October 15th 2012

 This text reads as an intense, philosophical stream-of-consciousness grappling with alienation, the societal definition of "success," and personal vindication.

The author writes from a position of feeling judged, dismissed, and labeled as an "unsuccessful" person by conventional standards, and responds by deconstructing and rejecting the framework used to judge them.

Here is an interpretation broken down by core thesis and key thematic layers:

---

Core Thesis

"The true nature of 'success' is UNLEARNED."

The author argues that modern, conventional "success" is an artificial, manufactured game of ego, power, and brand-management. True consciousness and human value, in their view, lie outside of resumes, social approval, and competitive hierarchies. Rather than striving to "succeed" under corrupt metrics, human beings should unlearn societal expectations and refuse to participate in hypocritical moral systems.

---

Key Themes & Section Breakdown

1. The Opening Maxim & The "Methodical Apology"

"The worst apology you can make someone not of your view, is a methodical one."

• Interpretation: A "methodical apology" implies something calculated, bureaucratic, formulaic, or performed for social utility rather than stemming from genuine remorse or shared values. To someone who fundamentally views reality differently, a formulaic apology feels patronizing, dishonest, and manipulative—a symptom of people playing societal roles rather than engaging authentically.

2. The Illusion of the "Common Good" & Branding (Section 1)

• The author critiques how people disguise self-interest under the guise of the "common good."
• They argue that society targets people who refuse to play the branding game ("targeting inferior branded models"). Acting polite or benevolent within an inherently competitive system just makes one an "easy target."
• Therefore, conventional success is not benevolent; it is built on manipulation, leverage, and emotional pretense.

3. The Rejection of Institutional Validation (Section 2)

• Tools of careerism—such as resumes, references, and credentials—are dismissed as superficial survival strategies that have nothing to do with genuine human consciousness.
• Conforming to these markers separates an individual from authentic moral and conscious living. To regain oneself, one must unlearn these societal definitions.

4. The Catalyzing Conflict & The Ironic Exchange (Sections 4 & 5)

• The philosophical reflection appears to be triggered by an actual confrontation with an acquaintance or peer (Section 5):
  • A woman accused the author of being "unsuccessful" and claimed their cynicism was rooted in jealousy.
  • The author countered that true purpose requires non-attachment ("what every man should do requires nothing").
  • The woman responded by ignoring them. The author labels this with bitter irony: she "successfully" ignored me.
• This personal sting fuels the deeper critique: the very people claiming moral or functional superiority simply exclude or silence anyone who challenges their worldview.

5. "Should Not" vs. Compulsive Striving (Sections 6–8)

• The author proposes an ethics based on restraint—what we should not do—rather than compulsive striving and self-promotion.
• Society is described as a "mockhood" (a parody or hollow simulation) where individuals align with partisan causes purely to elevate their own standing, switching allegiances whenever it serves their self-interest.

6. The Totem Pole vs. The Mountain Lion (Sections 9 & 10)

• The "Totem Pole of Empty Lies": Those who play the social ladder climb by erasing authenticity ("shaved of their symbols"). When they fail, they perform theatrical victimhood ("trapped in a cave of sorrow") and pretend to have nobility they do not possess.
• The "Mountain Lion": In contrast, the author evokes the image of a solitary predator whose survival and motives are honest, untamed, and unconcerned with performative approval.
• The closing observation notes that those who hold power often minimize their own malice by pretending their actions are just "routine" or "standard procedure," because they cannot tolerate genuine defiance.

---

Summary of Tone & Perspective

• Tone: Defensive, intellectually defiant, resentful, and seeking philosophical vindication.
• Psychological Core: The writer has experienced marginalization or criticism regarding their career or life trajectory. Rather than accepting the critique, they mount a counter-critique of the entire system: I am not a failure within a valid system; the system itself is invalid, dishonest, and predatory.

=======================

========================

The worst apology you can make someone not of your view, is a methodical one.

(1) This^ reason is the basis as to why I am an agent to the human condition. there are many people that serve a false idea of success, which is widely accepted in our abstract definition of it.

