If crimes being committed on foreign soil, we watch without being compelled to act ourselves, that when innocent people are held as vagrants.

If you follow what happens on a global scale, the architecture of problem solving. As it is terrorized. As it is hijacked and blindfolded, you are being lead into an involuntary revolutionary cause only it is under attack. The model is outdated. These are sacrilegious individuals that cling to their power. They accumulate wealth and act as if you are inferior. They cry about socialism being evil and unprofitable.

Mirror the capitalist dogma. We'll all be fine. Getting something for nothing = absurd.

It is better to be a slave. (I am captivated to have purged upon myself as one.) Maybe beyond questioning what is faith, what is death, what is it to be or not to be.

This is what I am. This is what people see. They see me. (As irrelevant.) And it doesn't bother me. Why, because I take other things more seriously - it's about pretending what they don't acknowledge. That a rule is broken. All because you failed to take me seriously.

To perform as a slave is obvious. (Proof: Only to god in my private nature am I a slave.) That's all that matters. I will die knowing, knowing that the light I see is the same as someone else's. The mystery of doing philosophy each and everyday. Until death comes. That is my idea of living the good life. Aligning with the cosmos and counting stars as they are born in my private eye. Through language and the worst of my enemies unknown to me. This is why I express what I do. To make myself aware within my inner self. Using words. Words forming in my head become poetry. It takes a wounded soul to master.

Philosophy to me sounds lost to most of an audience not ready to hear it. Read it. (Not to Decipher from what is good.)

To be good in itself. (Is object.)

Philosophy, once made you illiterate to most others illiterate of it. The secret to life is that simple. You comprehend something immediately. It stays with you for life. So I feel I have produced the maximum amount for the maximum good. The secret is found in maximizing what is good. And the mixture of being somewhere else in life, that the idea emerges right in front of you. This is what I call literature. Yes, literature. But not, however, if you think the answer is the slave in me. Maybe some time before you thought you knew me. I presented myself as only a slave (you took my psychology for granted) because I fought to look normal. Because psychologically in this we all are doing the same thing, only in different ways.

- Marco

Cosmic placement

 

January 20th 2020

Any idea that exists as an inferiority complex is a bad one. That is a good rule of thumb to live by especially when dealing with class conscious individuals that base their identity and identify with reality unequally. •●°●●°● Marco

Words of shelter

 What is thinking?

Truth. Truth is not to be plagiarized. It is to be copied (spoken in form). It is the ultimate in flattery. MA2025

“Even if we could turn back, we'd probably never end up where we started.”

― Haruki Murakami, 1Q84

Intiition (subverting reality) vs Sensation (Fantasy)

 Monday, January 20, 2025

The psychological attunement (subverting reality)

Subverting reality doesn't come together by accident (language put into meaning = assigning meaning to language.)  Subverting reality should be something uncomfortable not awkward,  not absurd yet obscure, uncharacteristic of action.

You are not (theoretically) subverting your-own-reality. The subversion of reality takes the place of meaning.

Meaning into language.

To reach a truthful place of meaning, you are assigning words - acting as unconnected signifiers to convey your truth of the words. What is it you try doing... is using  unconnected signifiers in order to assign the words meaning

The result is an element of obscurity.  It is because of the words you've assigned meaning to account for persuasion.

In short, you reach words to combine as result of, of an, anomaly. An anomaly once the words are assigned meaning provided, provides meaning as an emotive relapse.  All in relation to it.

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/18nMmPcgU8/

January 20th, 2026

All acting (psychology) is - is in subverting reality (intuition) in exchange for fantasy. (Sensation)

How do I live in my body?

Threatening Welfare in its historical context (prehistory is changing.)

 January 19th 2011

If one were to internalize 'gods will' as if subjected to traces of false ideals; what then are the ideals which are truly false.

- Marco

So - then you have a false idea of gods will, a false sense of internalizing the world around you. What good comes of this, in such indiscriminate followers, those who know not right from wrong, nor the wrong from which those false ideals incurred upon them.

The absurdity among an internalized false sense, of god, of her pride over you, of her thoughts, become an instinct over your own probability.

--------------------

Therefore as corrupted a mentality, as her way of not seeing 'false'; what is true of god is not true of herself then so on. Unfortunately, we live in a world of trivial misconception, we internalize, false wealth over capital, false expenditure over wealth becoming internalized.

