non-imported of the supernatural kind

 February 4th 2011

Two words of intellect which I've transmitted via your wannabe ingrates without a moral seeded in their tiny little brains: One enters Socrates' (mind).  The other enters Plato's (mind).

 

 

This is philosophy people.

 

 

But not one you might think of yourself.

 

 

The reason being, where philosophy of law from Plato's musings, the divided line if you will.  The Socratic Method of Socrates teachings, waged academic pursuits into the widest range of possibilities known to man, were born from those ancient classrooms.

 

 

--------------------------

 

 

Now you feel the return of Marco Almeida.

 

 

Where Marco Almeida - has entered some prime real estate opportunity, the same cannot be true of the person he is.

 

 

Therefore, only Marco Almeida must have some idea to commit the same practice, the same way, over and over again e.g. 'repetitively' not 'redundantly'

 

 

This very small but humble teaching, the art of humility let us pray of humility.

 

 

--------------------------

 

 

The question is does it matter which words were entered into either of the philosopher's brain even matter, which now gives you a false impression of Plato's laws.

 

 

Everything in the universe now consists of something to do with Plato's laws.

 

 

Therefore, the same cannot be said of a person of Plato's equal, be him or woman, man or her.

 

 

-------------------------

 

 

It is because of this disparity in resourcefulness, that clever Plato, always understood himself a negater of art.  The art of philosophy, cannot be taught, the philosophy of itself can (be taught), which that clever little Plato was enabled.  Plato felt he was onto something.

 

 

-------------------------

 

 

This is when the man of law, collided with the man of reason-ability.

 

 

------------------------

 

 

The man of reason, never truly understands the laws Plato insisted be taught, though that in itself would only be a rejection of regularity between variables.  So Plato thought, let's make law something that defines normalcy.  Although normally Plato would act as clever than most others; LAWYERS ARE YOU READING THIS.

 

 

-----------------------

 

 

Normalcy always declined the invitation to legitimacy, legitimacy declined the truth of 'normal' to be subject to things such as decency, or let's say indignity, or even torcher chambers.  No thought Plato, the law is too good for that; I am special knowledge of such power, they simply do not exist in law.  Does man have a threshold not to withstand the cause of law, because law has no age limit, no barrier, no complacency, no economic value, simply - law has a variable over every other living thing.

 

 

Here is where you are retarded Plato.

 

 

You have no say in irregularity.

 

 

Absolutely none.

 

 

They say Plato was a manipulator of no substance, or mind, or substantiating human sacrifice unconditionally speaking.

 

 

^ That was Plato's way of suffering the human condition, to say that laws were not made to be broken, that they defeat the purpose in all things young or old.

 

 

It was as if an unrestricted insurance claim, unlimited in potential on one anonymous condition of purging victims who actually enjoyed the thought of philosophy baring nothing else, simply continuity of choices, perhaps open ended, perhaps shut out.  But Plato always felt uncomfortable (inferior) so - so like many or next to most lawyers.  They pretend that you do not exist.

 

 

-------------------------

 

 

The problem wasn't that Plato didn't know how to do philosophy; it was that he didn't claim to know philosophy had a purpose of it's own, only he was unaware of it.

 

 

Candid as Plato was, that time before him allowed for it to happen, so we got stuck with lawyers make-believing they were philosophers for a shorter period of time than they could be called out on it.

 

 

That way they might get spooked to easily, there flushing their careers away at shore.

 

 

----------------------

 

 

The truth about the divided line, was only implemented, because Socrates drew that line, on the other side of the debaters.  Where Socrates secret society of non-linear thinkers held votes for the wicked philosophers of Plato's domain.

 

 

It was there the divided line came into being.

 

 

They say those were the ballots in between democracy, that Socrates won unanimously, but Socrates followers were sworn to secrecy on the subject of winning.  They said unto Plato, let's just let him play, we're nice enough to do that aren't we.

 

 

They say Plato has been fooled ever since.  In fact if true, he refuses to acknowledge the same answer to the same question, over and over.

=====================

And here finally is the answer, I find myself, to a fault - no fault of my own.

