Do you think love is something you can write about?⁠

⁠
K: No, no. You can write it but if there is no feeling there, if your heart is not... has no love, how can you talk about it? You may, a poet like Keats may have had this feeling, I don't know. But I am saying there is no intelligence without love. And there cannot be love if you are ambitious, if there is conflict in you. And love is not the movement of thought. The picture it creates is not love. So love means the freedom from all conflict. It is not a negative state, but through negation you come to the positive. And when there is that love there is that intelligence, which is compassion. That intelligence is completely secure, that intelligence is security. But to come to that, one has to meditate - not all this silly stuff, moneymaking business - but one has to be very, very serious about all this, this isn't a passing thing for one day and then pick up another thing the next day. One has to... This is one's life. If one doesn't understand one's life, how can you have intelligence, how can there be love and so on?⁠
⁠
⁠
J. Krishnamurti⁠
Interview San Francisco, California, USA - 28 April 1983⁠

Curiosity

When the use of unliteral force (i.e. intimidation) if for no real unconscious nor ostensible reason or intent is unjustly committed. The use of equal force to combat it becomes a necessity.

I don't make the rules based on another's independence. (I say this because I would rather be able to recognize it than not.)

When I use the word 'combat' it is to accentuate how intelligence plays part, disarming what is it that acts in the reality of a seemingly dire situation 'if' called upon.

The reality: What we are witness to in the US is demoralizing.

Unless, you have a use of coping mechanisms in place, Our collective humanity is at stake unless for it to end in Christo-fascism. We need to tip-toe our way around what is fear based of one's enemy.

The enemy = is obviously far too comfortable playing god.

(Hint: fear). Fear is equal to weakness in disarming who plays god. This is the ultimate question to all political discourse.

The issue being anti-woke as to identify the main cause. (Fear based reality.) This follows in asking yourself: how can you afford not to be silent. If your political behavior depends on your fear of god. The fear of god if it depends on your freedom, can only be equal to how we behave politically.

What must not happen (but does happen) is the weaponization of our ideas. We must fight to counter ourselves against the god complex. This has nothing to do with facts, because propaganda does not rely on factually given evidence. (It never has - empirically). Therefore, on a non-empirical level what We must look at is in our pride as individuals and turn the page on a god complex that is no more ancient than rules - as rules are only made to be broken. Recording our history in place of how things should happen (present tense), although not because it is as they've happened (past tense). God does not act as a mortal in our lives. How does this frame of thinking work in place of god? This comes in asking ourselves. = Acting is god's way of stating what we must do, only if we ask what is it we must face to act as mortals. What does this prove politically if not policing ourselves? It is nature. Our view of nature in things as much as ourselves.

Conclusion:

We should always ask: If we are being coerced to believe what we should as we should. Rewind to the beginning, on this basis :: who plays god. The aim is our humanity on a secular level. In ourself = Not gods functioning (e.g. what is god). To act = not what fear in god we possess (i.e. omnipotence) however, in the name of god all are made to be mortals and must remove the mask of those that refuse to be made mortals. We must not fear our power in the face of corruption. This would make an omniscient view for our future, that in time our psychological manner of thinking, would not subvert politics in place of mortals who possess a god complex.

Think of it: who in their right mind, 'deserves' independence. Independence if not equal. Can it be independence?

- Marco

 November 30, 2012

 

It’s better to be yourself and have no friends, than it is to be like your friends and have no self. - Marco

===========

If there can be one thing in such a description that turns over - everything on its head, is the deepening value of freedom, before it becomes a disabled (shielded) concern. - Marco

"those who love you are not fooled by mistakes you have made or dark images you hold about yourself. they remember your beauty when you feel ugly; your wholeness when you are broken; your innocence when you feel guilty; and your purpose when you are confused." - african saying

==============

(Tautology) 1- Fantasy is Obsession 2- Tolerance (abuse & its victimization) 3- (behavior) impetus of importance

August 22, 2013 

The 3 main aspects in the title are essential generalizations: that fantasy is in fact a repitition of ourselves, that the threshold we carry informs our idea of what is acceptable or not, behavior is learned as an unconscious device that is automatic in response.