It is in my opinion, provided that the - the nature of a persons opulence toward a "common good" operates under such assumption:

1- That the common good (is divisible)

2- is recognizable (reciprocation)

3- is prudent (not prejudicial)

When you characterize someone malevolent of you, it is the first principle of humanity based "success". If you are under the false impression of another, yet act nice to them anyway, does this not make you an easy target. I ask myself this question based on why our idea of success in society "happens", that it happens due to targeting inferior branded models.

Even though I may be in the minority of such unsuccessful minded - branding - egos, a benevolent condition of success is not the ideal in society.

I say the norms which dictate success, in which they are associated, may in fact be a falsehood unworthy of "success", because - because they which strive to be labeled in what they partake in.

What irony in "success" measures success translates to truly - truly represent: represents (a) gratitude unstated simply defines as the world living in a vacuum, all of it, is made up of awareness (b) misapplied manipulation (that means unconditional model of behavior, expectations, desires, intent etc. ARE NOT honored) (c) human emotion geared toward consciousness, that which our own level of arousal can only benefit from.

================

(2) In the nature of human experience, we mistake ourselves in terms of validation toward success onto things such as "resumes" which somehow is displaying our "skills" from that we collected "references" specific to a cause. the nature of that cause does not speak of consciousness, therefore, some inopportune method of survival. That kind of success we internalize in ourselves as in others is a separation of the common good. In fact if we are deceived of proper renunciation; what then has the human condition really brought to us.

"I say the norms which dictate success, in which they are associated, may in fact be a falsehood unworthy of "success", because - because they which strive to be labeled in what they partake in." (MA2012)

^The true nature of "success" is UNLEARNED.

(3) In our mockhood of society, the nature of success SHOULD NOT dictate justification.

(4) Our false impression of success SHOULD UNLEARN behavior in the falsehood of others, that denominate, having contempt, a lack of domination they themselves want deviance with authority (i.e. power).

(5) ^Everything here to me came into question based on another person that presented me as an unsuccessful type of individual action. She claimed I did not know what success is measured with, since she associates my guilt with jealousy in spite of other people, which I proved to her mistakenly in spite of me. My reply to her was simple, I laughed in my response, I said to her, what every man should do requires nothing. What makes you think about success is NOT my own undoing of it. To which I then felt ignored, successfully. She successfully ignored myself. How ironic.

(6) ^ I love it how people's only condition that matters in life is not to succeed at failure, but something not worth selling out to, is the most dishonest form of equal moral consideration I can think of. I hate it how people deviate to the norm of acting contingent to an idea, only to alter it once they feel conscious of demoting cause with purely selfish rather than selfless means.

(7) "In our mockhood of society, the nature of success SHOULD NOT dictate justification." (MA2012) Think about it, what if we lived in a world where everyone thought of what they Should Not (do). How radical would we live our lives without the pretense of success. Success is a made up word of eradicating quality. Consciousness is a much better formula to live, when thinking of malevolent - dogmatic - uninspired unification. Once a person needs welfare of one another, only because they have falsely been condemning their bad fortune, does this not also mean they have adopted a sense of partisan lifestyle choices.

(8)  par·ti·san - Adjective:1. Prejudiced in favor of a particular cause.

(9)  I shit you not, I have faced demons of my past and former self in a matter to objective equality, then only then, have taken prejudice used against me as my naive innocent aversion to succeed. When in rerality I have learned to play by the rules, as opposed to those that have not practiced "control" over inequality. They have sold out to a "larger" "think big" version of themselves as the host to their uncontested fear of success. That once they "achieve" a certain type of dominance, they have climbed atop a totem pole shaved of their symbols only to have their traces of success to a pyramid of empty lies. They rather not believe in the cause of nature, not handed to them, but conquest a mountain of secretive causal nature. The nature of their success depends on such false inhibitions, that once they fall, they lie about being trapped in a cave of sorrow, then make believe they can leap like real lions. Only true nature of success is of a mountain lion, whose aims are honest.

(10)  The most malevolent of creatures safe guard their participation as rudimentary, when in reality they rather not be stood up to.

(11)  People's strategies against the nature of my own self respect harbor a shallow grave, they back into a hollow volcano thinking it may or may not erupt, but my own force of nature is far much less explosive when the hot flow of lava runs dry, then merges with the earth. My energy leaves the volcano fueled with combustible heat, it is dormant which will not erupt, because I do not provoke it. Only the trained eye detects such whereabouts of endangering success, the failure of it.