It gets really very very stupid when people confuse my intellect, my better judgment without thinking of it. It gets smarter still when they guess I am a Canadian hero like Bret Hart.

It gets better or worse when violent predators refuse to look me straight in the eyes, because I am watching your every move, you silly boys and girls.

---------------------------

You see when you are one of the bad guys; it's one of the good guys that takes on my Maple Leaf in Red and White.

When you are obsessed with art as I am, you fill the stars, you earn my stripes.

I've always imagined scraping by the defense in stride, burying my head, and playing for pride, making the save, getting the girl.

-----------------------------

Damn - I really love being Canadian, eh.

----------------------------

Attention - whichever one of you fukwits deleted an entry of mine "which magically disappeared due to paranoia", keep chasing those rainbows, but wipe that smile of your face.

---------------------------

One day, long before my time, I will know exactly what all of this means.

=================

I dedicate this fabulous entry, to be eaten again and again, in the mouths of Karim Dharamsi and Sandra Tomsons, whose toothless and spineless aims caused me great grief - not unto this day.

sprinkle's of minimum wage

 February 4th 2010

I was working inside, where elderly people live, when this one lady provided me with her unsolicited wisdom. It was something clearly ornate, but much less done by. She told me quite simply to make sure I enjoy life, that her generation 'over-did' thing's. To which this alerted my frame of reference, I was after all, seated on the floor from where I was listening to her speak. I thanked her for the odd peculiarity of those comment's directed at me for unspecific reasons.

I guess I make the most of situation's, eventually her harmless looking hostility toward me, was meant to relieve me of pressure, whichever matters out of my life thus far. I much prefer honesty related to me, so I felt I somehow caused this, without the guilt.

I've made much less effort in loving life for what I have, throughout my very cold - at times a masked resistance.

So, I really didn't show her anything to prompt this, but in my mind - I must have.

As I stepped outside my comfort zone, this I managed to do, was symbolize something. I guess that's how I see what the older person said, meant to me. Not that she symbolizes anything, only the mere thought does. I usually think in terms of common sense, as a means to an ends, is something I participate in - knowing what the interlocutor is onto. In that sense, if it was intended as such, I really had no idea about why this took place. My claim to it was to keep my mouth shut as I did.
It's what nature intended.

controversial nature of a decathlete

 February 4th 2010

Whenever self-control becomes an issue, I find it of primary importance. The question quickly asserts itself, under any given circumstance, of a superior social skill set. Further to this discussion, in virtue of it, there is a need to elicit, what are the non-specific causes not associated with self-control to properly define it. There is no action, or no such a thing as action. There is no instinct, or no such a thing is present. The question then becomes how does one empower themselves of self-controlling measure, if so, what method which is lost can attribute into such natural causes.

So self-control, is a kind of all too ill-advised a source.

Does self-control elicit it's whereabout's, in a timely order, so that your acting in synchronicity of a universal proportion - or proportion to it. I find this a very fascinating investigation of individual-ity. Only because, in every way shape or form, the self-control that you exhibit will in fact - ultimately - prove it's outcome.

Can there be a link or divide of such a loosely defined term, such as self-control, which this may adopt some case toward an origin. An origin, that is possible.

My idea in favoring self-control, certainly, make's my case which involve's over-reaction to phenomena, as if, almost at will. So, my question is interfaced, without I cannot examine any known natural cause, whether self-control in someway's inertia playing in large part to observance, whether or not self-control is in it's own efficacy a natural cause itself. A purpose nonetheless rewarding. Which then ask's, how do us, in natural effect's somewhat, somehow, somewhere, exhibit this very natural archetype. Self-control is merely an awareness, which come's and it goes as please's.

Therefore, I am in constant communication with my own sense of perception, whether I am provoked in someway evoke's emotion, or does self-control if in fact it does exist, lose itself. (It must be allowed to.)

So, I came to the conclusion, that if self-control is always imminent, never to far beyond our scope of necessary reason, albeit necessary which self-control exhibits functioning. It does not however, inform nor guide anything other than myself, in what may in factuality i.e. real time it is taking place. Where everything, everyone submits is a known entity only determined by self-control as a means. In fact it is of an utmost important thing - us believe - not worth about questioning. Self-control simply is. It is - perfect. It manages itself without worry of natural causes related from it.