 

"Three grand essentials to happiness in this life are something to do, something to love, and something to hope for." - Joseph Addison"

 

 

Why is it that people trying to hang onto the most superficial reality they can think of, and pass off as your everyday normalized morality. You are only typical, this makes you another over the top conformist, having played hurt the moment something challenges you.

========

I hate it why people play pretend (fake their way through life) their main motif is in attracting you, even though they do not care about you.

========

I have learned a far greater mystery that liberates you: it is to mistake others with a rational understanding of your beliefs.

========

I can hardly believe people fail to think about what is happening with what actually happens. It boggles my mind, spirit, & numbs the body.

========

Sometimes when I am accused of making a mistake, it is precisely because of the fact, I was never wrong to begin with.

========

Re; corruption / The very act of defiance is not an irrational one, it is based on the correction of human error.

========

Empty threats are promises made that the other cannot keep.

========

Problems do not come with assumptions, they begin with false ideals of importance, and the attention to have accepted its reasoning.

========

Sentiments are unrelated to religious beliefs. There is no such cause re; religion - it is either manmade or not.

========

Understanding what is - is far greater than an apology not knowing what for.

========

 https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1A7zbF6Zmn/

Foucault was a political style philosopher along side Marx, who radicalized original themes of philosophy to something offering a more deeper analytical look. This takes subconscious effort to refine our personal views into ethical outcomes that should we exist in real time. Our inherent need to articulate thought in action. That and that only... is practical in its application in how radically we apply or challenge ideological-function into actual being.

- Marco

Necessity by design

 I keep getting older. . . 

but nothing ever changes.

When I was younger,

everything stayed the same.

(Which one was better.)

It's a predicament of genius.

Taking the Vertical

 November 28, 2010

 

I'm not quite sure, but which is worth more. . . tireless effort, pure fatigue, or unstoppable love. What answer I came to, is how utterly unrecognizable they actually are in this life.

 

Probably - probably because I care about the lifeless few who get no reward from it.  That is not me, or how I am going to live my life.

Quiet Eyes

 

 

There is no truth to that question; then what if my ability to dream is all that mattered in life.

To believe in those words as I do. They represent what dreams are made of. My ability to dream, supersedes all things. I am talking about my transparency to the world as a acquisition of skill and a possession of undying love.

- Marco

a supposition to the nature of language

 November 27, 2012

God makes up consciousness as if a door so beautiful that once you open it, its contents reveal every memory known to you.

If what those causes represent are in order, from the first time you ever had a dream life, what would that cause be, what would it look like, how would you feel it present in you.
Now think about how all this relates to your failing concerns.

The answer is it is impossible to resist.

============

Disclaimer:

I have to promote the following as some of the most ingenious things I have ever produced into language.

============

If you truly think about it, why are we not known in particular to god, serving gods own memory, as we manipulate everything we do as if stored in function of gods brain, then we were to lie about all of its happening. How does memory react to such a CAUSAL NATURE. What if everything in the universe is only governed based on gods memory, as we act as surfers to his causes - how do we possibly know.

If memory serves me as a cause of life, therefore then life came first (memory came before that.). How would god possibly represent our image if life was caused before memory could occur. That only if memory were caused before life, what becomes true of the origin of time and space.

So think about the circle you are in. The one you grew enough strength to change its shape, it still became a circle no matter how hard you try to disfigure it. What if the circle became perfect on its own, that nothing could ruin it - not even god. Did you invent that circle, was it already created for you, or is it simply an object invisible to the eye, you let the secret live within you. You see all the people passing, that you thought cared, but they did nothing to earn nor deserve such immediate affection. What happened to that circle, if you were to cry, filled it with tears.

I have had people judge me based on my inconsequential behavior, my job, my humanity, but I judge them right back again. There is nothing wrong with pursuing my talents on facebook, if I earned it. I use it as a publishing tool to promote my writing, my ideas, and thoughts that can change the world we live.

People want to watch me slip, fall and hurt myself. That is a wish I do not plan on keeping them. If I trip, it will be because I injured my pride in doing so, just so you get it. That is to show people I know, that think they know me, are not true fighters of a cause. The moral of my story in the circle is that, because I created a reality to cause things of a human nature, everyone else could have followed did not. There are no rules or instruction, it was simply a cause, my memory is made to serve a divine cause. A source that people that fail to draw a circular vision to, they traveled upward not looking to see what is left behind.

