Marco, Amnesty International, once a bastion of impartial justice, now tilts toward the transgressor and the left, extolling a world where rights eclipse rules. Such dubious partiality, veiled in noble intent, erodes the foundation of reason. Can trust persist when bias clouds the truth? Alas, their voice, once resolute, wavers under ideological sway. All nations must pause, reflect, and reassess their support for an organization whose questionable allegiance betrays its once-unwavering pursuit of justice.
================
Marco Almeida
Pedro Santos what is on the right side of history. That's what is where the truth hides. The left is where I am. How do you possibly prove rules when rules are politically motivated. There is truth about Amnesty as in its cause. To limit power imbalance... Where war is an injustifiable act of aggression. This is being objective in what is fair for all people. Personally, you can debunk Amnesty all you want. It doesn't change how Amnesty works in reality. If you for a minute believe the Middle East are trangressors, you are lying to yourself and to others. The 
have no business in the Middle East. Neither does Netanyahu's, in your words: approach to reason. 
will lead us. We align with human rights. Conservatives do not. What you care to believe is contrary to indecency. What is my idea of justice is here. For the public to see. I HAVE NOTHING TO HIDE. The and 
have everything not worth hiding. It is about uncovering the use of political gain for the pursuit of innocent lives: Amnesty International.
have no business in the Middle East. Neither does Netanyahu's, in your words: approach to reason. will lead us. We align with human rights. Conservatives do not. What you care to believe is contrary to indecency. What is my idea of justice is here. For the public to see. I HAVE NOTHING TO HIDE. The and have everything not worth hiding. It is about uncovering the use of political gain for the pursuit of innocent lives: Amnesty International.The same idea for justice applies in what is called thinking.
In conclusion: you will accuse me of involuntary injustice. I will accuse the of being on the wrong side of history... as you can only deny. Tell me again: exactly how do rules apply in a fascist manner of thinking. If you claim fascism relates to the Middle East then why can the bomb 
but not Israel. The system of rules based theory becomes less than obvious. What is the fallacy? It is a unilateral war of attrition. That's not my idea of rules: the idea that you can impose rules and order never works. That is fascism... fascism in action. To retaliate against such feudal oppression where innocent people die. That is equal to the pursuit of justice. In the minds of others, that much of this is worth fighting for? (In my mind, yes.) Further to this conclusion, finding the truth into the power dynamic, suggesting Western Values? Ask China what they think: China is the world's real super power. If anyone is against human right violations, it points to China. Not the Middle East. China has no Western Values. China fits into the far Right's fascist principle, being, offensive - offensive rule based theory. Communist rule in 
is something that does not fear either. is aligned with Western Values. (How does one debunk that argument.) is aligned with human rights circa 2025 as long the the Right have a voice, we wonder? CARNEY IS THE LEADER OF THE FREE WORLD.
of being on the wrong side of history... as you can only deny. Tell me again: exactly how do rules apply in a fascist manner of thinking. If you claim fascism relates to the Middle East then why can the bomb but not Israel. The system of rules based theory becomes less than obvious. What is the fallacy? It is a unilateral war of attrition. That's not my idea of rules: the idea that you can impose rules and order never works. That is fascism... fascism in action. To retaliate against such feudal oppression where innocent people die. That is equal to the pursuit of justice. In the minds of others, that much of this is worth fighting for? (In my mind, yes.) Further to this conclusion, finding the truth into the power dynamic, suggesting Western Values? Ask China what they think: China is the world's real super power. If anyone is against human right violations, it points to China. Not the Middle East. China has no Western Values. China fits into the far Right's fascist principle, being, offensive - offensive rule based theory. Communist rule in is something that does not fear either. is aligned with Western Values. (How does one debunk that argument.) is aligned with human rights circa 2025 as long the the Right have a voice, we wonder? CARNEY IS THE LEADER OF THE FREE WORLD.
No comments:
Post a Comment