papazoola
Post subject: Kicking Circus Posted: Aug 24, 2008 - 02:05 PM
...Don't look now ...BUT Duncan O'Mahoney is heading back to the Bomber practice field...How many shots does this guy get...He better get his act together quick...or the kicking fiasco on this team will turn into a nightmare...if it hasn't already reached that stage...Please...Taman....after the season is over (cuz i believe its too late now) straighten the Bombers kicking game up....in fact, make it the no 1 priority,,,,this is getting ridiculous...
_________________
...one of the most integral parts overlooked in conversation....is to hear what's NOT being said....Anonymous
sanjay
Post subject: Posted: Aug 24, 2008 - 03:51 PM
This is same circus that is going on in front office.
footballmad
Post subject: Posted: Aug 24, 2008 - 07:46 PM
i will cry if that useless good for nothing sack-of-no-talent bum makes it back onto the roster.
I still perosnally think the biggest mistake made in the bombers kicking game this year was releasing bryan munroe. he looked fanatastic in punting averaging over 50 and in preseaon both were clear over 60 yards, and although not a placekicking specialist was getting reps in and was outkicking westwood no problem. although serna started strong he nor o'mahony should have been brought in.
bigcanadiano
Post subject: Posted: Aug 24, 2008 - 05:55 PM
This kicking fiasco is a rather ironic concept indeed.
===========
The U of M proposal is not a good venue for this city, seeing a stadium is erected there for the Bombers? It is rather eratic to bestow such options in such a different set of circusmtances post-polo park/point douglas proposals. That being said: we've come to a cross roads in Bauer's humiliating business model as president of this club. We already reach a point that the pinnacle of such charade has impacted the team negatively on the field as a product. There is no unity conducive to a first class organization; it is a project filled with deceit, mutiny and corruption. This is all true, strictly based on fact that the present state of affairs befalls the community. How much clearer can more be brought on to prove what lay before our very eyes is the question.
It is a sad day in Winnipeg when not one of you commit to how strong this argument is fail to raise the bar. You carry hostility toward it rather than it being a positive thing to look at. We could haved hoisted Grey Cups in the past 18 years, only because Sammy Garza started ahead of Matt Dunigan (injured), Troy Westwood missing the mark in MTL vs. Calgary's Marcus Crandell, and last but not least Ryan Dinwiddie in for an injured Kevin Glenn. Which hurts us the most? I say none of them.
(1) My case in point being, through such a wide range of hysteria on the topic from Asper-to-Bauer-to a new stadium. . . the due process stems now to community that the basis of a renewal on the field stands.
(2) A new Board of Directors.
(3) The removal of Lyle Bauer immediately.
===============
I measure things with duality, zoo. Part of me is liberally lassez faire. I'm also a traditionalist in the not so conservative department. I avoid Bauer's shot at a mini-ministry like the plague.
==============
Actually, I decided to delete that reference. Far before you took offense to it. my bad.
Sure, so the greatest stage in all of sports wasn't a barn-burner. I'd say it was. Oh wait, I did already. go home.
==================
No. Unless we want Bishop, and toronto has no interest in trading him within the east. We could have traded Dinwiddie for him, but if Toronto didn't want Dinwiddie and the riders do? I guess that'd make sense.
===========
What may we ask is 'seeing the light exactly'? To agree with drastic change in ideology does not require a socioeconomic one as well. It speaks of an indian giving style of mentality. Case in point, any kind of intervention would not meet Lyle Bauer's best interest. Community ownership should in fact represent that lack of intervention which is required.
==============
This is the same team, not the exact same team from a year ago. . . that almost came up with a Grey Cup. The qb for this team was Ryan Dinwiddie. I see nothing to prevent us from winning a Grey Cup in the future. I think this logic follows fairly honest, than what it leads to a change in ownership is not the answer. How much clearer can I make myself without the forecast of Bauer's ultimate plan? I feel I've done my part in addressing the problem NOT resorting to pro-Bauer philosophy. In fact, we had an opportunity to trade Kevin Glenn in the off-season to MTL for #13. Where does that take us, if not for the typical push-over type thinking that we give credit to? As I said already: this team narrowly missed a grey cup last year. This has nothing to do with Bauer, but has everything to do with where we are going if community ownership isn't holding Bauer accountable because he refuses to part ways with our 'viability'.
