Adhd

 The shortest aversion to detail is an ADHD strategy. This means eliminating information overload. When your brain can focus like an adhd mind does, the brain collects and simultaneously edits what it wants to store. It is about an awareness. Having this awareness, is solution driven. You learn to live this way = acting as a normal individual. My adhd mind is aware of many things at the same time. This is my conscious state to create results driven behavior. Where I've intuitvely anticipated everything that happens - happens because I feel present in my body. Freedom for an adhd mind is tapped to a higher-order of (as I said in the beginning) solutions that regulate my behavior. I can pay attention to many things as they happen, but I have learned how to eliminate distraction. My source is isolating my conscious mind into acting as singularity.  

My mission: to beat my evil twin that's living in my head, (the evil twin that doesn’t know who is doing the observing). This means the actions I take come from infoming my evil twin I am in charge of it from intentionality I perform with.

- Marco

The proliferation of my psyche

 November 14, 2013

I have been better served by lesser people - this is in my view what approaching all individual archetype reveals to me.  Fact: any trained actor develops their creative ability to play a character, inasmuch the imaginary role a person on average has in real life tabulates nothing new to the world.  The same is true especially in acting.  

 

I would not confuse acting ability with having any special talent or specific quality other than the crave of it for hyper individuality.  

 

A result of this came as I attempted to do a scene with an actress.  She made a point of disowning my efforts that left me feeling rather repulsive, as I refuse to incorporate the image any person carries of themselves not without stepping on their egos.  That is the message I had been conveyed.

 

I have never experienced the type of humiliation this actress or any actress like her represents, I simply use this as an example of sickness in the acting industry which so many tread on.  I refuse to impart what that experience did to me as an actor - which made feel as an inferior rather than empowering the source of all art.  If anything it opened my eyes.  

 

It told me why stereotypes exist in the form of satire that cruelty enables the most wicked of minds.The point is this: if you are a fan of your idol 1- that person is probably a huge fake and made a profession of it. 2- Can you detect it.

 "Problems do not come with assumptions, they begin with false ideals of importance, and the attention to have accepted its (fallacious) reasoning."

Marco Almeida 2014

"I rather regret something worth doing than vacate my life's journey without it. There is nothing to learn."

Marco Almeida 2014

 It is easy to spot a blind man, because even if they do not respect my intelligence it would not affect me, impair my own judgment or evoke thoughts of a deceitful nature. However, what a blind man cannot detect of me, is that ability, to find reason, to identify cause, and only define that if my intelligence were to be insulted makes it much more difficult to just laugh about. - Marco

My 2013 thesis to end an unconscious apartheid no one is aware of. . .

 Master Thesis:

 

Think about it - does the world function on an ad hoc representation as its basis of corporate greed. (Now read this. . .) can you live in a place that - your country is forever branding itself an Utopian model of citizenship, that if you fail to sink or swim are you not (in the case of American civilization to this date) an evil empire. I argue you are blind to the systemic apartheid of corporate class conscious to abolish the middle class as fait accompli.

 

=============

 

Thesis (answer):

 

I have no idea why Ashton Kutcher is revered for pushing the envelope against white bred mentality when it in fact enables the corporate (enemy) class. YOU HAVE TO BE STUPID NOT TO SEE - that the class conscious divide is being thread by corporate agenda. Ashton Kutcher should be not be saying their is a false sense of entitlement - but that the avg. middle class is being taken for a ride and this is an apartheid against families that are at the bottom of the bread basket.

 

If you believe for a minute that hard work takes commitment, effort and practice to become a leader - you have branded the same stereotype of competition is enamored through sacrifice - struggle - suffering of those that cannot. This is about a gigantic corporate class model to abolish an already weakened complacent population. 

 

WAKE THE FUCK UP PEOPLE - ASHTON KUTCHER HAS NO IDEA WTF HE IS TALKING ABOUT!!!!!!

