The fallacy of freedom or "not being free"...
Justice comes before guilt. Justice before guilt is of the highest order. There cannot be a moral code to justice without disorder. Therefore, we do not judge if you psychologically fail in seeking guilt. And if no one like to feel guilt... It is because it's DNA or in our human nature not to. It is also psychopathic in behavior. It is the categorical meaning of being found. That once you feel guilt you eliminate it with discontent. Your confusion. The very fabric of humanity rests on such unified principles.
The above all qualify existence without god whether or not you appeal to an authority. This is a relevant statement.
○●○●○
Now consider the following;
An athiest choose to promote a universe of disorder, only because they also choose not to identify with god. In a world without god is a form of censorship which dictates this as a norm. The point this follows: is that if we fail to understand this informal fallacy then god is moot. Therefore, the existential athiest has not inferred formal argument against god. Which is censorship. (Only if on this level...) that if the censorship of god is in fact true. (Where do we find order or acknowledge form.) 1- Codes of conduct. 2- Morals in society. The question being where does censorship come from? 3- What are factors not directly dealing with a debunking of god. This is, for example, is an appeal to existentialism. What are your causes.
Discuss.
○●○●○
○○○○○
January 20th 2025
In the real world, truth is about honesty. What are some good strategies for honesty?
Honesty means that we bascially already have the correct epistemology of the concept of fact, we only need the morale to follow the rules of this correct epistemology.
Everyone already knows, at least on an intuitive basis, how to state a fact, like to say that there is a glass on the table. But there can be all kinds of psychological pressure to deny the truth that there is a glass on the table. Like financial reasons, or loss of status, laziness etc.
At which point a hodge podge of strategies come into play, to remain honest.
Then you should have a basic understanding of honesty, which is a subjective issue. The concept of subjectivity is a creationist concept.
1. Creator / chooses / spiritual / subjective / opinion
2. Creation / chosen / material / objective / fact
Basically the logic in a subjective statement is that the spirit chooses, and the spirit is identified with a chosen opinion.
Although in the logic of fact, a fact is forced by evidence, (a fact is a model of a creation) psychological pressure can make it so, that the statement of fact becomes chosen.
So then it becomes a decision to say whether or not there is a glass on the table, and a moral issue to follow the logic of fact.
So basically you are then choosing a judgment on the spirit in which you make the decision that there is, or there isn't a glass on the table.
Emotions must be primed for honesty beforehand. There must be built up emotional reserves for a passion for the truth.
Also emotional realism is a good strategy imo. Take all the painful truth you can deal with emotionally, and no more. Then just start negotiating with what level of truth you can handle.
There's a popular idea to welcome being found wrong, as some kind of strategy for honesty. I advise against that strategy. This is not a realistic way to deal with the pain of being found wrong in my opinion. Of course you can still welcome criticism of your position, as a challenge.
○○○○○
We all assign meaning to things. (Whether or not empirically valid or emotively based.)
I identify with myself. My own image. I assume none of the risk if I mirror my intention to other people beside myself. I think that makes sense. MA2025,
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DFC1bE0CAfD/?igsh=MWUxNmF5NXdxMTFkaA==
The great reset
Minding reinvention the slow purge: a premonition for (performance) art
In music you are having a sincere relationship with yourself for annaudience that intimately wants it How can this possibly be any different for an actor.
A person can pretend. It makes them irrelevant alll they want to. It requires no further Persuasion. Creativity takes on another role...
Creativity takes on an obsessive quality which dictates form. It restores order informing your memory. A mentality for chaos and surrender of a process that never ends.
○○○○○
Any idea that exists as an inferiority complex is a bad one. That is a good rule of thumb to live by especially when dealing with class conscious individuals that base their identity and identify with reality unequally.
○○○○○
“One great use of words is to hide our thoughts.”
Voltaire
○○○○○
"Only the great masters of style ever succeed in being obscure."
-- Oscar Wilde
●○●○●
January 20th 2025
In the real world, truth is about honesty. What are some good strategies for honesty?
Honesty means that we bascially already have the correct epistemology of the concept of fact, we only need the morale to follow the rules of this correct epistemology.
Everyone already knows, at least on an intuitive basis, how to state a fact, like to say that there is a glass on the table. But there can be all kinds of psychological pressure to deny the truth that there is a glass on the table. Like financial reasons, or loss of status, laziness etc.
At which point a hodge podge of strategies come into play, to remain honest.
Then you should have a basic understanding of honesty, which is a subjective issue. The concept of subjectivity is a creationist concept.
1. Creator / chooses / spiritual / subjective / opinion
2. Creation / chosen / material / objective / fact
Basically the logic in a subjective statement is that the spirit chooses, and the spirit is identified with a chosen opinion.
Although in the logic of fact, a fact is forced by evidence, (a fact is a model of a creation) psychological pressure can make it so, that the statement of fact becomes chosen.
So then it becomes a decision to say whether or not there is a glass on the table, and a moral issue to follow the logic of fact.
So basically you are then choosing a judgment on the spirit in which you make the decision that there is, or there isn't a glass on the table.
Emotions must be primed for honesty beforehand. There must be built up emotional reserves for a passion for the truth.
Also emotional realism is a good strategy imo. Take all the painful truth you can deal with emotionally, and no more. Then just start negotiating with what level of truth you can handle.
There's a popular idea to welcome being found wrong, as some kind of strategy for honesty. I advise against that strategy. This is not a realistic way to deal with the pain of being found wrong in my opinion. Of course you can still welcome criticism of your position, as a challenge.
○○○○○
We all assign meaning to things. (Whether or not empirically valid or emotively based.)
I identify with myself. My own image. I assume none of the risk if I mirror my intention to other people beside myself. I think that makes sense. MA2025,
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DFC1bE0CAfD/?igsh=MWUxNmF5NXdxMTFkaA==
The great reset
Minding reinvention the slow purge: a premonition for (performance) art
In music you are having a sincere relationship with yourself for annaudience that intimately wants it How can this possibly be any different for an actor.
A person can pretend. It makes them irrelevant alll they want to. It requires no further Persuasion. Creativity takes on another role...
Creativity takes on an obsessive quality which dictates form. It restores order informing your memory. A mentality for chaos and surrender of a process that never ends.
○○○○○
Any idea that exists as an inferiority complex is a bad one. That is a good rule of thumb to live by especially when dealing with class conscious individuals that base their identity and identify with reality unequally.
○○○○○
“One great use of words is to hide our thoughts.”
Voltaire
○○○○○
"Only the great masters of style ever succeed in being obscure."
-- Oscar Wilde
●○●○●
No comments:
Post a Comment