================
housedog
Post subject: Posted: Aug 24, 2008 - 01:02 AM
The only one who can't read is papa and piggy who are wearing the Asper tinted glasses. There is no gurantee that Asper will win any cups for Winnipeg. He has sat on the board for many years along with his cronies and we have won squat. The Jets had a private owner and where did that get us. Papa I have been going to Bomber games for 50 years. Please don't insult my itelligence with what Asper will do. If the Bombers are almost selling out their games and not spending to the max of the cap. Then this team is being mis-managed by Bauer. Other teams are not having these problems. If the Riders are selling team merchandise and making a fortune and we can't do the same. Then we have a marketing problem (Mis management )You can't even by a cheap Bomber shot glass or jersey in any department store in WPG. All aspects of how the team is operated should be looked into by a special appointed BODs. Appointed by civic and provincial gov'ts to see what is really going on before we hand over the keys to Asper for the price of a newspaper.
===================
papazoola
Post subject: Posted: Aug 23, 2008 - 11:22 PM
...sometimes drastic change is for the better bigcandiano...just takes a venturous spirit and a little imagination....change for the sake of change.....i don't like.....change for positives....yeah i can get on board...
=================
bigcanadiano
Post subject: Posted: Aug 23, 2008 - 03:22 PM
So unsubstantiated bs equates with taking Bauer's line of bait at the end of a Bomber reefer? Right, as for the innuendo you've all but built to dismiss my critical input to suit your own, my basis is entirely of focusing on the real subject matter. This is to speak, some come to think of it, as the community ownership model.
How about your answer for that, pigseye, in the opposite form of a negated rebuttal perhaps? Please, negate this. . .again, with misunderstading as the moral high ground we land on. But, I invite you nevertheless.
Notwithstanding of course.
It's your choice.
You are either one of Bauer's following, in the ambition to place Bomber fans into a post-partum depression (of a fragile 2-6 record) or have selective memory of the position marketing profit motive.
I would take the latter for your won over satisfaction.
Please, negate this.
_________________
"Kevin Glenn is a winner." Doug Berry's hear no evil see no evil philosophy.
==================
PIGSEYE wrote:
Like I said before, show me an actual economic forcast that concludes that this strategy will guarantee the football team will survive in the long run.
~'=
Quote:
you're totally right pigseye...this venture WILL NOT proceed without govt. dollars....
So, judging from that standpoint if Bauer says "you're either with us or against us" means exactly the same thing from a COMMUNITY based equation?? (I suppose the PROFIT MOTIVE - is a mere illusion of the fact.) Perhaps, those of us that refuse to bow our heads in relief as victims have selective memory we should choose Bauer as you are.
Better think again.
If we need an approval from a far more generous venture, that is a perogative worth initiating against. No matter how impartial we come across, as Blue-toothed fairytales go, if Bauer tells us 'the cow jumps over the moon,' we're automatically fans that wear t-shirts which read "Bomber property - we do what we're told. . ." (on the front) "love, Lyle Bauer" (on the back.)
Let me tell you both something in ourbombers land. . . you've got another thing coming.
If Bauer says it, it's okay, but if we say it. . . it's not??
Give me a break. Get rid of Bauer first. Then we'll break the silence barrier before walking the walk. Talking the talk is Bauer's 2-6 laugher of a team.
=================
Quote from: Vegas on August 23, 2008, 08:01PM
Marco'll say i'm stupid, but I just don't get him.....and I'm fine with that. Because him calling me a Nerf Ball is fine with me because i'm happy with my life
Vegas makes a good point; albeit common knowledge.
Quote from: Vegas on August 23, 2008, 07:59PM
Marco, you're alive! Be Happy!
Yes, there is the path we all must take.
4 = the number of times the word 'bud' has been applied in this thread.
5 = " " " " " " 'pizza' " " " " " " .
4 = ' horny' .
0= fully clothed. no finished product. Yet glory in many ways.
===============
So based on your unidentifiable 'unreliable' instincts, I have a value next equal to nothing with respect to post modern relativism. I can live with that.
===============
Mercules Re: She tried, Merk. She tried.
« Reply #8 on: August 23, 2008, 06:17PM »
It doesn't even matter if I am right. I base my opinion on pure instincts (might be unreliable but so far so good in life)
I place 0 value in anything you have to say.
I believe you are a genuine nut case at this point.
Sweet dreams
===============
well, if that'd be the case. . . you'll be in charge of the filming, and you'd do all the close ups.
toonces Re: vegas.
« Reply #19 on: August 23, 2008, 06:27PM »
^and sadie has a mad crush on vegas.
Tams Re: vegas.
« Reply #20 on: August 23, 2008, 06:28PM »
don't we all?
toonces Re: vegas.