 

============

So let me get this straight - conservatives in America (which is the basis of where this article is published via 'conservativepost.com') are fighting tooth and nail to label Obama - an honest Christian believer that does not entertain the wealthy over their own entitlement, is suppose to make me believe Ashton Kutcher on Ellen's show zeroing in on the same subject using loaded terms to describe the arrogant nature of white bred America.

 

1- Did anyone else not catch that? 2- American's are diseased with their false sense of entitlement, so specifically targets the same group of zealots that govern them?? That way the conservative agenda can push forward, and only Ashton Kutcher has realized this. Does anyone not feel how ridiculous that sounds.

 

Yeah - I thought so.

Mental distortion : causal matter

When exposing a crime is treated as committing a crime, you are being ruled by criminals.

 The trouble is white supremacy as an example. Criminal activity by white collar criminals fit into into a stereotype that does not discriminate no matter the color of skin. What supports my thesis herein, is that as long criminals have a cause for their sovereignty. Sovereignty is a sensory experience that is a material matter. White supremacists believe they are materially superior as a race. It is a matter of exhibiting this cause. Hence, critical race theory: is rejected. Rejected because when races of another kind of culture are born into, they are accused of tribalism to fit the same dark psychology. Dark psychology expediting fear regardless of = white supremacy in action on a normative associative level where discrimination is only seen as a mental distortion which is indivisible and can't be persecuted.

All causal matters in sovereignty falling into the same category of all human history have been dictated on the premise of white supremacy as the main motivating factor. That is fact.

Although we can change it.

- Marco 

==================

Revised:

All white supremacy is - is indivisible.

The following serves as a definition of the word:

----------------------

indivisible (adjective)

unable to be divided or separated:

----------------------

The trouble is white supremacy if treated as an example of the following premise:

"When exposing a crime is treated as committing a crime, you are being ruled by criminals."

Criminal activity by white collar criminals fit into into a stereotype that does not discriminate no matter the color of skin. > That much is not only a true statement but is irrefutable for purpose of reason.

What supports my thesis herein, is that as long criminals have a cause for their sovereignty. Sovereignty is a sensory experience that is a material matter. White supremacists believe they are materially superior as a race. It is a matter of exhibiting this cause. Hence, critical race theory: is rejected. Rejected because when races of another kind of culture are born into, they are accused of tribalism to fit the same dark psychology. Dark psychology expediting fear regardless of = white supremacy in action on a normative associative level where discrimination is only seen as a mental distortion which is indivisible and can't be persecuted. (Think about it. If we lived in a world of secret, how would you know. How would you intercept the double life of someone you thought you knew, but kept their psychosis hidden.) Therefore, what if those you see as racist only want what is best for themselves? That everything depends on answering, what is surrendering to the good life. As in: what if the ideology is unconsciously registered and imposed onto you? "America First" = propaganda symbolizing nationalism. Does this not register in Westernized thinking or are we recording it blindly.

All causal matters in sovereignty falling into the same category of human history have been dictated on the premise toward white supremacy as the main motivating factor. That is fact. (No matter if you fail to internalize that - is not up to you.)

Although we can change it.

Because we are living in it. Look no further than MAGA's anti-woke movement. (If we can afford to speak the truth.) It is in plain sight.

- Marco

To be made useful :: Marco's code = 1- 2 - 3 principles

1- Happiness is intelligence leaving the body.

2- Intuition is an effigy of your secret identity turned into language.

3- Fight with the heart of a lion.

==============

If all person's are meant to be made useful is it not the same as to be made of use. This is what Plutarch suggests? If all people are meant to make themselves useful, than is it not the same as being put to 'good' use. If all this follows: the idea is to make use of oneself, then it contradicts the nature of purpose. What is our purpose if it is not meant to be? (Our personal destiny). Rewind = to make use of oneself is above all else an enigma. What then justifies our actions on the basis of making use of ourselves. What governs our actions if not aware of our method in questioning. Questioning = what is of use?

My point is there are varying degrees of thinking how useful we are in terms of what we ask ourselves IS useful. I can be a cook. Not a good enough cook to be a chef. But I pretend to be a cook? (According to Plutarch.) My logic suggests being a cook at McDonalds is of use. Unless my virtue dismisses someone else who does not think this way. The way I think of this: is that a McDonald's cook is worth something of use.