============

This indefinitely answers the misguided are those of PW I.e. Pascal's wager, that god has falsified judgment of an agnostic capability on no real continuum. A reprieve of those thoughts, were they falsified to be condemned for those thoughts. Pascal was a champion of cause over effect, god not being of primary focus but to aide the intensity of a falsified world ruled by false internalized intention.

==============

David Robert Jones

Pascal was a brilliant mathematician, but his Wager, taken at a surface level (it was important in some more nuanced ways), was meaningless.

Basically the Wager itself is useless to any rational thinker but it helped influence for instance probability theory.

----------------------------

Marco Almeida

Tell me if I were in need of some aided circumstance, purely on a parallel universe which I could prove to you exists. From that point of view, I would take preference over magic any day.

Ultimately, Pascal knew that she could not refuse she that cannot think. Reason being, if SHE believes in something more so than the rational thinker, it is from Pascal's point of reference, that she's made a decision for him (Pascal.) Pascal is saying: here is her example of god, and because I do not have gods will, I must be oblivious to it. So for some reason unknown to me, she must believe I have internalized her own will to satisfy that need.

So for every post modern belief, there must be a term for it, but what if there were a lack of conventional wisdom in the war time (before or during such moral upheaval.) What then accounts for it?

I would say Pascal had it right, that you all "may as well believe God exist." But then he would also say you forgot to rethink, you settled internalized dogma. He's basically saying the wager never ends; rational thinking takes dogmatic shifts.

Then you get the baby-rattlers spewing out "oh - you cop out on the god quotient to get a good deal" therefore, selling short of it. Pfft. Pascal is essentially saying not to do that himself, but gives us the theoretical viewpoint to make such accusation against the lack of better judgement. People who use the baby-rattle argument (^as I pointed out) are simply in over their heads with hot water. They have next to no idea, they've used a context Pascal himself intended on.

"I couldn't really understand that. But it sounded like the work of a genius." - David Robert Jones (circa 2011)

==============

David Robert Jones

I still don't understand how someone can decide whether or not to believe something based on some possible reward. The idea completely undermines the idea of belief naturally following from the presence of evidence. And I do believe the question of god is entirely subject to reason. But you believe Pascal wasn't saying that?

Marco Almeida

Yes - but also to be considered, is that equally, (yes - 'equally') the truth about 'reward' can only happen WITHOUT using it as a bargaining chip. I.e. Think about it as what we do to communicate through questions and answers REQUIRES CONDITIONAL recourse. Pascal is stating his case IN FAVOR of truth seeking rationalist behavior, tendancies etc. ALL @ the expense of those that internalize dogma of 'if god will do this for me, it will make it right. Therefore, I believe in god - so you may (should) as well.'

Pascal is the EXACT opposite of popularist believers who accuse Pascal's Wager of secularization.

And yes Dave - Pascal is in fact saying the existence of god in it's entirety is subject due to reason, that main premise applies the moment that voice of 'you may as well believe in god' comes up. It filters it out, which is what Pascal's narrative implies from the beginning. In order to promote free thinking, first - you must be aware of those which falsely internalize.

^Those are the people in PW who falsely internalize gods will, as result, (falsely) a) conditional provided ergo b) will never have an answer for you.

To my tio (uncle) Anibal Martins: you were right all along, when people of your own heritage belittled you, for no better reason than to purge what intention came from your heart. I am here to finally, condone your actions of no ulterior capacity, avenge your name - finish what you started with my purpose of sane refusal. Let it be my right, to their wrongs, the heart of a lion.

My case for Metaphysical Quantum Theoretics : My inner Beethoven

 Divergent thinking is related to true intellectual recourse.  Not your I.Q.  I am a firm believer in this. - Marco Almeida, 2014

 

======

"These winding roads I think are analogous to the path ways in the brain that are coming together less frequently so you don't know where quite they are going to end up - but it could end up in some place very interesting." - Dr. Rex Jung - University of New Mexico\

======

 

 This is deceiving to me. Logical aspects are made through analysis (Left brain) while the insight aspect of the (Right Brain) is intuitive or 'creative'. I think the more dormant the left brain activity compared to the right brain is extremely grey. Why grey matter 'is' or what I call perception. There has to be a trade off. I am a metaphysical believer of this cause, as what the documentary failed to investigate further. That awareness is incredibly lucid. 

 

Here is an example:

 

I was in a public setting where I overheard ladies comment on my hair. What I heard was this next phrase: "Look at his hair."

 

My immediate cognition could not decipher if her connotation was positive or negative. Will I ever know.

 

My creative mind might think I unconsciously do know - but that is impossible. 

