the problem with neurotic thinkers (a pandemic) [October 7th 2014]

 I came across this question earlier tonight. It is a simple yet powerful concept that deserves its own explanation. (What alters reality.) The question is not a combination of 'how' or the 'why' than rather what is reality made. What is the focal point re; reality seems to be a very arbitrary thing. However, how can anything be arbitrary once you consider a system of beliefs working in some random order. This lends itself to chaos theory. That follows what does this branch of reality consist of if not based on singularity.

Subjectivity can only get you so far, it is found in how close will my subjectivity run as a reversal in the minds of others. The goal is to infer and be inferred as result of having reached subjectivity. So considering that is the answer related it also applies to what factors as reality. Literally to negate reality is a series of beliefs that should be aimed to reduce impartial grounds of reasoning. That is the basis of all things being equal limited to subjectivity. This subjectivity can only consist of matter in place of reality. Therefore, reality is altered as a condition of beliefs. ( This condition sets the type of precedent one belief has on any thing other. )

Conclusion: your self concept lives in a system programmed to manipulate you or alters the same outcome. Each outcome is the experience you yourself have trapped inside that vortex. How do you get out of the vacuum to reset your world view.

================

----------------------------

================

This passage explores how perception, belief systems, and social conditioning construct what an individual experiences as "reality."

Here is a breakdown of the core argument, its philosophical roots, and practical answers to the concluding question.

---

Core Interpretation

1. Reality as an Emergent, Subjective Construction

   • The text begins by bypassing purely mechanistic ("how") or teleological ("why") questions to ask what constitutes reality at its foundation.
   • While reality appears arbitrary on the surface, the author argues it is governed by an interacting web of subjective beliefs. Because these interactions are complex, non-linear, and semi-predictable, they mirror chaos theory—small changes in belief lead to wildly divergent perceived realities.

2. Intersubjectivity and Social Mirroring

   • Pure subjectivity is inherently isolated. The text notes that individual subjectivity gains traction only when it interfaces with the minds of others ("how close will my subjectivity run as a reversal in the minds of others").
   • We infer the world and seek to be inferred by others. Shared belief systems end up replacing objective, impartial truth with a collective, negotiated version of reality.

3. Belief as the Active Modifier ("What Alters Reality")

   • The passage concludes that what alters reality is belief itself. Belief is not merely an opinion about the world; it acts as an operative filter that dictates what matter and events mean to the observer.
   • If your beliefs determine your reality, then a conditioned or manipulated self-concept traps you in a closed feedback loop—a "vortex" or "vacuum" where your expectations continuously recreate and confirm the same limited outcomes.

---

Breaking the Vacuum: How to Reset Your Worldview

The passage finishes with an epistemological crisis: If your self-concept is trapped in a conditioned loop, how do you escape?

1. Radical Epistemic Deconstruction (Descartes & Pyrrhonism)

• Suspend certainty: Systematically identify core axioms you treat as absolute truths (about status, worth, capability, or morality) and ask: Where did this belief originate? Is it objectively true, or merely inherited?
• Recognize the observer effect: You are not the trapped observer inside the vortex; you are the awareness observing both the vortex and the beliefs feeding it.

2. Disrupting the Feedback Loops (Cognitive & Behavioral)

• Change the inputs: A conditioned mind reinforces itself using familiar environments, routines, and peer validations. Expose yourself to drastically divergent perspectives, disciplines, and cultures to break the intersubjective mirror you normally rely on.
• Falsification testing: Deliberately act in opposition to ingrained assumptions. Experiencing unexpected outcomes forces the neural and conceptual model to update.

3. Shift from "Content of Mind" to Somatic / Raw Phenomenological Awareness

• The vacuum described is primarily cognitive—a labyrinth of language, narratives, and social programming.
• Grounding attention in immediate physical sensation, breath, and unmediated sensory perception (phenomenological reduction) allows you to experience "matter" before the mind projects its layers of conditioned interpretation onto it.

October 7th 2010

 Dear lord; for all the unrest you lay upon me, I want to make one thing very clear, that you possess my unrest so that I may only recognize those with true vulnerability. - Marco

====================

This statement reflects a profound sense of existential vulnerability, spiritual surrender, and alienation from the surrounding human world.

Here is an interpretation of its core themes:

---

1. Surrender to Faith Amid Total Uncertainty

"I have no idea what's going to keep me safe; other than a belief in my god."

• Loss of tangible security: The speaker feels that conventional, worldly means of safety—institutions, other people, physical caution, or predictable systems—offer no genuine protection or guarantee.
• Faith as an anchor: When every external safeguard feels illusory or stripped away, an inward, personal belief in the divine becomes the singular foundation left to lean on. It conveys both a desperate reliance and a deep, radical surrender.

---

2. The Overwhelming Noise of Human Society

"Nature seems to get outdone beside everybody else."

This line carries a poetic, double-layered meaning depending on how you view "nature":

• External nature (the natural order vs. human excess): The stillness, simplicity, and truth of the natural world are constantly drowned out or eclipsed by human artifice, frantic striving, ego, and collective madness ("everybody else"). Society moves at a pace and intensity that makes organic, grounded reality feel overshadowed or obsolete.
• Human nature / Inherent goodness: "Nature" can also mean the organic, innate balance of being human. Beside the performative, aggressive, or chaotic ways people behave around them, simple human nature feels completely overridden and sidelined.