The same truth may apply to the surface, of unrelated causes, such as in pleasure in appetite, though we would not exhibit dieting as a form of pleasure, but one of punitive means. To lose weight is a superficial form of self-control, yet to gain weight is not seen in term's of self-control, what self-control does not do is gain weight which deviates from the dieting model. In retribution, self-control is the exact opposite of dieting as weight gain as it would be permissible. So, your choice in eating less, may offset the guilt in various stages of dieting, which is not the same as weight gain. As complex a system self-control is, undeniably it play's a major unconscious role in the way we factor.

It's as if we're compromising, negotiating our way into a kind of transparent state of mind, where we control nothing, but our self-control. Yet, it is a vaguely unfamiliar way to denounce such a thing into yourself. I find everything I've ever done based on this version of thoughts.

fortune-telling entitled to benevolence

 February 4th 2009

Have you ever had that feeling, where everything is in a kind of total transitory state, which you can only realize the feeling has escaped you, as if a clock were timing how placid that it became long to trace back. I experience this from moment to moment. The difficulty is in examining thoughts, as if they were meant to take shape in some form of triangulation, however, the plans were drawn out on blue prints if they were. My own personal view in the matter, has certainly evoked something peculiar in the event of regret. It is a "coming together" of sorts, where trial and error have gone mistaken for under privileged satisfaction - if there could be such a thing - that in question.

I have never been alone in experiencing the frugality of others, however, I inform the better of my intuition by chance - that my choices are made.

This brings me to the answers I unusually, yet, uncharacteristically find - estimate my sense of morality. I ask myself, in almost everything I classify what is moral. It goes to prove my own virtue in life, that should I choose to act what doormat am I stepping on in the process of doing. It would appear as though my vast knowledge of such a densely popular subject, would gather steam behind it - although my approach would adjoin it - if there is a time and a place for morality, where should it begin or end. Therefore, in an accurate evaluation of the subject no matter what entails its cause, morality is in fact perpendicular to such parameters of an enclosure. For in this instance my practice of writing could very well be someone else's (but not my own). Would this in such a case limit my potential - especially in moral juxtaposition. The question is again valid, as it is tenfold.

The problem is at the root, of asking such moral self-examination, though not in understanding it as a critical proclimation. At the heart of all moral investigation, the true nature of what is in fact immoral can only stem from virtue. In such a reference of thought due to morality, I suspect myself - is a cause. The cause of truth, is the same as the pursuit of ones morality. The problem that surfaces in appropriation to the cause, is that morality cannot exist without virtue. If thought in morality can exist. Therefore, intellect is the presence of virtue not of thought. Morality is in effect the essence of ones virtue.

I have reached this stage in life - that questions do mean everything, unless I am challenging superficial context which stems from thoughts that manipulation refrains from virtue.

Unwinding in good faith

The grave grace of silence if fake belief in the air... what is death beyond words, the tragic sound wisdom creates.

And the unwise know everything there is to think of.

While the simplest form of truth is void in meaning not its energy.

- Marco

 You have to live spherically - in many directions. Never lose your childish enthusiasm - and things will come your way.

Federico Fellini

The philosophy of poverty 2014 [subculture in Westernization]

 February 3rd 2014

Poverty stems from all things.  If you do not begin to seek yourself through poverty then you have lessened yourself as an opponent to the variety of things that can be said for you.  I attribute myself to the idea that ideas live as enigmatic and contribute to the same effort taht is required in our subcultures.  In other words subjectivity should always begin and end in truth for its great content, which reveals your inner poverty - your inner self - your inner life's quality as less than presumptuous.

 

Hate to me is a sign of success, not because it is contempt against me being made - but because it takes a certain impartiality meant only to be hurtful with NO amount of respect given. It tells me of what imaginary beliefs people have. I see the same type of individuals look hating you against your will. That is empowering to prove it wrong, even if it is in my own mind.

