My theory on what is dark matter

 This double slit theory is a secondary model to anything that can explain what is dark matter. What I hypothesize explaining what is dark matter? The theory I am working on is to prove all dark matter is - is light that dies - and that light that dies - makes for everything the universe is made. Basically, the answer to dark matter = 1- all light dies 2- light that dies makes dark matter what it is. My hypothesis follows that because all dark matter is light that collapses on itself (lights death) also follows that light came before its own creation. This also means, if we postulate dead light forms dark matter, dead light creates energy that turns into dark matter. It can attribute to is living in a vacuum. Like a black hole supplying endless energy, only we don't know it, because light cannot escape once inside. This theory from it being properly postulated... makes sense... if and only if we can prove light can escape a black hole. So in theory, what creates dark matter is light, once inside a black hole, found its way out. Light collapsed. Dark matter is dead light formed into each and every origin of the universe as its whole. Therefore, all connected through interference of black holes emitting energy, that was once light, collapsed. Black holes are basically light collapsing into endless supply of energy.

Marco Almeida ©️ 2025

the palin war machine

 °●°°●○°○°°○

brain salad

 •●•°●●°●°●°

lead me to the suburbs

 °●°○○°○°○°○

Moral obligation and the revisionist sentiment [contrition, awareness & autonomy in history]

 °●°○°○°○°▪︎°▪︎

This is my final installment on the subject of history as I discuss, which makes history a more personal description to it. Also, refer to the title change that the three postulates [contrition, awareness & autonomy] relate. When you are introducing history as a result of your emotion, very different rationality emerges, that is the point of this lecture:

"I examine history on a subjective level that is tempting of fate, not as history is automatically fatalist in its origin, as such, awareness living in a vacuum. I argue on terms of autonomy in history being more important than virtue itself." - Marco Almeida, 2013

Added some new material to consider: 

 1- typically abstract » ideas 2- predictable » logic 3- mental in relapse » movement 4- withdrawal » time and space. 5- eccentricity » belief 6- trust » irony 7- perverse » reality (Remember these are things which inform your personal awareness, not in assigning history, but carries a property subject to human error. Think of flirting with history in kindness. That is how to assess history, through objections, affiliation, and acts of attrition.)

°●°○○°○○°○°

I make an exclamation designating history is based on impervious societal affluence, political discourse, social or economical - that in order to examine history is not in the corrupt (impartial) view of life, but an acclimation of moral (virtual) veneration. History is a reconstructing of our ability rather than its destruction (diabolical), to enable ourselves by its assurance. 1- This in theory would state that history is the fascination of how incapable we are. 2- It is an anti-thesis to the fallibility (insurance) of what we already know. History typically entails how venerable we are, concerning the influence or model by design behind it. My approach is indifferent to recording history, on a more surreal (romantic) level, rather than its superfluous state of x, y, z happened for reasons a, b, c - [dialectic or pragmatic awareness is two fold]. Therefore, the particularity of history does NOT become expressed with a PRACTICAL meaning to it. This follows understanding history should be an impractical look into that which we escape from to the use of language as result. The objective is to change the way history is told. The goal in other words is not to allow history as a construct of what reality is made. I would call it a hyper-extension of metaphysical reactions. Basically this argument is made that eliminates the discourse of how history has been conventionally taught, as an intention to create the imperialist state of culture we are living in today. - Marco Almeida, 2013

Oscar Wilde - "The very essence of romance is uncertainty."

°●°○●°○°○°○°

Oscar Wilde

"Just as the worst slave-owners were those who were kind to their slaves, and so prevented the horror of the system being realised by those who suffered from it, and understood by those who contemplated it, so, in the present state of things in England, the people who do most harm are the people who try to do most good."

