At what point does information become experience ?

 All information is - is our sensory experience put into action. (i.e. the action of interpretation) To live as in metanarrative are the things that put you in sensory experience. What I think is of a property value in everything I see. I assess, and in my assessment there is a sensation which I translate as I go. So, in return, I equalize this as a means to an end. This is why I am a philosopher. That in this process, my language acts as the information of sensations I experience in real time. And information travels as the source of my ideas. These ideas are words that my use of language, in its style and syntax create. So as a philosopher of experience (e.g. wisdom) I record using my poetics.

This is self mastery. And information is found in the experiencer ("the me") with relation to how I present my trained mind. Theoretically speaking, I have trained this unitarily as my sensory experience. Where the eye meets the world through its own interpretation of me. "The me" - out of my control. Which circles back to being authentic as opposite of not being predictable.

So yes - I predicate the self in relation to sensory experience as something that negates the predictable with something else that the experience creates. This is a higher state of mind, in my view. My point here is if you are not creating something new to the world, why are you doing philosophy if it's not? This infers critical thought, logical reasoning, and language (information) itself.

- Marco

No one is self made (?)

 No one is self made

Contradiction negating value~ Wittgenstein

 

==============

This is my mind is both a brilliant yet a conflicting statement....

In the world everything is as it is and happens as it does happen. In it, there is no value, - and if there were, it would be of no value. Ludwig Wittgenstein.

1 John 2:15-17

 

=================

Another way of learning | J. Krishnamurti

 Another way of learning | J. Krishnamurti

There is a time interval between the idea and the action.  That is, there is, the ideal - and you are trying to put that ideal into action, so there is a gap between the principle, the ideal, the belief, and the actuality. 

Right?

Now, we are saying - the interval of time ⌚ between the ideal and action is non existent. 

================

A mind free to look ~ Krishnamurti

==================

The dying is the living | Krishnamurti

dark psychology? Machiavellian

 Self respecting principles 

I want to believe this is bs before thinking I blindly accept these so called laws. Anyone that says otherwise need to reevaluate themselves. - Marco

Machiavelli 

=====================

energy of it all = metaphysics 

 

🇨🇦 sovereignty

 

Acting in principle

 

 

I'm no fake

 

I rather talk-tough = mean it. . . than to be confronted by someone who acts tough who has no idea whatsoever.

Pride

 

Be what you are. This is the first step toward becoming better than you are. August W. Hare

June 20th 2022

 

I hate the feeling when I get my intelligence insulted due in the event I am being tested or screened base on the where I center on that other person's radar. I really don't know why it just bothers me to no end. I intuitively pick up on the ideological signals taking place and yet someone is setting up to be the victim of their personal judgment toward you. I can sniff such assholery out from their foxhole from the moment it happens. But the best part is another thing altogether remained unscathed.

My question is one portraying that person on the first part being immoral to me on the second part per se.

Every bit of my journey throughout life has met the risk of being undermined. Everybody does.

My purpose as philosopher is to identify the stereotypes associated with those that fit the profile.

With this in mind I find it parable to place my head above the water and this helps manifest the dichotomies that form a razor thin margin to help continue on my path to relative unknowns.

- Marco

 I have never thought of my body. The body. Something that is seperated from the mind Whereas the human experience is not within my grasp. If nothing else is worth knowing. Conceptially, being my body vs being itself- the conscious self - is a higher state of knowing. To infer what is a speaker in my body using this (my) flesh and blood as a deposit. This awarenss is not separated as in mind vs body. But the reason we exist? I feel almost embarrassed to say it. That this reason we exist, is without realizing how lucky we are. The fact is we don't know. It is in knowing that we don't. That makes for what is beautifully made. That there are no rules to be found, why we are just a body, that formed from the womb. If it is not divine in nature. Then my thoughts on this are false. Falsely put it.  

○°○•●•●

That is all it can be. (Falsely put.) That our awareness is as ancient as the symbols we ignore in time. Which throughtout history, time is a sign that we ignore certain elements that make up what is made of just our bodies. Nothing else?

°•○●○•°•○

The negation of our minds. That is what puts me here. That is what fascinating it is to think, my body is my spiritual self in human form. That without the soul, the body is nothing. There is that is nothing. That there is nothing to hold up the spine. A soul. A.souless spineless life in skeletal form. Just bones.  

Think abour that. I do.  

°°•●○••  

I know I have been searching for a greater part of me. And i will never stop searching. Because to stop searching is to concede curiosities. The faculty of what is in my body. What holds me up is not the skeleton. It is the power of my self itself. The human body is the soul stored in flesh and blood wrapped with skin and traced in spiritual form. My body takes shape, the shape of an awareness we have no control over.  