- Marco

False pioneering Complacency: growing old again

 November 12, 2009

I love the sight of a shooting star, because I can believe at that moment in time, I am the one to have witnessed it - only. Perhaps, that is the same way most people would attribute, defining the moment, which is too hard to miss since it is so much faster than you are to have seen such a light. I also suppose so much is true, that nothing is geometric, before you realize the world we live is looking down on us?

I've had no problem integrating my sense of consciousness through a different kind of awareness, that type of thinking which goes against modern convention.

I find it harder each day to reveal what may be my purpose in life, it has it's beginnings and in another manner of speaking, there is no end in sight. I suppose it is an internal will that I've allowed myself to explore, after a real kind of self-interest takes shape? There is so much that I see happening, which most people fail to realize, is undoing my belief's of unchanging principles.

I am not a creationist per se, but what I am aware of after finishing this article in self-examination, that I anticipate? Before we arrived on this planet, as humans have evolved, there was nothing but energy which somehow transmitted itself into what we do have today. Most of it hasn't manifested into a perfect form of energy, but an imperfect majority of plants and animals we use in our environment. It points me to one thing: that I am not psychological in my silent nature, I am neglected indicated from an intention that many are not attune to. It is a way of emitting what is lost must be found in some true explanation of a cerebral value which no material entity can survive. It is a braver archetype of intense outcomes dealing with freedom.

===========

Irrelevance Day is every November 11th

 Got to love how Remembrance day is commodified into the mass subconscious when the reality of it is brain washing how the avg citizen is suppose to fall over for what the human condition actually is accordingly. Since when does a war that is the catalyst of the industrial revolution suppose to make me thankful. Fuck the hell off with that shit. 

 

That is what we are celebrating - a branding of how we celebrate war as if it equates to freedom. 

 

Got to love how the avg. person fails to decide that for themselves, but latches onto the mythology of soldiers fighting for freedom in the name of god - when nothing about it is sacred whatsoever.

 

Think about it. The US Army is the epitome of rational divide and you care to enable that?? Is how we react to differences in the global mosaic supposed to signify hope and symbolize peaceful practice or participation.

 

Pass this on.

 

(Or feel free to be blind to all of what you just read.)

===========

I have a very different idea of myself in the global mosaic, but I can appreciate what I read when it comes to reminding me of what is important. I do not believe in death as a mortal coil that we must personify if I am to live a life of freedom. True freedom in my eyes is if I have afforded my own prejudice at no cost to anyone else or protecting myself from discrimination before it reaches its height shows tolerance - that is what I take pride in.

================

Facebook

Why are you calling them assailants? Assailant is defined as one who attacks or is hostile. They weren't protesting. The guy is a 5 year veteran there to be part of the ceremony. We should respect the sovereignty of their nations and respect their flag. Natives fought along side our canadian troops wars going way back as allies.

There is no procedure here either. Police are not allowed to just remove and arrest people in silence in this country. What is this, Egypt?? There was no offence in the video, and even if there was, an officer is obligated to inform a person of the charge if they ask. These officers just say silent and remove someone from the public for what seem like political reasons. That is not a free democracy and a violation of our rights.

===============

Did I call them assailants. No, what I did was defend them as potential assailants. Huge difference. (Because that is exactly how the officer treated them!!) My point is assailants can be victimized which in this case the victim IS being treated as an assailant. If that logic seems twisted to you - then I am a monkey's uncle. That is my reasoning (which you are allowed to disagree with.)

In terms of procedure, Jeff, I agree with you. I took a position as the Crown would have to administer. (Therefore I use the term assailant.) In the eyes of the court, that is how they would be treated, as though a mock cause.

I am on your side, Jeff. Read it again.

I have to make it clear - I do not use the term assailant without just cause - it is the very reason I used the term- to defend them. TO DISPROVE it. If the court were to characterize them as assailants, then they have to prove their guilt. Once the precedent is set that they are not assailants, it takes my clever tactic to ensure the crown is acting in good faith.

