Hence, critical race theory: is rejected. Rejected because when races of another kind of culture are born into, they are accused of tribalism to fit the same dark psychology. Dark psychology expediting fear regardless of = white supremacy in action on a normative associative level where discrimination is only seen as a mental distortion which is indivisible and can't be persecuted. (Think about it. If we lived in a world of secret, how would you know. How would you intercept the double life of someone you thought you knew, but kept their psychosis hidden.) Therefore, what if those you see as racist only want what is best for themselves? That everything depends on answering, what is surrendering to the good life. As in: what if the ideology is unconsciously registered and imposed onto you? "America First" = propaganda symbolizing nationalism. Does this not register in Westernized thinking or are we recording it blindly.

All causal matters in sovereignty falling into the same category of human history have been dictated on the premise toward white supremacy as the main motivating factor. That is fact. (No matter if you fail to internalize that - is not up to you.)

Although we can change it.

Because we are living in it. Look no further than MAGA's anti-woke movement. (If we can afford to speak the truth.) It is in plain sight.

- Marco

To be made useful :: Marco's code = 1- 2 - 3 principles

1- Happiness is intelligence leaving the body.

2- Intuition is an effigy of your secret identity turned into language.

3- Fight with the heart of a lion.

==============

If all person's are meant to be made useful is it not the same as to be made of use. This is what Plutarch suggests? If all people are meant to make themselves useful, than is it not the same as being put to 'good' use. If all this follows: the idea is to make use of oneself, then it contradicts the nature of purpose. What is our purpose if it is not meant to be? (Our personal destiny). Rewind = to make use of oneself is above all else an enigma. What then justifies our actions on the basis of making use of ourselves. What governs our actions if not aware of our method in questioning. Questioning = what is of use?

My point is there are varying degrees of thinking how useful we are in terms of what we ask ourselves IS useful. I can be a cook. Not a good enough cook to be a chef. But I pretend to be a cook? (According to Plutarch.) My logic suggests being a cook at McDonalds is of use. Unless my virtue dismisses someone else who does not think this way. The way I think of this: is that a McDonald's cook is worth something of use.

- Marco

False pioneering Complacency: growing old again

 November 12, 2009

I love the sight of a shooting star, because I can believe at that moment in time, I am the one to have witnessed it - only. Perhaps, that is the same way most people would attribute, defining the moment, which is too hard to miss since it is so much faster than you are to have seen such a light. I also suppose so much is true, that nothing is geometric, before you realize the world we live is looking down on us?

I've had no problem integrating my sense of consciousness through a different kind of awareness, that type of thinking which goes against modern convention.

I find it harder each day to reveal what may be my purpose in life, it has it's beginnings and in another manner of speaking, there is no end in sight. I suppose it is an internal will that I've allowed myself to explore, after a real kind of self-interest takes shape? There is so much that I see happening, which most people fail to realize, is undoing my belief's of unchanging principles.

I am not a creationist per se, but what I am aware of after finishing this article in self-examination, that I anticipate? Before we arrived on this planet, as humans have evolved, there was nothing but energy which somehow transmitted itself into what we do have today. Most of it hasn't manifested into a perfect form of energy, but an imperfect majority of plants and animals we use in our environment. It points me to one thing: that I am not psychological in my silent nature, I am neglected indicated from an intention that many are not attune to. It is a way of emitting what is lost must be found in some true explanation of a cerebral value which no material entity can survive. It is a braver archetype of intense outcomes dealing with freedom.

===========

Irrelevance Day is every November 11th

 Got to love how Remembrance day is commodified into the mass subconscious when the reality of it is brain washing how the avg citizen is suppose to fall over for what the human condition actually is accordingly. Since when does a war that is the catalyst of the industrial revolution suppose to make me thankful. Fuck the hell off with that shit. 

 

That is what we are celebrating - a branding of how we celebrate war as if it equates to freedom. 

 

Got to love how the avg. person fails to decide that for themselves, but latches onto the mythology of soldiers fighting for freedom in the name of god - when nothing about it is sacred whatsoever.

 

Think about it. The US Army is the epitome of rational divide and you care to enable that?? Is how we react to differences in the global mosaic supposed to signify hope and symbolize peaceful practice or participation.

 

Pass this on.

 

(Or feel free to be blind to all of what you just read.)

===========

I have a very different idea of myself in the global mosaic, but I can appreciate what I read when it comes to reminding me of what is important. I do not believe in death as a mortal coil that we must personify if I am to live a life of freedom. True freedom in my eyes is if I have afforded my own prejudice at no cost to anyone else or protecting myself from discrimination before it reaches its height shows tolerance - that is what I take pride in.

================

Facebook

Why are you calling them assailants? Assailant is defined as one who attacks or is hostile. They weren't protesting. The guy is a 5 year veteran there to be part of the ceremony. We should respect the sovereignty of their nations and respect their flag. Natives fought along side our canadian troops wars going way back as allies.

There is no procedure here either. Police are not allowed to just remove and arrest people in silence in this country. What is this, Egypt?? There was no offence in the video, and even if there was, an officer is obligated to inform a person of the charge if they ask. These officers just say silent and remove someone from the public for what seem like political reasons. That is not a free democracy and a violation of our rights.

===============

Did I call them assailants. No, what I did was defend them as potential assailants. Huge difference. (Because that is exactly how the officer treated them!!) My point is assailants can be victimized which in this case the victim IS being treated as an assailant. If that logic seems twisted to you - then I am a monkey's uncle. That is my reasoning (which you are allowed to disagree with.)

In terms of procedure, Jeff, I agree with you. I took a position as the Crown would have to administer. (Therefore I use the term assailant.) In the eyes of the court, that is how they would be treated, as though a mock cause.

I am on your side, Jeff. Read it again.

I have to make it clear - I do not use the term assailant without just cause - it is the very reason I used the term- to defend them. TO DISPROVE it. If the court were to characterize them as assailants, then they have to prove their guilt. Once the precedent is set that they are not assailants, it takes my clever tactic to ensure the crown is acting in good faith.

MY dissertation is a theoretical device. If I were a lawyer it is exactly how I would draft my proposition.