Resist the curse
Illogical mathematical formulas advertising my mental flow.
This is how I draw.
This is how I exhibit myself further than meets the eye. This is how I think. Abstract lines. Geometric patters trying to magnify, in my thoughtful alignment of words.
Learning how to think is...
To test the measure of an effect.
To feel an allowance.
To free the unconscious.
The shelter of my sorrowed mind.
I know very little about a great deal of things.
To test this has very little impact on the nature of my being.
This space between my mind.
I am not favoring guilt.
You know.
That vibrational sense of what you must be feeling any given moment.
My growing culpability.... it keeps growing
And growing.
Into the kind of a monster.
But not the type you strangely would associate with your mother. Like some form of psychological impairment.
It is more like the Moral aptitude of a coward who is never on time for love. And still sees the sunlight.
Being boring is a trait or characterisation into something undesirable.
Wild nightmares...
That in the universe is built upon... a heavy heavy unpredictability into what causes you to deserve and not deserving of.
What does that look like.
Does your face tell the untold story.
How might it unravel!?
Something like an uncalculated dose of fear into the brains neural pathways... interfering with the happiness you seek.
And maybe just maybe she'll be waiting for me.
Another time.
Another day.
How will I know it ends.
Question(s). Pertaining to my Roman Catholic faith what does this historically represent as a subject matter. In the context of what is presently happening in Gaza as an impromptu warzone for legal unilateral genocide.
Am I a killer. Not true. Are we murderers. Again, not true.
But against all odds does history show that the Roman Catholic religion has killed in the name of power.
I am thinking this much is true.
That since the accolades before the christ child and after the Roman Catholic empire has killed in the name of power. But the record shows... this is 1- in ancient Renaissance whereon the Roman empire which ...
2- in solidarity toward recycling its own sovereignty, killed in the name of power.
Emperors. Emperor kings were bound by the division of power and as acting as generals were certified death warrants in the name of that power. This assertion of such is a documented fact.
Fast forward to the Judiciary which stands in the name of Israel, Palestine and Judea. All of this encompassing a region which illustrates its own authority and position of power. If we compare this to how Romans attributed its power struggle, which the Roman Catholic religion derives its name. Let's leap frog. Calling this an insurrection of Palestine 🇵🇸 its people and an even poorer lost version of how they historically have been purged upon. Make no mistake. This war in what is it now? 2023A.D.!!
This war itself is parallel to an inquisition of Palestine.
This being a copy cat aversion of Israel 🇮🇱 to what historically points to kill for power. In this case it is an authority or power to kill innocent people.
Compared to what Hamas initiated on October 7th 2023. Was an improper declaration for war. Good people are not into terrorist ideology. It's that simple.
In conclusion further to this analysis is into making a two headed coin type of an argument based on religious connotation. This war is simply wrong. Don't turn a blind eye to it today. What is happening in Gaza is peanuts compared to terrorist activity. It is a complete infanticide.
I come from Roman Catholic propriety and am a proud man born and raised in Canada of Portuguese decent.
Portugal is a pro Palestinian state solution.
Netanyahu is a war criminal.
Do not be fooled by following terrosits agendas training your mind to think as white powered Nationalists. Unlearn it. Start thinking.
Most of my standards in life....
If I have learned anything about my true nature.The paradoxical nature between God and man is the very fabric of philosophy. Therefore, theology is philosophy with a general assignment of those variables. The truth is not theological. Only the question of God is philosophical and unknowable. Which creates our own dialogue. MA2023
It sucks that some people can't juggle. But really that's only one half of where talent ends. We reveal self deference in life which can only begin in wisdoms awakening where the other half isn't found.
“Faith is like love: it does not let itself be forced.” Arthur Schopenhauer
Where does rejection come from.
Valeriann Susan Donley interesting take you.have made there. I'd like to interpretively perform an interjection. My personal view of religious diety (i.e. beliefs). I consider myself a person that informs his religion as opposed to the opposite cause and effect. Which I would infer is your original point of automatic conditioning. I specially liked that premise so to expand on its formality. Conditioning also implies consciousness on a unilateral level, which I could argue is the same thing in attributing how religion functions. You read a canonical text and it automatically makes you that thing. If we agree on that premise we can also agree word for word that there may or .ay not be reasons to predicate or challenge what religion is based on. In this case word for word it is the canonical word of god. Therefore, we are coloring religion. We are taking it at face value are we not. Yes or no.
