In so many ways - not so much in words can reveal just how the human condition rests on money, wealth and power, but to realize it serves in almost every turn from the minute you are born. To have half of what I can call my own might in fact make some sense - let me imagine this were true as long as I had a deposit down - then after some thoughtful analysis, I'd relinquish my monetary assets. What would I have accomplished is the kind of answer I would want myself to seek, however, sadly - one cannot imagine this type of self-examination. For everything I feel I'm capable of doing, my honest reference to it would be one of complete generosity. Consumption, self-absorption, or less of the things you find less interest in that cause for indulgence as one's impulse commands probably signify the need for such intolerable behavior within the world we live in. That in itself might be a powerful metaphor to look into, or worth looking out of even in spite of how we neglect ourselves in the same process. I find myself truly guilty of so many of these lies, yet, we're all born from it. What kind of person that makes me, I don't know, but what I do find is that because I face myself asking these same questions - the world around me might not be everything it appears. It's not the kind of instance one meets with danger, it is a remedy to help ease the surface of my own skin. A mind for the peace life has to offer. Something that I revive if the world were a safer place, my thoughts are in it.
It is a curious yet funny thing to me. I have never wished that I had more. I have never wished that someone had less than me. But I have always wished that someone had as much as me. That I think - is the one true aspect of my personality that makes me different from those who really see me as I see myself through others. It is what makes a difference with every person in my life.
Monday, December 08, 2025
bad hair days in captivity
Woke up
What is the point in looking away. None. Nothing stops what is going on in the world today if you don't care enough to be better aware of it. The lines being crossed in this day and age are to a degree that we no longer recognize ourselves.
What matters is the humanity we have in place, examining what is right vs what is wrong.
Can you see the difference involved, if we live in a world that if we were silenced without knowing we are being silenced? How do I know that? Why state such a thing.
The woke culture which has come in part (with the anti-woke movement) if this makes sense, speaks to irrationality for myself being woke. Therefore, if I am woke? = I am guilty of (being woke) as some form of crime. My point is that if we lose sight of ourselves being too sensitive to reason with the causes or intent it takes to look evil in the eye. We have already lost.
Where does my last point leave us? How - how, do we look evil in the eye. What if that (evil) suspends itself from your view, only enough to hide it from themselves. That is the definition of a psychopath, and these are unprecedented times that evil are taking positions of power in the political arena only to use it to the advantage of themselves. We are living in a time that the use of propaganda has replaced vision aligned with a fairer world view.
We need to be vigilant into how such sovereign actions, motives rooted in how we function toward each other (is my idea of sovereignty). I am trying to participate as an individual in society made up of many many other individuals we find for ourselves - put into practice. (i.e. Practice reading into the idea, conceptually being, we are responsible for our actions on similar levels.) Not fear based reality. I fear we are living in a time that the line is being blurred between what is right vs what is wrong.
- Marco
Random selection: thought of the day. "You have not caused them to be their own victim, you reveal that their only cause as is exposed of themselves." (MA2012)
I am speaking of intent as a cause. How do we picture our most intimate desires with those of cause as an intent, that to arouse us, a causal intent of the will can then act. How does intent look; how should cause respond. Why does the will react outwardly or internally as in our nature.
Saturday, December 06, 2025
the jordan river
When people confuse being outspoken, either by their actions or otherwise in speech, which would only surmount to senseless bigotry? This being the craziest thing I can think of - is a matter of habit - where (in my mind, anyway. . .) tells me. It is a question of I have no answer to provide, myself, without the answer. (Not that there is any answer necessary.) However, that being made true, the question is in and of itself entirely a relevant one.
I find it shameful, probably even more so disbelief, that any persons 'he' or 'she', has not as much the gravity to find a common intention - or - intention common. So to speak of my world view on immaterial matters of implication (i.e. material implication) becomes rather delirious a perspective.
The book I am currently enamoured in scientific study (i.e. reading) researches this very topic very well. At what point in the human psyche, do our causes within the human realm of existence, appropriate the same existence of another cause, be it 'natural' or 'inhuman', it is a classic illustration of the normative sense of which reality fosters our outer limits. So, what is being said in the dialogue creates, a substantive amount of reasoning, to introduce, me, myself as the reader, to a longer list of qualitative measures. (The world as we think we know it?)
From what source do we exhibit the force to, our interest's as a whole, on a human level which is secular with humanity. Or - is humanity extinct already? It is a powerful rendition, of fabled narrative, into a quantity of literal concerns. Does the power of poetry, realize a proper historical articulation of fact as the main idea, subjective analysis, or circumstance.
The (heights of a. . .) 'monopoly on death'
Everyone should have the privilege of punctuality. It speaks of honest participation, among other things, less capable over.
