incremental obsolescence

I never believed in the ancient Egyptians model of life, as privilege, in fulfilling needs for a wealthier nobility.

I also never trusted a man who has never been in a real fight.

As history would indicate, there is a kind of seizure, a disclosure, an undesirable will which irony in itself has evolved through time.

It is an embarrassment of riches.  The kind of thing, one might detonate reality if frowned upon.  A type of serial morality, a brand of thought, an appraisal of the will.  That when these types of thoughts emerge unto ourselves, is a universal acclimation of the will.

A definitive ironic impact.

When I write, I do so with the confirmation of irony, that what translates off the page, speaks as a narrators version of real life - real life. What if real life had it's own narrator.  As I've said before, what if history had a nature to it (as in science), and time had a voice. To have this type of conscious awareness, the individual, has an internal dialogue which connects to the universe as a model of thought.  A type of narrative assembly on automatic pilot, methods turned inward then outward to be tested, again, then again, then it was before.

We do not confuse methods of the heart with a universal model (i.e.manipulative intent;) devices to satisfy a normal adherence of choices being made unto ourselves.  I would argue this is what makes up a moral acclimation of the will, the improvisation of self-regulation as we decompose our self-righteous habits.  To what degree are we aware of our universal being.

Searching for identity is a universal embodiment of the will, to succeed at your universal self image.  What proofs can there be, to achieve a truth of history's aims through a course of self embodiment of the will.  This is a conscious question, making up the nature of experience.  (a)  To contest the will, (b) in accordance of our human spirit. (c) It is not a sacred right, it is a privilege.

The same way in what defies reason, is not seen as sacred.  As result follows the course of history, dictating norms of a punitive level of arousal (i.e. moral acclimation of the will)l, which then follows what we know to be a universal model instead.  Awareness of the universe is a ironic choice of medium, effortlessly, to defy different forms of historical centerpieces.  To eliminate the traces of history, within a confluence of normative elements.  A narrative component made of universal affluence.

The logistics of self-directing accomplishment, rather then defeating irony in a universal contextual level, the irony influenced itself narrative.

Irony takes a step by step process toward achieving awareness on a non-secular universal model.

Self-defeating irony plays a prominent role in witness intimidation, when you are looked down upon to surrender your humility.  To achieve this an internal dialogue of the will over irony asserts itself, in exchange, that the same reason establishes a 1. pure irony from which to 2. limit the loss of 3. condescending behavior.  This is how one escapes from such irony not being fairly presented.