°°•○○••°

- Marco

if not true

 “Since ancient times, the left side has stood for the side of the unconscious or the unknown; the right side, by contrast, has represented the side of consciousness or wakefulness. Through the late twentieth century, the movement of the Left limited themselves to a materialist understanding of reality -exemplified by Marxism- demanding social justice and economic equality but not the restoration of intuition and the recognition of the hidden, qualitative dimensions of being suppressed by the mental-rational consciousness, narrowly focused on the quantifiable.”

–Jean Gebser

June 19th 2024 the ethics of Marco Almeida

 There is something about me. When I feel wronged. I always almost always make myself to blame. It goes without thinking. I don’t know why this is. I do know where it has taken me. I know I am a sensitive person - it is not out of character for me if you know me better.  

But to further this self examination, it boggles my mind how much hurt I've been through. 

In return from such a realization, it comes from a place of repentance. That people who blame themselves before placing that same type of judgment onto others, are people of god. This means you look out for others, putting their needs before your own.

It's about feeling disappointed but on a human level, most won't understand.

What I can say of me is that it makes me a good person, not - not that it makes me better than others. It simply means that when you connect the dots, you know what good vs evil looks like. And consequently there are those who perversely take advantage of that in spite of you.

In conslusion, there are people in my history. Some I loved dearly that completely shattered my personal perception of myself, my well being, and only misunderstood me for what I can now say had nothing to do with me. It was about me blaming only myself.  

It can be lonely.

- Marco

°•●●○○••••

The paradoxical nature between God and man is the very fabric of philosophy. Therefore, theology is philosophy with a general assignment of those variables. The truth is not theological. Only the question of God is philosophical and unknowable. Which creates our own dialogue.

°●○°○°○°○°○°○°○

June 20th 2026

I don't know about that.  A pure metaphysical standpoint, from which all things derive thenselves as is, does not physically represent an apriori discerned representation of MY REALITY.

°○°○°●°●°

 So what your argument says, is interesting to me.

°●°○°○°●° 

My point being that my personal affirmations (i.e. thoughts) that I hold myself to.  Are they merely dogmas of some type.  How do you know I am acting on my metaphysical representation of my relationship to the physical experience. Which to your point: would make my own sensory experience - obsolete?  °•●•°°

If in which case you don't see my contradiction as constructive of your idea.  Then, please refrain from a thoughtless response to me.

Thanks for your insight, regardless.

- Marco

Specific to the eye 👁‍🗨

 

'Awareness' implies- 'Sensitivity'.
To be Sensitive to the environment, to all the things, most of the things that are happening in the world outside,
and also To be Sensitive, to be aware of what is happening, going on within oneself, within the skin, as it were.

That is,
to be aware not only to nature, to other human beings, to all the beauty of the world, and the political chaos, the Contradictions, the Hypocrisy, all that outwardly,
and also to be aware inwardly one's own problems, Conflicts, desires, misery, confusion and so on.

So, it is a movement of Sensitivity to the outer as well as to the inner.
.
To be sensitive, to be conscious of one's own violence, Double talk, say one thing and think something else.
.
So, we are asking:- if one is not sensitive, You can't be Sensitive, if you say, 'I don't like that', or, 'I do like that'.
This gives me more delight in looking, and that disgusts me.
Because, if one is not capable to observe without any movement of thought, which is like and dislike, condemning, accepting,
how can one observe the extraordinary complexity of one's own existence inwardly?

You understand my question?
.
I am saying, To be 'Aware' implies- To be 'Sensitive', to be conscious of the outer as well as the inner.
If one is not Sensitive to the outer, it becomes much more difficult to be Sensitive to the things that are happening inside the skin, as it were.

.
.

J. Krishnamurti
Saanen, Switzerland,
27 - July - 1977,
Public Discussion - 1

Where I'm not involved : sensation is feedback

 

Christ ⛬

 

edit: my point is. When we know we are all wrong about him, and at the same time that the man he was - knew we were (all wrong). Makes for the greatest hero who ever was. 

- Marco

wonderwall

 

This side of genius : contradictory elements of mind in real time

 "You're not rushing to become anything and you're not haunted by things that you did," he said. "You're haunted by how little of it really mattered in the way you thought it would."

resorting to the title of antihero

 

Marlon Brando, the actor most responsible for bringing Method realism to American movies, spent his later years deflating the mystique around his own profession. His argument was that acting is simply persuasion and concealment, things every person practices daily, and that the craft differs from everyday life only in degree.

===================

June 17th 2026

Brando is right. He found it and then denied it. Played it down. Dumbed down his talent for the spotlight. It's all reverse psychology. Nobody fooled us better. The truth is, Brando was an enigma. One of a kind. To say he meant what he said on terms that made us revere him were only contradictory. A genius. I learned a great deal from him.

- Marco from WInnipeg 🍁