Therefore, a lot of the time it takes me to realize something, as important, though not important,
should it be fair.
The book I've been touting myself too, of late, is a alternate reality throughout the course of ordinary life under extraordinary circumstances, which altogether surround the material of death as a monopoly in which we live. Death, as a material? (It is otherwise known as immaterial for the most part.) However, the factoring-in-of-death in light of various factors, which are invisible, weigh in on society as a measure of thought. Particularly, throughout the novel are strings of detachment, wither to - our affable - if not gullibility is a part, this is a challenge for the reader to administer its plausibility. Therefore, it plays as an integral role for the reader not to absorb into the assumption, the reader, is living in an alternative satire of reality. There is no hint of sarcasm. The diminutive effect which carries on through 'death with interruptions', is the idea that death is hidden from us, not in graveyards per se, or in adverse conditions of which corruption prevails all are mortally wounded, as one might guess would indicate undertaking.
There is no protagonist or villain, Will-o-the-wisp or things that go bump in the night, violation (think of as the Grim Reaper) or drums rolling to its proverbial death march, only the influence of imagination or an opening to another door. Which the reader, I am, to speak for.
Personally, the idea of living in a world where death as a monopoly seems aggregate to whether it is, or it isn't, though it fluctuates. Much of these ideas are conveyed, through the premise if we were to live in world where nobody did die, then, what transforms through alternate reality, an induced repetition of what now happens as it already does exist today.
My commentary focuses on, how reality in which we adhere to on an everyday level, conflicts with the same purpose from which our aversion to monopolized version of this alternate reality where no one dies. So - it would mean that the mainstream idea of death, if it exists as something in an ordinary state, creates an unexplainable or unsatisfactory world we choose to live in. This proposal, gains in the form of an indisputable form of submission, though language is not one of subjective nature were we to ask ourselves, about what would actually take precedence in a world without death.
All of this^ follows the point that language, not having our benefit, is a disjointed albeit amalgamation of sinister ideals. Were we to act, without changing our ideals, language is sincerely evaporated before anything else is considered - to an eventual predisposition. That, is of - a nature so immaterial of virtue, we cannot escape the meaning -a lack thereof of language, we associate with death itself. So much so, that we disembody the trivial truths, that bind us from within that internally. In other words, we depend on death of ourselves, in some mishapping (that we've already concluded is impossible), such as the false hope of immortality. This leads us to an example of mortality (e.g. death), which can only explain, our intrinsic value.
Death, for the lack thereof in this case, death, survives above all things equally. Where no one dies, the myth that death brings about means, what carries on in fortitude? As natural as death is, in place of death, that people (i.e. unity) were to change the power structure on a secular level. This would mean that death without death as a penalty, would result in undesirable, daily inactivity, because we live in a world fostered of insurance corporation, politicians vying for affection of its people, the propaganda of television serving the masses, in an episode, of death ensuring our survival, demanding it returns to make us progress the human condition.
death, as it is meant, in lower case 'd' (not in capital upper case letter 'D'), is pronounced that it does not have a voice. That in which case, people everywhere, were to imagine death is an inhospitable reality, must be conveyed as a form of total worship, to denounce death, is to renounce eternal life. This is from which, death in case, were properly managed by church and state, that we should hold in the deepest regard for. Everything, within eventide homes, is measured by how indefinite, people, habituate these patterns as the upbringing or in apparatus. Death is restored, then, promising more than language, the status quo is met.
The thought of language is often superseded because of its intolerable cause, that on its surface, reality made to permeate - permeate the condition of refuge, into its paternal form of genius meeting intellect.
What am I thinking about when I write is from a navigated sense of where virtue lives.
- Marco
===========
"The majority of people spoil their lives by an unhealthy and exaggerated altruism – are forced, indeed, so to spoil them. They find themselves surrounded by hideous poverty, by hideous ugliness, by hideous starvation. It is inevitable that they should be strongly moved by all this. The emotions of man are stirred more quickly than man’s intelligence; and, as I pointed out some time ago in an article on the function of criticism, it is much more easy to have sympathy with suffering than it is to have sympathy with thought." - Oscar Wilde
If I had to choose between walking in another mans footsteps, only to choose a life of poverty, and that - that poverty was more meaningful than any other thing besides it, I would choose poverty less than its ignorance. - Marco
Marco Almeida is 
feeling heavy
Friday, December 05, 2025
Dialectic philosophy is my idea of language as it acts in non contradiction as formally presented logic. . . which the purveyor interprets as either empirical or not. What I am suggesting is that comparing opposing ideas comes across as fallacy not objective truth. Therefore, my conclusion is that to determine how language records ideas, its primary function is a negation. "The truth must be (this) therefore it is or is not. Not here nor there dependant of evidence." = dialectical theoretical application.