MY dissertation is a theoretical device. If I were a lawyer it is exactly how I would draft my proposition.

To tremble in fear

 The precursor for reality.

It is something that fuels me.

As reality in my mind would suggest all that is normal.

Becomes some kind of effigy in terms of shock value.

Drama in the courtroom?

What of it?

That trial and error that runs through your mind.

The mind of all your weaknesses, 

that you lack self esteem and have insecurity of.

To tremble in fear.

Like you are the best player on the field,

everyone watching your every move.

How does this make you react?

This is an inferiority complex as I would have it

- though no one wants.

Is it that obvious to the audience?

That my inferiority is a symbol.

A symbol.

To mock the world with,

with my incredible sense of guilt.

To process and presume the justice of purging my senses.

Into a fascination of some other world.

Some other dimension in time.

Rewind. . .

Fast forward.

Rewinding, recording every movement,

every thought.

Each memory wiring the past into visions of a future,

and what it might hold.

Perhaps, perhaps this time around. . .

I will have found.

Found that precious action I must have made in life.

The right action to have taken my life in a different direction.

Yet, not feel like a suicide.

As I said before, 

suicides are like an inferiority complex gone.

Gone to the birds.

So it is there I am.

I fly.

Fly to distant shores of my youth cradled into one.

(I write to record what may have been.)

A destiny unlike any other word ever seen before.

The world make-believe's itself to be true.

And the greatest of virtues is a logical transposition of mind.

It takes genius to find.

- Marco 

Oscar Wilde

"Where there is sorrow there is holy ground."

--from "De Profundis" (1897)

Art

 As an avid fan of Russel Crowe, he will be passed on winning an Oscar for his role in Nuremberg. (If only because he has won it before.) But - I'd be happy to see if Crowe's performance lands him his 2nd Oscar, because ironically this is Crowe's best work since his last best actor nomination since 2001 'A Beautiful Mind' = which Denzel Washington won that year. I look at movies from the perspective of an actor and what esthetic it offers based on the same merit from the acting involved. Crowe nails this.

I find the subject matter riveting, as I focused on the pivotal performances/interaction between Malek's portrayal of a psychiatrist in this film and Crowe.

In my personal experience, the acting is on point, however it is that Hollywood adaptation which begs for more.

I can't blame either Malek or Crowe, not mailing in their work, for the same reason that a psychiatrist/patient relationship does not move that fast in ordinary time. Therefore, to compound this into a fictional sense does not give the impression for more. What I mean is, there's a dynamic to be had between patient and a doctor, which if the dynamic is so quickly made just seems counter intuitive to the degree it suggests. This dynamic I speak of just whistles through. So as an objective observer, I don't know how sincere this doctor/patient relationship is.

That is how this movie would have benefitted. If it was a film that centered in on the relationship between Crowe and Malek, which seems glazed over to make it a more dramatic unbelievable piece of cinematic history. This film deserves the Oscar. No one is the wiser.


- Marco

The act of being Canadian

 https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/world/canadian-woman-20-outraged-after-being-banned-from-flying-to-see-her-grandparents-in-florida/ar-AA1QaLWA?ocid=socialshare#comments

Any chance rationalizing another countries fascism can only be caused by the same stupidity made up in their sad ironic minds.  I don't feel sorry for anyone travelling to the US.  Canadians need to stay out of the US. Period.  Boycott.  Boycott. Boycott.  

I have zero respect for people (even I know) that travel there knowing how hostile their president is.  It's disgraceful for any Canadian to go into the US.

And you know something else.  My point is I live in a country with no double standards.  If an American cares to come here, by all means, do.  I want a mosaic.  Not xenophobia without a culture for all.  Basic standards of decency seem to be lost in the chaos.  Not populist.  

- Marco 

================

Canadian woman, 20, outraged after being banned from flying to see her grandparents in Florida

Story by Sonya Gugliara For Dailymail.Com

A Canadian woman has claimed that she was barred from entering the US because customs officers unjustifiably flagged her as a suspicious traveler. 