 --from "The Soul of Man Under Socialism" (1895)

========

I make an exclamation designating history is based on impervious societal affluence, political discourse, social or economical - that in order to examine history is not in the corrupt view of life, but an acclimation of moral (virtual) veneration. History is a reconstructing of our ability rather than its destruction (diabolical), to enable ourselves by it. 1- This in theory would state that history is the fascination of how incapable we are. 2- It is an anti-thesis to the fallibility of what we already know. History typically entails how venerable we are, concerning the influence or model by design behind it. My approach is indifferent to recording history, on a more surreal (romantic) level, rather than its superfluous state of x, y, z happened for reasons a, b, c - [dialectic or pragmatic awareness is two fold]. Therefore, the particularity of history does NOT become expressed with a PRACTICAL meaning to it. This follows understanding history should be an impractical look into that which we escape from to the use of language as result. The objective is to change the way history is told. The goal in other words is not to allow history as a construct of what reality is made. I would call it a hyper-extension of metaphysical reactions. Basically this argument is made that eliminates the discourse of how history has been conventionally taught, as an intention to create the imperialist state of culture we are living in today.

"The breakthrough in reality is a smashing of conventional wisdom, shattered memories, that breaches this inherent awareness from a white dominated inbred type psychology to our modern world, and imperialist ideology that history is made." - Marco Almeida, 2013

°●°○°○○°○°○°○°

A conversion of autonomy (sovereignty is the basis of free will)

 I offer these as revelations to purport the idea of soveriegnty between Westernization and Socialism.

 

Here is my thesis to define communist agenda:

 

Transcend what is theoretical or in a sense 'automatic' though not to become actualized as absolute, therefore, to breath a cognitive element of real sovereignty.

 

You are either communist by trade or you are not. You cannot use it as a superlative and sit on both sides of the fence. In case you are victimized (judged) of your unpopular beliefs look no further than the McCarthy era. McCarthy's watered down version of communism was meant as a threat to capitalist virtue. This is so typical of any kind of initiative against the corporate agenda that has segregated our global village as the face of Westernization.

 

There is no reason to speculate theoretically exactly what contorts re; Marxism. Marxism being far more complex and less relative than most care to realize. Communism is strictly theoretically based, whereas free enterprise is its nemesis. Marxism is a sophisticated aversion of capitalist theory. My point being that Marxism is seen as the foundation of all communist thought - but that is not necessarily the case. If the average thinker such as myself is able to profess how powerful a concept communism is we would see massive change in how the industrial complex is governed. That is the unconscious development of a world without communism - to theorize how capitalism has been fueled propaganda to brainwash an unsuspecting masses.

 

 

The very basis of what all sovereignty should otherwise dictate are stereotypes that model against the cultural self-serving norms in society. Therefore, rather than enable the power structure Westernization has historically had resulting in its globalization. The following excerpt from Oscar Wilde should be considered as the salvation of sovereignty as solution to our utmost unimaginative element.

 

“What art seeks to disturb is monotony of type, slavery of custom, tyranny of habit, and the reduction of man to the level of a machine.”— Oscar Wilde

"Transcend what is theoretical or in a sense 'automatic' though not to become actualized as absolute, therefore, to breath a cognitive element of real sovereignty. " - Marco Almeida, 2013

^Think about the communist agenda (democratic) in terms of capitalist virtue (republican) - the ultimate answer should always lead to sovereignty in terms of deontological actualization as the very absence of capitalist free enterprise. Capitalism carries no agenda, and any sovereign type of ontological framework threatens it, which is why communism is not as sought after.

================

“That's what real love amounts to - letting a person be what he really is. Most people love you for who you pretend to be. To keep their love, you keep pretending - performing. You get to love your pretence. It's true, we're locked in an image, an act - and the sad thing is, people get so used to their image, they grow attached to their masks. They love their chains. They forget all about who they really are. And if you try to remind them, they hate you for it, they feel like you're trying to steal their most precious possession.”

