Weakness - confusion - and darkness into language...

 January 26th 2025

Justice

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/15YMmmdf3K/

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1PiZcRjncV/

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/19614dwgX3/

On the nature of intellect vs intelligence 

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/19BW5xBSgw/

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/15ZuPFwcE4/

David Lynch

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/19rAVJUFDu/

https://www.instagram.com/p/DFSwkjTy3So/?igsh=MWZwNmhuNmFydmVxaw==

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DFS0isjCbqq/?igsh=MXJzcWwyZ3JuYm5zZw==

Osho on living in eternity

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1A9tAz1q9U/

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/19BW5xBSgw/

Krishnamurti

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/15su5ZkpRe/

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DFSAtCgiZGA/?igsh=MXh0OTl3ejdvcGhlaQ==


Penelope Tabualevu in math it cannot deviate from what's expected as an end.  So I will never be able to compute errors.  Which is what makes us human.  Philosophy creates that paradox for us to understand our limitations.  All AI is programmed to perform are methods in retrieving and regurgitating information.  It is but on repeat.  It cannot assign error to things. Why. Because AI learns to play only by rules that it follows to follow its commands.  These rules govern their behavior toward us on a machine level.  Not a result of human understanding.  Which is what people get worried about... that only if computation can learn on its own.  Where does that leave us as indivividuals.  With or without machines if machines can learn the power of autonomy at this stage... 2025.... in its most primitive state.
- Marco Almeida 2025

Consider the number 2. What is it? The number two is simply one more than one. It is defined as 1 + 1.  Every number is defined as one more than the number that precedes it.  Starting with 1, we can then define every number by repeatedly adding  one to whatever we got before.

There is no actual thing that is a two. We can talk about two, and we  seem to be referring to an object, but this is a trick of the mind. We  can have words which are symbols for things that do not exist. Harry  Potter and Spiderman for example are names for people who do not exist.  These names are symbols, just like all other words. All words are metaphors in that they are something that stands for something else.

Comments? (Author unknown)

Chët Andersen there are rules that govern mathmatics (as we already know.  Laws are far less complex because we can infer from laws using logic as an empirical means to achieve a common set of standards or to that very end understand the laws we create as a function.)  The latter is the difference between math and philosophy.  In computer science theory 1's and 2's are to infer practical programming.  1s being true and 2s being false is a basic element, although as it is learned in instruction the patters with association to a binary system consists of coding 0s and 1s - are both consistent with 0s being positive and 1s being negative to that effect.  The patterns or codes of this binary programming create a specific pattern to reach a verdict or final cause because of 0s and 1s decipher this.  Binary instruction gets to be much more sophisticated and complex. - Marco Almeida 2025

https://meta.purplehillsbooks.com/docs/Ontology/numbers-arent-real