=============

When I define memories, I wonder the talent or skill people have to do it, I do this unconsciously, subconsciously I know most people are unaware of that potential.

How did this become knowledge, my purpose is to cause myself to function based on an unwritten program, other than the ones that (in this case gods shadows) out grew.

And as I write this, my concern is for a tolerable audience that can see make-believe is the art of truth. What that cause is - is my game of memory. What moves demonstrate my causes, what memory causes my belief in god to be something qualitative or exponential in values. This is the same idea god has of me, if my memory were a cause meant to serve its superfluous state of a meaningful substance.

-------------------------

A very short but truthfully meaningful poem.

===========

In Retro as in Art

The 1990's were sacred to me.

That I imagine a not so secret doorway to heaven was made in the 90's.

Did we miss it.

Not that likely.

We just saw it in passing.

==========

I guess writing that prose has no real form to its poetic level of inquiry. But if I could pretend that is what the 90's signified through minimal detail, and only though my private life without divulging its importance, that is what the 90's truly signify. So much has changed for me since that time, it is an impressionable setting of impartial quality. A lot of things happened in the 90's that to me are meaningful. So I make a point of it, here.

-----------------------

The true mystery of gods memory were wiped out, and he said which one of us created all of this, he denied knowing it. None of it happened. Would that be a cause of infinite freedom, of true vulnerability, of unsequestered variety.

=============

se·ques·ter - /səˈkwestər/

Verb:

1. Isolate or hide away (someone or something)

To (i.e. Unsequester) is something coherent to humanity of the all. Therefore, not "hidden".

==============

In the 90's if Yitzak Rabin was not assassinated, we would not see the holocaust that is happening today due to Palestinian uprising.

Sensing danger or the intensive nature of behavior :: disorder :: critical eye

 So basically, to be somebody that makes other people feel like they matter. Now put into another context... how do you make someone powerless in life feel like they can change the world, if not, we are talking about how to make others believe they are worthy of your time. That is acting (as well as rejection) in a nutshell. The intricacies or inner life of people is what captures us. But when in auditioning, these ideals are the last thing everyone dictates. Let's face it. There are people in life that don't care no matter how hard it is you try to convince them of your self worth. I hit the reset button over until the right feeling comes along. I sit with it. It is the only way to test my will in place of others that can't see how humanity works on a personal level. It has absolutely nothing to do with anything other than one's pure uninhibited self. = To believe in myself. Ultimately it's the only thing that matters.

- Marco 🍁

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DRkWE1Nj_km/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link&igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==

 So if a man act as a human being, such as myself, am I not seen to be effeminate? I understand the double standard she brings to attention. However, I can't help but wonder if she is stating women are superior. In my opinion, acting human means I am in touch with my feminine side. Men are characteristic of being dominant as oppossd to submissive which can lead me to believe in falsely stereotyping males. Males that behave according to stereotype are trapped as well.

 - Marco

 

 November 26, 2013

I am a lassez-faire brand of economic theory. I call myself crazy as result.

“When you are living at a survival level, barely able to pay your bills, do not feel that you are a failure. This is simply the way you have chosen to learn many important lessons and experience the essence of who you are. You may be growing rapidly from this experience. You may be learning that you deserve to have abundance by experiencing the lack of what you want. Perhaps you are discovering how little it takes to live on, realizing you are not as dependent on having things as you thought. Perhaps you are learning that you can be generous even when you have very little. You might be learning the higher qualities of trust, compassion, and humility. You may be looking at what is important in your life, sorting through what is meaningful and essential to you and what is not. You might be learning how to let others give to you, or how to feel powerful without money. When you understand, embrace, and accept the lessons, you will no longer need this experience.”

“When you have very little money, you are learning many lessons that will make it easier to handle money when it comes. To break through this level, you may need to keep your life simple and uncomplicated in terms of money, expenses, demands, and needs. Think of yourself as the rosebush that is cut back in the winter so that it can grow strong in the spring. Use this time to get in touch with basic needs and eliminate the things that do not serve you.”