---

Key Takeaway

The speaker feels deeply out of place in a human environment that feels overwhelming, artificial, or threatening. Finding no safety in people or societal structures, and watching what is natural get overpowered by human vanity and chaos, they retreat into the only protection that still feels real: a solitary, spiritual faith.

Krishnamurti on the universe untold

 

Psalms 112:5

 

Marco's thesis

 

The nature of (a) greed is simple, you are not celebrated a (b) reason unless you (c) trap the world around you. It is my afforded nature as an artist to be less than kind. I will not sell out my genius turning out to apathy. Fuck discrimination of the rat kingdom. I rather be a peasant without a weapon, then a bank without a cause.

1- Bonded is my heart to the sweet serenity of

2- newly offered freedom

3- against those that whisper false hope into my breathing.

You see: my genius takes talent, only because my breathing is an art which should the air be insured, everyone else would openly practice without even having to participate. I am talking about an aversion to those that cannot meditate through learning about themselves. As Plato suggested, who am I.

I always ask myself, that which are making the rules as opposed to that which are following them.

I choose to live in a world that includes my own human sacrifice. if we all chose to live in a culture of monetary warfare, capitalist aims, what kind of world are we "not" living in.

If you do not believe you can change the world, then what the hell are you doing here.

"...breathing is an art which should the air be insured, everyone else would openly practice without even having to participate." (MA2012) - I value myself most in a world, that I myself - myself imagine it to be, without irreputable cynicism.

" As Plato suggested, who am I." Actually I am inverting the fact, that Socrates came up with the original question, from which Plato himself rejected. I am proving Plato's refusal replaced.

^Socrates human sacrifice, Plato negated.

^We would live in a radically different world, if Plato's theory of the good life were exposed as fraudulent against societies better Socratic method in reasoning truth.

====================

===================

===================

This text is an intensely poetic, combative reflection on artistic integrity, anti-capitalism, and classical philosophy. It captures the author (Marco) asserting his identity as an uncompromising outsider who refuses to conform to social and economic expectations.

Here is an interpretation of the core themes, philosophical ideas, and psychological framework within the passage:

---

1. Rejection of Commercialism and the "Rat Kingdom"

• Greed as a Trap: Marco opens with a critique of capitalist incentives: "The nature of greed is simple, you are not celebrated a reason unless you trap the world around you." In his view, mainstream success requires exploiting others or commodifying oneself.
• The Noble Outcast: Lines like "Fuck discrimination of the rat kingdom" and "I rather be a peasant without a weapon, then a bank without a cause" highlight an embrace of poverty or marginalization over moral corruption. He would rather have no institutional power ("a peasant without a weapon") than possess power devoid of purpose or soul ("a bank without a cause").
• Artistic Defiance: Marco grants himself permission to be "less than kind" because he views politeness or pleasant compliance as a trap that leads to "apathy" and selling out his creative gifts.

---

2. The Metaphor of "Breathing as an Art"

• Inherent Value vs. Commodification: Marco writes: "my breathing is an art which should the air be insured, everyone else would openly practice without even having to participate."
• This is an allegory for fundamental human essence. Breathing is involuntary, free, and vital. He suggests that society only values things once they are enclosed, transactional, or financialized ("insured").
• For Marco, his existence and consciousness are art in their purest, uncommodified state. He expresses contempt for people who lack the capacity for self-reflection ("an aversion to those that cannot meditate through learning about themselves").

---

3. Socrates vs. Plato: The Martyr of Truth vs. The Institutionalist

In the second half, Marco pivots to classical philosophy, setting up a sharp contrast between Socrates and Plato:

• Socrates as the Ideal (Martyrdom for Truth): Marco identifies with Socrates, who famously practiced direct, disruptive self-examination ("Know thyself") and accepted execution ("human sacrifice") by the Athenian state rather than recant his principles or compromise his truth.
• Plato as the Architect of Social Hierarchy: Marco critiques Plato, implying that Plato’s structured vision of society (the Republic, rule by philosopher-kings) sanitized or codified what was originally a raw, individual quest for truth. Marco claims he is exposing Plato's vision as an intellectual trap ("fraudulent") that replaced the living, questioning Socratic method with rigid institutional theory.
• Questioning Authority: This ties directly to his personal inquiry: "I always ask myself, that which are making the rules as opposed to that which are following them." He aligns himself with the rule-breakers and questioners, not the architects or followers.

---

4. Psychological Undercurrents

• Willingness to Suffer for Conviction: A consistent motif across Marco's writings is the acceptance of personal sacrifice ("I choose to live in a world that includes my own human sacrifice"). He sees suffering and alienation not as failures, but as the inevitable price of refusing to participate in a spiritually bankrupt culture.
• Mission-Driven Urgency: "If you do not believe you can change the world, then what the hell are you doing here." This rhetorical challenge reveals a worldview where life is justified only through radical, world-altering purpose. Anything less feels intolerable or meaningless to him.

---

Summary

The passage is a declaration of intellectual and artistic defiance. Marco positions himself as a modern Socratic figure: choosing alienation, moral purity, and personal sacrifice over the material compromises of the "rat kingdom," while challenging institutional orthodoxies that seek to tame the raw pursuit of truth.