People pretend to be victimized or act offended when they are wrong. They may even act as an innocent bystandard based on their own inadequacies. In fact people make it such a habit: condition how well they can affront their political beliefs, use a much less candid form of thought, learning to manipulate their actions as justified. These observations are accentuated, when and only when you can transfer them as a manner of intent.
==========
You are capable of intefering with the same evil cause of others blatant misuse of logic. Coming back to political aspect of beliefs, Dogma is calculated in two ways: 1- the accuser use of their misinformed mind (i.e. dogma) to take a position which acts as unilateral. 2- In acting politically motivated, the accuser resorts to self defense as a means - thereby they are not formally engaged with their assailant. (e.g. politcally incorrect) Remember: relate these two points as I stated earlier "learning to manipulate their actions as justified." (Marco Almeida - Circa, 2013)
==========
The accused is supposed to believe no matter how politcally incorrect its accusers dogmatic thinking will prevail. The accuser plotting immunity, as if to implitcly deny the accused of their own basic sentiment.
==========
These tactics are used in the legal process of arraignment.^
==========
In its application, you can use this theory in order to debunk the misuse of entitlement.
=========
=========
=========
Here is some properties that pragmatically relate to my supposition re; dogmatic thinking
=========
=========
=========
You cannot act cool all of the time, and expect the world will not be able to see right through it.
=========
People will lie straight to your face, can be so skilled at it they disregard you not knowing any better.
=========
Not me: I hate it when people say sorry. Because that means they know what they did wrong but they still did it....
Me: What you want is their ability to surrender to the truth that what they did is wrong, where if they forgive themselves: re; forgiving themselves means they acknowledge your existence. (In most cases, they never really cared about you.)
=========
Not me: A person can only take so much.
Be careful you don't push a person over the edge of their limits and into the void of not giving a fuck.
Me: you are dead wrong. People are skilled especially on twitter to act offended as if victimized. Disagree 100%. The same type of awareness applies in the context I put it, now move it to real life scenarios. Same difference.
==========
Focus on being truthful and watch yourself (and your life) change infinitively.
==========
I love it how twitter executioners plot their indifference to you as if it means something and they get to eat cake over it.
==========
Kind of like validating your own shallowness. Fail. > Have you ever lost Respect you once held for a person in a matter of minutes.
==========
"Anarchy is politically methodical, those who argue otherwise have been drinking too much of that western liberalism Kool-Aid."
1- Anarchy is itself an ideology that needs to bridge the tangent of absolution in both circles re; liberal and western forces. 2- Anarchy itself is a political will and should act as an adversary to the constructs of ideologies used in governing. 3- Anarchy to work must be valued as an independent will, a kind of credibility linking diversity which is recognizable. 4- Anarchy is a tool that should be supported in unifying principles of western thought and its political freedom.
==========
I love being thought of as a traitor when the reality is they target a potential scapegoat for their own misgivings of things unrelated.
==========
Why is it that people trying to hang onto the most superficial reality they can think of, and pass off as your everyday normalized morality.
==========
No comments:
Post a Comment