« Reply #21 on: August 23, 2008, 06:28PM »
^and with that i off'd myself because of her just to make everyone happy of course. that b.
Vegas Re: vegas.
« Reply #22 on: August 23, 2008, 07:59PM »
Marco, you're alive! Be Happy!
Sadie Re: vegas.
« Reply #23 on: Today at 05:53 AM »
you're great too, biggs, when you're not hating me I think you're awesome
Hap Re: vegas.
« Reply #24 on: Today at 06:09 AM »
now get in the kitchen and make with the pizza.
Vegas Re: vegas.
« Reply #26 on: Today at 02:17 PM »
that was very Gandalf of you
===================
Quote from: toonces on August 23, 2008, 06:07PM
when i was on the phone with her that one time, i did all the talking, and she listened intently, . . .story of my life in fact.
eh, that tends to be how it goes with people. i don't usually talk very much.
==================
which explains the tams phenomena that we all grow to hold onto.
===================
Mercules Re: vegas.
« Reply #16 on: August 23, 2008, 06:22PM »
you admire me...I'm cool with that
I'm helping to mold you at this point. It is my mission in life
toonces Re: vegas.
« Reply #15 on: August 23, 2008, 06:21PM »
did you not just give me permission for me to love you?
Mercules Re: vegas.
« Reply #14 on: August 23, 2008, 06:18PM »
I will take that at face value
toonces Re: vegas.
« Reply #13 on: August 23, 2008, 06:16PM »
fine. i love you merk. there.
Mercules Re: vegas.
« Reply #10 on: August 23, 2008, 06:12PM »
dude you are ridiculous...don't get mad at me
toonces Re: vegas.
« Reply #11 on: August 23, 2008, 06:14PM »i'm not mad. i'm not mad. i'm not mad.
now don't fuck off please any better?
gawd.
there is no way you can be this blind. force of habit i guess.
========================
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote from: Vegas on August 23, 2008, 02:30PM
**gets shot by Toonces**
oddly enough I feel happy for you, sadie's a great gal.
====================
i don't get horny, it works nicely only if pizza is involved. yet somehow i find hard to repress pizza as an adaquate metaphor for 'horny'. i seriously thought sadie enjoyed a less meaningful experience. Pizza was the best i could come up with. i'm aware it'll never happen.
==================
if keeping it real means you while naked making a pizza with me while naked. . . we're set for life.
================
Mercules Re: She tried, Merk. She tried.
« Reply #6 on: August 23, 2008, 06:14PM »
Dude, I honestly don't 'know' Swedes.
My gut is that she says what she means. I could be wrong.
I don't think I am blind at all.
===================
YES YOU ARE. You just don't know it yet.
She does it to make a statement you fool. It's the fashionable thing to do, it's trendy because it's unpopular. Are you that blind??
===================
you two are like the resistence in France, negotiating a settlement on fine wines, on a bender heading to Naples.
So this has obviously happened, smart.
===================
You see here's the thing. . . as perverse as the reality may be, it's all about the abnormal fantasy that surrounds it. 2 internet freaks, that like night or day carve out each and every move on one another. Therefore, the sexual deviance is at a stand still, and they act on impulse only to prove which of them are the better gay person, or more so prevelant in stature. I hated each and every one of those people by the time I left that board mess. I hated it then, I hated them now, I'll hate them tomorrow. Sadly, misinformation is over-rated in the world we live in. . . so here we are. But, I use the term hate because I mean it. Who knew? Here's my case in point: They can fake it all they want, it doesn't hurt anyone.
Do people respect it? Oh, sure they do.
==============
^mind you, i feel rather heroic in this thread
^ i get mistaken for nobody all the time.
^I came up with that myself - btw.
====================
Quote from: Sadie on August 21, 2008, 01:40PM
christ, I had no idea they were fucking. I had to go anal and read that one...fun dramarama over there, damn.
this is why I choose not to meet (or ultimately fuck) any of you.
just complicates things and looses that pleasent anonymity you get from message boards.
That's fresh.
A couple immune to break-ups, they're also too shallow minded to admit their weaknesses. Sounds like a hate-fuck. That or an over-compulsive romp based on poor sense of self, mainly in over compensating for their sexual ambigous escapades. As result, trusting a person of Aaron's nature is simply based on fact that even if god posted on his internet board proclaiming he was the son of judas. Jen, simply has one of those extra y-chormosomes that inebriates her libido in an unwholesome fashion. Congrats on your hate-fucking endeavors.
====================
Stupidiest thing, if someone wants to talk to you - you can reply back. That's the last I heard
==============
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment