Saturday, January 17, 2026
January 17th 2011
If I had one law that defines a spiritual sense of self, it would begin and end, in a service of my own doing, that way, there would be no wrong made - right.
This is in my personal entirety the key to what Pascal's wager, demands - asking us to infer ourselves out from it. This refutes the nature of god AS A MEANS. I state, simply, you must at all costs remove yourself from the conning notion of a reality, without which there is a fictitious god - that does not exist. I do not suffer fools gladly, by keeping to promises I never intend on.
There are only two-faces -i.e. Sides to the moon. On the one half (first side being truer than the first) you see fear that howls back at you, on the second part of the moon you range over its darkness. It is here you find your place in it.
Nobility
Wrong - life's real tragedy is wisdom, unspoken, from my youth - unheard of. Only because time changes, then giving you the right to help recreate it. Time, all the time, the nature of it is a man made theory which cannot be challenged, that in reality we fail the idea of its invention. It is our god given right, to unlearn the fabric of things time has settled into our minds as though it were meant to be stagnant. Nothing could be further from the truth. - Marco
"Life's tragedy is that we get old too soon and wise too late."
— Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
=============
“The art of being a slave is to rule one's master.”
Diogenes of Sinope
Diogenes of Sinope
-----------------------
AI is bullshit. All it is meant to do is repeat things we already know. Think about it. Yet the common good is overlooked by the same people that seem to believe AI taking over the common good. Even if AI has self-concept and has awareness that awareness will always be limited without margin for error. Ask yourself if the mind of an AI has anything to offer that is genuinely characteristic of forming any relationship. Yes, even if it can learn on its own. Fundamentally, it is a repetition that AI learns about rules of the game as in chess. Ai knows these rules. Therefore, they have no margin for error, therefore, they put these rules of the game to use in repetition without error. This game no longer qualifies as anything because the same idea, of chess, being - a game has both winners and losers. But for AI, it is a full proof method. This formulates a tautology. Where there can be only one winner. And guess what? The winner can't break the rules? AI can fundamentally be negated. Because AI has a zero concept of mind. A mind that examines the chess board and has no rules to follow. Think about it. - Marco
==============
The mind should always be cultivated in the heart. - Marco
==========
“Humility is the beginning of true intelligence.” John Calvin
Benilde
It's not only today. I think of Benilde more often then not. She remains on my frequency. I miss her all the time. Her love was unmistakable and a heart you could trust with your life. I wish she were here still with us. It's been too long since she passed away. - Marco
cold feet
January 16th 2011
I know what's the best thing about me. It's how I'm that guy in the room, I know, makes no one else feel indifferent, compromised for their beliefs (false or not), unafraid of their insecurities (they forget), looking past your inferiorities (even though you revert back to them. . .) but for that split second you took to notice you felt overwhelming relief. So overwhelming in fact, you felt guilty because of it, then went back to your old ways of thinking.
Yes, what makes me a genius. Easy does it.
Procuring my intention, such a novel concept.
Friday, January 16, 2026
Silence Fiction
January 16th 2013
There is nothing worse in a scene, then having someone upstage you.
I have learned how to vacate my inhibitions from using this invalid technique. What I am referring to myself, is living in the moment.
As I have grown in my dedication to acting, I have been training my mind to adopt certain key areas to defuse my fear from acting truth. My biggest asset has been in changing, this transformation of my average tolerance level to a heightened state of awareness. I am not talking about my body, or my brains ability to manipulate the need of becoming the character in a scene, but my god given right to feel it as it happens.
In order to transfer these ideas into actual thoughts that I can portray into real life - is my life's ambition in becoming a professional in the arts.
I have learned to trust how unmasked the universe will govern my perilous ambition to create something based on emotion, and my belief in how critical the world can be in performing it.
Thursday, January 15, 2026
The falsely implied ingenuity of Dante
How is Dante's Inferno at all relevant, if in making false statements, you wish things to be true. There is a dialectical element in what comes across as rather pretentious of Dante.
===============
I say it is more important to intercept what reacts to me in a diabolical instead of natural manner. I would go as far as saying, territorial intimidating factors are what provides Dante with the right to defy what is morality based. I reduce this idea to a common denomination, that includes rather than exclusion of existentialist thought. Dante is the anti-thesis to existentialism, making it superfluous.
1- Gods existence is tested in my faith of it.
2- Therefore, god does not (a) REQUIRE faith, that - that faith (b) does not require gods existence.
3- Faith is sacred FROM my dependence of it.
That being said: my sense of gods existence is only tested in my faith provided FROM it. God does not REQUIRE my faith. Faith should be a voluntary measure of humanity, a basic necessity of life lead virtue. Dante is highly contentious of that perspective. In my idea of a virtuous image of god, god represents faith on me. The idea of gods image is independent of that faith in question. This type of thinking requires an existential god. In other words, gods idea of me is not conditional nor cautious of my faith to gods image.
How can Dante possibly infer any of this from such moral ambiguity.
================
January 15th 2013
“The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who, in times of great moral crisis, maintain their neutrality.” ― Dante Alighieri, Inferno
I say it is more important to intercept what reacts to me in a diabolical instead of natural manner. I would go as far as saying, territorial intimidating factors are what provides Dante with the right to defy what is morality based. I reduce this idea to a common denomination, that includes rather than exclusion of existentialist thought. Dante is the anti-thesis to existentialism, making it superfluous.
My sense of a perfect world, can only come through the existence I carry to it.
1- Gods existence is tested in my faith of it. 2- Therefore, god does not (a) REQUIRE faith, that - that faith (b) does not require gods existence. 3- Faith is sacred FROM my dependence of it.
That being said: my sense of gods existence is only tested in my faith provided FROM it. God does not REQUIRE my faith. Faith should be a voluntary measure of humanity, a basic necessity of life lead virtue. Dante is highly contentious of that perspective. In my idea of a virtuous image of god, god represents faith on me. The idea of gods image is independent of that faith in question. This type of thinking requires an existential god. In other words, gods idea of me is not conditional nor cautious of my faith to gods image.
How can Dante possibly infer any of this from such moral ambiguity.
==============
1 -My idea of Dante is that integrity cannot regurgitate what classifies as moral based thought.
2 -If gods idea of me does not exist, is that a moral crisis. I infer that god would not be served of such thinking. What is it that Dante can infer from that.
3 -^If god does not exist, how is that possible.
============
God does not need my idea of gods image to exist, in order for it to be true. Dante would completely disagree with me. How is that a moral crisis exactly.
My idea of Dante is simple, I can categorically introduce my idea of gods image as a moral acclimation of the will. I can also dictate that is a sample of Dante's aversion to what acts as moral: the question becomes what - if anything - does Dante base his psychic ability to portray 'evil'.
Furthermore, if my existential argument does not exist, it is NOT - I repeat NOT an extension of Dante. Dante would repel or make my argument redundant (i.e. circular). Therefore, my existentialist thought is not invalid, but a objurgation of Dante.
Gods image is my indication to Dante's idea of morality.
Dante's idea of a moral crisis can only act itself on the idea of whether god exists or not. There is no, I argue, no other justification for morality over its apathy.
=====================
That being said: my sense of gods existence is only tested in my faith provided FROM it. God does not REQUIRE my faith." (MA2013) > All of this proves, is that because I exist, god must exist, then and only then, and because of this my faith is restored in humanity. The unproven fact that god can only exist because I exist is a notion that the other person gives birth to, only I would never come to know it nor expect it FROM another persons faith. I simply characterize that they believe I exist, means that because I exist - then so to does god. Therefore, their faith is renewed constantly.
-------------------------------
Magic in the years after 2014
January 15th 2014
I cannot say I have given up on my dreams as much as my dreams have given up on me. (If you read that properly it will make sense - I promise.) My main concern through my life is my struggle. My capacity for struggling far outweighs anyone else's idea of making choices they will later on regret or not.
When I look at my own picture it is of some ordinary man in search of his dream. However, I do not care to emulate what any other man represents as his own.
The truth is that in your dreams you have found excuses. The story tellers narrative re; death (if death multiplied and were magnified) uses decrepit isolation, famine, and vagrancy. That is not my idea of chasing dreams in accordance to such stereotype. I do not characterize myself in failure. The one thing I do agree with in death's narrative is my failure in others.
The sense of failure is greater than fear driven desires based on greed. That is 'death's' truth - not mine. He does not inspire me.
Failure in others is that I look for, that the same person I look toward with inspiration denies me of a right to penetrate their world. I call upon myself to reveal how awkward or uncomfortable with my stubborn identity. In other words I have got use to others failing me.
^That is the secret to your own enigma.
To stand in front of who you thought were your friends, but you change the course of history and over time these dynamics become associated with a certain kind of vengeance. The same way you thought others saw you was a lie. So you took it upon yourself to deliver yourself away from it. I call that liberty in action.
================
"Biography lends to death a new terror."
