"Perhaps, I am concerned more of morality in the guessing department, if there is a moral upheaval involved is clearly not existent, therefore there is no argument to be made.
When I look at the viral element of survival, sometimes, competition is seriously done while that moment of time had completely evaporated. I'm not quite sure how to make an argument against the most greed, is it competition, or is it? Is it contempt for the vanity of its alluring nature, which sometimes, but only sometimes. . . should be kept at a safer distance from the greed which it informs.
I think that, there is more of it's practicality (or lack thereof the term), then it's comical sometimes expedient alienation in effecting potential outcomes. Perhaps, I am concerned more of morality in the guessing department, if there is a moral upheaval involved is clearly not existent, therefore there is no argument to be made.
I support the loss of competition, on an internal level, such as in failing to make that leap of faith to something 'greater' unknown, or the risk taking involved with such competitive disposition. I have never believed in the acquisition of wealth, if it has something to do with giving under falsehood of greed. I always thought that contempt begins first with greed, only ending in deception. It is that middle ground-breaking ability to assume, my worst, or sometimes best.
It clearly alters our misconceptions, as long as greed is involved.
So the challenge, is simple to attend to, how deviant or how killer the instinct perpetuates on itself.
I like to believe that that my thoughts are met with clarity, a clarity, where misconceptions are the norms unassociated with my character. I'm speaking of a reputation of private nature, my own inhibition of the will, to support the internal jeopardy of most neglected thoughts. That is where the true nature of competition emerged. However lost it has taken its turn - somewhere else in time - only to be difficult to rewind.
So, here I am.
No comments:
Post a Comment