 

 

Forgiveness is not something I equate with reward. Unlike anything else it is a skill. People look to forgiveness not as something you give freely but measured with prohibition. < That is a crucial aspect of this. (Read on.) Therefore to be forgiven is a very skewed alternative to what is inclusive. Forgiveness is about perception. Ultimately the individual is responsible for this fact in their reality of it.

 

Unless you are good at pretending to care forgiveness is just false. In that case I rather have 1000 enemies and only one true imaginary friend that transcends myself.

 

Hypocrisy is a loaded term used to describe the same definition of forgiveness. I openly have a chip on my shoulder, especially to those that I concern myself with deserve no respect or sense of it whatsoever. Some people do that better than others.

Forgiveness is closely linked to guilt, and I credit mine with solutions not condemnation. That requires profound logic to do it.<p> </p>I give you myself as an example^. I openly admit all of it. I do not reject MY views - I AM it. That takes bravery. It takes a genius to inform those that are evil two-faced liars. It is the reason I wrote all of this in response to MY OWN revelations re; forgiveness. It is the least understood of all intellectualized concepts.

I learned this about myself at the age of 5. Take that Einstein. xoxox

 

I have worked tirelessly to model myself as an individual that has learned what my intellect means to me and how it transcends all things.

 

I see people in my life that no longer see me for who I really am, because they can only pretend to know what is they think of myself.

 

When I close my eyes I have the ability to see geometric patterns changing and transforming as I see them. It is like a laser show, if you can imagine beams of light cascading through time and space. That is what I have the ability to do with my mind.

 

I have worked painstakingly hard to find my sacred self. I see these patterns develop in deep in my subconscious. It is a theme of the brains circuitry. It literally tells me how I function based on the experiment this video provides as evidence. 

 

To put this mildly, this experiment is not complex. Such a simple idea can immediately transform your perception of everything in life. 

 

If you want to understand the universe, think of energy, frequency, and vibration – Nikola Tesla -

 

 

http://www.spiritscienceandmetaphysics.com/amazing-resonance-experiment-the-sacred-geometry-of-sound/

 

======

 

This is a break down of what are Hidden Portals only because they are invisible.

 

Watch from 2:12 - 2:32 to explain how portals form and are then to be located as x-points:

 

There is a magnetic re-connection between forces between the sun and earth.This theoretically produces a "mingling of lines" between magnetic forces.Therefore, the sun x earth crisscross their magnetic forces.

 

As result: the magnetic field join to create openings.

 

X-points are where the crisscrossing takes place and a portal opens.

 

Theoretical implication: The joining of magnetic fields propels jets of charged particles from the x-point creating an electron diffusion region. In other words this creates a vacuum effect where in my view traces of physical phenomenon can travel through it. These portals are only meant to serve the type of conscious matter that interfaces with our physical realms. You are a model of energy, such as thoughts are to a bolt of lightning. You have the ability to transcend your conscious matter through to an unlimited energy source. These portals exist in order to magnify your life force - you have energy that is an element much like the periodic table - so this enables you to see things in a special manner than most are attuned.

 

February 3rd 2011

When facing that curtain, before the window; when facing the challenge of total sickness, slowly as I make my way out - into a light - perhaps of music. Yet all I see happens to be fear in the minds of others, my face doesn't turn to gold. I have truly faced the light, into the dark.

======================

This entry is made, because I care about the fear in people that hardly know it of themselves. That might be my face Plato cared about, by betraying a father of philosophy in Socratic wisdom. May Plato perish in flames of fire.

The spy game

 'Chess has taught me a great deal about life. As in life, in chess you can make all sorts of decisions. Here are five different moves or avenues. Which one should I take? If you can’t think ahead to the next several moves, it makes it more difficult to make a decision.

I once had a man tell me to pull over while I was in my car. At first I thought I knew him, but when he approached the car, I realized I didn’t. I cracked the window, and the man said, ‘Come on, get out of the car.’ In my mind, I quickly went through the scenarios. We could end up rolling in the street and getting hit by a car. He could have a gun. I could break my hand. I could go to jail for hitting someone I never met before. Once I rolled through all the options, there was only one real decision to make—roll up the window and drive away. That’s how chess affects your thinking. The most immediate move isn’t necessarily the best move.'