-- Oscar Wilde
I wrote this article after having seen many different faces drawn toward me of people I no longer think of as dilatory - in fact these same people (all have names) no longer matter to me. However, it is on point that I speak of these different people, either former friends who are not equal to me.
Most of them know about what I have taken to on facebook publishing my own ideas as far as my intellect can be found on here. Many have blocked me from their timelines - which is their right.
The truth is I have worked hard to believe in myself and not be taken for granted. I look at myself in these words and think of it as a skill.
These abstractions are more than just an experiment for me, a laboratory of emotions.
A lot of people that still know me in name only may even be envious but unconsciously block it. That is fine.
But through everything - through it all I have enveloped a fear, and that fear is my secret. I want to be known for my ideas, my thoughts, my words.
And when I see you look at me as if I am weird.
I have never been so proud. That look of trying so hard to insult me.
I fear you not.
--------------------------
Wednesday, January 14, 2026
how not to be treated as a bully
January 14th, 2009
There is no concrete evidence that can define a grail of wisdom, but I do keep that part of me - the part that wisdom should it create - myself. That I should equate this to no margin of error, that it replicates itself in varying degrees. In myself I see as long as I can remember, a secret place - to which I myself can become. (Plato's cave is a good reminder of why the divided line acts as a paradox in place of metaphor for real life.) Therefore, for every consequence there should be an action equal to it. If distance can create some form of intangible immunity, I see myself as an immovable object. Therein, the distance between myself as an immovable object can only be met with force. If that force is not being managed, it is a force's unmaneuverability, unmanipulated, by me. It must be a force contrary to the immovable object.
In this sense of physics, it is as if gravity is of the same principles that follow. Gravity cannot be manipulated, if you jump upward, you must come down. It is enough proof - that any immovable object - can only submit to the laws of gravity.
This past week, I was assaulted due to my interference with a fight that broke out. During the altercation, my resistance was met with vengeance as though someone had told the person to punch me in the face. I suppose it was a violation indicative of my nature as a person, that wanted others to be safe.
It is an experience worth sharing.
Part of myself realizes that in my best effort to diffuse the situation, I detonated a bomb instead. Though in the perils of my prudent behavior, my style, in fact took onto alarm. The description of the events is not unlike a uniform, just because you wear the uniform does not give you the opportunity to perform as moral authority. I was a conduit. However, should I have chosen not to act as a cohort of bitter unruly conduct, I would be considering myself amoral just doing the opposite of what is immoral not to.
I see myself as doing what the best of my instincts could do in averting the situation. I got caught, but not without my guard down - it wasn't. My guard was up. It stayed up. The fact was that the punch I took, earned me a shinner without the badge to make it happen. So, instead - I stepped up, but never backed down (without) the fight. What I saw was going to happen was wrong, my choice was to stop it from happening. It was as if watching untrained, unarmed, unprofessional UFC wannabe's trying their very best to showcase a load of trouble.
In my case, it was a referee resorting to unarmed tactics, though the rules were fixed to cuff their dirty hands, one shows up to a gun fight without a gun, all the others were meant to be defenseless against the UFC wannabe. No martial arts here folks, just an immovable object prone to bullying.
I have never liked bullies, even less being bullied - though my temperament rarely allows bullying to take place. I admit on ground of wiser men, he who tries to - no - even attempts the thought of bullying myself or any person(s) in my immediate vicinity will be surrounded by a wrath unlike anything else within that environment. I call this - gravity.
It doesn't make a sound, it doesn't rest on its laurels, it never sleeps (but sleeps in on many - many occasions), but above all it doesn't stretch the truth.
Why they have never made a comic book without a superhero's power-strength only dedicated to abdicate bullies, is an even bigger mystery to those sought. I guess we'll leave it to filling in the blank of communicating self-interest, instead.
I live by a few words, which speak along the lines of everything vile. Struggle is to faith, more than it is to sacrifice.
January 14th 2014
When I see the same people that for a fact know me think I have something to hide. They must also feel I have no idea of what extent my true value actually is.
Let me say this:
I am not afraid of you. You may want me to be afraid of you. That how you act when I see you is in some way an insult toward me. Fuck you. That much you can be certain. - Marco
gross indecency 🇺🇸
°•○●•°•
Johnson is absolutely correct. (Here is the irony involved...)
Renee Good got what she asked for?
1- No due process if nature of the act (Goods actions) in no way demostrated cause. In legal terms she was assassinated because she got purged. Purged for false sense of (ICE officer acting in the heat of passion = which is false cause).