If we rewind to host the same idea mentioned earlier in my theoretically hypothetical propositions. I stated something about religious diety as an artifice which you stated we automatically get conditioned to either master or believe is guiding us (for lack of better terminology.) My point if we fast forward to right now is simpler... how do I inform religion. That is a strong concept to consider when conceptually canonical text is law or as in commandments gods personal prophecy as advocated through Moses. Why is Moses the interpreter of canonical laws therein? But I digress. Because these are indisputably laws associated to gods word and testament.
So if you've followed my ability to express my thoughts into writing thus far I applaud you!!
Here is my final conclusion I ask you to consider. Can we inform religion. Does this not make us human rather than automatically conditioned to perform canon law(s) as gods word. Therefore, we are by trade heretic. All of us. If we follow the same pattern. Unless we break convention there is no pattern. Do we? Can we or not.
I reject things that usually means something I haven't yet understood. But I learn to provoke thought into it. That is how I reject arithmetic because why should I consume myself with symbols and formulas which are entirely unrelated to the universe as a whole. Math is something I never understood and probably never will expect if it offers theories. I am a theoretical style thinker which means I rather postulate using inference as a form of logical dialogue. Mathematics independent of language makes no sense to me. Never has.
The model of light-years in its entirety ties into quantum physics which I also know nothing about on a quantitative level. I rather understand things through qualifying my own thoughts, against a theoretical framework.
In order to undertake any real properties related to numbers I rather using logic to decipher what everything that means.
Is math useless? That's my question from which I placehold my own theory to.
How can we possibly reach other solar systems..think about it. Theoretically it will be impossible to achieve.
Unless physical teleportation is possible. Which means we can transfer uniform particles being that we are made of as energy and transport a compound as particles light years away. How is this not a reality yet. Isn't it fair to ask. And if so, what does it point to. Teleportation is the only thing imaginable.
My theory of time travel is another element in teleportation through dimensionality.
My theory is simple.
If future time travel in theory does exist in future time, I believe that the model for time travel would mean my double would already have visited me in real-life and altered the course of my life.
Now prove it. Prove that I am simultaneously not in between a future and present day. It's improbable. Time travel cannot exist otherwise I'd be completely changed as result.
The model of light-years in its entirety ties into quantum physics which I also know nothing about on a quantitative level. I rather understand things through qualifying my own thoughts, against a theoretical framework.
In order to undertake any real properties related to numbers I rather using logic to decipher what everything that means.
Is math useless? That's my question from which I placehold my own theory to.
How can we possibly reach other solar systems..think about it. Theoretically it will be impossible to achieve.
Unless physical teleportation is possible. Which means we can transfer uniform particles being that we are made of as energy and transport a compound as particles light years away. How is this not a reality yet. Isn't it fair to ask. And if so, what does it point to. Teleportation is the only thing imaginable.
My theory of time travel is another element in teleportation through dimensionality.
My theory is simple.
If future time travel in theory does exist in future time, I believe that the model for time travel would mean my double would already have visited me in real-life and altered the course of my life.
Now prove it. Prove that I am simultaneously not in between a future and present day. It's improbable. Time travel cannot exist otherwise I'd be completely changed as result.
Being empowered by such a technique of deprogramming the mind takes skill. It becomes a material personal awareness that takes on a psychology of its own. Follow that with unlocking the secret to a greater way of thinking. Your ability in knowing nothing come from eliminating thought from body and mind. It will be as personal to you in growth and accomplishment.
A social scientific overview of the thinking process which is a law for all observable phenomenon. Therefore, thinking about what to process is obsolete. Asking 'What is' is personal to you and your aim to define that us epistemological in value.
As to wonder how the seeds of time magically somehow appeared in the palm of your hand, that you never let go of.
How the seedically -
Somehow -
Appeared in the palm of your hand, that you
Feminists are never wrong about anything they're just fucking hypocrites. I on the other hand still look cool without wearing sunglasses.
Karma is and will always be my personal guide to being happy. I relate everything to philosophical investigation *gender specific stereotypes.
