I live in the area and what is I see can only be described as indecipherable. Anyone that truly hate Morantz is for his idiotic political takes. Now he's going to trace this leading as a victim to it. Whoever is responsible should be ashamed for enabling him - never mind the racism. What is happening in Gaza has no recurring value as to why Morantz is a target. Morantz openly and uncandidly endorses what Netanyahu has done. This type of thing isn't about what is reprehensible. It's about spreading hate. And Morantz will only use this as a political card. He doesn't care what's happening in Gaza. He doesn't care what he does here.
Here is my point:
If a conservative makes a threat, it's deemed as acceptable.
If anyone else does it to a conservative, the cause is deemed as a threat.
Huge double standard.
What is the dichotomy may be false. Does not make this event any less true. My second point here is, the irony of such. (It wasn't long ago in case anyone forgot.) There was a staged anti semetic planted message on a business who used it as motive to abandon it due to vandals... which was not true. The owners first denied it. Police investigation determined it was a hoax. All is forgotten.
Marco Almeida
-The Peg
°○○●○•°•
what is it that I did to endorse antisemitism in my exact words. It is not an outright denial. What is the crux of my argument? The argument at the very least forms what is a red herring. However, the same thing cannot be said? No. My logic is NOT incomplete. It is verifiable by virtue. I accept any challenege accusing my position of antisemitism. I am sick of the same thing being equated the minute a refutation is made in some sort of favor. This position is also not using stylized bigotry nor a renunciation in terms of it.
My position is one of what is disloyal to moral standards. What is that SHOULD be said. What is an unnegotiable CONSCIENTIOUSLY made argument.
This is where I stand.
Marco Almeida
-The Peg
No comments:
Post a Comment