― Jim Morrison

-------------------------

Any given moment? Only if Foucault is himself involved as an authority in the logic of epistemology do I find a discrepancy. If Foucault is saying what I think he is then we are either living a lie or the plausibility of a culture is found without pure discord. In which case I see a fallacy in language used to describe all things may exist within that culture, hitherto a flawed reality in which choices are manifested. This is to say that everything is preliminary on our radar, as if awaiting the next solar eclipse.

I am an existentialist and I wonder if Foucault himself is double dipping into the realm of existentialist thought or forgoing it as a realist. Foucault's rhetoric fails in its distinction to the core of this contradiction in terms.

“In any given culture and at any given moment, there is always only one 'episteme' that defines the conditions of possibility of all knowledge, whether expressed in theory or silently invested in a practice.”

― Michel Foucault, The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences

--------------------------

If you fail to read this you are a moron. My goal in life have been to be this honest with others as with myself. Here is a mind blowing entry for our consideration:

============

December 12, 2013

This is the philosophy of poverty = presented in dichotomy of an illustration between Nikola Tesla and Paris Hilton.

Are you prepared to realize how less exploited you are can somehow or other justify the meaning of your existence. That is the essence of violation. Feeling violated is an alarm that does not ring true to most people for this reason.

My point being simple: that you are programmed to feel violated on the basis of greed. If not true then replace that with another question and ask yourself what is the reality between correcting your behavior - would you agree it is a matter of prohibition. That what your only motive precedes is goal oriented. Is ambition the secret killer between your motive and what the world is telling you to become.

How does this not require consciousness. If you lie to yourself - you fail to even ask the same question and mistake it as a correcting measure. An insult to your intelligence. If you can establish the truth on such grounds, then you are in fact a genius.

If I program will and understanding onto my double how am I expecting to be treated.

--------------------

My Inner Monologue

 To be sovereign is to be self aware and to be authentic is to be fortuitous. - Marco Almeida

Dialing in ability

 To 1- create is an 2- artistry of thoughts 3- hostile to the source.

 

Standards: the application of higher learning, meaning, never forget to check my own availability.

 

I do everything to support false jeopardy of ideas, my incidental awareness entitles me.

 

I have an immunity to fate, I think of it as concealing my own relevance.

 

I will one day understand what it means to lie, to cheat, to steal, right now - I will enjoy my view from here.

======================

The true measure of power is patience as my own virtue; then not to abuse such self mandate.

 

Branding what is fake in this world is probably the single most important skill I have ever learned to produce of myself - myself included. It takes a psychological nature of my own doing. That is the true measure of talent, the nature of responsibility, the act of discipline, the courage of conviction. My reason for living are all these things.

 

======================

 

"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." - Mahatma Gandhi

 

If my life were branded as selfish, I would immediately correct it as false, if I were to branding what fake there is in the world.

 

=====================

 

I am here on this earth to accomplish myself of something infamous, not famous - I already am famous of nothing.

 

 From the minute I was born, this might be in my context of traditional values, is a first - where I can finally say I like myself. That is my idea of Canadian culture if it is to survive.

 

=====================

 

True happiness, in my mind, is not without a sacred balance, to put fear into the eye of my beholder.

 

=====================

 

If I were to ask someone how does it feel to feel free, 1000$ says no one would KNOW how.

 

=====================

 

 The most certain of statements I will ever see written. The irony is kind of sad, more so happy. It's not everyday I am faced with that type of irony in hand, it just reminds me of how people suck the life out of me with no good reason to. I know a lot of people on such a trivial level, it makes the world a sad place when I think about it. Though not unless I twist my own fate, my own "grave" irony will not lack originality.

 

======================

 

I am not one to know how far playing within the rules will take me; as there are too many to count which go against me.

 

======================

 

To my surprise, I want other people to forget me not, that shows I care, to the type of thought compassionately void.