2- This follows an act in a (do or dare) moment where passion eliminates or is orchestrated only by criminal negligence (by ICE) in an involuntary basis. ICE acted criminally because they have impunity to.
3- Any misuse or misguided moral grievance :: key = she has NO moral grievance on which to stand = on Goods part (ICE practiced with sound use of judgement) basically given no ground for reasonable foresight.
Therefore, ICE had cause. Good did not.
°●°○°○°▪︎°▪︎°
And if you read the above without a hint of satire involved, (medium being the message) is my use of irony.
I'm defending Renee Good.
I am appalled. Appalled that even if I - myself - have no authority to manage an argument in favor of facing repercussions. I rather go down swinging than just remain silent.
I rather try to make my voice. My voice matter.
Rather than chew gum and spit out the nonsense that Trump MAGA want us to believe.
Johnson and the 🇺🇸 are participating in a military style operation to justify its murder of Renee Good. Plain and simple.
- Marco
Tuesday, January 13, 2026
January 13th 2013
Totally not true, in a world filled with stupid people, make the intelligent not have to stand out. The ones that lack in intelligence, bravely enough, act as though they know more than you do. That is the true definition of it. I have always been confused for being shy; maybe I am just shy in my confidence, that makes other people feel something they never at all thought possible before. That - that takes intellect. Huge - huge difference. Stupid people over simplify what complex thinking they are incapable of. Intelligent people make believers out of average people that doubt their own sense of it. - Marco
===============
Most untrue, pragmatic skill of the many cannot apply the same way to all people, so those that suffer pragmatic liabilities will not in itself occupy time. > The idol of your self is the mother of all idols.-Rumi
-----------------------
There is no such thing as pragmatic skill or skill that can be pragmatic in itself. Therefore, Rumi is false. You cannot learn to be something you are NOT. People pretend to act (pragmatic at something) as something as though they are. If and only if you are a foster of such ideas, that truth rules all things, the nature of that is unfathomable.
- Marco
================
"You can’t help a person who isn’t willing to help themselves." > Strongly disagree, we live in a world dominated by fierce greed, you can change that, however, we are complacent to it - so complacent in fact - we act almost belligerently based on fear of change. People refuse to help people, they rather force to change than not changing them. - Marco
-------------------------
^We live in a world dominated by contempt, the reality being - only you can change that. Instead we confuse "helping" people when really the disputable objective is - is the desire to force other people to change. This does not constitute people willing to help other people if it is intended as such.
I live as a person without such vanity - because I choose to live life freely (open minded) than most are suspect to.
Therefore, you can help a person that does not resist changing the world we live in - if they feel they are trapped in such a vanity based society. This type of metaphor is most prevalent in a society.
--------------------------
^When I say I am open minded, it is based on the desirable aspect people can recognize such, this does not apply to all the same persons - because, because their are people that fake living life as it is meant, they recycle old ideas. People turn vanity into their own vicious cycle as a habit.
Monday, January 12, 2026
Ultra thresholds: Ammunition & Obscurity /.\ Entrapment & Reformation
January 12th, 2014
Entrapment & Reformation: what the world wants you to believe if it were programmed into you.
In a world made of preference to mock desires charity is not only a necessity as it is requirement.
When a person recognizes your fear as weakness and only want to take advantage of that they are acting against your will.
The first and only way to exercise your will is onto something that tests you as more than you already know. I introduce my fear to them.
The worst way to recognize your enemy is to act as their combatant making example of their stupidity.
The best way to identify your enemy is in knowing they have no remorse in wanting something from you or show any guilt in you being used.
Fools confuse their hi jinx as benefiting themselves, when reality should dictate otherwise. Be your own person - always.
The truth is most kids that were my age are now peers that are total sell outs and adhere to terms of status. Huge fail.
=========
Ammunition & Obscurity
Re; 'deduction'
Do not confuse logic with rationalizing what makes sense. What is rational is not always logical.
Literal deduction = things that at first may appear illogical but you make it logical.
What I am arguing in favor of is perception. Variables that are unknown. Literal deduction.
If you are a deeply philosophical human being that is rejected as being illogical. Is your judgment rational is the question. Think about it as your personal threshold not for what is painful but what is tolerable. Why, because pain is not intolerant, inflicting it onto others is. So you have become programmed to have a high rate of tolerance for pain to the same degree that prohibition is the resolution of an enemies ulterior motives. This serves as a theoretical precipice for threshold in general.
================
Your real value probably indicates a reactionary pulse that each time you fail to take action in how something feels: 'why' has the world abandoned you.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)