I have to agree with the master here. I read Bible passages as they are meant to relate to the worship of Jesus Christ. But the scripture is meant specifically be the dialogue that represents only Jesus Christ as an entity to himself. That much is undeniable. If what I say is true it is not to be what some would perhaps look down upon as scrutiny of his holy name.
Therefore, what I argue is that you CAN put aside the Bible as you must also respect that it serves a one dimensional aspect of Jesus Christ. The Bible essentially doesn't teach you to think for yourself but of Jesus Christ's empowerment being the focus upon yourself as a disciple.
I can't make it any clearer.
Both sides of my argument are honorable. One the one hand you are a free thinker and on the other hand you are allowing for religious freedom. That is a win/win situation. Not too good to be true.
Fear is a reaction. Courage is a decision. God is the freedom to choose. Religion is the freedom to become.
What we neglect in thought, the freedom of thought, is the freedom from religion.
That does not negate religion nor its word against Jesus Christ as a savior.
Philosophical inquiry requires that you divide the two as separate entities through a logical equivocation.
No comments:
Post a Comment