 

 "to the type of thought compassionately void." = This means people are void of thought, which they are otherwise unaware of. Therefore, compassionately driven people think about everyone but themselves. If that were a universal habit that all people employed, we would live in a very different world, rather than a displacement of radical thoughts at random. (a) If everything could be less pertinent (b) to one thing true of everything and everyone, (c) a trained psychic self image. Compassion would be better served in all our needs, wants, and thoughts of a universal voice. A method of riches to key in on life.

 

=====================

 

sara caira ‏@saracaira

I hate people who use a guilt trip on you for sympathy. I have no sympathy for anyone who makes someone feel bad on purpose

 

Marco Almeida ‏@bigcanadiano

@saracaira Guilt by association is very deceptive, a person habitually fake, needy of attention, to make me feel bad about myself.

 

CraveMyThoughts ‏@CraveMyThoughts

Every single person on the planet has a story. Don't judge people before you truly know them. The truth might surprise you.

 

Marco Almeida‏@bigcanadiano

@CraveMyThoughts False branding, not only should follow my better judgment, "truth" based logic will never totally be justified.

in my wildest dreams

 . . . i've taken a lot of time to think just how devious the world we live is. It is in this sense I find my place of wisdom resides within me.

Earlier in the week i stumbled upon old yearbooks that were stored away for my recycling box. As I flip through those pages today - so much reminds me of an era I sometimes forget I make a part of. It's funny to see how resilient a person I've become, or more so specifically to the same individuals that grace the pages past.

Funnier still as it may seem to me after all those early days, were spent in school hallways, deliver almost nothing to bare. It serves a purpose of denial. So much so - that when encountering 'old' friends per se, so many of those, are merely figments a radical transformation. Some are so pretentious as they were then, are more so ignorant now.

Nothing - seems real.

In fact: even the teachers themselves appear to be static to how little influence they truly had, yet so bizarre those days were that the truth would be too much for us to accept.

What I remember about myself, is a person that learned to read about time.

That was a time my self-awareness was probably meant to exclude how fragile my sense of belonging really was. Yet, again. . . today I see a boy being lied to. Then again, today - I see a man looking through that time as if a mirror were being held up saying, "It's not really happening."

The prime minister of Canada was Jean Chretien, with US president Bill Clinton.

So much of this I see today, is a reflection of the materialist notion that friends long ago were bound to. When I see people that truly have no inner-life but due to their own false conceptions of reality, it is my perception, that I express not one of these people ever really knew who I was. They are as if ghosts, trying to make-believe they remember a person from such a time in my life.

When I see such creeps I look away and I refer to them as monsters of the abyss. My memory will not serve such creatures well.

When I remind myself of the place we live in - that I choose to be a part of - I see myself in a curious circle of hypocrites that blame other people. . . "You are part of the rat race. . . must destroy."

It is a world of desensitized robots.

Perhaps, getting married while taking an imaginary air balloon ride does suffice to some addicts out there. The ones that compare themselves to such high esteem, they wanted to become doctors - but instead became nothing but nurses or teachers of the same brick-institution they came out of. Some became tradesmiths or professional-extortionists, others are now drug dealers that cop out on every given opportunity for the sake they can hold down a meaningless occupation.

Needless to say I've witnessed all of these things, and as result, I've deprived myself to some form of distinction on a lower level of intelligencia. However, my faith better survives the aftermath of rational conclusions.

It all comes to me on a day like today - where my intuition if it serves me well - corrects the days that have passed on by without even a glimmer to show for it.

For every passing ingrateful person that provides prejudice - only because I am a cleaner holding a mop.

For every person that passes judgment because I am not a Cnd. but I am proud to be from my rite of birth in Portugal.

To those that get married for the sake of it, only be it due to status though will gain monetary measure achieving absolutely nothing.

This is for you. . .

September 10th, 2010

 

September 10th, 2012

 

 How people on twitter cannot differentiate between quantifiable reasoning and unjustified harassment makes them fuckholes.

quantifiable reasoning = substance

unjustified harassment = shallow

Never under any circumstances will I run away from a fight based on living a lie between confrontation (confession) and conflict (guilt).