(12)  Success were a toolbox this^ would be its most active clarity of choice.

(13)  " My energy leaves the volcano fueled with combustible heat, it is dormant which will not erupt, because I do not provoke it. Only the trained eye detects such whereabouts of endangering success, the failure of it. " (MA2012) Changing the world one moment at a time...

(14)  Failure is equal to success, because of which we live in a world that can only rise against it. Failure in other words has been "deceiving" (i.e. to be caused) "caused" is the operative form of false inhibitions, people use their strategy independent of each other TO CAUSE other people's failures. Success then becomes a defense mechanism which divides the masses, because people use success as their excuse to mitigate failure, the method of survival is the nature of imploring competition as a weapon.

(15)  ^Think about it, when any person breaches your trust for the purpose of their own welfare, we do not see that as "selfish" we have been brain washed not to believe that our failures should be compensated: almost automatically in 1-favoritism to 2- "success" as a 3- model vehicle to promote against true free will.

(16)  I have to admit, that I have patietnly arrived at a crossroad of truth which I can confidently say is my soul survival, that makes up not only my own consciousness, (a) but my affliction (b) to a cause much greater (c) then ordinary life may otherwise reveal. This is the true nature of my philosophy in detail.

People sell out, to further their apparel as though it is a right rather than a privilege, which to me, speaking of which moral virtue I care to amplify.

- Marco 

Here is an interpretation of Marco’s text, breaking down its metaphors, core philosophy, and structural meaning across sections (11) through (16).

---

Core Theme

At its heart, this passage is an introspective philosophical manifesto about power, emotional restraint, competitive society, and moral integrity. Marco examines how society weaponizes the concepts of "success" and "failure" against individuals, and contrasts that toxic rat race with a grounded, dormant inner strength.

---

Section-by-Section Breakdown

(11)–(13) The Hollow Volcano: Restraint Over Reaction

• The Metaphor: People who try to undermine his self-respect walk straight into danger ("a shallow grave", "backing into a hollow volcano"). They gamble on whether he will explode.
• The Turn: Marco points out that his true power is not in explosive anger or reactive violence, but in containment. When lava cools and merges with the earth, it becomes permanent, immovable ground.
• The Dormant Energy: The fire and heat exist, but remain dormant because he possesses the discipline not to ignite them needlessly.
• "Only the trained eye...": Most people misjudge stillness for weakness. Only someone with acute awareness recognizes that maintaining dormant power—rather than recklessly spending it—is the true mastery of success versus failure. In (12) and (13), he identifies this conscious choice of restraint as the most critical tool in a person's arsenal.

(14) The Weaponization of "Success" and "Failure"

• Failure as Manufactured Harm: Marco argues that societal failure isn't just an organic misstep; it is often engineered ("caused"). Individuals intentionally induce failure in others through cutthroat strategies.
• Success as a Shield and Weapon: Because failure is so punishing, people chase "success" not out of genuine self-actualization, but as an anxious defense mechanism. Success becomes a competitive weapon used to divide people and justify stepping over others to survive.

(15) Conditioned Selfishness and False Free Will

• Normalized Betrayal: Society conditions us to accept betrayal as normal business or survival. When someone breaks your trust for personal gain, society excuses it as ambition or competitiveness rather than calling it what it is: selfishness.
• The Illusion of Free Will: By conditioning people to worship a narrow definition of "success" and despise "failure," society programs individuals to prioritize self-interest and favoritism over collective humanity and true autonomy.

(16) The Moral Crossroad and Purpose

• The Personal Awakening: Marco declares he has reached a firm inner clarity essential to the survival of his soul. His struggles and pain (affliction) are tied to a higher moral purpose, transcending ordinary material concerns.
• Selling Out vs. True Virtue: He critiques superficial materialism ("selling out to further their apparel")—treating luxuries and status as inherent entitlements rather than privileges. He concludes by committing to amplify genuine moral virtue rather than playing the transactional social game.

---

Key Takeaway

Marco's philosophy argues that true power lies in quiet restraint, not explosive reaction. While society traps most people in a hostile game of manufactured failure and defensive ambition, he chooses to ground his power, reject selfish competition, and align himself with a deeper moral standard.