- Lennox Lewis

°●°●°●°●°●°

So Lewis directly made a choice that he ignored something. Not sure what his point is here.

- Marco

===============

I brand my own style of poetics as surrealistic in its most proper form. - Marco

Feeling (not fearing) what is truth

 Ernest Hemingway once said:

When people talk listen completely. Don’t be thinking what you’re going to say. Most people never listen. Nor do they observe. You should be able to go into a room and when you come out know everything that you saw there and not only that. If that room gave you any feeling you should know exactly what it was that gave you that feeling.

It’s a rare and profound gift to be fully present with someone, and yet, it’s something so few of us truly offer. Most people only half-listen, their minds already formulating their next words, distracted by their own thoughts, or zoning out entirely.

Imagine how powerful it would be if we listened more deeply—if we made a commitment to being fully engaged, to hearing and understanding not just the words, but the emotions and intentions behind them. Listening isn’t just about waiting for your turn to speak; it’s about absorbing what someone else is sharing and making them feel heard, valued, and understood. It’s about connecting on a level deeper than surface conversations, because when you truly listen, you open a door to empathy and genuine connection. And isn’t that what we’re all really longing for?

Beyond listening, there is also the art of observing, of truly noticing the world around you. When you walk into a room, take a moment to soak in everything. Notice the details—the way the sunlight filters through the windows, the color of the walls, the expressions on people’s faces, the way someone is nervously tapping their foot or laughing with their eyes more than their mouth. Most of us rush through spaces, our minds preoccupied and our eyes barely registering what’s in front of us. But there’s magic in paying attention, in being mindful of the small details that make every moment unique.

Think of the room not just as a physical space, but as an experience. Every room has a mood, a feeling, an energy. It could be the coziness of a room filled with laughter, the tension of a space where a difficult conversation just took place, or the warmth of a place that holds beautiful memories. The more we tune in to these subtle feelings, the more deeply we can understand our surroundings and the people in them. What gave you that feeling? Was it the way someone’s eyes lit up when they smiled? The scent of freshly brewed coffee that brought a sense of comfort? Or perhaps the distant echo of a song that stirred up a forgotten memory?

Being observant and emotionally aware in this way takes practice, but it also transforms the way you move through life. You become more sensitive, more attuned, more aware. You start to notice the way a friend’s voice softens when they’re talking about something they love, or the slight shift in someone’s tone when they’re hiding something. You begin to see and feel things that others miss entirely, and that awareness can lead to a richer, more connected experience of the world.

It’s a beautiful thing to be a person who listens with their heart, who observes deeply, and who feels fully. It means you’re not just drifting through life; you’re living it intentionally. You’re soaking in the fullness of each moment, aware of the beauty and complexity around you. It means you understand people better, because you’ve made the effort to see and hear them, to pick up on the nuances of their being. It means you can be the kind of person whose presence feels calming, because people know you’re truly there with them, not just waiting for your turn to talk or half-heartedly engaging.

So, when you’re in conversation, let go of the urge to plan your next statement. Take a breath, relax your mind, and give the person speaking your undivided attention. Let yourself be present, fully. When you walk into a room, slow down and really see it. Observe the details, feel the energy, notice the small things that make that moment unique. You’ll find that life becomes richer, fuller, and more meaningful when you learn to listen and observe completely. It’s not just about hearing words or seeing objects—it’s about feeling the fullness of everything around you. It’s about experiencing life, deeply and completely.

-

What do you believe we miss out on when we’re not fully present, and how does that impact our relationships and experiences.

Credit Goes To The Respective Owner

For the love of Socrates

February 2nd 2010

 There are a few thing's that come to my mind, from which - I have found no meaning. This is a rather odd predicament to be in, since - trying to uncover what those thing's are - based on nothing but myth. In order to move across this threshold, let's say into reason, come from such belief system's otherwise known as dogmatic in relief. I see such thing's in searching for answer's, which I myself haven't arrived to conclude. One that truly is stuck in such muddy water, is that of - do what you love. (Not to eb confused with as -so what you love in -life. Simply, do what you -love. Then, that operative term, seems so irrational, perhaps even radical to lie about. . . because in factuality, I don't believe there is a person in the universe that could truthfully say that is the case from which they offer.

