It's funny to me really.
When did I reach this point in 'understanding' how fucked-up it may seem, even if not brought upon the surface, those little details dare we neglect, without them knowing how it may appear in private thoughts of a cerebral kind.
That goes in saying, how marginal circumstances may (not) apply to the investigation, of what - who - how - or where did this - or that thing come from. I'm talking toward a complex measure, in the simplest of terms, without speaking of a very simple, very real, thing/accordingly. It is to show without any added purpose, that somehow, or somewhere else that it may be that very ominous thing has some quality, though never to attempt at approaching said subjective to it's least desirable state.
Can it even occur, that something in it's least desirable state has undergone some sort of disqualification, simply based on norms associated with it.
I'm not sure (that the answer) will ever know itself.
2 comments:
Marco Almeida
It's awesome how just 'a little bit of concern' equated (realistically speaking) in real present time (as in Today.)
Today the very post I wrote before^ this, applied in it's entirety, without me even trying to find 'the answer'.
It's amazing to my personal opinion, related to the observation(s) which were as I illustrated.
Why is it that people resort not to thinking, but instead, find virtue in the subjective nature of themselves?? As in example from their choosing. . . use of a reverse psychology, rather than trust the psychological nature inherent within themselves is good 'enough'.
I might be exaggerating the cowardice in part due to the nature of circumstances, but none of the circumstances were caused or manipulated by some other whereabout's. The central force of one person to person contact is never meant to be irregular under any which narrative of human consumption, should provide.
What is even further, is so far-reaching to the point, that people resorting to reverse-psychology as though some unconscious tactic as omniscient.
What this (means) to follow re; ploy of reverse-psychology, is that when at work (there is no 'if' factor involved), people which rather subject you to not saying what they actually mean to be saying. Therefore, without actually promoting what it is that they've inferred upon you.
I've never imagined myself as an individual of such dishonest-evasive qualities, should it make-up my better awareness. Yet, when I come across superficial stereotypical actions, against my deliberation of it, will not stand to be corrected by any other means which may or may not even be necessary.
This reverse-psychological ploy, transcends in so many distinct formalities in the world gone by, one cannot help but ask themselves in the duality of a process. . . (e.g. where one is using reverse-psychological method, whereas I am the 'interpreter').
The strange thing about this medium (written beneath this message of it. . .) is why do people bellieve in themselves any better, for not stating exactly what it is they want from your situation? This is utter mind-boggling to say the least, that when it actually takes place, it's happening right before your nose.
When people appear as though they're successful at it, they deliberately NOT wish to say what they mean. Yet, on the same token, when they're not being taken seriously for what they've already done, instead are being 'told' exactly what you think? They balk.
Fucked up world, yes.
15y
Marco Almeida
"When did I reach this point in 'understanding' how fucked-up it may seem, even if not brought upon the surface, those little details dare we neglect, without them knowing how it may appear in private thoughts of a cerebral kind."
I'm just going to say it^ here, again. . . this is not only fucking mad-brilliant, it is language made to perfection in the image of itself. Yes - that being poetry without a face or a name.
Really - I cannot fathom the fact, when my age, tells quite a different story from those who ignite no passion within themselves whatsoever, expecting not to be criticized for it. I get that. I can see things much more radically, however.
To insist (that people) say things about me, my virtue, or my sake of everything I own in place of (life) itself, is a well unknown conclusion: they say, "Why don't you get a real job - you need one."
I'm honestly told this on no other level than there is, otherwise, those same individuals are lost I'm afraid.
The rest can only follow. And then some.
Marco Almeida ^a cop out?? Never in your fucking life. . . I won't even dream of it. That's Marco Almeida.
15y
Post a Comment