Julia, who chose not to share her last name, had been looking forward to her six-week-long trip to Orlando, Florida, to visit her grandparents. 

The 20-year-old is on a break from her studies until the spring and is unemployed, so she figured now would be the perfect time for a vacation. 

But she told CTV that her plans went terribly awry when she approached US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Preclearance at Pearson International Airport in Toronto. 

What was supposed to be a standard round of questioning allegedly turned into an interrogation, and agents brought Julia into a separate room. 

'I was starting to hyperventilate a bit, because I was nervous that something was going to happen. Then I’m told I’m denied entrance into America,' she claimed to CTV. 

Julia alleged that she was held back from boarding her Porter Airlines flight because the agents believed she was attempting to move to America illegally. 

'I have no interest of ever living in America,' she bluntly told the outlet. 

Disappointed and confused, Julia said she was sent home from the airport with nothing but a checklist indicating why she was barred from entering the US.

Officers claimed Julia failed to provide proof of a return flight to Canada, but CTV reviewed her itinerary and her return flight booking. 

US Customs had also requested proof of either employment or schooling, Julia said, both of which she was unable to hand over because she does not have a job and is not in school. 

'It felt like a bit of abuse of power, honestly,' Julia's distraught mother, Kate, told CTV. 

Julia, who traveled to visit her grandparents in February with no hiccups, said she is worried that she will run into similar travel issues in the future. 

Although she was fully refunded by Porter Airlines, her mother is furious and wants other Canadians to know that they run the risk of being blocked from entering the US. 

'It can have financial repercussions, as well as emotional. If our story helps any family avoid it, that would be great,' Kate told CTV. 

'I think a lot of people are boycotting travel to the US, and after this experience, I’m all for it.'

Julia's experience is far from unique, Immigration lawyer Heather Segal told CTV. 

'US immigration takes their orders from the top and when there’s a more anti-immigration sentiment in the country, they have all the tools to use at their discretion in a negative manner,' Segal said. 

'Some of the politics between Canada and the US play out at the border.'

The attorney said that in recent months, she has heard of an increasing number of Canadians facing extensive questioning about the purpose of their trips.

She also alleged that US Customs agents have been demanding to review more documents from travelers. 

The Daily Mail has reached out to CBP for comment. 

Social commentary to the world's hypocrisy isn't everyone's cup of tea.  As if speaking only debunks a dogma.  This through unsuccessful negation, as it does not nullify the main premise (harmony) following use of false antecedents.  Nor does this watered down model codify, what acts validly quantifiable.  Purifying the world is not about fairytale's to some magical island. 

What agrivates me personally, is much the same philosophically inquiring what results, for example, what informs punishment vs reward as westernization to that end.  Philosophy should be meant as remittance to our grievances.

In conclusion, on what planet would Werner suggest harmony be?  Where hostility, chaos and murder are refuge to a greater version of Hegelianism.  If you read this and don't see the difference, than why bother believing a word that Herzog implies.  Herzog is selling us what we are blind of.  I get it.  But this exercise in submission is to quote a fragile loser.  Which is to read it, and subvert it.

- Marco

So suggesting Werner creates a character where the fictional element offers a protagonist. The protagonist lets say for sake of argument, has been done before. We can use James Camron's 'Terminator' as our example to that effect. My point is: if the same social commentary has been done before. Herzog is having his say, albeit looks different. In Terminator the protagonist is a machine exhibits chaos, hostility and murder. There is nothing that motivates the human mind more than the average inferiority complex we place upon ourselves as a mirror to the world view we possess in others. That is harmony. Our human condition. (Let's not bullshit here.) Herzog is either commiting theft of an idea without further investigation or we can call it, see it, for what it is. A fabricated lie. Show me something that tells me about the human condition such as in philosophy, demands challenge. That is a clear issue for the audience to personify. Herzog stirs emotion typical of a topic that's been beaten.

- Marco