Got the look

 Feminism has been butchered for decades and generationally hasn't been transient to the gender neutral society we supposedly live in or want to be part of.

Equality is so pervasive it's become a look that is totally devoid of thought. We are living in a "battle of the sexes" that in this day and age our hyper focused mentality - is supported through dominant alpha-beta psychology.

You don't have to be an expert to see how shallow the appeal to selling sex has been normalized, with nothing to show for it, but engendering both sexes to exploit the other.

What Elliot is getting at does not require a fool to read and pretend it makes sense.

Marco Almeida

Mark DeFrancisis I am at odds with the character of a feminist. The ideology functions in two ways:

1 - it can only be true, that feminist ideology promotes free thinking in all individuals at any given time on the premise of equality.

2 - it can only be true, that feminist ideology represents every woman's right to choose the same way members of any given society factor. (This is a function of free will in the ideology, that if truth be told, feminists act as revolutionary.)

The accusation of my being a man is merely academic. Same applies to all people who have not considered why feminism hasn't been adopted as a contingent agreement in our cultural norms of day to day life.

In conclusion:

I find anyone in disagreement with this is an anomaly of interest to me. I have simply stated that in this agreement between what is feminism = how it can and cannot be thought of. If you are revolutionary type of female, (a) this could probably mean the same idea of revolution applies to 'herself only' (b) a feminist would identify: that all women should be considered equal. (That is a fight of flight mentality which goes silently in feminists cultural identity.) I do not think that's an unreasonable description of contemporary feminist ideology across the political spectrum.

However, what is feminism in truth is a half baked ideology. Why? Because the fight for women's rights in the revolutionary sense is seen as something else. What the idea represents is that A revolutionary woman approaches feminist ideology as weaponized. (i.e. fear based reality) won't settle for less than what champions the relationship between feminists on column 'A' (revolutionary post ergo feminist theory) or 'B' (contingency = equality between the sexes). If you are not willing to believe that, I have nothing else worth the offer from which we contemplate. If you are a feminist revolutionary in theory your belief REJECT societal norms. If you are NOT a revolutionary feminist. . . you consider equality between sexes as gender roles being honored therefore, not displaced in rejecting society.

I cannot make it any clearer.

Marco

===================

Marco Almeida

Mark DeFrancisis Oh, and in case you missed. . . my personal views are: I prefer a feminist revolutionary that coincides with traditional female roles AND I acknowledge her autonomy as a free thinking individual.

===================

Elias Sseguya

At the end of the day we are all humans with equal potential the concept of feminism is a social construct, i believe in equality for all

===================

Marco Almeida

Elias Sseguya it is far more complex than just that. Feminist ideology is not fueled with the same morals - which is a question which demands attention. I've seen feminists in action only fueled by their revolutionary approach, completely humiliate their targets as incompatible.