Hybrid Trials Of Faith Vs. Vanity (an anti-thesis)

November 21, 2012 
My weight has become a problem of rather elusive quality, that scientific proportion, between what I feel about my weight to how it dictate the world around me. I - myself have a personal view of the world; not that I feel the world is telling me how I should look or feel about it, that is my dilemma. I need to challenge all of that.

============

Just had a conversation with my sister, which involved me switching roles with Danny DeVito, as I compared my appearance to Arnold Schwarzenegger in a comedy of my predicament. It felt as though I was on an episode of The View, speaking to Elizabeth Hasselback, while playing the role of an American Jewish lady ready to wear her yoga pants for the first time. We text back and forth regarding my physical elements as if I was Sofia Petrillo on the Golden Girls, mocking Blanch Devereaux for her compulsive yet tastefully promiscuous sexual habits and eating cheese cake for breakfast.

============

My 'not' to do list:

- I will not give up Coca Cola. That would be like settling for Pepsi as a beverage.

- I will not cut out my indulgence for food that I like to eat, this includes A&W bacon & eggers.

- I will not limit my dietary condition to that of a poor man consuming formaldehyde.

- I rather not drink than be drunk off of coffee.

- My body weight is of nutritional value, foods I enjoy, I will not limit myself to emotional eating habits.

^Which ever of these are lies I will not honor.

So, pretty much all of it means I need to be truthfully aware in identifying the problem. That this is 1- no bacon & eggers 2- coffee is okay 3- starving myself is not an option 4- I can eat things I necessarily still want, not to avoid having.

==============

Faith in oneself only copies without trying, it is not up to me if I fail in admitting it.

^All this leads to, means that it is easiest to 1- self regulate how faith works, 2- unless I admit, that faith becomes a CAUSE. Can I make faith 3- (create an ambitious will) 4- in myself that delivers me from my contentious habits, 5- of not committing myself.

Is my cause true enough - what should require I stick to something that is more important than (faith) me failing at it. How do I know what is pertinent to understanding my self-image, without it being a form (my) self-vanity.

It is truly a mind bogging experience to measure if the truth in my ambition is (a) false (b) am I confusing my idea of weight with faith as (c) a duty to its real purpose. What is more important, my faith as I see it, or my false idea of weight being less than important.

=============

"Is my cause true enough - what should require I stick to something that is more important than (faith) me failing at it. How do I know what is pertinent to understanding my self-image, without it being a form of (my) self-vanity.

It is truly a mind bogging experience to measure if the truth in my ambition is (a) false (b) am I confusing my idea of weight with faith as (c) a duty to its real purpose. What is more important, my faith as I see it, or my false idea of weight being less than important." (MA2012)

I am truly in search of an answer to this dichotomy between faith vs. logic. Do I really feel the need to put my energy into something such as body mass, to meet my false idea of a status quo, which I feel does not benefit me.

============

" to measure if the truth in my ambition is (a) false (b) am I confusing my idea of weight with faith as (c) a duty to its real purpose. " (MA2012) Is losing weight a reality worth crediting/investing my most basic or supreme cause of faith. Do I really lack the faith necessary (to want) to be physically active.

============

I really see that people use their obsessive habits over self-image with a great deal of vanity. What does that help produce in self-value, self-worth, or self-thoughts. Honestly, I do not know what to think about this most imperfect dilemma.

===========

Is losing weight really a worthy cause. That is my question I put forth myself, as a deviant discord of my self-faith. Do I really believe that my weight is an issue.

===========

"Faith in oneself only copies without trying, it is not up to me if I fail in admitting it." (MA2012)

People might see your faith, but will rather than acknowledge it, negate your only purpose in that. That on the other hand, people rather than acknowledge your faith - will not do so - because it empowers you. They feel superficially threatened that if they were to cohort your faith as a person, they would be acting as an accomplice to your cause - control - purpose - not theirs. To effectually manipulate faith the easier its effort is stolen. (i.e. discontinued)

^Case in point, we experience cause in a society where faith becomes mainstream only as it becomes rejected. Inasmuch the same way science debates the existence of gods autonomy.

What is DECIDING its FAITH for you.

Alter Ego: posturing unending gravity

 November 21, 2012

 

{My personal endorsement to acting method.}

[The most overrated over hyped form of acting. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Method_acting]

===========

All of method acting - all of it is irrelevant today.

Here is the mentality as to why method acting is a cause of outdated nuance: these are principles in acting HABITS:

1- Learning the ultimate prize
2- Untrained obedience
3- Good undisciplined behavior
4- Irrational (absurd) thought processing
5- Not letting go

============

When I came to realize my own strength as an actor lay in my ability, it became clear to me, that my maturity complimented my audacity to the belief I could produce reality as a source of valid inspiration.

My first clue to this is now even clearer.

Right now I am seated on a couch. Everything around me is a reality I choose, because its all been ordained. I clean here. It is my job.

^That in of itself is the description of a future award winning actor, only nobody needs to know it yet - yet.

Although I am self described, what this also tells me is how I create a source of my own real nature, so it can be tested in a world gone blind of itself. That is how I measure the truth in all things.

For instance, the fact I work for my parents cleaning business is not a chore, it is in fact true. Now considering the source of that, a person of the same instance might belittle me. How do I know, because that is all part of this narrative. My purpose is to prove to myself, that other idea, though not my own - its purpose is to belittle me. Have they really done so successfully is my main point here.

If I am hurt, not physically, mentally or spiritually wounded as result of myself there is nature to that substance. The same substance that lives in my mind is part of my soul.