Really? I never thought about love, in such a context of doing, it just doesn't seem nor does it sound reverent enough. (Though I believed.) Let alone love, if there were such a thing, someliken commodity - we call Valentine's Day - I prefer to call it by it's instructive name, maybe even narcissistic. But never have I thought about love, in any genuine way.

So that got me to answering this quest for unknown love spelt ( l - o - v - e doesn't help either,) reaching my wit's end.

I finally figured it out - that what you do, is not what you do for a certain attainable cause, which it's end result is naturally the 'l' word. It is that no matter what you do, you are permitted unless otherwise chosen, to add the 'l' word in place of that thing (which can be replaced with anything else.)

This isn't so much about antiquity, the chicken/egg who first?

But - that age old question, doesn't even truly exist, which means in reality the lie is in place of the myth, or myth in place of the lie -whichever works. Then, after revisiting the truth, how I asked myself what I felt about it wasn't so simple. I actually think - it's nothing personal - it's okay - l word - I forgive.
So apology is met with authority, 1 word, has always taken the position of myth in place of it that it lie's so prudently yet so often, which the imagination provides itself.

Imagination - I demand the next apology from you immediately or else. (There is no response.) I want a reply! (There is no response.)

February 2nd 2011

What is my true spiritual meaning brought about, attributed, to my own sacred devotion, if at all - not subjective inasmuch defiance or my dedication to it.

Can I not connote or infer a double meaning there^ or at the least very desirable state (e.g. Reminded "least desirable"). How must I thereby infer such (a) state over satire without (b) improving myself first - before (c) internalized suffering of a (d) dogmatic nature.

Therefore, the same can be said is dogmatic.

In sacrosanct terms: including the use of language in all variability, - Cannot also then (of religion or any for that matter) be true.

===============

Revised^

I am not advocating, I am promoting my own experience of depression through channels associative of myself. These channels are not of choices, but of thoughts independent of myself.

---------------------------

This journey I have taken my heart to, required of me great amounts of suffering, of decisions contradicting to my sense of self. I might say excruciatingly difficult.

------------------------

To have found myself in this turmoil, might in effect be lost.

==================

you people have absolutely no idea - zero. Do-es you?

 "The only way to get rid of a temptation is to yield to it. Resist it, and your soul grows sick with longing for the things it has forbidden to itself."

-- from The Picture of Dorian Gray by Oscar Wilde

 February 2nd 2014

Hate to me is a sign of success, not because it is contempt against me being made - but because it takes a certain impartiality meant only to be hurtful with NO amount of respect given. It tells me of what imaginary beliefs people have. I see the same type of individuals look hating you against your will. That is empowering to prove it wrong, even if it is in my own mind.

- Marco

Mr. Mister - Kyrie (Official Video)

From the farthest point of empathy

 Not everything has to be a work of art, but that shouldn't ever stop someone for being an artist

- Marco 

Universal Sacrament

 Unless you act as a slave to god then you must answer as a slave to no one else.

Marco

Guitar 🎸

guitar 🎸    

I began by picking up a  guitar for the first time about just over a year now. I consider myself to be still in the beginner phase which is something I think isn't a bad thing. On the onset I believe forging a real relationship with someone who is genuinely attracted to music and wants to share their knowledge is infinite in this progress I've made. To interact with the instrument has changed my life and my outlook in general. A new found love. It's been inspirational and motivational for me.

I have hit about 100 hours of practice in over a year, but that is just stating I am progressing at a stretched out pace. It takes measure of your skill development and I have a long way to do things to get where I want. I figured about 500hrs of practice will benefit the cost of taking lessons.

Practice is key. But unless you take an approach that initially both (my) intent and focus on guitar is to learn how to practice (as opposed to conceptually 'immediately' learning how to play the instrument properly). This takes on imagination together as your journey to strengthen the ability you aim for. edit: progress is in my belief by design. I started playing guitar at 47yrs old. I plan on achieving my goals. It will change you, who you are and life in general.

That's all I got. . .

- Marco Almeida

Krishnamurti :: Go beyond yourself

Go beyond yourself :: Krishnamurti