- Creating Money: Attracting Abundance (Orin and DaBen)

My opinion re; capital punishment

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/world/tennessee-death-row-inmate-declines-to-choose-between-the-electric-chair-and-lethal-injection/ar-AA1QaQDy?ocid=socialshare#comments

This point I am going to make sits with my unpopular opinion only; being - that in this day and age the way we still have death as a means to sacrifice those which committed heinous crimes, along with prohibitive actions, applies the revenge society places on them.  In my mind: Remorse should equal guilt.  I do not want blood but that the victims who died in vain are not being honored by killing the same person that did them in.

In proper language, not psycho-semantics, this dialed in society that is attached to revenge. . .  should be more diplomatic and forgiving.  Instead, we seek justice through torture as practice?  The irony.  (Strangely enough it is not that we award fate to criminals getting away with murder.)  It is that predictable behavior is not what we deserve, no matter due process for wrong-doing, there is no justice served for wanting an execution style society. What filters through? We must rise above capital punishment. We are better to believe the guilt of those that acted cruel to sentient beings are not rewarded by penalty we cannot be saved by.  Salvation over revenge is my conclusion.  As much as it hurts us to believe.  I don't get pleasure seeing others suffer.  

Let the confession of guilt - without which remorse we choose cruelty toward an end that involves our poor use of revenge.  The result is more compassion than superiority over our neurotic, primitive need that capital punishment is our hope to salvation in each other.  To harm another sentient being is a striking tragedy in itself which should not trigger other outcomes above all others, which means we can lead in light of not corrupting ourselves.  

Reality acting in chaos

 So what do I love deeply, if it is merely kept a secret. That is the answer to my dreams.

I know plenty of people my age that justify their existence on the same faulty premise of greed, then expect me to accept such change is 'lifestyle choice' when it really is a corporate class mentality. The same people I use to know alienate me today I am no longer friends with. > @PeopleUDontNeed: Corporate ambitious people, they destroy their human ideals in order to achieve success in the corporate sphere.

November 25, 2012 

I dare say: have I not aimed at that in jest. Is which I believe Oscar Wilde is truly contemplating. That we live in a world where if the role were reversed, to be honest about it. Millionaires fling their noses to the air in pursuit of monetary gains. They twist their fate, as if its fascination relies on their dollars rather then the amount of sense and sensibility to truth, they do not own. They fail at life's rigor mortis. Money is not to do with commonality. Which is the main reason Obama wants to tax the rich instead of its traditional role of seek and destroy. The rank and file of a military strategist, is that all of their freedom is taken from its cause then stripped of itself. A millionaires inability is not much worse. Think about it, how do we maintain a status quo if the most unfamiliar person you once knew, suddenly changed its idea of life, to something of a counterfeit operation. Is that not the black market we are exporting to. We treat economics the same way we treat our trades between nations. What about, a reality unearthed worth more than that. Oscar Wilde is commenting on a living metaphorical assumption, that what we are trained to become, not require fascination, because if it did, Millionaires would cease to exist. The question is are they as real as life gives us credit to. - Marco

"It is better to have a permanent income than to be fascinating."

-- "The Model Millionaire" (1912), by Oscar Wilde

=============

In having thought about myself as a millionaire, Wilde is portraying the idea that ambitious metaphor of every persons wealth, if they realize how exuberant and exaggerated it really is, we are truly blind to things which are in fact fascinating.

"They twist their fate, as if its fascination relies on their dollars rather then the amount of sense and sensibility to truth, they do not own. They fail at life's rigor mortis." (MA2012)

An idea is something millionaire cannot own sense and sensibility over, and put a proper value on. As in "rigor mortis" is how a man leads his life without its secret of truly living. We have no concept of what true fascination has, can become. Instead, we fail to cause ourselves as millionaires within reality, because our inability of that purpose is dead to us.

- Marco

-------------------------------

November 25, 2013

I subscribe to this theory whole heartedly. Reform is nothing but a covert operation to procure disease as a class conscious individual scientific in its recourse, dishonorable, and alienating. I am voting for Justin Trudeau as result. > @Anti_Reform: Reform is designed to release political tensions by feeding empty hope to the masses.

November 25, 2013 

Knowledge is another way of informing the mind that rationality does not involve rhetorical excuses for what the truth actually entails. - Marco