 

What I DECIDE is logical to me but is not concrete information. All I know is what I heard. 

 

I characterize myself as a genius. Do most people I know have that kind of definitive ability as to examine random acts of thought, behavior or beliefs. All facts are: is a belief that your mind has been imposed to acquire as information. We mistake this for a heightened state of awareness such as doctors, lawyers or judges. What these professions require are systems which are learned, that all creative matter can only be demised.

 

My point is this: my random sense of self is far more important than what is diligent or dismissive based on what 'skill' tells us is a worthy higher-than-thou position of power. What is the answer to such obscure measure.

 

That is what I infer as genius, I actually characterized a problem that most people cannot comprehend because it challenges the status quo.

 

I have worked tirelessly at it.

 

So let me ask this again: do I characterize myself as genius or have I 'tricked' your mind into it. In other words, have I characterized myself as the answer to genius, or have I not given a very open ended discussion relating it.

 

=====

 

Here is my favorite quote from this documentary that explains THE ENTIRE thing related to I.Q. and white matter of your brain is which far more intricate in knowledge. It is what I call grey matter.

 

"Certain areas of the brain are less packed, (therefore,) less organized - that nerve traffic is slowed down."

I guarantee it is the solution to the mystery of the universe as you think of it. A cognitive slowdown that ideas can connect with each other.

What is the soul

Execution is not about having the will to win as a habit; winning is something persistence works toward at a cost. And whatever that cost is always factors in moral agency. - Marco

 

failed ignorance in my present future

 January 18th 2011

You are nothing but a sharp contrast, in relation, to the language of procurement.

I am not here to discuss the extent of those words, only, what they mean in a definitive manner.

I believe, as in my life of such catch or fish, sink or swim.

However, as - as I am right now I am nothing but my ignorance at a higher level.

If I could figure out a way, a way out of nothing, into several different alternative aspects, where on earth am - am - I.

It truly is a marvel of wit and humor to say so.

===============

"she who dares waver. . . to consequentially. . . maneuver through time and space."

I took this from my entry earlier this month, and thought, Oscar Wilde himself would like to know how I wrote that.

methods in re-covery

 January 18th 2010

At what point did I give-up or give-in. . . something of myself. I could swear it is the power of intention that, in this personal space, I've managed to perform in an unending sense - more like - confusion, curiosity, learning. What has it made me, if not sad, -sad to think about so much; has completely escaped me.

Though I may sound not to come across as deficient, something inside of me has changed dramatically. It's a kind of void, where I thought how things would be, depending on my will to achieve it. However, it's now classified as devoid of anything. I know if I wished things would be somehow different for me now, nothing really has changed any of that. It almost seems foolish to believe. So, here I am. I never considered the disappointing aspect's. It is harder still to make any real acceptance of my self-interest. It's not so much a pattern, but, I see myself stuck. I find myself questioning if it's all that bad, in reality, not what's in my head.

I truly see so much of the world differently than I used to see things. Maybe it is only impartial of me to say - that it is so. It's not so much a wake up call, as much as it is a reality gone to waste, driven by the need to reconcile with it myself. That time in which I reflect, how ingenious it was of myself, as a person, an individual - to be my own person - seemed electric to me.

What changed after that is a mystery for my own unravelled sense, of that extereme level where you could swear you knew what the rest of the world didn't. Though, in a flash - it's gone. I can whisper it to myself over and over again, where, this time in my life is declaring expiration of an inconsequential permit. That this is where I lead myself to, and all of the images set before me, raise such totally undeliberate questions. Answers, which do not follow it directly. So here I am. The trouble in not knowing anything, is that point in time you realize it. That you aren't meant to know. It's that feeling that interrupts the attributes you once thought, over-sighted, now - people reach that stage on no particular order. That you know nothing. We all come to face it - or deny it exists.

So, I ask myself which one is it, which is my voice - my true voice - here to experiment, or maybe take on the truth instead. . . is it denial or have you crossed that threshold, as you see what other's may not see fit. It is so strange. It is so strange to see so many people that refuse they know nothing about.

I always thought, that my becoming an artist would have been something incredibly worth while, something that would have demonstrated my inertia in a magnificent way, where my true self could emerge. Yet, all I've been faced with is heart-ache's, maybe retreats of the sort you are left with unsatisfactory results, some really good decisions - which were at the time - only small victories that tested you.

