There are calculated thoughts that need be brought to light, of which pertaining (not why) Charlie Kirk got assassinated.
I don't have all the answers, you may as well fill in the blank and stop reading now.
I just want to make this simple. That Charlie Kirk was a vagrant with nothing to redeem himself which qualified.
Comparing Kirk to the same level that MLK was is preposterous.
Everything I have learned about what Kirk stood for is not far from vile. It's worse. . . worse because he fully knew what he was doing.
(That's not what got him killed.)
My point is nothing Kirk stood for was worth being listened to let alone murdered for.
Kirk's act was as pointless as his death became. Unnecessary and fraudulent. At this point in my life, I have an idea of what history entails and nothing Kirk's death implies itself being recorded as anything but tragically inauspicious. What he stood for is undoubtedly inconsequential of himself. What did his death accomplish? It was a personal vendetta.
================
What Kirk's death ultimately means is that his posterity speaks to Westernization run amok. Kirk didn't have ideas. He was possessed with his own incredulous notions of what revisionists do to turn our own moral agency against others. In other words divide that which our better interests would never absorb.
I certainly did not believe a word that came out of his mouth.
But many people do.
That's the saddest part.
- Marco
No comments:
Post a Comment