That is where all true acting takes place, the heart made of love, passion, stone.

Am I a person that can be conned into acting, the question is yes - is yes. How can a question come before its answer. There is truth in acting habits.

The properties of acting are all made through my self awareness of those properties:

1- Learning the ultimate prize: it came to my attention, that real artists, do not obscure their meaning. This is a property of virtue.
2- Untrained obedience: the disobedience of one mans responsibility. You learn how to provoke new causes.
3- Good undisciplined behavior: That because of yourself, everyone knows how much to expect of its cause.
4- Irrational (absurd) thought processing: if acting were a habit known to man, we would only begin in knowing how limits resist our true sense of the world. This follows...
5- Not letting go: That the belief you have is something worth examining.

===========

Case in point: try to intentionally provoke me as an actor, you simply cannot even try. That is where truth is made.

============

I have been curious of certain subjectivity, based on simple grounds of no intentional malice, people that have no conception of their moral apparatus whatsoever. What I mean using subjectivity as a divide, is the derivative of its concept: how two things converge into one depending on its acquisition 1- non-specific variables, but is 2- superlative. In other words 3- observable phenomena are facts conflicted such as laws 4- can only be observed. That type of phenomena which are not controlled, cannot be regulated, its finite properties cannot influence beyond measure. What is that, that we can create our own reality based phenomena.

"That type of phenomena which are not controlled, cannot be regulated, its finite properties cannot influence beyond measure. What is that, that we can create our own reality based phenomena." (MA2012)

When 2 stars collide, do you even have to wonder what made that even possible, it is a source beyond words. Is there an explanation (other than scientific) as to why in our solar system do these things happen. The same thing applies in consciousness.

The Untruthful Adoption Of Altruism

 November 21, 2012

This article is mistaken dichotomy, it is leaning against modern convention, stating that we should live without irony, when in fact irony has not been defined. the article brands irony as its misuse, that is not as apparent on the surface it brands us; irony takes skill, talent and above all is the measure of all things. http://m.facebook.com/home.php?refid=52

"This article is mistaken dichotomy, it is leaning against modern convention, stating that we should live without irony, when in fact irony has not been defined." (MA2012)

Re; irony

Irony is not meant to offend, its only offense is that its cause is unmitigated. People misuse irony and confuse it for sarcastic form of inequality. Its careful use, is the cause of ones appetite in favor of all things being equal. The so called "hipster" mentality is made to suffer its consequential nature, in fact, if the argument has been already made, I suggest, the hipster mentality is not that its irony is mistaken it is because irony cannot exist in its own demise. The hipster mentality is an anti-theoretical approach to substance irony can only be causing.

==========

Why and how is altruism shocking, while the right thing does not make people heroes of any wrong doing. Compassionate people make better enemies to some that will not feel it when it becomes necessary - that is what makes a hero heroic.

===========

Think about altruism in this way: 1- When in fact is the cause more important than its refusal. 2- If you say 'never', but always believe in what cause should represent of you, 3-that asks you to perform a duty of yourself.

There is no specific cause to its demand of you or I. That nature in reality is the true causal instinct we measure altruistically. When altruism is not existent, we measure reality just as falsely.

Some people should not be left wondering that there are causes which need to better reevaluate their understanding of humanity.

===========
Make a proposal (action) to someone you believe is not altruistic and see if you are wrong or right in that presupposing belief. That follows:

" (a) There is no specific cause to its demand of you or I. (b) That nature in reality is the true causal instinct (c) we measure altruistically.

When altruism is not existent, we measure reality just as falsely. " (MA2012)

Ask yourself: how do I react to things on average.

===========

"Some people should not be left wondering that there are causes which need to better reevaluate their understanding of humanity." (MA2012)

Truly think about it, when are you ALWAYS being altruistic, does that question not depend on others refusal. How do you or I know to realize our movement. That is an utilitarian perspective.

===========

Can you CAUSE altruism in people, that is what makes you become part of the human condition, unconditionally. Unconditional altruism is heroic in common sense approach to reason with its ultimate purpose.

============

Quite literally understand how altruism functions in everyday life, people are more blind to it then they are open. It is a crucial aspect of the human psyche, to differentiate its actuality.

 November 21, 2012

"People's strategies against the nature of my own self respect harbor a shallow grave, they back into a hollow volcano thinking it may or may not erupt, but my own force of nature is far much less explosive when the hot flow of lava runs dry, then merges with the earth. My energy leaves the volcano fueled with combustible heat, it is dormant which will not erupt, because I do not provoke it. Only the trained eye detects such whereabouts of endangering success, the failure of it." (MA2012)

The Proper Value Of Immaturity

 November 21, 2012

"Laughter is not at all a bad beginning for a friendship, and it is far the best ending for one."
-- Oscar Wilde

Not mistaken from an enemies stand point, the one that laughs last - laughs loudest becomes the victim.

Can you or can you not make the enemy reveal its intent as malicious to a cause, on the other hand, they believe they have the upper hand on you. They actually think you are the cause as their victim. In other words - they have failed at framing you. Can you identify such evil in false friendship, and let them have its reward: A misdemeanor. You have not caused them to be their own victim, you reveal that their only cause as is exposed of themselves. The evil in good standing substance is that laughs last, laughs loudest. There is the transformation of intent, to find the good in the lesser of two evils.

Are you or have you been the victim of a cause so ordinary, so impure, that yes they concealed their true identity all in favor of their wicked internalized hostility, without ever revealing themselves (as) you.

^God is good. God is good.