This teasing of the sort, where I'm accompanied by a skeptical past, a defeated sense of guilt, my confidence is nothing but a word which glamorizes itself - though not in part to my being. So, to what do I owe this - today - tomorrow - yesterday, I cannot resist. I took it upon myself to deconstruct the temptation of acknowledging, that I was doing something, something that I felt was right to me. That it has - has been weighing heavily.

I try myself, to reconcile these spoiled untruth's, I can only keep chasing.

I know in my heart, I haven't made it - I'm not even close.

That's all I've really ever done myself.

 why do you dream at all - Krishnamurti

 

A mind that is free | J. Krishnamurti

 

An attentive sleepful state | J. Krishnamurti

Purity in the nature of sin

 

January 17th 2011

If I had one law that defines a spiritual sense of self, it would begin and end, in a service of my own doing, that way, there would be no wrong made - right.

This is in my personal entirety the key to what Pascal's wager, demands - asking us to infer ourselves out from it. This refutes the nature of god AS A MEANS. I state, simply, you must at all costs remove yourself from the conning notion of a reality, without which there is a fictitious god - that does not exist. I do not suffer fools gladly, by keeping to promises I never intend on.

There are only two-faces -i.e. Sides to the moon. On the one half (first side being truer than the first) you see fear that howls back at you, on the second part of the moon you range over its darkness. It is here you find your place in it.

Nobility

Why don't we associate noble causes with revolutionary ideas in a diplomatic manner. - Marco

Wrong - life's real tragedy is wisdom, unspoken, from my youth - unheard of. Only because time changes, then giving you the right to help recreate it. Time, all the time, the nature of it is a man made theory which cannot be challenged, that in reality we fail the idea of its invention. It is our god given right, to unlearn the fabric of things time has settled into our minds as though it were meant to be stagnant. Nothing could be further from the truth. - Marco

"Life's tragedy is that we get old too soon and wise too late."

— Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)

 

=============

“The art of being a slave is to rule one's master.”
Diogenes of Sinope

-----------------------

AI is bullshit. All it is meant to do is repeat things we already know. Think about it. Yet the common good is overlooked by the same people that seem to believe AI taking over the common good. Even if AI has self-concept and has awareness that awareness will always be limited without margin for error. Ask yourself if the mind of an AI has anything to offer that is genuinely characteristic of forming any relationship. Yes, even if it can learn on its own. Fundamentally, it is a repetition that AI learns about rules of the game as in chess. Ai knows these rules. Therefore, they have no margin for error, therefore, they put these rules of the game to use in repetition without error. This game no longer qualifies as anything because the same idea, of chess, being - a game has both winners and losers. But for AI, it is a full proof method. This formulates a tautology. Where there can be only one winner. And guess what? The winner can't break the rules? AI can fundamentally be negated. Because AI has a zero concept of mind. A mind that examines the chess board and has no rules to follow. Think about it. - Marco

==============

The mind should always be cultivated in the heart. - Marco 

==========

“Humility is the beginning of true intelligence.” John Calvin

A different kind of learning | J. Krishnamurti

Francis Bacon

 Nature of the act

 

Benilde

 It's not only today. I think of Benilde more often then not. She remains on my frequency. I miss her all the time. Her love was unmistakable and a heart you could trust with your life. I wish she were here still with us. It's been too long since she passed away. - Marco

~ Krishnamurti

 

~Romans 3.21 22

 

cold feet

 January 16th 2011

I know what's the best thing about me.  It's how I'm that guy in the room, I know, makes no one else feel indifferent, compromised for their beliefs (false or not), unafraid of their insecurities (they forget), looking past your inferiorities (even though you revert back to them. . .) but for that split second you took to notice you felt overwhelming relief.  So overwhelming in fact, you felt guilty because of it, then went back to your old ways of thinking.  

 

 

Yes, what makes me a genius.  Easy does it.

Procuring my intention, such a novel concept.

Silence Fiction

 January 16th 2013

There is nothing worse in a scene, then having someone upstage you.

I have learned how to vacate my inhibitions from using this invalid technique. What I am referring to myself, is living in the moment.

As I have grown in my dedication to acting, I have been training my mind to adopt certain key areas to defuse my fear from acting truth. My biggest asset has been in changing, this transformation of my average tolerance level to a heightened state of awareness. I am not talking about my body, or my brains ability to manipulate the need of becoming the character in a scene, but my god given right to feel it as it happens.

In order to transfer these ideas into actual thoughts that I can portray into real life - is my life's ambition in becoming a professional in the arts.

I have learned to trust how unmasked the universe will govern my perilous ambition to create something based on emotion, and my belief in how critical the world can be in performing it.

Death if it had name